Laryngeal MasksNCT01592760
Air-Q® SP Versus Air-Q® and I-gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial
A study testing air-Q SP, air-Q and i-gel in people with Laryngeal Masks, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The air-Q Self-Pressurizing Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA SP) is a modification of the air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA). Besides the i-gel, it is the only breathing tube that sits above the vocal cords that does not require inflation of a cuff with air. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Laryngeal Masks
- What is being tested?
- air-Q SP, air-Q and i-gel
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 225 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2012to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ≥ 18 years;
- scheduled for an elective surgery or procedure; and
- general anesthesia with placement of a SGA planned.
Who cannot join
- < 18 years of age;
- non-English speaking;
- known or believed to be pregnant;
- prisoner;
- has impaired decision-making capacity;
- has symptomatic untreated gastroesophageal reflux;
Show all 11Show fewer
- has had a prior esophagectomy;
- has a known or suspected hiatal hernia;
- has vomited within twenty-four hours of the surgery or procedure;
- has known oral pathology making a proper SGA fit unlikely; or
- has any condition for which the primary anesthesia care team deems intubation with a tracheal tube to be necessary.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Air-Q® Self-Pressurizing (SP) Intubating Laryngeal Airway With the Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway and I-gel for Airway Maintenance in Adults Under General Anesthesia
The air-Q Self-Pressurizing Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA SP) is a modification of the air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA). Besides the i-gel, it is the only breathing tube that sits above the vocal cords that does not require inflation of a cuff with air. The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of the aILA-SP to maintain patency of a patient's airway during general anesthesia with that of the aILA and i-gel devices. As a measure of this ability, we hypothesized that the airway sealing pressures will be equal between the aILA-SP and aILA, but superior when comparing the aILA-SP to the i-gel (i-gel will be lower).
Read the detailed description
Laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) are a group of airway devices, alternatively referred to as supraglottic airways (SGAs), used in anesthesia that are positioned in the back of the throat (pharynx) above (supra) the glottis (windpipe opening) and the vocal cords. This is in contradistinction to a tracheal tube, which is an airway device that is placed through the vocal cords and extends to a position below the glottis (infraglottic) and resides in the trachea (windpipe). Since their first approval for use in the United States by the US Food and Drug Administration in the early 1990s, the application of SGAs has become more widespread. Initially, they were only used in anesthetized patients who were breathing on their own (i.e., spontaneously ventilating). This was, in large part, due to a relatively low airway seal pressure, the pressure with which the device seals against the throat, thereby, keeping the air pushed in by a breathing machine (ventilator) from getting into the stomach or leaking out around the device and out through the mouth - in either case, not going into the patient's lungs. The relatively low airway seal pressure (18 - 20 cmH2O) did not allow for the use of muscle relaxant (paralyzing) drugs and positive pressure ventilation. Successive generations of SGAs by a variety of manufacturers have overcome and continue to attempt to overcome limitations of earlier devices. In addition, accumulated clinical experience has made anesthesia providers more comfortable with their use. No SGA, however, is yet ideal, and incremental changes continue to appear to improve airway management and reduce airway morbidity (e.g., sore throat, jaw pain, etc.).
The air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA, Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL) is a newer, commercially-available, SGA designed for use as a primary airway and as an intubation conduit. It is available in polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-based, single use and silicone-based, reusable models. Information on its safety and effectiveness from a randomized, controlled trial in adults, undergoing general anesthesia, compared to that of the silicone-based, reusable aILA versus the LMA-Proseal™ (pLMA, North America, San Diego, CA), the current "gold standard" for SGA airway seal pressure, is available.
The air-Q® Self-Pressurizing (SP) Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA-SP, Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL) is a commercially-available, modification of the silicone-based, reusable aILA. Its overall design is identical to the aILA, but incorporates a communication orifice between the air tube and cuff, which regulates airflow into and from the cuff during periods of positive pressure and spontaneous ventilation. As such, it incorporates a self-pressurizing cuff that does not require manual inflation. Such a cuff may be advantageous insofar as it dynamically adjusts its intra-cuff pressure and fit with the patient's pharyngeal and periglottic anatomy, which may lead to a reduction in airway morbidity, while still providing the high seal pressure afforded by the aILA design.
