SurgeryLAS VEGASNCT01601223
Local Assessment of Ventilatory Management During General Anesthesia for Surgery
An observational study of Surgery and Anaesthesia, run by European Society of Anaesthesiology at 19 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
Objectives 1. To characterize mechanical ventilation practices during general anesthesia for surgery 2. To assess the dependence of intra-operative and post-operative pulmonary complications on intra-operative Mechanical Ventilation (MV) settings Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgery, Anaesthesia, Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury
- How many people
- 10,690 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to Nov 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Mechanically ventilated patients undergoing general anesthesia for surgery during a period of one week
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years
- All surgical procedures requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (MV)during general anesthesia for laparoscopic or non-laparoscopic surgery.
- This includes MV performed with supra-glottic devices (e.g. laryngeal mask)
- This includes patients receiving MV at the onset of the procedure (e.g. Intensive Care Unit patients)
- This includes patients who will receive one-lung ventilation during the procedure
Who cannot join
- Obstetric surgical procedures or any procedure during pregnancy
- Surgical procedures outside the operating room
- Surgical procedures involving extra-corporal circulation
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 8 countries.
19 sites in 8 countries
United States3 sites
University of Colorado School of Medicine/University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Germany3 sites
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technonology, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Therapy
Dresden
Duesseldorf University Hospital
Düsseldorf
Diakoniekrankenhaus Friederikenstift
Hanover
Netherlands3 sites
Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
VU University Medical Center
Amsterdam
MC Haaglanden
The Hague
Estonia2 sites
North Estonia Medical Center
Tallinn
Tartu University Hospital
Tartu
Italy2 sites
Ospedale San Martino, Dipartimento di scienze chirurgiche e diagnostiche integrate
Genoa
Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan
Lithuania2 sites
Vilnius University Hospital - Institute of Oncology
Vilnius
Vilnius University Hospital - Santariskiu Clinics
Vilnius
Norway2 sites
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen
Førde Central Hospital /Førde Sentral Sykehus
Førde
Slovenia2 sites
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
Ljubljana
University Medicine Centre Ljubljana
Ljubljana
About this study
Official title: Local Assessment of Ventilatory Management During General Anesthesia for Surgery - a Prospective Observational Multi-center Cohort Study
Objectives
- To characterize mechanical ventilation practices during general anesthesia for surgery
- To assess the dependence of intra-operative and post-operative pulmonary complications on intra-operative Mechanical Ventilation (MV) settings
Read the detailed description
Research questions
- What MV-settings are used during general anesthesia for surgery?
- Do MV-settings vary in and/or between centers?
- Do MV-settings vary internationally?
- Are MV-settings associated with incidence of intra-operative pulmonary complications?
- Are MV-settings associated with incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications?
- Conditions
- Surgery, Anaesthesia, Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Lung Injury, Pneumonia, Pneumothorax
- Keywords
- Ventilatory Management, Mechanical Ventilation, Post Operative pulmonary complications, Intra-operative complications, General Anesthesia, Surgery, LAS VEGAS, ESA (European Society of Anaesthesiology), European Society of Anaesthesiology
- Medical subject headings
- Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Lung Injury, Pneumonia, Pneumothorax, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Respiratory Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical mechanically-ventilated | Surgical patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for general anesthesia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Post-operative pulmonary complications, possibly related to ventilation strategy
Effect of Mechanical Ventilation settings during general anesthesia for surgery on the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications (new or prolonged invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation, need for oxygen therapy, respiratory failure, pneumonia, ARDS 'Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome', pneumothorax) Defined post-operative pulmonary complications are recorded from the medical chart on day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 after surgery. On day 28 length of hospital stay and in hospital death are assessed.
Measured: Post-operative on day of surgery, day 1, 2,3,4,5 and day 28
Secondary outcomes (2)
Intra-operative complications related to the ventilation strategy
Measured: Time point(s) at which outcome measure is assessed is is: Day of surgery, day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 28 after surgery
Mechanical ventilation-settings during general anesthesia for surgery
- Variation of applied MV settings within centers
- Variation of applied MV settings between centers on an international basis
Measured: During the surgical procedure, from moment of to tracheal extubation or discharge from operation room (in case patient remains on mechanical ventilation)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionNov 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (41)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 10,690 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- European Society of Anaesthesiology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Schultz Marcus, MD, Study chair, AMC, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsSabrine Hemmes, MD, Study director, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01601223
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LAS VEGAS
- Acronym
- LAS VEGAS
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 14 May 2012
- Last updated
- 14 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Zinserling J, Wrigge H, Pelosi P. Meta-analysis: ventilation strategies and outcomes of the acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Oct 20;151(8):566-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-8-200910200-00011.
