AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Phase 2NCT01569152

Safety and Efficacy of MK-8457 and Methotrexate (MTX) in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite MTX Therapy (P08683, MK-8457-008)

A Phase 2 study testing MK-8457 100 mg and Methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of MK-8457 + Methotrexate (MTX) in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite MTX therapy. The primary hypothesis is that at least 1 dose of MK-8457 + MTX will be superior to placebo + MTX as measured by the percentage of participants who… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
What is being tested?
MK-8457 100 mg and Methotrexate
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
82 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
22 May 2012to 3 Oct 2013
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis for at least 6 months prior to screening
  • Active rheumatoid arthritis as defined by the presence of >= 6 swollen joints (of 66 count) and >= 6 tender joints (of 68 joint count)
  • C-reactive protein blood level >0.9 mg/dL
  • Anti-citrullinated protein antibody positive and/or rheumatoid factor positive at screening
  • American College of Rheumatology Functional Class I, II, or III
  • Received methotrexate for a minimum of 3 months prior to screening with a regionally appropriate stable weekly dose for at least 4 weeks prior to screening
Show all 9Show fewer
  • If using oral corticosteroids, the participant must be on a stable dose of 10 mg prednisone
  • No history of either untreated, latent, or active tuberculosis prior to baseline
  • Participants of reproductive potential must agree to remain abstinent or use 2 acceptable methods of birth control

Who cannot join

  • Presence of inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis, including but not limited to psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
  • Positive hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C test result or the presence of Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • HIV positive
  • User of recreational or illicit drugs or has had a history (within the previous 2 years) of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence
  • Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant, intend to become pregnant, or are lactating;
  • Severe opportunistic infection within 6 months prior to study start.

About this study

Official title: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter, Worldwide, Dose-Ranging Clinical Trial With a Proof-of-Concept Lead Cohort to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of MK-8457 + MTX in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of MK-8457 + Methotrexate (MTX) in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite MTX therapy. The primary hypothesis is that at least 1 dose of MK-8457 + MTX will be superior to placebo + MTX as measured by the percentage of participants who achieve American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) response after 12 weeks of treatment.

Read the detailed description

In Base Study Phase IIa, participants were to receive blinded MK-8457 100 mg or matched placebo for up to 24 weeks. At Week 12 and 18 of Phase IIa, efficacy evaluation was conducted to assess eligibility for early escape, defined as <20% reduction in both tender and swollen joint counts. The study plan included Base Study Phase IIb in which dose range finding or dose-response was to be evaluated, depending on the outcome of Phase IIa. Participants who completed Phase IIa or Phase IIb and those eligible for early escape could enroll in Period 3, a 2-year Safety Extension.

All participants must have been treated with MTX for at least 3 months prior to screening and have been receiving a stable dose of MTX for at least 4 weeks prior to screening.

Being tested
MK-8457 100 mg, Dose-Matched Placebo, Methotrexate
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MK-8457 100 mgDrug

    MK-8457 100 mg dosed orally BID

  • Dose-Matched PlaceboDrug

    Dose-matched placebo dosed orally BID

  • MethotrexateDrug

    Also called MTX

    MTX dosed at the stable dose receive upon study entry

Study groups in NCT01569152
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Base Study Phase IIa: MK-8457ExperimentalParticipants received MK-8457 100 mg dosed twice daily (BID) orally with MTX at the stable dose received upon study enrollment. Phase IIa lasted up to 24 weeks.
Receives: Drug: MK-8457 100 mg; Drug: Methotrexate
Base Study Phase IIa: PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received placebo dosed BID orally with MTX at the stable dose received upon study enrollment. Phase IIa lasted up to 24 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Dose-Matched Placebo; Drug: Methotrexate
Safety Extension Period 3: MK-8457ExperimentalParticipants received MK-8457 100 mg BID orally with MTX at the stable dose received upon study enrollment. Period 3 was to last up to 2 years.
Receives: Drug: MK-8457 100 mg; Drug: Methotrexate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 12

    ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) as Measured by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 12

    The DAS28-ESR is a continuous parameter based upon a statistically-derived index combining tender joints (28 joints, TEN28), swollen joints (28 joints, SW28), ESR (an inflammatory marker), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (GH). It is defined as follows: DAS28-ESR = 0.56 × SQRT(TEN28) + 0.28 × SQRT(SW28) + 0.70 × ln (ESR) + 0.014 × GH. SQRT = square root. The DAS28-ESR is a scale ranging from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline in DAS28 as Measured by C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12

    The DAS28-CRP is a continuous parameter based upon a statistically-derived index combining tender joints (28 joints, TEN28), swollen joints (28 joints, SW28), CRP (an inflammatory marker), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (GH). It is defined as follows: DAS28-CRP = 0.56 × SQRT(TEN28) + 0.28 × SQRT(SW28) + 0.36 × ln (CRP+1) + 0.014 × GH + 0.96. The DAS28-CRP is a scale ranging from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater RA disease activity. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response at Week 12

    ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Week 12

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving Hybrid ACR Response at Week 12

    Hybrid ACR Response evaluates the improvement in active RA by combining elements of the ACR20/50/70 with a categorical score of the mean change in the core set measures (tender joint count, swollen joint count, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, disability index of the HAQ, and CRP). The mean percentage improvement from Baseline in the core set measures was computed and used with the participant's ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 status to determine the hybrid ACR response in a lookup table. The range of values was -100 to 100, with a positive change indicating improvement. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Week 12

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR-N Response at Week 12

    The ACR-N response is the minimum of the following: 1) the percent decrease from Baseline in tender joint counts (68 joints, 0 = absent, 1 = present); 2) the percent decrease from Baseline in swollen joint counts (66 joints, 0 = absent, 1 = present); and 3) the median percent decrease from Baseline for the following: a) Patient's Global Assessment of Pain (VAS, 0 mm = "no pain" and 100 mm = "extreme pain"); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS, 0 mm = doing very well to 100 mm = doing very poor); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS, 0 mm = doing very well to 100 mm = doing very poor); d. physical function as measured by the HAQ (Likert scale, 0 to 3 with a lower score indicating less disability); and e) CRP. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Week 12

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving a DAS28-ESR Response at Week 12

    The DAS28-ESR is a continuous parameter based upon a statistically-derived index combining tender joints (28 joints, TEN28), swollen joints (28 joints, SW28), ESR, and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (GH). It is defined as follows: DAS28-ESR = 0.56 × SQRT(TEN28) + 0.28 × SQRT(SW28) + 0.70 × ln (ESR) + 0.014 × GH. SQRT = square root. The DAS28-ESR is a scale ranging from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater RA disease activity. Depending upon the DAS28-ESR value for a given visit, change in DAS28-ESR is categorized as follows: No Response (reduction from Baseline ≤0.6), No response or Moderate Response (reduction >0.6 - 1.2), and Moderate or Good Response (reduction >1.2). The percentage of participants with a Moderate or Good change in DAS28-ESR was reported. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Week 12

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving a DAS28-CRP Response at Week 12

    The DAS28-CRP is a continuous parameter based upon a statistically-derived index combining tender joints (28 joints, TEN28), swollen joints (28 joints, SW28), CRP, and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (GH). It is defined as follows: DAS28-CRP = 0.56 × SQRT(TEN28) + 0.28 × SQRT(SW28) + 0.36 × ln (CRP+1) + 0.014 × GH + 0.96. The DAS28-CRP is a scale ranging from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater RA disease activity. Depending upon the DAS28-CRP value for a given visit, change in DAS28-CRP is categorized as follows: No Response (reduction from Baseline ≤0.6), No response or Moderate Response (reduction >0.6 - 1.2), and Moderate or Good Response (reduction >1.2). The percentage of participants with a Moderate or Good change in DAS28-CRP was reported. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Week 12

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR Remission at Week 12

    The DAS28-ESR is a continuous parameter based upon a statistically-derived index combining tender joints (28 joints, TEN28), swollen joints (28 joints, SW28), ESR, and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (GH). It is defined as follows: DAS28-ESR = 0.56 × SQRT(TEN28) + 0.28 × SQRT(SW28) + 0.70 × ln (ESR) + 0.014 × GH. SQRT = square root. The DAS28-ESR is a scale ranging from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater RA disease activity. DAS28-ESR remission is defined as a value <2.6 at the visit. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Week 12

  9. Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP Remission at Week 12

    The DAS28-CRP is a continuous parameter derived from the formula: 0.56 × the square root of the tender joint count (0-28) + 0.28 × the square root of the swelling joint count (0-28) + 0.36 × the C reactive protein value (in mg/L +1) + 0.014 × Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS of 0-100 mm + 0.96. The DAS28-CRP is a scale ranging from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater RA disease activity. DAS28-CRP remission is defined as a value <2.6 at the visit. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Week 12

  10. DAS28-ESR Area Under the Curve (AUC)

    DAS28-ESR AUC was to be calculated from the DAS28-ESR score versus time curve, which provided an assessment of changes in disease activity over time. The DAS28-ESR AUC was to be calculated using the trapezoidal rule as the DAS28-ESR multiplied by the duration of the assessment period (in weeks) and was to be expressed as %-weeks. A higher calculated AUC value indicates higher disease activity (worse). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  11. DAS28-CRP Area Under the Curve (AUC)

