AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast NeoplasmsPhase 3PERUSENCT01572038

A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Trastuzumab (Herceptin) and a Taxane in First-Line Treatment in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Docetaxel, Nab-paclitaxel and Paclitaxel in people with Breast Neoplasms, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 299 sites in 39 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, Phase IIIb study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of pertuzumab in combination with trastuzumab (Herceptin) and a taxane (docetaxel, paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel) in first-line treatment in participants with metastatic or locally recurrent HER2-positive breast cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Breast Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Docetaxel, Nab-paclitaxel and Paclitaxel
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,436 participants
Where
299 sitesin 39 countries
Study dates
1 Jun 2012to 20 Sep 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast with metastatic or locally recurrent disease not amenable to curative resection
  • HER2-positive breast cancer
  • Eastern cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2
  • LVEF of at least 50 percent (%)

Who cannot join

  • Previous systemic non-hormonal anti-cancer therapy for metastatic or locally recurrent disease
  • Disease-free interval from completion of adjuvant or neoadjuvant systemic non-hormonal treatment to recurrence less than or equal to (</=) 6 months
  • Previous approved or investigative anti-HER2 agents in any breast cancer treatment setting, except for trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting
  • Disease progression while receiving trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting
  • History of persistent Grade 2 or higher (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [NCI-CTC], Version 4.0) hematological toxicity resulting from previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy
  • Central nervous system (CNS) metastases
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Current peripheral neuropathy of Grade 3 or greater (NCI-CTC, version 4.0)
  • History of other malignancy within the last 5 years prior to first study drug administration, except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma
  • Inadequate bone marrow, liver or renal function
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Hepatitis B, hepatitis C or Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection

Trial locations and contacts

299 sites in 39 countries.

299 sites in 39 countries

Spain48 sites
  • Fundacion Hospital de Alcorcon; Servicio de Oncologia

    Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922

  • Hospital Virgen de los Lirios; Servicio de Oncologia

    Alcoy, Alicante, 03804

  • Hospital de Barbastro; Servicio de Oncologia

    Barbastro, Huesca, 22300

  • Hospital Quiron Barcelona; Servicio de Oncologia

    Barcelona, 08024

  • Hospital Clínic i Provincial; Servicio de Hematología y Oncología

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau; Servicio de Oncologia

    Barcelona, 08041

  • Hospital de Basurto; Servicio de Oncologia

    Bilbao, Vizcaya, 48013

  • Complejo Asistencial Universitario De Burgos; Servicio de Oncologia

    Burgos, 09006

  • Hospital San Pedro De Alcantara; Servicio de Oncologia

    Cáceres, 10003

  • Hospital Provincial de Castellon; Servicio de Oncologia

    Castellon, Castellon, 12002

  • Hospital General de Elda; Servicio de Oncologia

    Elda, Alicante, 03600

  • Hospital de Cabueñes; Servicio de Oncologia

    Gijón, Principality of Asturias, 33394

  • Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta; Servicio de Oncologia

    Girona, 17007

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves; Servicio de Oncologia

    Granada, 18014

  • Hospital General Universitario de Guadalajara; Servicio de Oncologia

    Guadalajara, 19002

  • Hospital de Jerez de la Frontera; Servicio de Oncologia

    Jerez de la Frontera, Cadiz, 11407

  • Hospital Universitario Materno Infantil de Gran Canaria; Servicio de Oncologia

    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, LAS Palmas, 35016

  • Hospital de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin; Servicio de Oncologia

    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, LAS Palmas, 35020

  • Hospital Severo Ochoa; Servicio de Oncologia

    Leganés, Madrid, 28911

  • Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Leon; Servicio de Oncologia

    León, 24071

  • Complejo Hospitalario San Millan - San Pedro; Servicio de Oncologia

    Logroño, La Rioja, 26006

  • Centro Oncologico MD Anderson Internacional; Servicio de Oncologia

    Madrid, 28033

  • Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Servicio de Oncologia

    Madrid, 28034

  • Fundacion Jimenez Diaz; Servicio de Oncologia

    Madrid, 28040

  • Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos; Servicio de Oncologia

    Madrid, 28040

  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre; Servicio de Oncologia

    Madrid, 28041

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz; Servicio de Oncologia

    Madrid, 28046

  • HOSPITAL DE MADRID NORTE SANCHINARRO- CENTRO INTEGRAL ONCOLOGICO CLARA CAMPAL; Servicio de Oncologia

    Madrid, 28050

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria; Servicio de Oncologia

    Málaga, 29010

  • Hospital General Universitario J.M Morales Meseguer; Servicio de Oncologia

    Murcia, 30008

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de Arrixaca; Servicio de Oncologia

    Murcia, 30120

  • Hospital de Navarra; Servicio de Oncologia

    Navarra, Navarre, 31008

  • Complejo Hospitalario de Orense; Servicio de Oncologia

    Ourense, 32005

  • Hospital Universitario Son Espases

    Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07014

  • Clinica Universitaria de Navarra; Servicio de Oncologia

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008

  • Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus; Servicio de Oncologia

    Reus, Tarragona, 43204

  • Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli; Servicio de Oncologia

    Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208

  • Hospital de Sagunto; Servicio de Oncologia

    Sagunto, Valencia, 46520

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio de Oncologia

    Salamanca, 37007

  • Complejo Hospitalario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria; Servicio de Oncologia

    Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, 38010

  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS) ; Servicio de Oncologia

    Santiago de Compostela, LA Coruña, 15706

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena; Servicio de Oncologia

    Seville, 41009

  • Hospital Arnau de Vilanova (Valencia) Servicio de Oncologia

    Valencia, 46015

  • Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset

    Valencia, 46017

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid; Servicio de Oncologia

    Valladolid, 47005

  • Hospital de Rio Hortega; Servicio de Oncologia

    Valladolid, 47010

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa; Servicio de Oncologia

    Zaragoza, 50009

  • Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet; Servicio Oncologia

    Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom31 sites
  • Royal United Hospital; Oncology Department

    Bath, BA1 3NG

  • City Hospital NHS Trust

    Birmingham, B18 7QH

  • Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre

    Bristol, BS2 8ED

  • Addenbrookes Hospital; Dept of Oncology

    Cambridge, CB2 2QQ

  • Velindre Hospital

    Cardiff, CF14 2TL

  • Walsgrave Hospital

    Coventry, CV2 2DX

  • Royal Derby Hospital

    Derby, DE22 3NE

  • University Hospital of North Durham

    Durham, DH15TW

  • Hairmyres Hospital; Oncology Dept

    East Kilbride, G75 8RG

  • Eastbourne District Hospital; Department of Pharmacy

    Eastbourne, BN21 2UD

  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre

    Glasgow, G12 0YN

  • Diana Princess of Wales Hosp.

    Grimsby, DN33 2BA

  • Royal Surrey County Hospital

    Guildford, GU2 7XX

  • Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust;St James's Institute of Onc

    Leeds, LS9 7TF

  • Huddersfield Royal Infirmary - Pharmacy department

    Lindley, HD3 3EA

  • Barts and the London NHS Trust.

    London, EC1A 7BE

  • Royal Free Hospital; Dept of Oncology

    London, NW3 2QG

  • Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    London, SE5 9RS

  • Royal Marsden Hospital - London

    London, SW3 6JJ

  • Macclesfield District General Hospital

    Macclesfield, SK10 3BL

  • Christie Hospital; Breast Cancer Research Office

    Manchester, M20 4QL

  • James Cook Uni Hospital

    Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW

  • Freeman Hospital; Northern Centre For Cancer Care

    New Castle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN

  • Mount Vernon Cancer Centre

    Northwood, HA6 2RN

  • Churchill Hospital

    Oxford, OX3 7LJ

  • Peterborough City Hospital

    Peterborough, PE3 9GZ

  • Derriford Hospital; Plymouth Oncology Centre

    Plymouth, PL6 8DH

  • Musgrove Park Hospital

    Somerset, TA1 5DA

  • The Royal Marsden Hospital

    Sutton, SM2 5PT

  • Royal Cornwall Hospital

    Truro, TR1 3LQ

  • Wishaw General Hospital

    Wishaw, ML2 0DP

Other trials in United Kingdom

France29 sites
  • Clinique De L Europe; Radiotherapie Chimiotherapie

    Amiens, 80090

  • ICO Paul Papin; Oncologie Medicale.

    Angers, 49055

  • Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine; Chimiotherapie Radiotherapie