PubMed 19841457Tremblay LN, Slutsky AS. Ventilator-induced lung injury: from the bench to the bedside. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jan;32(1):24-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2817-8. Epub 2005 Oct 18. No abstract available.
PubMed 16231069Slutsky AS. Lung injury caused by mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1999 Jul;116(1 Suppl):9S-15S. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.suppl_1.9s-a. No abstract available.
PubMed 10424561Burns KE, Adhikari NK, Slutsky AS, Guyatt GH, Villar J, Zhang H, Zhou Q, Cook DJ, Stewart TE, Meade MO. Pressure and volume limited ventilation for the ventilatory management of patients with acute lung injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2011 Jan 28;6(1):e14623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014623.
PubMed 21298026ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669.
PubMed 22797452Gajic O, Frutos-Vivar F, Esteban A, Hubmayr RD, Anzueto A. Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jul;31(7):922-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2625-1. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
PubMed 15856172Gajic O, Dara SI, Mendez JL, Adesanya AO, Festic E, Caples SM, Rana R, St Sauver JL, Lymp JF, Afessa B, Hubmayr RD. Ventilator-associated lung injury in patients without acute lung injury at the onset of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2004 Sep;32(9):1817-24. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000133019.52531.30.
PubMed 15343007Briel M, Meade M, Mercat A, Brower RG, Talmor D, Walter SD, Slutsky AS, Pullenayegum E, Zhou Q, Cook D, Brochard L, Richard JC, Lamontagne F, Bhatnagar N, Stewart TE, Guyatt G. Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010 Mar 3;303(9):865-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.218.
PubMed 20197533Lachmann B. Open up the lung and keep the lung open. Intensive Care Med. 1992;18(6):319-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01694358. No abstract available.
PubMed 1469157Fernandez-Perez ER, Keegan MT, Brown DR, Hubmayr RD, Gajic O. Intraoperative tidal volume as a risk factor for respiratory failure after pneumonectomy. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jul;105(1):14-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200607000-00007.
PubMed 16809989Schultz MJ, Haitsma JJ, Slutsky AS, Gajic O. What tidal volumes should be used in patients without acute lung injury? Anesthesiology. 2007 Jun;106(6):1226-31. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267607.25011.e8.
PubMed 17525599Wrigge H, Uhlig U, Baumgarten G, Menzenbach J, Zinserling J, Ernst M, Dromann D, Welz A, Uhlig S, Putensen C. Mechanical ventilation strategies and inflammatory responses to cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1379-87. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2767-1. Epub 2005 Aug 17.
PubMed 16132888Wrigge H, Uhlig U, Zinserling J, Behrends-Callsen E, Ottersbach G, Fischer M, Uhlig S, Putensen C. The effects of different ventilatory settings on pulmonary and systemic inflammatory responses during major surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004 Mar;98(3):775-81, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000100663.11852.bf.
PubMed 14980936Wolthuis EK, Choi G, Dessing MC, Bresser P, Lutter R, Dzoljic M, van der Poll T, Vroom MB, Hollmann M, Schultz MJ. Mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressure prevents pulmonary inflammation in patients without preexisting lung injury. Anesthesiology. 2008 Jan;108(1):46-54. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000296068.80921.10.
PubMed 18156881Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, Wegenius G, Reber A, Hedenstierna G. Prevention of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. Lancet. 1995 Jun 3;345(8962):1387-91. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92595-3.
PubMed 7760608
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Local Assessment of Ventilatory Management During General Anesthesia for Surgery - a Prospective Observational Multi-center Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01601223
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LAS VEGAS / LAS VEGAS
- Conditions
- Surgery, Anaesthesia, Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Lung Injury, Pneumonia, Pneumothorax
- Keywords
- Ventilatory Management, Mechanical Ventilation, Post Operative pulmonary complications, Intra-operative complications, General Anesthesia, Surgery, LAS VEGAS, ESA (European Society of Anaesthesiology)
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10,690 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- European Society of AnaesthesiologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 May 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objectives
- To characterize mechanical ventilation practices during general anesthesia for surgery
- To assess the dependence of intra-operative and post-operative pulmonary complications on intra-operative Mechanical Ventilation (MV) settings
Detailed description
Research questions
- What MV-settings are used during general anesthesia for surgery?
- Do MV-settings vary in and/or between centers?
- Do MV-settings vary internationally?
- Are MV-settings associated with incidence of intra-operative pulmonary complications?
- Are MV-settings associated with incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications?
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical mechanically-ventilated | – | –Surgical patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for general anesthesia |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Mechanically ventilated patients undergoing general anesthesia for surgery during a period of one week
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- All surgical procedures requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (MV)during general anesthesia for laparoscopic or non-laparoscopic surgery.
