AzTrials
AzTrials

Laryngeal MasksNCT01592760

Air-Q® SP Versus Air-Q® and I-gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial

A study testing air-Q SP, air-Q and i-gel in people with Laryngeal Masks, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The air-Q Self-Pressurizing Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA SP) is a modification of the air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA). Besides the i-gel, it is the only breathing tube that sits above the vocal cords that does not require inflation of a cuff with air. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Laryngeal Masks
What is being tested?
air-Q SP, air-Q and i-gel
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
225 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2012to Aug 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 18 years;
  • scheduled for an elective surgery or procedure; and
  • general anesthesia with placement of a SGA planned.

Who cannot join

  • < 18 years of age;
  • non-English speaking;
  • known or believed to be pregnant;
  • prisoner;
  • has impaired decision-making capacity;
  • has symptomatic untreated gastroesophageal reflux;
Show all 11Show fewer
  • has had a prior esophagectomy;
  • has a known or suspected hiatal hernia;
  • has vomited within twenty-four hours of the surgery or procedure;
  • has known oral pathology making a proper SGA fit unlikely; or
  • has any condition for which the primary anesthesia care team deems intubation with a tracheal tube to be necessary.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Air-Q® Self-Pressurizing (SP) Intubating Laryngeal Airway With the Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway and I-gel for Airway Maintenance in Adults Under General Anesthesia

The air-Q Self-Pressurizing Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA SP) is a modification of the air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA). Besides the i-gel, it is the only breathing tube that sits above the vocal cords that does not require inflation of a cuff with air. The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of the aILA-SP to maintain patency of a patient's airway during general anesthesia with that of the aILA and i-gel devices. As a measure of this ability, we hypothesized that the airway sealing pressures will be equal between the aILA-SP and aILA, but superior when comparing the aILA-SP to the i-gel (i-gel will be lower).

Read the detailed description

Laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) are a group of airway devices, alternatively referred to as supraglottic airways (SGAs), used in anesthesia that are positioned in the back of the throat (pharynx) above (supra) the glottis (windpipe opening) and the vocal cords. This is in contradistinction to a tracheal tube, which is an airway device that is placed through the vocal cords and extends to a position below the glottis (infraglottic) and resides in the trachea (windpipe). Since their first approval for use in the United States by the US Food and Drug Administration in the early 1990s, the application of SGAs has become more widespread. Initially, they were only used in anesthetized patients who were breathing on their own (i.e., spontaneously ventilating). This was, in large part, due to a relatively low airway seal pressure, the pressure with which the device seals against the throat, thereby, keeping the air pushed in by a breathing machine (ventilator) from getting into the stomach or leaking out around the device and out through the mouth - in either case, not going into the patient's lungs. The relatively low airway seal pressure (18 - 20 cmH2O) did not allow for the use of muscle relaxant (paralyzing) drugs and positive pressure ventilation. Successive generations of SGAs by a variety of manufacturers have overcome and continue to attempt to overcome limitations of earlier devices. In addition, accumulated clinical experience has made anesthesia providers more comfortable with their use. No SGA, however, is yet ideal, and incremental changes continue to appear to improve airway management and reduce airway morbidity (e.g., sore throat, jaw pain, etc.).

The air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA, Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL) is a newer, commercially-available, SGA designed for use as a primary airway and as an intubation conduit. It is available in polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-based, single use and silicone-based, reusable models. Information on its safety and effectiveness from a randomized, controlled trial in adults, undergoing general anesthesia, compared to that of the silicone-based, reusable aILA versus the LMA-Proseal™ (pLMA, North America, San Diego, CA), the current "gold standard" for SGA airway seal pressure, is available.

The air-Q® Self-Pressurizing (SP) Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA-SP, Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL) is a commercially-available, modification of the silicone-based, reusable aILA. Its overall design is identical to the aILA, but incorporates a communication orifice between the air tube and cuff, which regulates airflow into and from the cuff during periods of positive pressure and spontaneous ventilation. As such, it incorporates a self-pressurizing cuff that does not require manual inflation. Such a cuff may be advantageous insofar as it dynamically adjusts its intra-cuff pressure and fit with the patient's pharyngeal and periglottic anatomy, which may lead to a reduction in airway morbidity, while still providing the high seal pressure afforded by the aILA design.

Lastly, the i-gel (Intersurgical Inc., Liverpool, NY) is a commercially-available SGA that uses a thermoplastic elastomer to create a non-inflating, anatomically-conforming, periglottic cuff. Studies have shown it to be an easily inserted, effective airway device with a lower incidence of sore throat and neck complaints. With exception to the aILA-SP, it is the only other commercially-available SGA that does not require cuff inflation.

To date, no reports are available on the clinical performance of the aILA-SP in relation to other SGAs. Thus, the primary purpose of this study is to compare the airway seal pressure (ASP) of the aILA-SP against the aILA and i-gel in adults undergoing general anesthesia. Airway seal pressure is the most common surrogate for ventilatory capacity used in SGA studies.