    Bordeaux, 33077

  • Centre Hospitalier Fleyriat; Oncologie/Hematologie

    Bourg-en-Bresse, 01012

  • Centre Leonard De Vinci;Chimiotherapie

    Dechy, 59187

  • Fondation Clement Drevon; Oncology

    Dijon, 21000

  • Centre Georges Francois Leclerc; Oncologie 3

    Dijon, 21079

  • Clinique Sainte Marguerite; Oncologie Medicale

    Hyères, 83400

  • Polyclinique de Blois; Chimiotherapie Ambulatoire

    La Chaussée-Saint-Victor, 41260

  • Clinique Victor Hugo

    LeMans, 72000

  • Polyclinique Du Bois; Centre Bourgogne

    Lille, 59000

  • Clinique Chenieux; Oncology

    Limoges, 87039

  • Centre Leon Berard; Departement Oncologie Medicale

    Lyon, 69373

  • Institut Paoli Calmettes; Oncologie Medicale

    Marseille, 13273

  • Centre Azureen De Cancerologie; Cons externes

    Mougins, 06250

  • Hopital Cochin; Unite Fonctionnelle D Oncologie

    Paris, 75014

  • Hopital Hotel Dieu; Oncologie Medicale

    Paris, 75181

  • Institut Curie; Oncologie Medicale

    Paris, 75231

  • Hopital Saint Louis; Service Onco Thoracique

    Paris, 75475

  • Centre Catalan D' Oncologie

    Perpignan, 66000

  • Polyclinique De Courlancy; Centre Radiotherapie Oncologie

    Reims, 51057

  • Centre Eugene Marquis; Unite Huguenin

    Rennes, 35042

  • Centre Rene Huguenin; ONCOLOGIE GENETIQUE

    Saint-Cloud, 92210

  • Chp Saint Gregoire; Cancerologie Radiotherapie

    Saint-Grégoire, 35768

  • Ico Rene Gauducheau; Oncologie

    Saint-Herblain, 44805

  • Institut D Oncologie Medical

    Strasbourg, 67000

  • Institut Claudius Regaud; Departement Oncologie Medicale

    Toulouse, 31059

  • Hopital Prive Drome Ardeche; Hopital De Jour

    Valence, 26000

  • Clinique Onco Des Dentellieres; Chimiotherapie Radiotherapie

    Valenciennes, 59300

Other trials in France

Germany20 sites
  • Klinikum am Bruderwald; Frauenklinik

    Bamberg, 96049

  • Gynaekologicum Bremen; Prof. Dr. Willibald Schröder

    Bremen, 28211

  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen; Frauenklinik

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Universitätsklinikum Essen; Zentrum Für Frauenheilkunde

    Essen, 45122

  • Klinikum Esslingen; Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe

    Esslingen am Neckar, 73730

  • AGAPLESION Markus-Krankenhaus

    Frankfurt, 60431

  • SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe

    Gera, 07548

  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf; Frauenklinik

    Hamburg, 20246

  • Gynaekologisch-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Prof. Dr. med. Lueck, Dr. Schrader und Dr. Noeding

    Hanover, 30177

  • Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) ; Gyn. Onk. Frauenklinik; Uniklinikum Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes; Klinik f. Frauenheilkunden und Geburtshilfe

    Homburg/Saar, 66424

  • St.-Vincenz-Krankenhaus; Frauenklinik

    Limburg, 65549

  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein / Campus Lübeck; Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe

    Lübeck, 23538

  • Brustzentrum Rhein-Ruhr Servicegesellschaft mbH

    Mönchengladbach, 41061

  • Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München; Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde

    München, 81675

  • Ruppiner Kliniken, Klinik fuer Gynaekologie und Geburtshilfe

    Neuruppin, 16816

  • Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Rotenburg

    Rotenburg (Wümme), 27356

  • Praxis Dr. Wagner

    Saarbrücken, 66113

  • Kreiskrankenhaus Torgau; Abt.Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

    Torgau, 04860

  • Universitätsklinik Tübingen; Frauenklinik

    Tübingen, 72076

Other trials in Germany

Italy19 sites
  • Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona; Oncology

    Ancona, The Marches, 60121

  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Giuseppe Moscati

    Avellino, Campania, 83100

  • Asst Papa Giovanni XXIII; Oncologia Medica

    Bergamo, Lombardy, 24127

  • Arcispedale S.Anna; Oncologia Medica

    Cona (Ferrara), Veneto, 44124

  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi;S.C. Oncologia Medica 1

    Florence, Tuscany, 50139

  • Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera; S.C. Oncologia Medica

    Genoa, Liguria, 16128

  • Ospedale Mater Salutis; Dept of Oncology

    Legnago, Lombardy, 37045

  • Irccs Ospedale San Raffaele;Oncologia Medica

    Milan, Lombardy, 20132

  • Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia

    Milan, Lombardy, 20141

  • Ospedale Maggiore Della Carita; Oncologia Medica

    Novara, Piedmont, 28100

  • Irccs Policlinico S. Matteo - Uni Pavia; Clinica Medica I Div. Med. Int. Onc. Medica E Gastroent.

    Pavia, Lombardy, 27100

  • Az. Osp. Ospedale Civile; U.O. Di Oncologia Medica Ed Ematologia

    Piacenza, Emilia-Romagna, 29100

  • Ospedale Degli Infermi Di Biella; Reparto Oncologia Medica

    Ponderano (BI), Piedmont, 13875

  • Ospedale Di Macerata; Oncologia

    Province of Macerata, The Marches, 62100

  • Azienda USL di Ravenna; Unità Operativa di Oncologia Medica

    Ravenna, Emilia-Romagna, 48100

  • Ospedale S. Vincenzo; Oncologia Medica

    Taormina, Sicily, 98030

  • Fondazione Del Piemonte; Medical Oncology

    Turin, Piedmont, 70060

  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Dipartimento Interaziendale Di Oncologia

    Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, 33100

  • Ospedale Belcolle Di Viterbo; Oncologia

    Viterbo, Lazio, 01100

Other trials in Italy

Israel12 sites
  • Soroka Medical Center; Oncology Dept

    Beersheba, 8410100

  • Rambam Medical Center; Oncology

    Haifa, 3109601

  • Wolfson Hospital; Oncology

    Holon, 5822012

  • Shaare Zedek Medical Center; Oncology Dept

    Jerusalem, 9103102

  • Hadassah Ein Karem Hospital; Oncology Dept

    Jerusalem, 9112000

  • Nahariya Hospital; Oncology

    Nahariya, 22100

  • Rabin Medical Center; Oncology Dept

    Petah Tikva, 4941492

  • Chaim Sheba Medical Center; Oncology Dept

    Ramat Gan, 5262100

  • Kaplan Medical Center; Oncology Inst.