- This includes MV performed with supra-glottic devices (e.g. laryngeal mask)
- This includes patients receiving MV at the onset of the procedure (e.g. Intensive Care Unit patients)
- This includes patients who will receive one-lung ventilation during the procedure
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Obstetric surgical procedures or any procedure during pregnancy
- Surgical procedures outside the operating room
- Surgical procedures involving extra-corporal circulation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Post-operative pulmonary complications, possibly related to ventilation strategy
Time frame: Post-operative on day of surgery, day 1, 2,3,4,5 and day 28
Effect of Mechanical Ventilation settings during general anesthesia for surgery on the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications (new or prolonged invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation, need for oxygen therapy, respiratory failure, pneumonia, ARDS 'Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome', pneumothorax) Defined post-operative pulmonary complications are recorded from the medical chart on day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 after surgery. On day 28 length of hospital stay and in hospital death are assessed.
2 secondary outcomes
Intra-operative complications related to the ventilation strategy
Time frame: Time point(s) at which outcome measure is assessed is is: Day of surgery, day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 28 after surgery
Mechanical ventilation-settings during general anesthesia for surgery
Time frame: During the surgical procedure, from moment of to tracheal extubation or discharge from operation room (in case patient remains on mechanical ventilation)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Oct 2015.
- Background: PubMed 19841457Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Zinserling J, Wrigge H, Pelosi P. Meta-analysis: ventilation strategies and outcomes of the acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Oct 20;151(8):566-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-8-200910200-00011.
- Background: PubMed 16231069Tremblay LN, Slutsky AS. Ventilator-induced lung injury: from the bench to the bedside. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jan;32(1):24-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2817-8. Epub 2005 Oct 18. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 10424561Slutsky AS. Lung injury caused by mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1999 Jul;116(1 Suppl):9S-15S. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.suppl_1.9s-a. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21298026Burns KE, Adhikari NK, Slutsky AS, Guyatt GH, Villar J, Zhang H, Zhou Q, Cook DJ, Stewart TE, Meade MO. Pressure and volume limited ventilation for the ventilatory management of patients with acute lung injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2011 Jan 28;6(1):e14623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014623.
- Background: PubMed 22797452ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669.
- Background: PubMed 15856172Gajic O, Frutos-Vivar F, Esteban A, Hubmayr RD, Anzueto A. Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jul;31(7):922-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2625-1. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
- Background: PubMed 15343007Gajic O, Dara SI, Mendez JL, Adesanya AO, Festic E, Caples SM, Rana R, St Sauver JL, Lymp JF, Afessa B, Hubmayr RD. Ventilator-associated lung injury in patients without acute lung injury at the onset of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2004 Sep;32(9):1817-24. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000133019.52531.30.
- Background: PubMed 20197533Briel M, Meade M, Mercat A, Brower RG, Talmor D, Walter SD, Slutsky AS, Pullenayegum E, Zhou Q, Cook D, Brochard L, Richard JC, Lamontagne F, Bhatnagar N, Stewart TE, Guyatt G. Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010 Mar 3;303(9):865-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.218.
- Background: PubMed 1469157Lachmann B. Open up the lung and keep the lung open. Intensive Care Med. 1992;18(6):319-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01694358. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16809989Fernandez-Perez ER, Keegan MT, Brown DR, Hubmayr RD, Gajic O. Intraoperative tidal volume as a risk factor for respiratory failure after pneumonectomy. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jul;105(1):14-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200607000-00007.
- Background: PubMed 17525599Schultz MJ, Haitsma JJ, Slutsky AS, Gajic O. What tidal volumes should be used in patients without acute lung injury? Anesthesiology. 2007 Jun;106(6):1226-31. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267607.25011.e8.
- Background: PubMed 16132888Wrigge H, Uhlig U, Baumgarten G, Menzenbach J, Zinserling J, Ernst M, Dromann D, Welz A, Uhlig S, Putensen C. Mechanical ventilation strategies and inflammatory responses to cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1379-87. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2767-1. Epub 2005 Aug 17.
- LAS VEGAS Study Specific WebsiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 1
Serial Amnioinfusions as Regenerative Therapy for Pulmonary Hypoplasia
Renal Failure Congenital, Congenital Renal Anomaly Nos
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Schultz Marcus, MD study chair
AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Sabrine Hemmes, MD study director
AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
19 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Surgery and Anaesthesia, run by European Society of Anaesthesiology at 19 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in United States, Germany, Netherlands, Estonia, Italy and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Post-operative pulmonary complications, possibly related to ventilation strategy (time frame: Post-operative on day of surgery, day 1, 2,3,4,5 and day 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01601223, which also lists 41 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2015.