AzTrials
AzTrials

Pediatric Cardiac SurgeryNCT01600287

Closed Loop Propofol Administration in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

A study testing IAADS and Manual propofol administration in people with Pediatric Cardiac Surgery and Intraoperative Awareness, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate and compare the feasibility, efficacy and safety of IAADS (Improved Anaesthetic Agent Delivery System) for propofol anaesthesia against manual control using bispectral index in paediatric patients undergoing open heart surgery under cardio-pulmonary bypass. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 18 years
What is being tested?
IAADS and Manual propofol administration
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
Jan 2012to Dec 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Children, aged 5-18 years and ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status 2-3, planned for elective open heart surgery under general anaesthesia.

Who cannot join

  • Patients weighing more than ±30% of ideal body weight.
  • Patients having neurological/psychological disorders or on psychoactive medications.
  • Patients belonging to NYHA (New York Heart Association) class IV.
  • Patients with severe stenotic valvular lesions, eg, mitral or aortic stenosis.
  • Patients with known allergy to propofol or any of its constituents.
  • Patients having severe pulmonary arterial hypertension.
  • Patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease.
  • Patients requiring deep hypothermic circulatory arrest during surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Advanced Cardiac Centre.Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research.

    Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160012

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Closed Loop Anaesthesia Delivery System for Propofol Anaesthesia in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

The purpose of the study is to evaluate and compare the feasibility, efficacy and safety of IAADS (Improved Anaesthetic Agent Delivery System) for propofol anaesthesia against manual control using bispectral index in paediatric patients undergoing open heart surgery under cardio-pulmonary bypass.

Read the detailed description

Automated drug delivery has gained considerable interest in recent times. It is carried out by specially programmed electro-mechanical devices where dose rate adjustment is made independent of human intervention. The desired target is chosen by the clinician. The closed loop system depends upon a feedback signal to modify the rate of drug delivery. These have an advantage that they are able to overcome the individual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences as well as the differing levels of surgical stimulation. Majority of studies on closed loop delivery of hypnotics has been done using propofol. CLADS(Closed loop anesthesia delivery system) is a BIS guided closed loop anaesthesia delivery system developed at PGIMER (Post graduate institute of medical education and research), Chandigarh and has been used successfully for administration of propofol in various situations, eg, non-cardiac surgery, cardiac surgery, post-operative sedation and high altitude. The system used will be IAADS, Improved anesthetic agent delivery system - the present and updated version of CLADS), a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model based adaptive system . There are only a few studies/reports regarding closed loop delivery of muscle relaxants in children. In this study, the efficacy of IAADS will be compared with manual control for administration of propofol using BIS as a control variable during induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in children undergoing elective open heart surgery.

After approval from the Institutional ethics committee and written informed parental consent, 40 children, aged 5-18 years and ASA physical status II-III, planned for elective open heart surgery under general anaesthesia will be studied. Patients will be randomly allocated to one of two groups - the manual group and the IAADS group using computer-generated random numbers in sealed opaque envelopes. Exclusion criteria will be: patients weighing more than ±30% of ideal body weight, those with neurological/psychological disorders, on psychoactive medications, belonging to NYHA class IV, those with severe stenotic valvular lesions, with known allergy to propofol or any of its constituents, having severe pulmonary arterial hypertension, with cyanotic congenital heart disease and those who may require deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for repair. The investigator will be present during the procedure for data collection purpose only and was not involved in the conduct of anaesthesia. Patients will be premedicated with oral midazolam syrup 0.25mg/kg 30 minutes before shifting to operating room. EMLA cream will be applied to the site of venipuncture for at least one hour. Intravenous access will be obtained in the operating room. Routine physiological monitoring will be commenced (pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure). BIS will be obtained by disposable sensors (Aspect Medical System Inc. MA USA) attached to the forehead of the patients. The children resisting venous cannula placement will be excluded from the study and subjected to inhalational induction.

Before induction, patients will receive fentanyl 3µg/kg over three minutes. In automatic mode, IAADS will calculate and titrate the initial and subsequent propofol infusion rate according to the weight of the patient, the risk status, the target BIS value which will be set at 50 for all cases. In manual mode, infusion rate will be determined by the attending anaesthesiologist according to the weight of the patient and target BIS of 50, with the aim to maintain BIS within 40-60. After loss of consciousness, patients will receive 0.1mg/kg of vecuronium bromide and trachea will be intubated after 4 minutes. The lungs will be ventilated with 100% O2; tidal volume and respiratory rate will be adjusted to maintain an EtCO2 of 30-35 mm Hg. Central venous catheter and arterial cannula will be inserted subsequently.

Analgesia will be maintained with infusion of fentanyl at 1µg/kg/hr and additional boluses of 1µg/kg will be administered before skin incision, sternotomy and commencement of cardio-pulmonary bypass. Muscle relaxation will be maintained with vecuronium bromide. Tachycardia and hypertension will be treated with fentanyl bolus, esmolol, nitroglycerine as appropriate. Hypotension will be treated with fluid bolus, phenylephrine, inotropes as appropriate. Significant bradycardia will be treated with atropine sulphate. During CPB, infusion of fentanyl and propofol will be continued. MAP will be maintained between 30-50 mm Hg and any deviation from these limits will be treated with phenylephrine boluses or nitroglycerine infusion. Propofol will be administered as per IAADS protocol in automatic group and manually in control group. The number of times propofol infusion rate that will needed to be changed in the manual group will be noted.

After skin closure, fentanyl and propofol infusion will be stopped, study protocol will be terminated and the patients will be shifted to ICU without antagonizing the muscle relaxant for elective mechanical ventilation. Patients will be given propofol infusion for postoperative sedation and will be extubated when standard criteria for weaning and extubation will be met. The children will be subjected to a structured interview as described by Lopez et a for conscious awareness; on second day after surgery and approximately one month later.