    Rehovot, 7610001

  • Sourasky / Ichilov Hospital; Dept. of Oncology

    Tel Aviv, 6423906

  • Assuta Medical Centre; Oncology

    Tel Aviv

  • Assaf Harofeh; Oncology

    Tsrifin, 6093000

Other trials in Israel

Canada10 sites
  • William Osler Health System Brampton Civic Hospital

    Brampton, Ontario, L6R 3J7

  • Cross Cancer Institute ; Dept of Medical Oncology

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • CSSS champlain - Charles-Le Moyne

    Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1

  • Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; Oncology

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9

  • Grand River Hospital

    Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 1G3

  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0C2

  • McGill University; Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital; Oncology

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2

  • Lions Gate Hospital

    North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7L 2L7

  • Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

  • Bcca - Vancouver Island Cancer Centre; Oncology

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 6V5

Other trials in Canada

China9 sites
  • Beijing Cancer Hospital

    Beijing, 100142

  • Southwest Hospital , Third Military Medical University

    Chongqing, 400038

  • Sun Yet-sen University Cancer Center

    Guangzhou, 510060

  • Heilongjiang Provincial Tumor Hospital

    Harbin, 150040

  • Jiangsu Cancer Hospital

    Nanjing, 210009

  • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center

    Shanghai, 200120

  • Tianjin Cancer Hospital

    Tianjin, 300060

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of The Fourth Military Medical University (Xijing Hospital)

    Xi'an, 710032

  • First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Xi'an Jiaotong University

    Xi'an, 710061

Other trials in China

Austria8 sites
  • Lkh-Univ. Klinikum Graz; Klinik Für Gynäkologie

    Graz, 8036

  • LKH-UNIV. KLINIKUM GRAZ; Klinische Abteilung für Onkologie

    Graz, 8036

  • Tiroler Landeskrankenanstalten Ges.M.B.H.; Abt. Für Gynäkologie

    Innsbruck, 6020

  • Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern; Abt. fur Innere Medizin 1

    Linz, 4010

  • Lkh Salzburg - Univ. Klinikum Salzburg; Iii. Medizinische Abt.

    Salzburg, 5020

  • A.Ö. Lhk; Ii. Medizinische Abt. Mit Schwerpunkt Gaströnter. & Onkologie

    Steyr, 4400

  • Medizinische Universität Wien; Univ.Klinik für Frauenheilkunde - Klinik für Gynäkologie

    Vienna, 1090

  • Medizinische Universität Wien; Univ.Klinik für Innere Medizin I - Abt. für Onkologie

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Mexico8 sites
  • Iem-Fucam

    D.F., 04980

  • Medica Sur Centro Oncologico Integral

    D.F., 14050

  • Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia; Oncology

    Distrito Federal, 14080

  • Consultorio de Medicina Especializada; Dentro de Condominio San Francisco

    Mexico City, 03100

  • Centro Medico Nacional Siglo Xxi - Imss; Hospital de Oncologia

    Mexico City, 06720

  • Hospital General de México; Unidad de Oncologia

    Mexico City, 06726

  • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas Y de La Nutricion Zubirán

    Mexico City, Tlalpan 14000

  • Cancerologia de Queretaro; Oncologia

    Queretaro, Queretaro, 76090

Other trials in Mexico

Netherlands8 sites
  • Medisch Centrum Alkmaar

    Alkmaar, 1815 JD

  • Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis

    Dordrecht, 3318 AT

  • Catharina ZKHS; Inwendige Geneeskunde Afd.

    Eindhoven, 5623 EJ

  • Martini Ziekenhuis; Dept of Internal Medicine

    Groningen, 9728 NT

  • Mc Haaglanden, Locatie Antoniushove; Interne Geneeskunde

    Leidschendam, 2262 BA

  • Ikazia Ziekenhuis; Interne Oncologie

    Rotterdam, 3083 AN

  • Twee Steden Ziekenhuis - Locatie Tilburg; Interne Geneesekunde

    Tilburg, 5042 AD

  • Vie Curie

    Venlo, 5912 BL

Other trials in Netherlands

Portugal8 sites
  • IPO de Coimbra; Servico de Oncologia Medica

    Coimbra, 3000-075

  • Hospital do Espirito Santo; Servico de Oncologia Medica

    Evora, 7000-811

  • Centro Clinico Champalimaud; Oncologia Medica

    Lisbon, 1400-038

  • Hospital da Luz; Departamento de Oncologia Medica

    Lisbon, 1500-650

  • Hospital de Santa Maria; Servico de Oncologia Medica

    Lisbon, 1649-035

  • Hospital Beatriz Angelo; Departamento de Oncologia

    Loures, 2674-514

  • IPO do Porto; Servico de Oncologia Medica

    Porto, 4200-072

  • Hospital de Sao Joao; Servico de Oncologia

    Porto, 4200-319

Other trials in Portugal

Brazil7 sites
  • Hospital Amaral Carvalho

    Jaú, São Paulo, 17210-120

  • Hospital Sao Lucas - PUCRS

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000

  • Oncologistas Associados

    Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 22271-110

  • Hospital Sirio Libanes; Centro de Oncologia

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 01308-050

  • Hospital Perola Byington

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 01317-000

  • Hospital das Clinicas - FMUSP

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000

  • Hospital Sao Jose

    São Paulo, São Paulo, CEP 01321-001

Other trials in Brazil

Greece7 sites
  • Anticancer Hospital Ag. Savas ; 2Nd Dept. of Oncology - Internal Medicine

