AzTrials
AzTrials

Supraspinatus Calcifying TendonitisNCT01602653

Extracorporeal Shock-wave Therapy for Supraspinatus Calcifying Tendonitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Different Energy Levels

A study testing Extracorporeal shock wave therapy STORZ MEDICAL Modulith SLK in people with Supraspinatus Calcifying Tendonitis, run by University of Roma La Sapienza.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two different ranges of energy flux density with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in treatment of supraspinatus calcifying tendonitis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Supraspinatus Calcifying Tendonitis
What is being tested?
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy STORZ MEDICAL Modulith SLK
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
46 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2008to Jun 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • no visible clinical benefits by previous conservative treatment
  • medium and large calcific deposits, according to Bosworth classification
  • type I and II Gartner deposits

Who cannot join

  • presence of tiny calcific deposits, according to Bosworth classification
  • type III, according to the Gartner classification
  • age (if less than 18 years old), diabetes, coagulation diseases or anticoagulant therapy, tumors, bone infections, previous shoulder surgery, pregnancy, pace-maker, acute bursitis demonstrated by ultrasound imaging, rheumatoid arthritis or other connective tissue diseases

About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare two different ranges of energy flux density with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in treatment of supraspinatus calcifying tendonitis.

Being tested
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy STORZ MEDICAL Modulith SLK

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Extracorporeal shock wave therapy STORZ MEDICAL Modulith SLKDevice

    an energy level of 0.20mJ/mm2, 2400 pulses once a week for 4 weeks.

  • Extracorporeal shock wave therapy STORZ MEDICAL Modulith SLKDevice

    an energy level of 0.10mJ/mm2, 2400 pulses once a week for 4 weeks.

Study groups in NCT01602653
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorthe first group of patients received an energy level of 0.20mJ/mm2, 2400 pulses once a week for 4 weeks.
Receives: Device: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy STORZ MEDICAL Modulith SLK
2Active comparatorThe second grouop of patients received 0.10mJ/mm2, 2400 pulses once a week for 4 weeks.
Receives: Device: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy STORZ MEDICAL Modulith SLK

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Constant Murley Scale

    Constant-Murley scale is the scoring system used to assess shoulder function in four of the studies being reviewed. It combines physical examination tests with subjective evaluations by the patients and consists of 35 points and 65 points respectively. Its strength is the method of its application, which is quite clearly described, and its being an improvement on pre-existing scales

    Measured: Change in the mean Constant Murley Scale (CMS) scores at 3 and 6 months was the primary endpoint.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Visual Analogic Scale

    It is a horizontal line, 10 cm in length with 0 cm labeled "no pain" and 10 cm labeled "worst pain I have ever had". The patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state

    Measured: The change in the mean Visual Analogic Scale scores from baseline to 3 and 6 months after the intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2008
  3. Primary completionJun 2010
  4. Study completionJun 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
46 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01602653
Sponsor's protocol ID
PTJ-2011-0252.R1
Status last verified
May 2012
First submitted
14 May 2012
Last updated
21 May 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Ioppolo F, Tattoli M, Di Sante L, Attanasi C, Venditto T, Servidio M, Cacchio A, Santilli V. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for supraspinatus calcifying tendinitis: a randomized clinical trial comparing two different energy levels. Phys Ther. 2012 Nov;92(11):1376-85. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110252. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

    PubMed 22745199

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Extracorporeal shock wave therapy STORZ MEDICAL Modulith SLK in people with Supraspinatus Calcifying Tendonitis, run by University of Roma La Sapienza.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Constant Murley Scale (time frame: Change in the mean Constant Murley Scale (CMS) scores at 3 and 6 months was the primary endpoint.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01602653, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in