Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)REG01NCT01605838
Noninvasive Monitoring of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), run by Advanced Brain Monitoring, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
BACKGROUND: The brain is very sensitive to both excessive and insufficient flow of blood. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is normally auto-regulated by the blood vessels in the brain, but this protective mechanism is often disturbed after a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to May 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients (18 - 65 years) hospitalized in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) because of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of acute moderate or severe TBI
- Hospitalization within 12 hours from the injury
- Intraarterial catheterization and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring instantiated within 72 hours from the injury
Who cannot join
- Earlier head injuries, stroke, space-occupying intracranial lesions, meningitis, or cerebral vasculopathies
- Concomitant severe injuries of the chest, abdomen, pelvis, extremities or spine
- Concurrent terminal illness with a life expectancy of less than 6 months
- Unlikely to survive the next 48 hours after enrollment
- Implanted cardiac pacemaker, cardiac converter/defibrillator, or other electrical stimulator
- Pregnancy
- Patient is a prisoner or on a probation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
LA County + USC Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
About this study
Official title: Pilot (Feasibility) Study of New Portable Monitor for Continuous Assessment of Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) Autoregulation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
BACKGROUND: The brain is very sensitive to both excessive and insufficient flow of blood. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is normally auto-regulated by the blood vessels in the brain, but this protective mechanism is often disturbed after a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Impairment or loss of the CBF autoregulation makes the brain vulnerable to oscillations of either arterial blood pressure (ABP) or intracranial pressure (ICP). The ideal management of TBI patients, therefore, involves continuous measurement and management of the cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP = ABP - ICP) but the measurement of CPP is currently possible only with specialized equipment and expertise that is not available in all institutions. The investigators have converted a no-longer used system that continuously monitors CBF autoregulation using rheoencephalography (REG) technology into a modern, small, battery-powered, low-cost monitor (aka BM-1) that acquires the REG signals using only noninvasive electrodes placed on the skin/scalp. REG data can then be used to calculate the optimal CPP to maintain in each individual patient. BM-1 is also capable of monitoring electroencephalography (EEG) and impedance plethysmography (IPG), which can, respectively, be used to measure brain electrical activity and changes in peripheral blood flow caused by blood pressure changes.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives are to (Obj. 1) demonstrate that REG acquired noninvasively is equal to the well-established but invasive method using intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, (Obj. 2) retrospectively test the idea that TBI patients have a less favorable outcome if their CPP were found less optimal using the REG data, and (Obj. 3) determine if noninvasive IPG or the PPG finger sensor monitoring (used to measure heart rate in doctor's offices) can replace the invasive monitoring of arterial blood pressure (ABP).
METHODOLOGY: This is an observational study with retrospective data analysis. 20 adult patients (18-65 yrs) with acute TBI, who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria, will be enrolled on a first-come-first-enroll basis. The enrolled patients will have the REG, EEG and IPG signals monitored for the duration of ICU stay or 15 days, whichever is shorter. Standard neurological assessment will be made at the patient's discharge from the ICU and at 3 months after injury. The study is expected to end June 2013.
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
- Keywords
- TBI
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE)
Measured: 3 months post-injury
Secondary outcomes (3)
Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI)
Measured: 3 months post-injury
Rappaport Disability Rating Scale (DSR)
Note regarding the time frame: based on the USC patient database for 2010 and 2011, patients may be discharged from the ICU anywhere between 4 days to 4 weeks; 50% of them will spend 10 +/- 3 days in the ICU.
Measured: At discharge from intensive care unit; on average, 10 days post-injury
Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (KI-ADL)
Measured: 3 months post-injury
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 May 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionJun 2013 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2014
Why it stopped: A series of administrative delays on all sides involved, combined with funding problems.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Advanced Brain Monitoring, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Southern California
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Djordje Popovic, MD, Principal investigator, Advanced Brain Monitoring, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01605838
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ABM-TBI-0001
- Other IDs
- W81XWH - 10 - C - 0061
- Acronym
- REG01
- Status last verified
- Jan 2015
- First submitted
- 22 May 2012
- Last updated
- 14 Jan 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Overgaard J, Tweed WA. Cerebral circulation after head injury. 1. Cerebral blood flow and its regulation after closed head injury with emphasis on clinical correlations. J Neurosurg. 1974 Nov;41(5):531-41. doi: 10.3171/jns.1974.41.5.0531. No abstract available.