Lastly, the i-gel (Intersurgical Inc., Liverpool, NY) is a commercially-available SGA that uses a thermoplastic elastomer to create a non-inflating, anatomically-conforming, periglottic cuff. Studies have shown it to be an easily inserted, effective airway device with a lower incidence of sore throat and neck complaints. With exception to the aILA-SP, it is the only other commercially-available SGA that does not require cuff inflation.
To date, no reports are available on the clinical performance of the aILA-SP in relation to other SGAs. Thus, the primary purpose of this study is to compare the airway seal pressure (ASP) of the aILA-SP against the aILA and i-gel in adults undergoing general anesthesia. Airway seal pressure is the most common surrogate for ventilatory capacity used in SGA studies.
- Conditions
- Laryngeal Masks
- Being tested
- air-Q SP, air-Q, i-gel
- Keywords
- air-Q SP, air-Q, i-gel, supraglottic airway device, laryngeal mask airway
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
air-Q SPDevice
air-Q SP placement for airway maintenance.
air-QDevice
air-Q placement for airway maintenance.
i-gelDevice
i-gel placement for airway maintenance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| air-Q SP | Experimental | air-Q Self-Pressurizing Intubating Laryngeal Airway, sizes 3.5 and 4.5 (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL, USA) Receives: Device: air-Q SP |
| air-Q | Active comparator | air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway, sizes 3.5 and 4.5 (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL, USA) Receives: Device: air-Q |
| i-gel | Active comparator | i-gel, sizes 3, 4, and 5 (Intersurgical Inc., Liverpool, NY, USA) Receives: Device: i-gel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Airway Seal Pressure After Device Placement
Airway seal pressure is defined as the pressure in cmH2O at which the needle of a manometer attached to the anesthesia circuit reaches equilibration, associated with an audible air leak from the subject's oropharynx or gastric insufflation, limited to a maximum pressure of 40 cmH2O. It is measured with the subject's head and neck in neutral position, the expiratory valve on the anesthesia machine closed, and the fresh gas flow set to five liters per minute.
Measured: Measured within 5 minutes after device placement/study initiation
Secondary outcomes (11)
Device Placement Time
Device placement time is the time measured in seconds from when the study investigator picks up the airway device to confirmation of ventilation by the presence of an adequate end-tidal carbon dioxide tracing on the monitor.
Measured: Measured at device placement/study initiation
Device Placement Success Rate
Device placement success rate is defined as the proportion of devices successfully placed within three attempts at device placement.
Measured: Measured at the time of attempted study device placement immediately after the induction of general anesthesia
Device Ease of Insertion
Device ease of insertion is graded as either easy, slightly difficult, difficult, or impossible. The outcome measure is the proportion of successful study device placements recorded as easy versus slightly difficult versus difficult versus impossible.
Measured: Reported by the device operator at the time successful device placement is recorded.
Device Position in Relation to the Vocal Cords
Device position in relation to the vocal cords is assessed with a flexible fiberoptic camera and graded as follows: 1 = full view of the vocal cords, 2 = partial view of the vocal cords including the arytenoids, 3 = view of the epiglottis only, and 4 = other (device cuff, pharynx or other structures).
Measured: Measured within 5 minutes of successful study device placement
Device Use Time (Min)
Device Use Time is the time recorded to the nearest minute of the period bounded by the time the device placement was determined to be adequate in the study subject to its withdrawal from the study subject.
Measured: Measured between successful device placement and device removal for any reason, approximately 2 hours
Incidence of Gastric Insufflation
Gastric insufflation is present when audible air sounds are heard by stethoscope over the subject's epigastrium.
Measured: Measured within 5 minutes of device placement/study initiation
Incidence of Gastric Aspiration
Gastric aspiration is present when gross gastric contents or bile is observed on or within the device or within the subject's oropharynx. The outcome is the proportion of study subjects in whom the outcome measure was observed.
Measured: Measured between successful device placement and device removal for any reason.
Incidence of Oropharyngeal Injury
Oropharyngeal injury is defined as a new lip, tongue, buccal, or pharyngeal abrasion or laceration or dental damage observed in the immediate recovery area after use of a study device.
Measured: Measured in the post-anesthesia care unit/recovery room within 15 minutes after device removal
Overall Clinical Usefulness
Excellent, good, fair, or inadequate. Scale defined by clinical measures and observations.
Measured: Reported by the device operator at the time of device removal
Oropharyngolaryngeal Morbidity at Discharge
Perioperative oropharyngolaryngeal morbidity is assessed by the subject's response to standardized questions regarding oropharyngeal complaints.