    Athens, 115 22

  • Hippokratio Hospital; 2Nd Internal Medicine

    Athens, 115 27

  • University General Hospital of Heraklion

    Crete, 711 10

  • University Hospital of Larissa; Oncology

    Larissa, 413 35

  • University Hospital of Patras Medical Oncology

    Pátrai, 265 04

  • Euromedical General Clinic of Thessaloniki; Oncology Department

    Thessaloniki, 546 45

  • Papageorgiou General Hospital; Medical Oncology

    Thessaloniki, 564 29

Other trials in Greece

Australia6 sites
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Medical Oncology

    Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050

  • Canberra Hospital; Medical Oncology

    Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2606

  • HOCA Chermside

    Chermside, Queensland, 4032

  • Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre; Cancer Services

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3084

  • Royal Melbourne Hospital; Hematology and Medical Oncology

    Parkville, Victoria, 3052

  • Mater Hospital; Cancer Services

    South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101

Other trials in Australia

Hungary6 sites
  • Szent Margit Hospital; Dept. of Oncology

    Budapest, 1032

  • Fovarosi Szent Laszlo Korhaz-Rendelointezet; Onkologiai Osztaly X

    Budapest, 1097

  • Orszagos Onkologial Intezet; Onkologiai Osztaly X

    Budapest, 1122

  • Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont ; Department of Oncology

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Borsod-Abauj-Zemplen Megyei Korhaz Es Egyetemi Oktato Korhaz; Onkologiai Osztaly

    Miskolc, 3501

  • Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem, AOK, Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont, Onkoterapias Klinika

    Szeged, 6720

Other trials in Hungary

Poland6 sites
  • Bialostockie Centrum Onkologii; Oddzial Onkologii Klinicznej

    Bialystok, 15-027

  • Świętokrzyskie Centrum Onkologii; Dział Chemioterapii

    Kielce, 25-734

  • Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie, Oddział Kliniczny Kliniki Onkologii

    Krakow, 30-688

  • Wojewodzkie Wielospecjalistyczne Centrum Onkologii i Traumatologii; Poradnia Chemioterapii

    Lodz, 93-513

  • Europejskie Centrum Zdrowia Otwock Szpital im. Fryderyka Chopina, Klinika Onkologii

    Otwock, 05-400

  • Cent.Onkologii-Instytut im. M. S-Curie, Klinika Now. Piersi i Chirurgii Rekon

    Warsaw, 02-781

Other trials in Poland

Sweden6 sites
  • Gävle Sjukhus; Onkologiska Kliniken

    Gävle, 80187

  • Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset; Jubileumskliniken

    Gothenburg, 413 45

  • Centralsjukhuset Karlstad, Onkologkliniken

    Karlstad, 65185

  • Skånes University Hospital, Skånes Department of Onclology

    Lund, 221 85

  • Västmanlands sjukhus Västerås, Onkologkliniken

    Västerås, 72189

  • Centrallasarettet Växjö, Onkologkliniken

    Vaxjo, 35185

Other trials in Sweden

Belgium5 sites
  • UZ Brussel

    Brussels, 1090

  • UZ Antwerpen

    Edegem, 2650

  • UZ Gent

    Ghent, 9000

  • UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, 3000

  • CHU Sart-Tilman

    Liège, 4000

Other trials in Belgium

Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
  • Baskent University Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Practice and Research Hospital; Medical Oncology

    Adana, 01250

  • Akdeniz University Medical Faculty; Medical Oncology Department

    Antalya, 07070

  • Ege University Medical Faculty; Medical Oncology Department

    Bornova, İ̇zmi̇r, 35100

  • Trakya University Medical Faculty Research And Practice Hospital Medical Oncology Department

    Edirne, 22770

  • Hacettepe Uni Medical Faculty Hospital; Oncology Dept

    Sihhiye/Ankara, 06230

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Finland4 sites
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital; Oncology Clinics

    Helsinki, 00029

  • Satakunta Central Hospital; Oncology

    Pori, 28500

  • Tampere University Hospital; Dept of Oncology

    Tampere, 33520

  • Turku Uni Central Hospital; Oncology Clinics

    Turku, 20520

Other trials in Finland

Ukraine4 sites
  • Mun. Multifield Clin.Hosp.#4,Dept. of Chemotherapy, DSMU; Chair of Oncology and Medical Radiology

    Dnipropetrovsk, 49102

  • Kyiv City Clinical Oncological Center; Chemotherapy Department

    Kiev, 03115

  • State Oncology Regional Treatment-Diagnostic Center; Chemotherapy Department

    Lviv, 79031

  • Zaporozhye Regional Oncology Hospital; Dept of Oncology

    Zaporizhzhya, 69104

Other trials in Ukraine

Egypt3 sites
  • Manial Specialized Hospital; Oncology

    Cairo, 11555

  • El Mokatam HIO Hospital

    Cairo, 11654

  • Nci; Oncology Dept

    Cairo, 11796

Other trials in Egypt

Pakistan3 sites
  • Shifa International Hospital; Department of Oncology

    Islamabad, 44000

  • Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital; Department of Oncology