Conditions
Laryngeal Masks
Being tested
air-Q SP, air-Q, i-gel
Keywords
air-Q SP, air-Q, i-gel, supraglottic airway device, laryngeal mask airway

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • air-Q SPDevice

    air-Q SP placement for airway maintenance.

  • air-QDevice

    air-Q placement for airway maintenance.

  • i-gelDevice

    i-gel placement for airway maintenance.

Study groups in NCT01592760
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
air-Q SPExperimentalair-Q Self-Pressurizing Intubating Laryngeal Airway, sizes 3.5 and 4.5 (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL, USA)
Receives: Device: air-Q SP
air-QActive comparatorair-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway, sizes 3.5 and 4.5 (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL, USA)
Receives: Device: air-Q
i-gelActive comparatori-gel, sizes 3, 4, and 5 (Intersurgical Inc., Liverpool, NY, USA)
Receives: Device: i-gel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Airway Seal Pressure After Device Placement

    Airway seal pressure is defined as the pressure in cmH2O at which the needle of a manometer attached to the anesthesia circuit reaches equilibration, associated with an audible air leak from the subject's oropharynx or gastric insufflation, limited to a maximum pressure of 40 cmH2O. It is measured with the subject's head and neck in neutral position, the expiratory valve on the anesthesia machine closed, and the fresh gas flow set to five liters per minute.

    Measured: Measured within 5 minutes after device placement/study initiation

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Device Placement Time

    Device placement time is the time measured in seconds from when the study investigator picks up the airway device to confirmation of ventilation by the presence of an adequate end-tidal carbon dioxide tracing on the monitor.

    Measured: Measured at device placement/study initiation

  2. Device Placement Success Rate

    Device placement success rate is defined as the proportion of devices successfully placed within three attempts at device placement.

    Measured: Measured at the time of attempted study device placement immediately after the induction of general anesthesia

  3. Device Ease of Insertion

    Device ease of insertion is graded as either easy, slightly difficult, difficult, or impossible. The outcome measure is the proportion of successful study device placements recorded as easy versus slightly difficult versus difficult versus impossible.

    Measured: Reported by the device operator at the time successful device placement is recorded.

  4. Device Position in Relation to the Vocal Cords

    Device position in relation to the vocal cords is assessed with a flexible fiberoptic camera and graded as follows: 1 = full view of the vocal cords, 2 = partial view of the vocal cords including the arytenoids, 3 = view of the epiglottis only, and 4 = other (device cuff, pharynx or other structures).

    Measured: Measured within 5 minutes of successful study device placement

  5. Device Use Time (Min)

    Device Use Time is the time recorded to the nearest minute of the period bounded by the time the device placement was determined to be adequate in the study subject to its withdrawal from the study subject.

    Measured: Measured between successful device placement and device removal for any reason, approximately 2 hours

  6. Incidence of Gastric Insufflation

    Gastric insufflation is present when audible air sounds are heard by stethoscope over the subject's epigastrium.

    Measured: Measured within 5 minutes of device placement/study initiation

  7. Incidence of Gastric Aspiration

    Gastric aspiration is present when gross gastric contents or bile is observed on or within the device or within the subject's oropharynx. The outcome is the proportion of study subjects in whom the outcome measure was observed.

    Measured: Measured between successful device placement and device removal for any reason.

  8. Incidence of Oropharyngeal Injury

    Oropharyngeal injury is defined as a new lip, tongue, buccal, or pharyngeal abrasion or laceration or dental damage observed in the immediate recovery area after use of a study device.

    Measured: Measured in the post-anesthesia care unit/recovery room within 15 minutes after device removal

  9. Overall Clinical Usefulness

    Excellent, good, fair, or inadequate. Scale defined by clinical measures and observations.

    Measured: Reported by the device operator at the time of device removal

  10. Oropharyngolaryngeal Morbidity at Discharge

    Perioperative oropharyngolaryngeal morbidity is assessed by the subject's response to standardized questions regarding oropharyngeal complaints.

    Measured: Measured prior to discharge from phase II of the post-anesthesia care unit/recovery room

  11. Oropharyngolaryngeal Morbidity at 24 Hours Post-operatively

    Perioperative oropharyngolaryngeal morbidity is assessed by the subject's response to standardized questions regarding oropharyngeal complaints.

    Measured: Measured at 24 hours after device placement/study initiation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2012
  3. Primary completionAug 2014
  4. Study completionAug 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
225 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01592760
Sponsor's protocol ID
2011-0805
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
2 May 2012
Last updated
17 Mar 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No: Not applicable. There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

Publications

  • Galgon RE, Schroeder KM, Han S, Andrei A, Joffe AM. The air-Q((R)) intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-ProSeal(TM) : a prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure. Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66(12):1093-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06863.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

    PubMed 21880031

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing air-Q SP, air-Q and i-gel in people with Laryngeal Masks, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Feb 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Airway Seal Pressure After Device Placement (time frame: Measured within 5 minutes after device placement/study initiation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01592760, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in