Measured: Measured prior to discharge from phase II of the post-anesthesia care unit/recovery room
Oropharyngolaryngeal Morbidity at 24 Hours Post-operatively
Perioperative oropharyngolaryngeal morbidity is assessed by the subject's response to standardized questions regarding oropharyngeal complaints.
Measured: Measured at 24 hours after device placement/study initiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 May 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2012
- Primary completionAug 2014
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Laryngeal MasksStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Wisconsin, MadisonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 225 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Richard E Galgon, MD, MS, Principal investigator, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01592760
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2011-0805
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 2 May 2012
- Last updated
- 17 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Not applicable. There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.
Publications
Galgon RE, Schroeder KM, Han S, Andrei A, Joffe AM. The air-Q((R)) intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-ProSeal(TM) : a prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure. Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66(12):1093-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06863.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
PubMed 21880031
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Air-Q® Self-Pressurizing (SP) Intubating Laryngeal Airway With the Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway and I-gel for Airway Maintenance in Adults Under General Anesthesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01592760
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2011-0805
- Conditions
- Laryngeal Masks
- Keywords
- air-Q SP, air-Q, i-gel, supraglottic airway device, laryngeal mask airway
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 225 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, MadisonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2012
- Primary completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 May 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Feb 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The air-Q Self-Pressurizing Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA SP) is a modification of the air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA). Besides the i-gel, it is the only breathing tube that sits above the vocal cords that does not require inflation of a cuff with air. The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of the aILA-SP to maintain patency of a patient's airway during general anesthesia with that of the aILA and i-gel devices. As a measure of this ability, we hypothesized that the airway sealing pressures will be equal between the aILA-SP and aILA, but superior when comparing the aILA-SP to the i-gel (i-gel will be lower).
Detailed description
Laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) are a group of airway devices, alternatively referred to as supraglottic airways (SGAs), used in anesthesia that are positioned in the back of the throat (pharynx) above (supra) the glottis (windpipe opening) and the vocal cords. This is in contradistinction to a tracheal tube, which is an airway device that is placed through the vocal cords and extends to a position below the glottis (infraglottic) and resides in the trachea (windpipe). Since their first approval for use in the United States by the US Food and Drug Administration in the early 1990s, the application of SGAs has become more widespread. Initially, they were only used in anesthetized patients who were breathing on their own (i.e., spontaneously ventilating). This was, in large part, due to a relatively low airway seal pressure, the pressure with which the device seals against the throat, thereby, keeping the air pushed in by a breathing machine (ventilator) from getting into the stomach or leaking out around the device and out through the mouth - in either case, not going into the patient's lungs. The relatively low airway seal pressure (18 - 20 cmH2O) did not allow for the use of muscle relaxant (paralyzing) drugs and positive pressure ventilation. Successive generations of SGAs by a variety of manufacturers have overcome and continue to attempt to overcome limitations of earlier devices. In addition, accumulated clinical experience has made anesthesia providers more comfortable with their use. No SGA, however, is yet ideal, and incremental changes continue to appear to improve airway management and reduce airway morbidity (e.g., sore throat, jaw pain, etc.).
The air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA, Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL) is a newer, commercially-available, SGA designed for use as a primary airway and as an intubation conduit. It is available in polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-based, single use and silicone-based, reusable models. Information on its safety and effectiveness from a randomized, controlled trial in adults, undergoing general anesthesia, compared to that of the silicone-based, reusable aILA versus the LMA-Proseal™ (pLMA, North America, San Diego, CA), the current "gold standard" for SGA airway seal pressure, is available.
The air-Q® Self-Pressurizing (SP) Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA-SP, Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL) is a commercially-available, modification of the silicone-based, reusable aILA. Its overall design is identical to the aILA, but incorporates a communication orifice between the air tube and cuff, which regulates airflow into and from the cuff during periods of positive pressure and spontaneous ventilation. As such, it incorporates a self-pressurizing cuff that does not require manual inflation. Such a cuff may be advantageous insofar as it dynamically adjusts its intra-cuff pressure and fit with the patient's pharyngeal and periglottic anatomy, which may lead to a reduction in airway morbidity, while still providing the high seal pressure afforded by the aILA design.