    Lahore, 54000

  • Hameed Latif Hospital; Department of Oncology

    Lahore, 54600

Other trials in Pakistan

Peru3 sites
  • Instituto;Oncologico Miraflores

    Lima, 18

  • Clinica Internacional, Sede San Borja; Unidad de Investigacion de Clínica Internacional

    Lima, Lima 41

  • Hospital Nacional LNS dela Policia Nacional del Perú. Unidad Onco; Deapartamento de Oncología

    Lima, Lima11

Other trials in Peru

Uruguay3 sites
  • Grupo Oncológico Cooperativo Uruguayo; Hospital de Clínicas - Dpto. de Oncología

    Montevideo, 11400

  • Hospital Central De Las FF.AA.; Servicio De Oncologia

    Montevideo, 11600

  • Hospital Pereira Rossell; Oncology Department

    Montevideo, 11600

Other trials in Uruguay

Argentina2 sites
  • Centro Oncologico Riojano Integral (CORI)

    La Rioja, F5300COE

  • Instituto de Oncología de Rosario

    Rosario, S2000KZE

Other trials in Argentina

Ecuador2 sites
  • Hospital Solca Portoviejo; Oncologia

    Portoviejo, EC130104

  • Hospital Solca Quito; Oncologia

    Quito, EC170124

Other trials in Ecuador

Estonia2 sites
  • North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation; Oncology Center

    Tallinn, 13419

  • Tartu University Hospital; Clinic of Hematology and Oncology

    Tartu, 50406

Other trials in Estonia

Lebanon2 sites
  • American University of Beirut - Medical Center

    Beirut, 1107 2020

  • Hotel Dieu de France; Oncology

    Beirut, 2063 1111

Other trials in Lebanon

Lithuania2 sites
  • Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health. Sciences Kaunas Clinics

    Kaunas, 50009

  • Uni Oncology Inst. ; Chemo - Radiation Dept

    Vilnius, 08660

Other trials in Lithuania

Saudi Arabia2 sites
  • King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre; Oncology

    Riyadh, 11211

  • King Abdul Aziz Medical City, King Fahd National Guard; Oncology

    Riyadh, 22490

Other trials in Saudi Arabia

Serbia2 sites
  • Institute for Onc/Rad Serbia

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Oncology Institute of Vojvodina

    Kamenitz, 21204

Other trials in Serbia

Venezuela2 sites
  • Centro Integral de Oncología

    Caracas, 1060

  • Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad; Servicio de Gastroenterología

    Caracas, 1080

Other trials in Venezuela

Algeria1 site
  • CPMC; Service d'Oncologie Médicale

    Algiers, 16000

Other trials in Algeria

Hong Kong1 site
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Clinical Oncology

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

Morocco1 site
  • Institut National D'oncologie Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah; Anatomopathologie

    Rabat, 10000

Other trials in Morocco

Slovenia1 site
  • Institute of Oncology Ljubljana

    Ljubljana, 1000

Other trials in Slovenia

United Arab Emirates1 site
  • Tawam Hospital

    Al Ain City, 15258

Other trials in United Arab Emirates

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Trastuzumab and a Taxane in First Line Treatment of Patients With HER2-Positive Advanced (Metastatic or Locally Recurrent) Breast Cancer

This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, Phase IIIb study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of pertuzumab in combination with trastuzumab (Herceptin) and a taxane (docetaxel, paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel) in first-line treatment in participants with metastatic or locally recurrent HER2-positive breast cancer. Participants will receive pertuzumab intravenously (IV) and trastuzumab (Herceptin) IV plus a taxane in cycles of 3 weeks each until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurs first.

Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DocetaxelDrug

    Participants may receive 'docetaxel' taxane chemotherapy as per investigator's choice, administered in line with the respective product information and/or recognized clinical practice guidelines.

  • Nab-paclitaxelDrug

    Participants may receive 'nab-paclitaxel' taxane chemotherapy as per investigator's choice, administered in line with the respective product information and/or recognized clinical practice guidelines.

  • PaclitaxelDrug

    Participants may receive 'paclitaxel' taxane chemotherapy as per investigator's choice, administered in line with the respective product information and/or recognized clinical practice guidelines.

  • PertuzumabDrug

    Also called RO 43-68451

    Participants will receive pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) IV on Day 1 or Day 2 of Cycle 1, followed by 420 mg IV on Day 1 or Day 2 of each subsequent 3-week cycle.

  • TrastuzumabDrug

    Also called Herceptin

    Participants will receive trastuzumab (Herceptin) 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) IV on Day 1 or Day 2 of Cycle 1, followed by 6 mg/kg IV on Day 1 or Day 2 of each subsequent 3-week cycle, administered in line with the respective product Information and/or recognized clinical practice guidelines.

