AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal NeoplasmsPhase 4NCT01607255

Comparative Efficacy of Water & Indigo Carmine vs. Water or Air Method on Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) - a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

A Phase 4 study testing Indigo carmine, water (exchange) method and water (exchange) plus dye method in people with Colorectal Neoplasms, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality indicator of colonoscopy performed for colorectal cancer screening. Population studies have shown that traditional air colonoscopy fails to eliminate post screening colonoscopy cancers or cancer mortality in the proximal colon. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Indigo carmine, water (exchange) method and water (exchange) plus dye method
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
480 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
16 May 2013to 30 Sep 2017
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • asymptomatic Veterans scheduled for first time screening colonoscopy and agree to be randomized will be enrolled.

Who cannot join

  • patients who decline to be randomized, non screening cases.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA

    Sacramento, California, 95655

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparative Efficacy of Water & Indigo Carmine vs Water or Air Method

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality indicator of colonoscopy performed for colorectal cancer screening. Population studies have shown that traditional air colonoscopy fails to eliminate post screening colonoscopy cancers or cancer mortality in the proximal colon. The investigators aim to establish the superior effectiveness of combining chromoendoscopy with the water exchange method in detecting more proximal diminutive adenomas during screening colonoscopy in sedated Veterans. An improved adenoma detection rate associated with optical colonoscopy will minimize the risk of missed lesions. The improvement may translate into a remedy for the limitations of screening colonoscopy in the proximal colon, e.g. a higher adenoma detection rate may minimize the burden of post screening colonoscopy interval colorectal cancers among the veteran population.

Read the detailed description
  1. Design: Prospective, single center, patient blinded, randomized controlled trial
  2. Methods: Colonoscopy with traditional air insufflation, water exchange or water exchange plus indigocarmine to aid insertion of colonoscope; split dose bowel preparation; all patients will receive sedation; assessment of serum electrolytes level before and after colonoscopy
  3. Control method: Traditional air insufflation method.
  4. Study methods:
  • Water exchange method.
  • Water method combined with chromoendoscopy (0.008% indigo carmine).
  1. Population to be studied Veterans between age 50 and 75 referred for first time screening colonoscopy
  2. Unit(s) of analysis
  3. Primary outcome: overall adenoma detection rate.
  4. Secondary outcomes: patient demographic variable and procedure related measures.
  5. Sampling strategy: all Veterans referred for screening colonoscopy will be offered enrollment in the study.
  6. Sample size calculation. A total of 480 subjects will be recruited and randomized with 160 in each group.
  7. Subject recruitment: patients referred for screening colonoscopy come from three sources.
  8. Description of base population and groups to be studied and method of randomization.

Veterans between age 50 and 75 referred for first time screening colonoscopy. After informed consent, assignment to control or study arm based on computer generated random number codes stored in pre-arranged opaque envelopes.

Being tested
Indigo carmine, water (exchange) method, water (exchange) plus dye method, air method
Keywords
adenoma detection, screening colonoscopy, water exchange method, chromoendoscopy
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Indigo carmineDrug

    0.008% indigo carmine in water is used as a surface contrast agent to enhance visualization of diminutive polyps (adenoma) during screening colonoscopy

  • water (exchange) methodProcedure or surgery

    Residual pocket of air will be suctioned. Water is infused using a peristaltic pump to facilitate scope advancement until the cecum is reached. Dirty water will be suctioned and clean water is infused. Air will not be insufflated until the cecum is reached. Residual water is suctioned and air insufflated on scope withdrawal to facilitate biopsy and removal of lesions.

  • water (exchange) plus dye methodProcedure or surgery

    Residual pocket of air will be suctioned. Water with 0.008% indigocarmine is infused using a peristaltic pump to facilitate scope advancement until the cecum is reached. Dirty water will be suctioned and clean water is infused. Air will not be insufflated until the cecum is reached. Residual water is suctioned and air insufflated on scope withdrawal to facilitate biopsy and removal of lesions

  • air methodProcedure or surgery

    The colonoscope is inserted gently and advanced slowly using minimal air insufflation, if necessary, the assistant will provide abdominal compression or the patient's position will be changed to facilitate scope passage. The scope is inserted until the cecum is reached. Air is insufflated on scope withdrawal for visualization and water irrigation is used to remove any adherent feces covering the mucosa. Biopsy or polypectomy is performed where indicated.

