Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaPhase 2NCT01600053
Revlimid® as Consolidation Treatment Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
A Phase 2 study testing Lenalidomide in people with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, run by Thomas Kipps at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether on course (6 cycles) of consolidation therapy with Revlimid can shrink or slow the growth of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in the bone marrow. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- Lenalidomide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 11 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to May 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia:
- Previously treated patients of any age with a diagnosis of CLL with documented residual disease following therapy, but not meeting an indication for treatment based on current guidelines
- At least 2 months following previous CLL directed therapy
- ECOG performance status of less than or equal to 2 at study entry
- Laboratory test results within these ranges:
- Platelet count greater than or equal to 50 x 109/L
Show all 16Show fewer
- CrCl >.60 ml/min
- Total bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL
- AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) less than or equal to 2 x ULN
- Females of childbearing must adhere to strict guidelines and have negative pregnancy test prior to enrollment
- Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form.
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form.
- Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
- Disease free of prior malignancies for greater than or equal to 2 years with exception of currently treated basal cell, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in situ" of the cervix or breast.
- All study participants must be registered into the mandatory RevAssist® program, and be willing and able to comply with the requirements of RevAssist®.
- Able to take aspirin (81 or 325 mg) daily as prophylactic anticoagulation (patients intolerant to aspirin may use warfarin or low molecular weight heparin).
Who cannot join
- Known Hepatitis B Ag positive, Hepatitis C positive patients.
- Known HIV positive patients.
- Patients with uncontrolled Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA) or autoimmune thrombocytopenia (ITP)
- Patients with active fungal, bacterial, and/or viral infection
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to Revlimid or thalidomide
- Concurrent use of other anti-cancer agents or treatments
Show all 15Show fewer
- Patients with history of deep venous thrombus or pulmonary embolism
- Patients who are at increased risk of thrombosis during treatment with Revlimid including those taking concurrent erythropoietin, darbepoetin or high-dose corticosteroids
- Inability to provide informed consent.
- Concurrent malignancy (excluding basal and squamous cell skin cancers).
- Pregnant or breast-feeding females. (Lactating females must agree not to breast feed while taking Revlimid).
- Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
- Use of any other experimental drug or therapy within 28 days of baseline.
- The development of erythema nodosum if characterized by a desquamating rash while taking thalidomide or similar drugs.
- Patients with a history of embolic events (e.g. TIA) from arrhythmia or peripheral arterial disease or of recent MI whether or not treated with anti-platelet drug.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Moores UCSD Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093-0698
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Trial of Revlimid® as Consolidation Treatment of Residual Disease in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
The purpose of this study is to determine whether on course (6 cycles) of consolidation therapy with Revlimid can shrink or slow the growth of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in the bone marrow.
Read the detailed description
CLL is the most prevalent leukemia in the western world and is considered incurable. Standard therapy for CLL is typically in the form of purine analogs, alkylating agents, monoclonal antibodies, or combinations of these drugs. Unfortunately, despite high response rates these treatment strategies are considered palliative and all patients eventually experience disease relapse and with time become less responsive to therapy. Following standard treatment, CLL patients often fail to achieve a complete response, or they have minimal residual disease (MRD) in the marrow and this often correlates with a short time to progression and next therapy.
The National California Institute Working Group and newly updated International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Working Group definition of a complete response (CR) in CLL is quite permissive and allows for the persistence of 30% of residual lymphocytes in the marrow. These response criteria were initially developed at a time treatment options for CLL patients were limited and relatively few CRs were obtained. However, therapeutic advances including monoclonal antibodies and stem cell transplant have reduced residual CLL cells to a greater extent than previously possible and necessitated updating of current response criteria to include MRD evaluation and the development of highly sensitive assays that can measure MRD such as multiparametric 4-color flow cytometry, allele-specific PCR, and more convenient investigational assays such as peripheral blood levels of CLLU-1. Regardless, the majority of complete responses achieved following any initial therapy still have detectable residual disease.