PubMed 4418221Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Menon DK, Pickard JD. Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients. Stroke. 1996 Oct;27(10):1829-34. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.10.1829.
PubMed 8841340Lam JM, Hsiang JN, Poon WS. Monitoring of autoregulation using laser Doppler flowmetry in patients with head injury. J Neurosurg. 1997 Mar;86(3):438-45. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0438.
PubMed 9046300Lang EW, Chesnut RM. A bedside method for investigating the integrity and critical thresholds of cerebral pressure autoregulation in severe traumatic brain injury patients. Br J Neurosurg. 2000 Apr;14(2):117-26. doi: 10.1080/02688690050004534.
PubMed 10889883Steiner LA, Czosnyka M, Piechnik SK, Smielewski P, Chatfield D, Menon DK, Pickard JD. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2002 Apr;30(4):733-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200204000-00002.
PubMed 11940737Lang EW, Mehdorn HM, Dorsch NW, Czosnyka M. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation: a validation study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 May;72(5):583-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.72.5.583.
PubMed 11971041Schmidt B, Czosnyka M, Raabe A, Yahya H, Schwarze JJ, Sackerer D, Sander D, Klingelhofer J. Adaptive noninvasive assessment of intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation. Stroke. 2003 Jan;34(1):84-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000047849.01376.ae.
PubMed 12511755Brady KM, Shaffner DH, Lee JK, Easley RB, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Jallo GI, Guerguerian AM. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity after traumatic brain injury in children. Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124(6):e1205-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0550.
PubMed 19948619Bodo M. Studies in rheoencephalography . Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance 2010; 1: 18 - 40.
Bodo M, Pearce FJ, Montgomery LD, Rosenthal M, Kubinyi G, Thuroczy G, Braisted J, Forcino D, Morrissette C, Nagy I. Measurement of brain electrical impedance: animal studies in rheoencephalography. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2003 May;74(5):506-11.
PubMed 12751577Bodo M, Pearce FJ, Baranyi L, Armonda RA. Changes in the intracranial rheoencephalogram at lower limit of cerebral blood flow autoregulation. Physiol Meas. 2005 Apr;26(2):S1-17. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/2/001. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
PubMed 15798222Bodo M, Pearce FJ, Armonda RA. Cerebrovascular reactivity: rat studies in rheoencephalography. Physiol Meas. 2004 Dec;25(6):1371-84. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/6/003.
PubMed 15712716
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jan 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot (Feasibility) Study of New Portable Monitor for Continuous Assessment of Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) Autoregulation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01605838
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REG01 / ABM-TBI-0001
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
- Keywords
- TBI
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: A series of administrative delays on all sides involved, combined with funding problems.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Advanced Brain Monitoring, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Southern California
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 May 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
BACKGROUND: The brain is very sensitive to both excessive and insufficient flow of blood. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is normally auto-regulated by the blood vessels in the brain, but this protective mechanism is often disturbed after a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Impairment or loss of the CBF autoregulation makes the brain vulnerable to oscillations of either arterial blood pressure (ABP) or intracranial pressure (ICP). The ideal management of TBI patients, therefore, involves continuous measurement and management of the cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP = ABP - ICP) but the measurement of CPP is currently possible only with specialized equipment and expertise that is not available in all institutions. The investigators have converted a no-longer used system that continuously monitors CBF autoregulation using rheoencephalography (REG) technology into a modern, small, battery-powered, low-cost monitor (aka BM-1) that acquires the REG signals using only noninvasive electrodes placed on the skin/scalp. REG data can then be used to calculate the optimal CPP to maintain in each individual patient. BM-1 is also capable of monitoring electroencephalography (EEG) and impedance plethysmography (IPG), which can, respectively, be used to measure brain electrical activity and changes in peripheral blood flow caused by blood pressure changes.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives are to (Obj. 1) demonstrate that REG acquired noninvasively is equal to the well-established but invasive method using intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, (Obj. 2) retrospectively test the idea that TBI patients have a less favorable outcome if their CPP were found less optimal using the REG data, and (Obj. 3) determine if noninvasive IPG or the PPG finger sensor monitoring (used to measure heart rate in doctor's offices) can replace the invasive monitoring of arterial blood pressure (ABP).
