Nasolabial FoldPhase 3NCT01585220
Efficacy and Safety Study of Neuramis in Correction of Nasolabial Fold
A Phase 3 study testing HA filler in people with Nasolabial Fold, run by Medy-Tox at 2 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
This study design is a randomized, multi-center, double Masked, matched Pairs, active-controlled clinical trial. Subjects who voluntarily signed the informed consent and are judged to be eligible for this study will be intradermally injected both of study device and comparator device. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nasolabial Fold
- What is being tested?
- HA filler
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 69 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 9 Feb 2012to 30 Oct 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women aged between 30 and 75
- Subjects who wanting to correct his/her nasolabial fold and attaining grade 3 or 4 in the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale(WSRS) of nasolabial fold
- Subjects whose nasolabial folds are visually symmetric
- Subjects who agreed to restrict any treatment for the wrinkle correction at the lower orbital rim area for the duration of the study
- Subjects who can understand and comply with the instructions and all visit schedule
- Subjects who voluntarily decided the participation of the study and signed the informed consent
Who cannot join
- Subjects who had anti-coagulant therapy(excluding low-dose aspirin therapy(100mg, maximum 300mg/day dose)) within 2 weeks from the screening date
- Subjects who had previous treatment at the lower orbital rim for wrinkle correction(e.g., face lift, soft tissue augmentation, medium depth peels, dermal photorejuvenation) within 6 months from screening date
- Subjects who were treated calcium hydroxyapatite at the NLF area within a year from screening date
- Subjects who had dermal augmentation permanent implants(e.g., silicone, Softform®) at the NLF area
- Subjects who have a scar or skin lesion which can be affect to efficacy to the NLF area
- Subjects who had anaphylaxis or severe combined allergy or allergy to lidocain or hyaluronic acid
Show all 12Show fewer
- Subjects who had a history of keloid formation or hypertrophic scar
- Subjects who have a skin disorder or wound infection in the NLF area
- Subjects who participated in other clinical trial within 30 days from screening date
- The childbearing subjects who disagreed with medically acceptable contraception(e.g., condom, oral contraceptives continuing at least 3 months, contraceptives for injection or insertion, intrauterine contraceptive devices)
- Pregnant or lactating subjects
- Patients who are not eligible for this study at the medical discretion of the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
South Korea2 sites
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam, Gyunggi, 463-707
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, Gangnam, 135-710
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Multi-center, Double Masked, Matched Pairs, Active-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Injection With Neuramis as Compared to Restylane® in Correction of Nasolabial Fold
This study design is a randomized, multi-center, double Masked, matched Pairs, active-controlled clinical trial. Subjects who voluntarily signed the informed consent and are judged to be eligible for this study will be intradermally injected both of study device and comparator device. Subjects will be randomized to receive injection of study device and comparator device on their each nasolabial fold. Efficacy is evaluated based on the change in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) from baseline. Safety will be assessed based on 24 weeks follow up visits and subject diary which will be given to subjects during the first 2 weeks after the injection. Any uncomfortable things and adverse events will be investigated from subeject diary and follow up visits.
- Conditions
- Nasolabial Fold
- Being tested
- HA filler
- Keywords
- WSRS, GAIS, HA filler, filler
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HA fillerDevice
The study device and comparator device will be intradermally injected to each left and right nasolabial fold according to the randomization.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Neuramis | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: HA filler |
| Restylane® | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: HA filler |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
WSRS
The change between baseline and 24 weeks WSRS evaluated by the investigator in charge of live assessment
Measured: 24 weeks after the injection
Secondary outcomes (7)
WSRS
The change between baseline and 2, 8, 16, 24 week WSRS evaluated by the investigator in charge of photographic assessment
Measured: 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
WSRS
The change between baseline and 2, 8, 16 week WSRS evaluated by the investigator in charge of live assessment
Measured: 2, 8, 16 weeks after the injection
GAIS
The rate of subjects whose GAIS, evaluated by the investigator in charge of live assessment, is 1 point or above after 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks from the injection
Measured: 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
GAIS
The rate of subjects whose GAIS, evaluated by the subjects him/herselves, is 1 point or above after 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks from the injection
Measured: 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
WSRS
The rate of subjects whose change of WSRS, evaluated by the investigator in charge of live assessment, is 1 point or above after 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks of the injection
Measured: 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
WSRS
The rate of subjects whose change of WSRS, evaluated by the investigator in charge of photographic assessment, is 1 pointe or above after 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks of the injection
Measured: 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
Number of adverse events in subjects
Adverse events occured after informed consent, Adverse drug events, Serious adverse events, lab test, physical examination, vital signs
Measured: Up to 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Study start9 Feb 2012
- Primary completion30 Aug 2012