Importantly, CLL patients who lack minimal residual disease following treatment consistently demonstrate prolonged progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those with persistent MRD. As such, the development of therapeutic strategies that have the potential to eradicate disease after therapy are highly desired. Such consolidation therapies have potential to improve the depth of a remission, prolong PFS, and potentially overall survival in CLL patients. The investigators propose that Revlimid might be one such therapy that can be used as consolidation to eradicate residual disease or improve remissions in patients who have received therapy and that this might lead to a prolonged disease free duration. The investigators hypothesize that Revlimid will be safe and well tolerated in this setting.
The investigators further hypothesize that Revlimid consolidation might be effective in CLL patients at risk of early relapse such as those patients with leukemia cells that use unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable regions. The investigators found that the relative CLLU1 expression level on blood samples mirrored the residual level of CLL cells as determined by 4-color flow cytometry on cells from the aspirated marrow. The investigators hypothesize that monitoring for expression of CLLU1 might provide a reliable means with which to evaluate residual disease in the context of Revlimid consolidation therapy. Previous single agent Revlimid studies have suggested that Revlimid treatment of CLL patients may positively impact immune parameters increasing the relative composition of T-lymphocytes, modulation of cytokines, and can lead to improvement immunoglobulin levels and or the development of leukemia specific antibodies, the investigators hypothesize that similar changes in immune parameters may occur in the context of Revlimid consolidation therapy.
- Conditions
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- Being tested
- Lenalidomide
- Keywords
- Chronic, Lymphocytic, Leukemia
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome, Leukemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LenalidomideDrug
Also called Revlimid
Lenalidomide will be taken orally days 1-21 for up to six 28-day cycles (6 cycles = 1 course of Revlimid consolidation). Revlimid will be initiated at 5mg and can be dose escalated at the start of each cycle based on individual patient tolerability to a maximum of 25 mg. The total number of treatment cycles cannot exceed 12 cycles or two courses of six cycles each.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lenalidomide | Experimental | Lenalidomide will be taken orally days 1-21 for up to six 28-day cycles Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Eradication of Residual Disease From the Marrow
Measured: From date of first dose until then end of 12 cycles of treatment (12 months) or progression of disease, whichever comes first.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Recording of the Occurrence of Adverse Events
Measured: From date of first dose until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2012 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionMay 2014
- Study completionMay 2014
Why it stopped: interim analysis showed that the trial will not meet the interim endpoint.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Thomas Kipps
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Celgene Corporation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Thomas Kipps, University of California, San Diego
- Investigators
- Thomas J. Kipps, M.D., Ph.D., Principal investigator, University of California Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01600053
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 101955
- Status last verified
- Oct 2016
- First submitted
- 9 May 2012
- Last updated
- 15 Dec 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Dec 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Trial of Revlimid® as Consolidation Treatment of Residual Disease in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01600053
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 101955
- Conditions
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- Keywords
- Chronic, Lymphocytic, Leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: interim analysis showed that the trial will not meet the interim endpoint.
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Thomas KippsUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Celgene Corporation
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 May 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Dec 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether on course (6 cycles) of consolidation therapy with Revlimid can shrink or slow the growth of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in the bone marrow.
Detailed description
CLL is the most prevalent leukemia in the western world and is considered incurable. Standard therapy for CLL is typically in the form of purine analogs, alkylating agents, monoclonal antibodies, or combinations of these drugs. Unfortunately, despite high response rates these treatment strategies are considered palliative and all patients eventually experience disease relapse and with time become less responsive to therapy. Following standard treatment, CLL patients often fail to achieve a complete response, or they have minimal residual disease (MRD) in the marrow and this often correlates with a short time to progression and next therapy.