Study groups in NCT01572038
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + TaxaneExperimentalParticipants will receive pertuzumab and trastuzumab (Herceptin) IV plus a taxane in cycles of 3 weeks each until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurs first. Taxane chemotherapy can be either docetaxel, paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel as per investigator's choice.
Receives: Drug: Docetaxel; Drug: Nab-paclitaxel; Drug: Paclitaxel; Drug: Pertuzumab; Drug: Trastuzumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent. TEAEs of special interest included LVEF decreased, liver enzymes increased, and suspected transmission of infectious agent by the study drug.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  2. Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)

    All adverse events leading to death, regardless of whether they were classified as treatment emergent, are listed by system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 22.1 (MedDRA version 22.1); PTs that are part of a given SOC are listed in the rows directly below each SOC within the results table. Admin. = administration; Mediast. = mediastinal

    Measured: The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  3. Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)

    All adverse events leading to death, regardless of whether they were classified as treatment emergent, are listed by system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 22.1 (MedDRA version 22.1); PTs that are part of a given SOC are listed in the rows directly below each SOC within the results table. Admin. = administration; Mediast. = mediastinal

    Measured: The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  4. Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs by system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT); PTs that are part of a given SOC are listed in the rows directly below each SOC within the results table. If a participant experienced the same AE at more than one severity grade, only the most severe grade was presented.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  5. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs and the system organ classes are presented in descending order according to the total frequency of occurrence. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  6. Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs and the preferred terms are presented in descending order according to the total frequency of occurrence. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  7. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs and the preferred terms are presented in descending order according to the total frequency of occurrence. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category. Discont. = discontinuation; Ptz = pertuzumab; Tax = taxane; Trz = trastuzumab

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  8. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs and the preferred terms are presented in descending order according to the total frequency of occurrence. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category. Interrupt. = interruption; Ptz = pertuzumab; Tax = taxane; Trz = trastuzumab

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, it was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. If a participant had more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs; AEs may fall within multiple categories.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  10. Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, it was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. If a participant had more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs; preferred terms (PT) that are part of a given category are listed in the rows directly below each category within the results table.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  11. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs of special interest included LVEF decreased, liver enzymes (ALT or AST) increased, and suspected transmission of infectious agent by the study drug. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs; preferred terms (PT) that are part of a given category are listed in the rows directly below each category within the results table. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  12. Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  13. Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  14. Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  15. Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  16. Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  17. Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  18. Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  19. Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  20. Number of Participants With a Congestive Heart Failure Event

    Congestive heart failure was defined as the Standardised MedDRA Query (SMQ) 'Cardiac failure (wide)' from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 22.1 (MedDRA version 22.1).

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  21. Time to Onset of the First Episode of Congestive Heart Failure

    Congestive heart failure was defined as SMQ 'Cardiac failure (wide)' from the MedDRA version 22.1. Time to onset of the first episode of congestive heart failure was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who did not experience any congestive heart failure at the time of data-cut were censored at the date of the last attended visit whilst on-treatment (including visits up to and including 28 days after last dose of study treatment). Only treatment emergent congestive heart failure events are included.

    Measured: From Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  22. Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study

    All participants must have had a baseline LVEF ≥50% to enroll in the study; patients with significant cardiac disease or baseline LVEF below 50% were not eligible for this study. The change from baseline LVEF values were reported at every 3 cycles over the course of the study and at the final treatment, worst treatment, and maximum decrease values. The final treatment value was defined as the last LVEF value observed before all study treatment discontinuation. The worst treatment value was defined as the lowest LVEF value observed before all study treatment discontinuation. The maximum decrease value was defined as the largest decrease of LVEF value from baseline, or minimum increase if a participant's post-baseline LVEF measures were all larger than the baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline, predose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  23. Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study

    All participants must have had a baseline LVEF greater than or equal to (≥)50% to enroll in the study; patients with significant cardiac disease or baseline LVEF below 50% were not eligible for this study. The number of participants are reported according to four change from baseline in LVEF value categories over the course of the study: 1) an increase or decrease from baseline LVEF less than (<)10% points or no change in LVEF; 2) an absolute LVEF value <45% points and a decrease from baseline LVEF ≥10% points to <15% points; 3) an absolute LVEF value <45% points and a decrease from baseline LVEF ≥15% points; or 4) an absolute LVEF value ≥45% points and a decrease from baseline LVEF ≥10% points. BL = baseline; Decr. = decrease; Incr. = increase

    Measured: Baseline, predose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  24. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0

    Clinical laboratory tests for hematology and coagulation parameters were performed at local laboratories. Laboratory toxicities were defined based on NCI-CTC v4.0 from Grades 1 (least severe) to 4 (most severe). Some laboratory parameters are bi-dimensional (i.e. can be graded in both the low and high direction). These parameters were split and presented in both directions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Values from all visits, including unscheduled visits, were included in the derivation of the worst post-baseline grade. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: was clinically significant (per investigator); was accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or resulted in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy.

    Measured: Predose at each treatment cycle (1 cycle is 3 weeks) from Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  25. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria

    Clinical laboratory tests for hematology and coagulation parameters were performed at local laboratories. Laboratory toxicities were defined based on local laboratory normal ranges (for parameters with NCI-CTC grade not defined). Some laboratory parameters are bi-dimensional (i.e. can be graded in both the low and high direction). These parameters were split and presented in both directions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Values from all visits, including unscheduled visits, were included in the derivation of the worst post-baseline grade. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: was clinically significant (per investigator); was accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or resulted in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy.

