AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CancerNCT01574677

Assessment of Septin9 Biomarker for Detection of Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test

An observational study of Colorectal Cancer, run by Epigenomics, Inc at 2 sites in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States and affects men and women almost equally. The United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) currently recommends screening with any of three options, which include fecal testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 49 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Cancer
How many people
0 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2012to not given
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 49 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Eligible subjects will be identified at Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) and Kaiser Permanente Georgia (KPGA). KPNW is a nonprofit group-model HMO with membership of about 485,000 in SW Washington and NW Oregon. KPNW includes 797 physician s and 395 allied clinicians (265 primary care providers). The member population base is similar to the local insured community in terms of age, gender, race, and ethnicity. About 19% of members are racial and ethnic minorities. Membership of KPGA has a racial and socioeconomic distribution similar to metropolitan Atlanta: ~ 50% Caucasian, 45% African American, 4% Hispanic, and 1% other races. 90 percent of the KPGA membership receives primary care at 12 medical offices owned and operated by KPGA and through contracts with 125 community practices.

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 49-80
  • Member of Kaiser Permanente Northwest or Southeast
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Had a positive fecal screening (FIT) and has an active referral to colonoscopy

Who cannot join

  • Having a personal history of colon cancer
  • Having had a prior colonoscopy within 5 years
  • Currently under hospice care
  • Currently in a skilled nursing facility
  • Currently being treated for active cancer (any type)
  • Having ever had carcinoid tumor or full colectomy
  • Having indicated a preference at enrollment into Kaiser health plan to not participate in research

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Kaiser Permanente Georgia

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30300

  • Kaiser Permanente Northwest

    Portland, Oregon, 97227

Other trials in United States

About this study

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States and affects men and women almost equally. The United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) currently recommends screening with any of three options, which include fecal testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy.

Screening for CRC with fecal occult blood testing (using a guaiac-based test) done annually or biennially has been shown to decrease mortality 15-33% primarily through detection of early stage cancer. Guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) has a known positive balance of benefit and risk in screening populations, is the least expensive, and is the preferred method of screening in 30-55% of patients. The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) offers significant improvements over the gFOBT, most notably that it is easier to use (requires fewer samples and no dietary or medication restrictions) and is more sensitive than the gFOBT with respect to detecting both CRC and precancerous adenomas. As a result of improved test performance and usability, in 2008 multiple professional societies endorsed the use of four types of FITs for colorectal cancer screening. Kaiser Permanente currently uses the OC-Micro FIT as the fecal screening test in all regions.

Read more

In recent years, intensive efforts have been undertaken to identify blood-based markers that may provide a promising alternative or supplement to fecal testing for non-invasive CRC screening. One method under development is to identify aberrantly methylated genes in cancer tissue through a blood test. Prior studies have explored those specific colorectal cancer genes that show the highest differences in methylation between the cancer and background genetic expression. Of these, methylation of the Septin 9 gene through a qPCR assay is relatively well studied.

The proposed study aims to evaluate whether the Septin 9 biomarker may be used to supplement the OC-Micro FIT for colorectal cancer screening in such a way as to safely reduce unneeded colonoscopies. The population of interest for this study-those with a positive screening OC-Micro fecal immunochemical test-has a CRC prevalence of approximately 5%. Knowing how well Septin 9 can identify those without cancer prior to colonoscopy is important largely because colonoscopy, even when done diagnostically (e.g., after a positive FIT result), can cause serious complications.

Keywords
Colorectal cancer, fecal immunochemical test, Septin 9, screening
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01574677
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Screening FIT positivePatients aged 49-80, with a positive screening FIT, who are referred to colonoscopy, and who meet inclusion criteria.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Performance characteristics of the Septin 9 biomarker among patients who have a positive FIT result

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Septin 9 (relative to colonoscopy) for detecting CRC in a sample of individuals with a positive test result for single-sample OC-Micro FIT using various thresholds for Septin 9 positivity.

    Measured: Participants are prospectively enrolled. Eligible participants will be asked to provide a blood sample at least 2 days prior to receiving a colonoscopy. The timeframe for participation will generally be within 3 months of receiving a positive FIT result.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Concordance and discordance (Kappa scores) between Septin 9 test results and colonoscopy findings associated with patient demographic factors.

    Patient demographic factor such as age and gender will be assessed.

    Measured: The timeframe for participation will generally be within 3 months of receiving a positive FIT result.

  2. Concordance and discordance (Kappa scores) between Septin 9 test results and colonoscopy findings associated with co-morbid conditions.

    Co-morbid conditions will include, for example, diabetes, congestive heart failure, etc.

    Measured: The timeframe for participation will generally be within 3 months of receiving a positive FIT result.

  3. Concordance and discordance (Kappa scores) between Septin 9 test results and colonoscopy findings associated with specific medication use practices.

    Medications will include common medications in screening population (ie. blood thinners).

    Measured: The timeframe for participation will generally be within 3 months of receiving a positive FIT result.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Apr 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01574677
Sponsor's protocol ID
Septin 9 Colorectal Biomarker
Status last verified
Aug 2014
First submitted
20 Mar 2012
Last updated
4 Aug 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Colorectal Cancer, run by Epigenomics, Inc at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Performance characteristics of the Septin 9 biomarker among patients who have a positive FIT result (time frame: Participants are prospectively enrolled. Eligible participants will be asked to provide a blood sample at least 2 days prior to receiving a colonoscopy. The timeframe for participation will generally be within 3 months of receiving a positive FIT result.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in