The National California Institute Working Group and newly updated International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Working Group definition of a complete response (CR) in CLL is quite permissive and allows for the persistence of 30% of residual lymphocytes in the marrow. These response criteria were initially developed at a time treatment options for CLL patients were limited and relatively few CRs were obtained. However, therapeutic advances including monoclonal antibodies and stem cell transplant have reduced residual CLL cells to a greater extent than previously possible and necessitated updating of current response criteria to include MRD evaluation and the development of highly sensitive assays that can measure MRD such as multiparametric 4-color flow cytometry, allele-specific PCR, and more convenient investigational assays such as peripheral blood levels of CLLU-1. Regardless, the majority of complete responses achieved following any initial therapy still have detectable residual disease.
Importantly, CLL patients who lack minimal residual disease following treatment consistently demonstrate prolonged progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those with persistent MRD. As such, the development of therapeutic strategies that have the potential to eradicate disease after therapy are highly desired. Such consolidation therapies have potential to improve the depth of a remission, prolong PFS, and potentially overall survival in CLL patients. The investigators propose that Revlimid might be one such therapy that can be used as consolidation to eradicate residual disease or improve remissions in patients who have received therapy and that this might lead to a prolonged disease free duration. The investigators hypothesize that Revlimid will be safe and well tolerated in this setting.
The investigators further hypothesize that Revlimid consolidation might be effective in CLL patients at risk of early relapse such as those patients with leukemia cells that use unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable regions. The investigators found that the relative CLLU1 expression level on blood samples mirrored the residual level of CLL cells as determined by 4-color flow cytometry on cells from the aspirated marrow. The investigators hypothesize that monitoring for expression of CLLU1 might provide a reliable means with which to evaluate residual disease in the context of Revlimid consolidation therapy. Previous single agent Revlimid studies have suggested that Revlimid treatment of CLL patients may positively impact immune parameters increasing the relative composition of T-lymphocytes, modulation of cytokines, and can lead to improvement immunoglobulin levels and or the development of leukemia specific antibodies, the investigators hypothesize that similar changes in immune parameters may occur in the context of Revlimid consolidation therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lenalidomide | Experimental | Drug: LenalidomideLenalidomide will be taken orally days 1-21 for up to six 28-day cycles |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia:
- Previously treated patients of any age with a diagnosis of CLL with documented residual disease following therapy, but not meeting an indication for treatment based on current guidelines
- At least 2 months following previous CLL directed therapy
- ECOG performance status of less than or equal to 2 at study entry
- Laboratory test results within these ranges:
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Known Hepatitis B Ag positive, Hepatitis C positive patients.
- Known HIV positive patients.
- Patients with uncontrolled Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA) or autoimmune thrombocytopenia (ITP)
- Patients with active fungal, bacterial, and/or viral infection
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to Revlimid or thalidomide
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LenalidomideAlso: RevlimidLenalidomide will be taken orally days 1-21 for up to six 28-day cycles (6 cycles = 1 course of Revlimid consolidation). Revlimid will be initiated at 5mg and can be dose escalated at the start of each cycle based on individual patient tolerability to a maximum of 25 mg. The total number of treatment cycles cannot exceed 12 cycles or two courses of six cycles each. | Drug | Lenalidomide |
Primary outcome
Eradication of Residual Disease From the Marrow
Time frame: From date of first dose until then end of 12 cycles of treatment (12 months) or progression of disease, whichever comes first.
1 secondary outcome
Recording of the Occurrence of Adverse Events
Time frame: From date of first dose until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Dec 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Nemtabrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL) Refractory to Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor or Pirtobrutinib and Previously Treated With a BCL2 Inhibitor
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study of Monoclonal B Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL), Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM), and Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma (SMZL)
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia, Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Nemtabrutinib Plus Venetoclax vs Venetoclax + Rituximab (VR) in Second-line (2L) + Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL) (MK-1026-010/BELLWAVE-010).
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas J. Kipps, M.D., Ph.D. principal investigator
University of California Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Lenalidomide in people with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, run by Thomas Kipps at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Dec 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Eradication of Residual Disease From the Marrow (time frame: From date of first dose until then end of 12 cycles of treatment (12 months) or progression of disease, whichever comes first.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2016.