METHODOLOGY: This is an observational study with retrospective data analysis. 20 adult patients (18-65 yrs) with acute TBI, who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria, will be enrolled on a first-come-first-enroll basis. The enrolled patients will have the REG, EEG and IPG signals monitored for the duration of ICU stay or 15 days, whichever is shorter. Standard neurological assessment will be made at the patient's discharge from the ICU and at 3 months after injury. The study is expected to end June 2013.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients (18 - 65 years) hospitalized in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) because of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of acute moderate or severe TBI
- Hospitalization within 12 hours from the injury
- Intraarterial catheterization and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring instantiated within 72 hours from the injury
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Earlier head injuries, stroke, space-occupying intracranial lesions, meningitis, or cerebral vasculopathies
- Concomitant severe injuries of the chest, abdomen, pelvis, extremities or spine
- Concurrent terminal illness with a life expectancy of less than 6 months
- Unlikely to survive the next 48 hours after enrollment
- Implanted cardiac pacemaker, cardiac converter/defibrillator, or other electrical stimulator
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE)
Time frame: 3 months post-injury
3 secondary outcomes
Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI)
Time frame: 3 months post-injury
Rappaport Disability Rating Scale (DSR)
Time frame: At discharge from intensive care unit; on average, 10 days post-injury
Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (KI-ADL)
Time frame: 3 months post-injury
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jan 2015.
- Background: PubMed 4418221Overgaard J, Tweed WA. Cerebral circulation after head injury. 1. Cerebral blood flow and its regulation after closed head injury with emphasis on clinical correlations. J Neurosurg. 1974 Nov;41(5):531-41. doi: 10.3171/jns.1974.41.5.0531. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8841340Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Menon DK, Pickard JD. Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients. Stroke. 1996 Oct;27(10):1829-34. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.10.1829.
- Background: PubMed 9046300Lam JM, Hsiang JN, Poon WS. Monitoring of autoregulation using laser Doppler flowmetry in patients with head injury. J Neurosurg. 1997 Mar;86(3):438-45. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0438.
- Background: PubMed 10889883Lang EW, Chesnut RM. A bedside method for investigating the integrity and critical thresholds of cerebral pressure autoregulation in severe traumatic brain injury patients. Br J Neurosurg. 2000 Apr;14(2):117-26. doi: 10.1080/02688690050004534.
- Background: PubMed 11940737Steiner LA, Czosnyka M, Piechnik SK, Smielewski P, Chatfield D, Menon DK, Pickard JD. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2002 Apr;30(4):733-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200204000-00002.
- Background: PubMed 11971041Lang EW, Mehdorn HM, Dorsch NW, Czosnyka M. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation: a validation study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 May;72(5):583-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.72.5.583.
- Background: PubMed 12511755Schmidt B, Czosnyka M, Raabe A, Yahya H, Schwarze JJ, Sackerer D, Sander D, Klingelhofer J. Adaptive noninvasive assessment of intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation. Stroke. 2003 Jan;34(1):84-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000047849.01376.ae.
- Background: PubMed 19948619Brady KM, Shaffner DH, Lee JK, Easley RB, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Jallo GI, Guerguerian AM. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity after traumatic brain injury in children. Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124(6):e1205-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0550.
- BackgroundBodo M. Studies in rheoencephalography . Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance 2010; 1: 18 - 40.
- Background: PubMed 12751577Bodo M, Pearce FJ, Montgomery LD, Rosenthal M, Kubinyi G, Thuroczy G, Braisted J, Forcino D, Morrissette C, Nagy I. Measurement of brain electrical impedance: animal studies in rheoencephalography. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2003 May;74(5):506-11.
- Background: PubMed 15798222Bodo M, Pearce FJ, Baranyi L, Armonda RA. Changes in the intracranial rheoencephalogram at lower limit of cerebral blood flow autoregulation. Physiol Meas. 2005 Apr;26(2):S1-17. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/2/001. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
- Background: PubMed 15712716Bodo M, Pearce FJ, Armonda RA. Cerebrovascular reactivity: rat studies in rheoencephalography. Physiol Meas. 2004 Dec;25(6):1371-84. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/6/003.
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Nanopulse Laser Therapy
TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
Recruiting
Evaluation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) in Individuals With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
Sleep Architecture, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Djordje Popovic, MD principal investigator
Advanced Brain Monitoring, Inc.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), run by Advanced Brain Monitoring, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) (time frame: 3 months post-injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01605838, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2015.