    Measured: Predose at each treatment cycle (1 cycle is 3 weeks) from Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  26. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0

    Clinical laboratory tests for biochemistry parameters were performed at local laboratories. Laboratory toxicities were defined based on NCI-CTC v4.0 from Grades 1 (least severe) to 4 (most severe). Some laboratory parameters are bi-dimensional (i.e. can be graded in both the low and high direction). These parameters were split and presented in both directions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Values from all visits, including unscheduled visits, were included in the derivation of the worst post-baseline grade. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: was clinically significant (per investigator); was accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or resulted in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy.

    Measured: Predose at each treatment cycle (1 cycle is 3 weeks) from Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  27. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria

    Clinical laboratory tests for biochemistry parameters were performed at local laboratories. Laboratory toxicities were defined based on local laboratory normal ranges (for parameters with NCI-CTC grade not defined). Some laboratory parameters are bi-dimensional (i.e. can be graded in both the low and high direction). These parameters were split and presented in both directions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Values from all visits, including unscheduled visits, were included in the derivation of the worst post-baseline grade. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: was clinically significant (per investigator); was accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or resulted in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy.

    Measured: Predose at each treatment cycle (1 cycle is 3 weeks) from Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Secondary outcomes (31)
  1. Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  2. Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  3. Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  4. Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  5. Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  6. Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  7. Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  8. Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  9. Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  10. Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  11. Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  12. Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  13. Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  14. Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  15. Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  16. Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  17. Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  18. Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

    Measured: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  19. Overall Response Rate (Complete Response or Partial Response) Based on Best Overall Response (Confirmed) as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    The overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their best confirmed response (≥4 weeks later), as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 from the start of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression or death. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  20. Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    Best overall response (BOR) was defined as the best response recorded from the first dose of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death in the absence of disease progression. The hierarchy used to determine BOR: Complete Response (CR)>Partial Response (PR)>Stable Disease (SD)>Progressive Disease (PD)>Not Evaluable. Note that CR or PR was confirmed ≥4 weeks later. RECIST v1.1 responses are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum.; PD = At least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, and absolute increase of ≥5 mm.; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

    Measured: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression or death. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  21. Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overall Response Rate (Complete Response or Partial Response) Based on Best Overall Response (Confirmed) as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    The overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their best confirmed response (≥4 weeks later), as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 from the start of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression or death. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  22. Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overall Response Rate (Complete Response or Partial Response) Based on Best Overall Response (Confirmed) as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    The overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their best confirmed response (≥4 weeks later), as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 from the start of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression or death. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  23. Clinical Benefit Rate (CR or PR, or SD for at Least 6 Months) Based on Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v.1.1

    The clinical benefit rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose best confirmed response (≥4 weeks later) was a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) that lasted at least 6 months, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 from the start of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death. Clinical benefit responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD; at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions and absolute increase of ≥5 mm), taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

    Measured: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  24. Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    Duration of response (DOR) was defined as the time from when a confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was first documented to first documented disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first). DOR was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not progressed or died after having had a confirmed response were censored at the date of their last tumor measurement. Response was assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter until event occurrence or end of study. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Measured: From date of first confirmed response (CR or PR) to first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  25. Time to Response for Participants With Best Overall Response of Complete Response or Partial Response, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1

    Time to response (TTR) was defined as the time from the first study treatment administration to the date of first confirmed response (CR or PR). TTR was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who did not have CR or PR were censored at the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants for whom no post-baseline tumor assessments were available were censored at Day 1. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Measured: From date of first study treatment until date of first confirmed response (CR or PR). The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

  26. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study

    The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. Participants were given a series of statements in each subscale and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B total score, ranging from 0 to 148, was the sum of the scores for each subscale, provided that at least 80% of the items had been answered; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. If any of the 5 subscale scores were missing, the total score was also set to missing. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  27. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study

    The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the physical well-being subscale, participants were given a series of 7 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B physical well-being subscale score, ranging from 0 to 28, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  28. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study

    The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the social well-being subscale, participants were given a series of 7 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B social well-being subscale score, ranging from 0 to 28, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  29. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study

    The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the emotional well-being subscale, participants were given a series of 6 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B emotional well-being subscale score, ranging from 0 to 24, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  30. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study

    The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the functional well-being subscale, participants were given a series of 7 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B functional well-being subscale score, ranging from 0 to 28, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

  31. Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study

    The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the breast cancer subscale, participants were given a series of 10 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B breast cancer subscale score, ranging from 0 to 40, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Apr 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jun 2012
  3. Primary completion20 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion20 Sep 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,436 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01572038
Sponsor's protocol ID
MO28047
Other IDs
2011-005334-20
Acronym
PERUSE
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
3 Apr 2012
Last updated
25 Sep 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Bachelot T, Ciruelos E, Schneeweiss A, Puglisi F, Peretz-Yablonski T, Bondarenko I, Paluch-Shimon S, Wardley A, Merot JL, du Toit Y, Easton V, Lindegger N, Miles D; PERUSE investigators. Preliminary safety and efficacy of first-line pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and taxane therapy for HER2-positive locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (PERUSE). Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):766-773. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz061.

    PubMed 30796821

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Docetaxel, Nab-paclitaxel and Paclitaxel in people with Breast Neoplasms, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 299 sites in 39 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 299 sites in Spain, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy and 34 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Sep 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0) (time frame: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.). The study lists 27 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01572038, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in