Lastly, the i-gel (Intersurgical Inc., Liverpool, NY) is a commercially-available SGA that uses a thermoplastic elastomer to create a non-inflating, anatomically-conforming, periglottic cuff. Studies have shown it to be an easily inserted, effective airway device with a lower incidence of sore throat and neck complaints. With exception to the aILA-SP, it is the only other commercially-available SGA that does not require cuff inflation.
To date, no reports are available on the clinical performance of the aILA-SP in relation to other SGAs. Thus, the primary purpose of this study is to compare the airway seal pressure (ASP) of the aILA-SP against the aILA and i-gel in adults undergoing general anesthesia. Airway seal pressure is the most common surrogate for ventilatory capacity used in SGA studies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| air-Q SP | Experimental | Device: air-Q SPair-Q Self-Pressurizing Intubating Laryngeal Airway, sizes 3.5 and 4.5 (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL, USA) |
| air-Q | Active comparator | Device: air-Qair-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway, sizes 3.5 and 4.5 (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL, USA) |
| i-gel | Active comparator | Device: i-geli-gel, sizes 3, 4, and 5 (Intersurgical Inc., Liverpool, NY, USA) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ≥ 18 years;
- scheduled for an elective surgery or procedure; and
- general anesthesia with placement of a SGA planned.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- < 18 years of age;
- non-English speaking;
- known or believed to be pregnant;
- prisoner;
- has impaired decision-making capacity;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| air-Q SPair-Q SP placement for airway maintenance. | Device | air-Q SP |
| air-Qair-Q placement for airway maintenance. | Device | air-Q |
| i-geli-gel placement for airway maintenance. | Device | i-gel |
Primary outcome
Airway Seal Pressure After Device Placement
Time frame: Measured within 5 minutes after device placement/study initiation
Airway seal pressure is defined as the pressure in cmH2O at which the needle of a manometer attached to the anesthesia circuit reaches equilibration, associated with an audible air leak from the subject's oropharynx or gastric insufflation, limited to a maximum pressure of 40 cmH2O. It is measured with the subject's head and neck in neutral position, the expiratory valve on the anesthesia machine closed, and the fresh gas flow set to five liters per minute.
11 secondary outcomes
Device Placement Time
Time frame: Measured at device placement/study initiation
Device Placement Success Rate
Time frame: Measured at the time of attempted study device placement immediately after the induction of general anesthesia
Device Ease of Insertion
Time frame: Reported by the device operator at the time successful device placement is recorded.
Device Position in Relation to the Vocal Cords
Time frame: Measured within 5 minutes of successful study device placement
Device Use Time (Min)
Time frame: Measured between successful device placement and device removal for any reason, approximately 2 hours
Incidence of Gastric Insufflation
Time frame: Measured within 5 minutes of device placement/study initiation
Incidence of Gastric Aspiration
Time frame: Measured between successful device placement and device removal for any reason.
Incidence of Oropharyngeal Injury
Time frame: Measured in the post-anesthesia care unit/recovery room within 15 minutes after device removal
Overall Clinical Usefulness
Time frame: Reported by the device operator at the time of device removal
Oropharyngolaryngeal Morbidity at Discharge
Time frame: Measured prior to discharge from phase II of the post-anesthesia care unit/recovery room
Oropharyngolaryngeal Morbidity at 24 Hours Post-operatively
Time frame: Measured at 24 hours after device placement/study initiation
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Mar 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21880031Galgon RE, Schroeder KM, Han S, Andrei A, Joffe AM. The air-Q((R)) intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-ProSeal(TM) : a prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure. Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66(12):1093-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06863.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Not applicable. There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.
Related trials for Laryngeal Masks
Not yet recruiting
Tizanidine Premedication Versus Placebo for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion and Recovery in Adults Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery
Airway Management
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Second- and Third-Generation Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Patients
Airway Management, Anesthesia, General
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Laryngeal Mask Airway vs Endotracheal Tube on Hypothermia in Laparoscopic Hernia Surgery
Perioperative Hypothermia, Hernia, Inguinal
RecruitingPhase 4
Propofol-Ketamine Versus Sevoflurane for Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization
Propofol, Ketamine
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Neuromuscular Blocking Agent Use on Video Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion
Airway Management, Supraglottic Airway Device Insertion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Richard E Galgon, MD, MS principal investigator
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing air-Q SP, air-Q and i-gel in people with Laryngeal Masks, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Feb 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Airway Seal Pressure After Device Placement (time frame: Measured within 5 minutes after device placement/study initiation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01592760, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2017.