Being tested
IAADS, Manual propofol administration
Keywords
bispectral index, propofol, paediatric cardiac surgery, closed loop anaesthesia delivery system
Medical subject headings
Intraoperative Awareness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IAADSOther

    In automatic mode, the system requests an update of the BIS data every 5 seconds and calculates the BIS "error" (difference between the target and actual BIS value). This value along with the trends of BIS in the epoch of the last 30 seconds as well as in the last 5 minutes is passed on to a patient individualized, model based adaptive control algorithm. The algorithm uses the error to calculate an adjustment to the propofol delivery rate, but does not apply it immediately. Adjustments to the propofol delivery rate are only made every 30 seconds, taking into account the sum of previous six BIS "error" values, the trends of BIS in the epoch of last 30 seconds as well as in the last 5 minutes, time elapsed since the initiation of infusion, pharmacokinetics, the time delay factor between sensing and averaging of BIS data, the time delay factor between the change in infusion rate and the actual change in the plasma concentration of propofol as well as the peak effect of propofol.

  • Manual propofol administrationOther

    In "manual" mode, the user can also control the propofol infusion rate manually, using the keyboard or the mouse of the PC. The PC displays a graph of the propofol delivery rate and trend of BIS value.

Study groups in NCT01600287
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IAADS groupExperimentaldosage of propofol adjusted automatically by IAADS
Receives: Other: IAADS
Manual groupActive comparatordosage of propofol adjusted manually
Receives: Other: Manual propofol administration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Time Bispectral Index(BIS) Remains+/-10 of Target

    The primary outcome to be measured is the ability of the system to keep the depth of anesthesia in the target range, i.e, Bispectral Index(BIS) value of 50+/- 10. This will assess the ability of the system to prevent intra-operative awareness of the patients and at the same time avoid excessive depth of anesthesia with its accompanying adverse effects.

    Measured: Approximately 8 hours

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Median Performance Error(MDPE)

    The difference between the observed and target of measure of depth of anesthesia (BIS) expressed as percentage of target BIS is calculated as performance error every 30 seconds. This value may be either '+' or '_' indicating whether the observed measure is above the target (overshoot-+) or below the target (undershoot-_). The median value of all performance errors during propofol anesthesia is median performance error and is a measure of bias of the system. This outcome is expressed as the mean of Median Performance Errors per participant.

    Measured: Approximately 8 hours

  2. Median Absolute Performance Error(MDAPE)

    The difference between the observed and target of measure of depth of anesthesia (BIS) expressed as percentage of target BIS is calculated as performance error every 30 seconds. This value may be either '+' or '_' indicating whether the observed measure is above the target (overshoot-+) or below the target (undershoot-_).The median of the absolute values of performance errors (without considering the direction of error) is median absolute performance error. This outcome measures the magnitude of error or inaccuracy of the system studied. A lower value indicates a more precise system.This outcome is expressed as the mean of Median Absolute Performance Errors per participant.

    Measured: Approximately 8 hours

  3. Wobble

    Wobble measures the intra-individual variability in performance error.The median of the difference between individual performance errors throughout anesthesia and the median performance error for each participant is the wobble of that participant. The mean value per participant is indicated in the outcome measure.

    Measured: Approximately 8 hours

  4. Percentage of Time Heart Rate Remains Within 25% of Pre-op Baseline

    The duration of time heart rate remains within 25% of the pre-operative baseline value during the period propofol (general anesthetic) is administered to the study population. This value is expressed as a percentage. This outcome is expressed as the mean of percentage of time per participant.

    Measured: Approximately 8 hours

  5. Percentage of Time Mean Arterial Pressure Remains Within 25% of Pre-op Baseline

    The duration of time mean arterial pressure remains within 25% of the pre-operative baseline value during the period propofol (general anesthetic) is administered to the study population. This value is expressed as percentage. This outcome is expressed as the mean of percentage of time per participant

    Measured: Approximately 8 hours

  6. Intra-operative Awareness

    The number of patients who will be able to recall the intra-operative events when assessed postoperatively. This will be assessed by a structured protocol

    Measured: Approximately 3 days and then 1 month later

  7. Divergence

    slope of the linear regression curve of performance error against time.

    Measured: 8 hours (approx)

  8. Global Score

    overall performance assessment of the system calculated as= [(MDAPE+Wobble)/percentage of time BIS remains within target]x100 Lower score indicates better overall performance

    Measured: 8 hours (approx)

  9. Intraoperative Phenylephrine Used (Pre CPB)

    total phenylephrine dose needed to be used in the pre CPB period to maintain hemodynamic stability

    Measured: 2 hours(approx)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2012
  4. Study completionDec 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01600287
Sponsor's protocol ID
8450/PG-2Trg/2010/
Status last verified
Jul 2013
First submitted
11 May 2012
Last updated
9 Aug 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Agarwal J, Puri GD, Mathew PJ. Comparison of closed loop vs. manual administration of propofol using the Bispectral index in cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Mar;53(3):390-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01884.x.

    PubMed 19243324
  • Solanki A, Puri GD, Mathew PJ. Bispectral index-controlled postoperative sedation in cardiac surgery patients: a comparative trial between closed loop and manual administration of propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Aug;27(8):708-13. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328335b2d4.

    PubMed 20299990
  • Puri GD, Kumar B, Aveek J. Closed-loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS) using bispectral index: a performance assessment study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Jun;35(3):357-62. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0703500306.

    PubMed 17591128

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing IAADS and Manual propofol administration in people with Pediatric Cardiac Surgery and Intraoperative Awareness, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Aug 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Time Bispectral Index(BIS) Remains+/-10 of Target (time frame: Approximately 8 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01600287, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2013.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in