Study groups in NCT01607255
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
water (exchange) methodExperimentalResidual pocket of air will be suctioned. Water is infused using a peristaltic pump to facilitate scope advancement until the cecum is reached. Dirty water will be suctioned and clean water is infused. Air will not be insufflated until the cecum is reached. Residual water is suctioned and air insufflated on scope withdrawal to facilitate biopsy and removal of lesions.
Receives: Procedure: water (exchange) method
water (exchange) plus dye methodExperimentalResidual pocket of air will be suctioned. Water with 0.008% indigocarmine is infused using a peristaltic pump to facilitate scope advancement until the cecum is reached. Dirty water will be suctioned and clean water is infused. Air will not be insufflated until the cecum is reached. Residual water is suctioned and air insufflated on scope withdrawal to facilitate biopsy and removal of lesions
Receives: Drug: Indigo carmine; Procedure: water (exchange) plus dye method
air methodActive comparatorThe colonoscope is inserted gently and advanced slowly using minimal air insufflation, if necessary, the assistant will provide abdominal compression or the patient's position will be changed to facilitate scope passage. The scope is inserted until the cecum is reached. Air is insufflated on scope withdrawal for visualization and water irrigation is used to remove any adherent feces covering the mucosa. Biopsy or polypectomy is performed where indicated.
Receives: Procedure: air method

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Detected Proximal Diminutive (<10 mm) Adenoma Detection Rate

    Proximal diminutive adenoma detection rate (ADR) in screening colonoscopy performed with the unusual air method, versus the water (exchange) method and with dye added to the water (exchange) method

    Measured: 36 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study start16 May 2013
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2017
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
480 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01607255
Sponsor's protocol ID
CLIN-10-11S
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
24 May 2012
Last updated
15 Jan 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Leung JW, Ransibrahmanakul K, Toomsen L, Mann SK, Siao-Salera R, Leung FW. The water method combined with chromoendoscopy enhances adenoma detection. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;1(2):53-58. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.2.16827.

    PubMed 21776426
  • Leung FW, Leung JW, Siao-Salera RM, Mann SK, Jackson G. The water method significantly enhances detection of diminutive lesions (adenoma and hyperplastic polyp combined) in the proximal colon in screening colonoscopy - data derived from two RCT in US veterans. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;1(2):48-52. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.2.16826.

    PubMed 21776425
  • Leung JW, Do LD, Siao-Salera RM, Ngo C, Parikh DA, Mann SK, Leung FW. Retrospective analysis showing the water method increased adenoma detection rate - a hypothesis generating observation. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;1(1):3-7. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.1.14585.

    PubMed 21686105
  • Leung J, Mann S, Siao-Salera R, Ransibrahmanakul K, Lim B, Canete W, Samson L, Gutierrez R, Leung FW. A randomized, controlled trial to confirm the beneficial effects of the water method on U.S. veterans undergoing colonoscopy with the option of on-demand sedation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.020.

    PubMed 21184876
  • Leung JW, Mann SK, Siao-Salera R, Ransibrahmanakul K, Lim B, Cabrera H, Canete W, Barredo P, Gutierrez R, Leung FW. A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.253. Epub 2009 Jun 24.

    PubMed 19555938
  • Leung JW, Thai A, Yen A, Ward G, Abramyan O, Lee J, Smith B, Leung F. Magnetic endoscope imaging (ScopeGuide) elucidates the mechanism of action of the pain-alleviating impact of water exchange colonoscopy - attenuation of loop formation. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):142-146. doi: 10.4161/jig.23738. Epub 2012 Jul 1.

    PubMed 23805397
  • Yen AW, Leung JW, Leung FW. A new method for screening and surveillance colonoscopy: Combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):114-119. doi: 10.4161/jig.23730. Epub 2012 Jul 1.

    PubMed 23805389
  • Yen AW, Leung JW, Leung FW. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

    PubMed 23473001
  • Leung JW, Siao-Salera R, Abramyan O, Mann SK, Ward G, Yen A, Gutierrez R, Leung FW. Impact of water exchange colonoscopy on serum sodium and potassium levels: an observational study. Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Mar;59(3):653-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2934-0. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

    PubMed 24254340
  • Ngo C, Leung JW, Mann SK, Terrado C, Bowlus C, Ingram D, Leung FW. Interim report of a randomized cross-over study comparing clinical performance of novice trainee endoscopists using conventional air insufflation versus warm water infusion colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):135-139. doi: 10.4161/jig.23736. Epub 2012 Jul 1.

    PubMed 23805395
  • Leung J, Mann S, Siao-Salera R, Ngo C, McCreery R, Canete W, Leung F. Indigocarmine added to the water exchange method enhances adenoma detection - a RCT. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):106-111. doi: 10.4161/jig.23728. Epub 2012 Jul 1.

    PubMed 23805387
  • Leung FW, Pan Y, Mann SK, Leung JW, Siao-Salera RM, Jackson G. The water exchange method and difficult colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):103-105. doi: 10.4161/jig.23727. Epub 2012 Jul 1. No abstract available.

    PubMed 23805386
  • Leung F, Harker J, Leung J, Siao-Salera R, Mann S, Ramirez F, Friedland S, Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S, Terruzzi V, Hsieh Y. Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with a greater reduction of pain score - review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water method colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):114-120. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18510. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

    PubMed 22163081

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Indigo carmine, water (exchange) method and water (exchange) plus dye method in people with Colorectal Neoplasms, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jan 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Detected Proximal Diminutive (<10 mm) Adenoma Detection Rate (time frame: 36 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01607255, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in