Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT01562327
A Non-interventional Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 7 sites in Argentina.
Trial summary
This multi-center, observational study will evaluate the clinical practice patterns, efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in participants with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Tocilizumab
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesArgentina
- Study dates
- Feb 2012to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Rheumatoid arthritis participants treated with tocilizumab
Who may be able to join
- Adult participants, >/= 18 years of age
- Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis
- Participants initiating treatment with RoActemra/Actemra on their physician's decision (in accordance with the local label), including participants who started treatment with RoActemra/Actemra in the 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit
Who cannot join
- RoActemra/Actemra treatment more than 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit
- Previous RoActemra/Actemra treatment in a clinical trial or for compassionate use
- Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever is longer) before starting treatment with RoActemra/Actemra
- History of autoimmune disease or any joint inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
Argentina7 sites
Study site
Buenos Aires, C1426AAL
Study site
Buenos Aires, C1428DQG
Study site
Ciudad Autonoma de, C1221ADC
Study site
La Plata, 1900
Study site
San Juan, 5400
Study site
San Juan Bautista, 1888
Study site
San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000IFP
About this study
Official title: A Multi-national, Multi-center Non-interventional Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Tocilizumab Actemra
This multi-center, observational study will evaluate the clinical practice patterns, efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in participants with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Data will be collected from each eligible participant initiated on RoActemra/Actemra treatment by their treating physician according to local label for 6 months from start of treatment.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Tocilizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TocilizumabDrug
Also called Actemra
Participants received tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Participants with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens. Receives: Drug: Tocilizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at 6 Months After Treatment Initiation
Measured: 6 months after treatment initiation
Secondary outcomes (24)
Percentage of Participants With Systemic Manifestations of RA at Baseline
Systemic manifestations of RA included anemia, fatigue, conventional risk factors for cardiovascular disease, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) above upper limit of normal, rheumatoid nodules, rheumatoid vasculitis and interstitial lung disease. Participants were included if they experienced at least one of the conditions.
Measured: Baseline
Number of Participants Who Stopped Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) Prior to Start of Tocilizumab
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
Measured: Baseline
Reason for DMARDs Withdrawal at Baseline
Measured: Baseline
Number of Participants Who Stopped Biologic Agents Prior to Start of Tocilizumab
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received Biologic Agents
Measured: Baseline
Reason for Biologic Agent Withdrawal at Baseline
Measured: Baseline
Reasons for Dose Modifications
Measured: approximately 3 years
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued From Tocilizumab for Safety Versus Efficacy
Measured: Approximately 3 years
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy
Percentage of participants on Tocilizumab as monotherapy or combination therapy (with DMARDs) were reported at start of treatment and at 6 months from the start of treatment.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Month 3 and Month 6
The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1, for 28 joints and joints were classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 28. A decrease in score indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Month 3 and Month 6
The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form, no swelling = 0, swelling =1, for 28 joints and were classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 28. A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS 28) Response Classification at Month 3 and Moth 6
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeter per hour [mm/hr]), and patient global assessment of disease activity (PGH) (measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 is a measurement of RA activity on a 0 to 10 scale: a score greater than (>) 5.1 indicates high disease activity; a score between 3.2 and 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity; a score of less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity; a score of less than (<) 2.6 is considered remission.
Measured: Month 3, Month 6
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Response Classification at Month 3 and Month 6
CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PGH and physician global assessment of disease activity (PhGH) assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI <= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, >2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, >10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and >22 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Measured: Month 3, Month 6
Simplified Disease Activity (SDAI) Response Classification
The SDAI was a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA which reflected the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PGH and PhGH, assessed on 0-100 mm VAS where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = worst disease activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP). SDAI total score = 0-86. A SDAI score </= 3.3 represented clinical remission, a score of between 3.4 and 11.0 represented low disease activity, a score between 11 and 26.0 represented moderate disease activity and a score > 26.0 represented high (or severe) disease.
Measured: Month 3, Month 6
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response
Clinical response assessed as per EULAR categorical DAS28 response criteria was defined as clinically meaningful improvement at a particular time point. EULAR response was based on change from baseline (CFB) in the DAS28 score and also on the actual DAS28 score at the time point so was more reflective of the current status of the participant. The DAS28 score was a measure of the participant's disease activity, based on the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PGH, and ESR. DAS28 total scores ranged from 0 to approximately 10. Scores <2.6 = best disease control and scores >5.1 = worse disease control. A negative CFB indicated clinically meaningful improvement. EULAR Good response: DAS28 <=3.2 and a CFB <-1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a CFB < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2. EULAR No response: DAS28 ≤3.2 or CFB greater than or equal to (>=) -0.6, DAS28 >3.2 to <=5.1 or CFB>=-0.6 and DAS28 >5.1 or CFB >=-0.6.