- Study completion30 Oct 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nasolabial FoldStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medy-Tox
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Chan Yeong Heo, Principal investigator, Seoul National University Bundang HospitalSaik Bang, Principal investigator, Samsung Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01585220
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MT_PRT_NLF01
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 24 Apr 2012
- Last updated
- 29 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Pak C, Park J, Hong J, Jeong J, Bang S, Heo CY. A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Matched-Pairs, Active-Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds. Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Nov;42(6):721-8. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.6.721. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
PubMed 26618119
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Multi-center, Double Masked, Matched Pairs, Active-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Injection With Neuramis as Compared to Restylane® in Correction of Nasolabial Fold
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01585220
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MT_PRT_NLF01
- Conditions
- Nasolabial Fold
- Keywords
- WSRS, GAIS, HA filler, filler
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medy-ToxIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 9 Feb 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study design is a randomized, multi-center, double Masked, matched Pairs, active-controlled clinical trial. Subjects who voluntarily signed the informed consent and are judged to be eligible for this study will be intradermally injected both of study device and comparator device. Subjects will be randomized to receive injection of study device and comparator device on their each nasolabial fold. Efficacy is evaluated based on the change in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) from baseline. Safety will be assessed based on 24 weeks follow up visits and subject diary which will be given to subjects during the first 2 weeks after the injection. Any uncomfortable things and adverse events will be investigated from subeject diary and follow up visits.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Neuramis | Experimental | Device: HA filler |
| Restylane® | Active comparator | Device: HA filler |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Men and women aged between 30 and 75
- Subjects who wanting to correct his/her nasolabial fold and attaining grade 3 or 4 in the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale(WSRS) of nasolabial fold
- Subjects whose nasolabial folds are visually symmetric
- Subjects who agreed to restrict any treatment for the wrinkle correction at the lower orbital rim area for the duration of the study
- Subjects who can understand and comply with the instructions and all visit schedule
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Subjects who had anti-coagulant therapy(excluding low-dose aspirin therapy(100mg, maximum 300mg/day dose)) within 2 weeks from the screening date
- Subjects who had previous treatment at the lower orbital rim for wrinkle correction(e.g., face lift, soft tissue augmentation, medium depth peels, dermal photorejuvenation) within 6 months from screening date
- Subjects who were treated calcium hydroxyapatite at the NLF area within a year from screening date
- Subjects who had dermal augmentation permanent implants(e.g., silicone, Softform®) at the NLF area
- Subjects who have a scar or skin lesion which can be affect to efficacy to the NLF area
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HA fillerThe study device and comparator device will be intradermally injected to each left and right nasolabial fold according to the randomization. | Device | Neuramis, Restylane® |
Primary outcome
WSRS
Time frame: 24 weeks after the injection
The change between baseline and 24 weeks WSRS evaluated by the investigator in charge of live assessment
7 secondary outcomes
WSRS
Time frame: 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
WSRS
Time frame: 2, 8, 16 weeks after the injection
GAIS
Time frame: 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
GAIS
Time frame: 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
WSRS
Time frame: 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
WSRS
Time frame: 2, 8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
Number of adverse events in subjects
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Mar 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26618119Pak C, Park J, Hong J, Jeong J, Bang S, Heo CY. A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Matched-Pairs, Active-Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds. Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Nov;42(6):721-8. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.6.721. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
Related trials for Nasolabial Fold
Recruiting
A Study to Confirm Safety and Effectiveness of RADIESSE® Injectable Implant for the Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Folds
Not yet recruiting
Dermal Evaluation of Facetem™ S in Nasolabial Folds Esthetics Improvement: DEFINE Study
Nasolabial Folds
Active, not recruiting
Post Market Clinical Follow up Evaluating the Performance and Safety of Juläine(TM) on Nasolabial Fold Wrinkles
Nasolabial Fold
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Assess Adverse Events and How Effective NOA LIFT is Compared to JUVÉDERM VOLIFT With Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds in Adults
Nasolabial Folds
Recruiting
THE EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE OF AN INJECTABLE HYALURONIC ACID FILLER
Lips Enhancement Nasolabial Fold Correction Midface Volume Deficit
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chan Yeong Heo principal investigator
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Saik Bang principal investigator
Samsung Medical Center
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing HA filler in people with Nasolabial Fold, run by Medy-Tox at 2 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
WSRS (time frame: 24 weeks after the injection). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01585220, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2019.