AzTrials
AzTrials

Tooth InjuriesNCT01599312

Forces on Teeth During Videolaryngoscopy

A study testing Forces exerted on teeth during intubation in people with Tooth Injuries and Intubation Complication, run by Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this randomized crossover trial the investigators test whether three different brands of videolaryngoscopes (VLS) exhibit reduced forces on both upper and lower teeth, and compare them with a classic Macintosh laryngoscope blade. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tooth Injuries, Intubation Complication
What is being tested?
Forces exerted on teeth during intubation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
May 2012to Sep 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Informed patient consent
  • ASA I -III
  • Age > 18 years
  • Elective surgery, other than head and/or throat surgery
  • Pre-operative Mallampati I -III
  • Fasted (≥6 hours)

Who cannot join

  • No informed patient consent
  • ASA ≥ IV
  • Age < 18 year
  • Emergency surgery, surgery of head and/of throat
  • Locoregional anaesthesia
  • Pre-operative Mallampati IV
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Fasted < 6 hours
  • Pre-operative expected difficult airway
  • No teeth, bad dentition
  • Dental crowns and/or fixed partial denture

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven

    Eindhoven, North Brabant, 5623 EJ

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Forces Exerted on Upper and Lower Teeth During Intubation: a Randomized, Cross-over Trial Comparing Indirect Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Videolaryngoscopy.

In this randomized crossover trial the investigators test whether three different brands of videolaryngoscopes (VLS) exhibit reduced forces on both upper and lower teeth, and compare them with a classic Macintosh laryngoscope blade.

Read the detailed description

During endotracheal intubation the anesthesiologist uses a laryngoscope blade to distract the tongue to achieve the best view of the glottis opening, thereby avoiding using the maxillary incisors as a fulcrum to lever the soft tissues upwards. Using the maxillary incisors as a fulcrum may otherwise result in dental trauma. It is obvious that contact with teeth and - even worse - the incidence of accidental dental trauma, is directly related to the difficulty of the intubation.

Indirect videolaryngoscopy has proven advantageous over direct laryngoscopy using a classic Macintosh blade, for improved viewing of the glottis, with subsequent more successful intubations, and a shorter effective airway time both in patients with normal and difficult airways. Previously, it has been demonstrated that the forces exerted by the anesthesiologist on the patient's maxillary incisors are reduced when using a VLS, compared with a classic Macintosh laryngoscope. However, only one type of VLS (V-MAC®, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was used or only forces applied to upper teeth were being registered.

Being tested
Forces exerted on teeth during intubation
Keywords
Videolaryngoscopy, Forces, Teeth
Medical subject headings
Tooth Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Forces exerted on teeth during intubationDevice

    Also called Macintosh laryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany), McGrath® (Aircraft Medical Ltd, Edinburgh, UK), C-MAC® (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany), GlideScope® Cobalt (Verathon Medical, Bothell, WA, USA).

    Anesthesia will be induced in the conventional matter. The classic Macintosh laryngoscope will be placed in the patient's mouth and a tube will be brought into position in front of the glottis. Hereafter, one of the three videolaryngoscopes will be placed in the patient's mouth and the endotracheal tube will be actually passed through the vocal cords. The measurement of forces applied to the teeth will be performed using Flexiforce® sensors.

Study groups in NCT01599312
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Classic Macintosh laryngoscopeOtherClassic Macintosh laryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany)
Receives: Device: Forces exerted on teeth during intubation
McGrath®OtherMcGrath® (Aircraft Medical Ltd, Edinburgh, UK)
Receives: Device: Forces exerted on teeth during intubation
C-MAC®OtherC-MAC® (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany)
Receives: Device: Forces exerted on teeth during intubation
GlideScope® CobaltOtherGlideScope® Cobalt (Verathon Medical, Bothell, WA, USA)
Receives: Device: Forces exerted on teeth during intubation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Measuring the frequency with which forces are applied to the upper and lower teeth.

    One of the three videolaryngoscopes will be placed in the patient's mouth. The measurement of forces applied to the teeth will be performed using Flexiforce® sensors.

    Measured: At intubation of the patient

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Measuring the magnitude of the forces being applied and registering the differences between (video)laryngoscopes.

    Measured: At intubation of the patient

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2012
  3. Primary completionSep 2012
  4. Study completionSep 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01599312
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL39915.060.12
Other IDs
M12-1217
Status last verified
Feb 2015
First submitted
14 May 2012
Last updated
10 Feb 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Lee RA, van Zundert AA, Maassen RL, Willems RJ, Beeke LP, Schaaper JN, van Dobbelsteen J, Wieringa PA. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors during video-assisted intubation. Anesth Analg. 2009 Jan;108(1):187-91. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818d1904.

    PubMed 19095848
  • Lee RA, van Zundert AA, Maassen RL, Wieringa PA. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors by video laryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Feb;56(2):224-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02541.x. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

    PubMed 22091734

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Forces exerted on teeth during intubation in people with Tooth Injuries and Intubation Complication, run by Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Measuring the frequency with which forces are applied to the upper and lower teeth. (time frame: At intubation of the patient). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01599312, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in