Measured: Month 3, Month 6
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
ACR response was calculated based on total joint count evaluation (28 or 66/68 joint count) and other clinical and laboratory assessments. A positive ACR20 response required at least a 20% improvement (reduction) compared to baseline in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and at least 3 of the following 5 assessments: patient's global assessment of pain, PGH, PhGH (all 3 assessed at 0 [good] to 100 mm [worst] VAS scale), participant assessment of disability measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (assessed on a 0 to 3 scale, where higher scores represented higher disease activity), Acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR). A reduction in the level of and acute phase reactants was considered an improvement. ACR50, ACR70, ACR90 require a 50%, 70%, 90% improvement from baseline respectively.
Measured: Month 3, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6
The Patient Global Assessment of disease activity provides an overall assessment of how RA affects the participant using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates they are managing very well and 100 indicates they are managing very poorly. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
The HAQ-DI was a participant self-reported questionnaire for assessing the extent of a participant's functional ability. It consisted of 20 questions in 8 categories (dressing and grooming, rising, eating, walking, reach, grip, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities). Each question had 4 response options, ranging from 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. The HAQ-DI scale was an average of all the scores and ranged from 0 to 3, where higher scores represented higher disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Fatigue at Month 3 and Month 6
The Patient Global Assessment of fatigue provides an overall assessment of the level of fatigue that the participant is experiencing using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates no fatigue and 100 indicates extreme fatigue. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Month 3 and Month 6
The Patient Global Assessment of pain provides an overall assessment of the severity of pain that the participant is experiencing using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates unbearable pain. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Patient's Severity of Morning Stiffness at Month 3 and Month 6
Morning stiffness was defined by the time elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the participant was as limber as he/she would be during a day involving typical activities. Morning stiffness was assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0= none and 100= very severe.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Percentage of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug.
Measured: approximately 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2012
- Primary completionMar 2014
- Study completionMar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01562327
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML28142
- Status last verified
- Oct 2016
- First submitted
- 21 Mar 2012
- Last updated
- 29 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-national, Multi-center Non-interventional Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Tocilizumab Actemra
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01562327
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML28142
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2012
- Primary completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Oct 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This multi-center, observational study will evaluate the clinical practice patterns, efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in participants with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Data will be collected from each eligible participant initiated on RoActemra/Actemra treatment by their treating physician according to local label for 6 months from start of treatment.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | – | Drug: TocilizumabParticipants with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) received Tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Rheumatoid arthritis participants treated with tocilizumab
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult participants, >/= 18 years of age
- Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis
- Participants initiating treatment with RoActemra/Actemra on their physician's decision (in accordance with the local label), including participants who started treatment with RoActemra/Actemra in the 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- RoActemra/Actemra treatment more than 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit
- Previous RoActemra/Actemra treatment in a clinical trial or for compassionate use
- Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever is longer) before starting treatment with RoActemra/Actemra
- History of autoimmune disease or any joint inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TocilizumabAlso: ActemraParticipants received tocilizumab according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens. | Drug | Tocilizumab |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at 6 Months After Treatment Initiation
Time frame: 6 months after treatment initiation
24 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Systemic Manifestations of RA at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Participants Who Stopped Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) Prior to Start of Tocilizumab
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received DMARDs
Time frame: Baseline
Reason for DMARDs Withdrawal at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Participants Who Stopped Biologic Agents Prior to Start of Tocilizumab
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants Who Previously Received Biologic Agents
Time frame: Baseline
Reason for Biologic Agent Withdrawal at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Reasons for Dose Modifications
Time frame: approximately 3 years
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued From Tocilizumab for Safety Versus Efficacy
Time frame: Approximately 3 years
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Month 3 and Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Month 3 and Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS 28) Response Classification at Month 3 and Moth 6
Time frame: Month 3, Month 6
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Response Classification at Month 3 and Month 6
Time frame: Month 3, Month 6
Simplified Disease Activity (SDAI) Response Classification
Time frame: Month 3, Month 6
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response
Time frame: Month 3, Month 6
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
Time frame: Month 3, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Fatigue at Month 3 and Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Month 3 and Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Patient's Severity of Morning Stiffness at Month 3 and Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Percentage of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)
Time frame: approximately 3 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Nov 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 7 sites in Argentina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Oct 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at 6 Months After Treatment Initiation (time frame: 6 months after treatment initiation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2016.