    DAS28-CRP AUC was to be calculated from the DAS28-CRP score versus time curve, which provided an assessment of changes in disease activity over time. The DAS28-CRP AUC was to be calculated using the trapezoidal rule as the DAS28-CRP multiplied by the duration of the assessment period (in weeks) and was to be expressed as %-weeks. A higher calculated AUC value indicates higher disease activity (worse). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  12. Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 12

    Tender Joint Count was examined on 68 joints of the fingers, elbows, hips, knees, ankles, and toes distal for pain in response to pressure or passive motion at the study time points. Joint pain was scored as 0 = Absent; 1 = Present for each joint. The overall Tender Joint Count ranged from 0 to 68. A higher score indicated greater disease severity. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  13. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 12

    Swollen joint count included 66 joints (same joints as for tender joint count except this excluded evaluation of hips) that were assessed for the presence of swelling. Soft tissue swelling was considered to be present if there was palpable or visible evidence of capsular distention considered to be due to either synovial thickening and/or a joint effusion. Bony swelling, nodule formation, and joint deformity were excluded from consideration. A swollen joint was scored as 0 = Absent; 1 = Present for each joint. The overall swollen joint count ranged from 0 to 66. A higher score indicated greater disease severity. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  14. Change From Baseline in the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Week 12

    SDAI is the simple linear sum of the following parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity [PGA, VAS 0 to 10 cm], Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (MDGA, VAS 0 to 10 cm) and CRP levels (mg/dL). SDAI =TJC + SJC + PGA + MDGA + CRP. Overall scores can range from 0.0 to 86.0. A higher score indicated greater disease severity. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  15. Change From Baseline in the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 12

    The SF-36 is a health-related quality of life instrument that consists of 8 multi-item scales: limitations in physical functioning due to health problems, limitations in usual role activities due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general mental health (psychological distress and well-being), limitations in usual role activities due to personal or emotional problems, limitations in social functioning due to physical or mental health problems, vitality (energy and fatigue), and general health perception. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0 to 100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the greater the disability i.e., a score of 0 corresponds to maximum disability and a score of 100 corresponds to no disability. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  16. Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) at Week 12

    The FACIT-F is a questionnaire that assesses self-reported tiredness, weakness, and difficulty conducting usual activities due to fatigue. FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). The higher the participant's response to the questions the greater the participant's fatigue. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  17. Change From Baseline in the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Status/Activity (PGADSA) at Week 12

    A participant's overall assessment of pain was assessed from the amount of pain due to arthritis experienced during the past 48 hours on a VAS, where 0 mm = doing very well to 100 mm = doing very poor. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  18. Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Status/Activity (IGADSA) at Week 12

    The Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Status/Activity (IGADSA) is measured with scores ranging from 0 to 100 mm (VAS, 0 mm = doing very well to 100 mm = doing very poor). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  19. Change From Baseline in the Patient's Global Assessment of Pain (PGAP) at Week 12

    A participant's overall assessment of pain was assessed from the amount of pain due to arthritis experienced during the past 48 hours on a VAS where 0 mm = "no pain" and 100 mm = "extreme pain". A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  20. Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability (HAQ Disability Index) at Week 12

    The functional status of the participant was assessed using the Disability Index of the HAQ on a Likert scale. This 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. The overall score for the Disability Index is the mean of the 8 functional area scores and also ranges from 0 to 3, with a lower score indicating less disability. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  21. Change From Baseline in Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12

    C-Reactive Protein is an inflammatory marker with a normal reference range of less than 0.9 mg/dL. Change from Baseline in CRP at Week 12 (Week 12 concentration minus Baseline concentration). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  22. Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 12

    The ESR is the rate at which red blood cells sediment in a period of one hour, and is a non-specific measure of inflammation. Change from Baseline is ESR at Week 12 minus ESR at Baseline. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  23. Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 12

    Hemoglobin is the iron-containing oxygen-transport metalloprotein in red blood cells. Change from Baseline is hemoglobin at Week 12 minus hemoglobin at Baseline. This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  24. Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response at Week 12

    ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Week 12

  25. Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response Over Time

    ACR responses are numerical measurements of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. An ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement in 1) swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) (0 = Absent; 1 = Present) and 2) ≥20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 assessments: a) a participant's overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, no pain =0 to extreme pain =100); b) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100); c) Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (doing very well =0 to doing very poor =100 ; d) participant's assessment of function across 8 functional areas as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), total scores ranging from no difficulty =0 to inability to perform tasks =24; and e) serum C-Reactive Protein (decrease indicates improvement). This outcome measure applied to Base Study participants only.

    Measured: Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 18 and Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study start22 May 2012
  3. Primary completion3 Oct 2013
  4. Study completion3 Oct 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
82 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01569152
Sponsor's protocol ID
P08683
Other IDs
MK-8457-008, 2012-000439-17, 132235, P08683
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
30 Mar 2012
Last updated
27 Mar 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing MK-8457 100 mg and Methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Mar 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in