TuberculosisTBNEATXpertNCT01554384
Trial of Point-of-treatment Xpert MTB/RIF Assay
A study testing Xpert MTB/RIF assay and Smear microscopy in people with Tuberculosis, run by University of Cape Town at 4 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Xpert MTB/RIF assay is a novel automated molecular tool for the diagnosis of TB. Xpert can detect TB genetic material in sputum samples as well as test for genetic resistance to rifampicin providing results within 2 hours. Xpert received WHO endorsement in December 2010. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tuberculosis
- What is being tested?
- Xpert MTB/RIF assay and Smear microscopy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,472 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to Jul 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Able and willing to give informed consent
- Ambulant patient presenting to TB clinic
- IF HIV negative requires 2 or more of the following:
- Cough ≥ 2 weeks
- loss of weight
- persistent fever ≥ 2 weeks and/or
Show all 17Show fewer
- a single recorded temp > 38°C
- night sweats
- generalized fatigue
- hemoptysis or
- chest pain
- OR if HIV positive - any one of the following:
- current cough
- night sweats
- fever
- loss of weight
- Patient 18 years or above
Who cannot join
- Inability to provide informed consent (e.g. mentally impaired)
- Unable to produce 2 sputa of ≥ 1ml
- TB treatment within the last 60 days
- Unable to potentially return for study follow-up at 2 and 6 months (i.e. leaving community)
- Patient not meeting inclusion criteria
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 3 countries.
4 sites in 3 countries
South Africa2 sites
University of Cape Town
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7945
Medical Research Council
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal
About this study
Official title: Multicentre Randomised Control Trial of Point-of-treatment (Clinic-based) Xpert MTB/RIF Assay
Xpert MTB/RIF assay is a novel automated molecular tool for the diagnosis of TB. Xpert can detect TB genetic material in sputum samples as well as test for genetic resistance to rifampicin providing results within 2 hours. Xpert received WHO endorsement in December 2010. There is limited data on the impact of Xpert on time-to-treatment and TB-related patient morbidity in primary care clinics. No studies have yet evaluated Xpert performed at the point-of-treatment (POT) i.e. in primary care clinic location. The investigators hypothesize that one sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay performed at the POT will improve time-to-diagnosis, time-to-treatment and TB related patient morbidity for patients with suspected TB presenting to primary level TB clinics in high HIV prevalent settings.
Read the detailed description
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the world's most important infectious causes of mortality and continues to kill 1.8 million people annually. Despite intensified standard measure of TB control, TB case detection rates are low, posing major hurdles for TB control. It is estimated that approximately 50% of patients with TB are still not diagnosed and treated appropriately. The problem is compounded by the increasing prevalence of multi drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug resistant (XDR) TB and the close association between TB and HIV infection.
Diagnostic tools introduced 100 years ago are still in routine use and increasingly inaccurate if the face of the HIV and TB syndemics. Consequently, many patients with active TB remain undiagnosed and continue to spread the disease within the community. Thus, missed or delayed diagnosis results in ongoing transmission, patient morbidity and mortality, and social and economic consequences. Currently, there is no available point-of-care, or even point-of-treatment test that allows early detection of active tuberculosis at the peripheral health clinic level. Lack of rapid, simple and accurate diagnostic tests at this level is a major hurdle in controlling the global burden of TB. A number of promising new TB diagnostics have shown initial promise but there remains an urgent need to assess their impact when used at the point-of-treatment in primary care level.
In 2009, Cepheid released the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay, which is the only system able to deliver answers directly from unprocessed samples by combining on-board preparation of the sample with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in less than 2 hours. Additionally, the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay allows for simultaneous on-demand molecular testing for the detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) and rifampicin (frontline anti-TB drug) resistance. . The GeneXpert™ system consists of a GeneXpert instrument, personal computer and disposable fluidic cartridges. The system combines cartridge-based sample preparation with amplification and detection in a fully integrated and automated nucleic acid analysis instrument. Xpert has now been shown to be an accurate tool for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in both smear-positive and smear-negative samples in both a multicentre evaluation and demonstration study with a sensitivity of approximately 70% in smear negative culture positive TB. Xpert testing in both these studies was performed at microscopy laboratories. In December 2010, on the basis of these results, Xpert was endorsed for TB diagnosis by the World Health Organisation (WHO) but is yet to be integrated into national tuberculosis control programmes.
Limited data is available on the impacts of Xpert on patient important outcomes such as TB-related morbidity. No data is available about the feasibility and robustness of performing Xpert in primary care clinics at the POT using minimally trained nursing staff. The objective of this study will be to examine the feasibility and impact of a single point-of-treatment Gene Xpert MTB/RIF Assay performed by clinic staff compared to standard microscopy-centre based diagnostics. Special focus will be on the patient-related outcomes of time-to-treatment initiation, drop out rates and the mean difference in TB-morbidity scores in patients diagnosed with Xpert.
The Xpert POT study will be a multicentre patient-level randomised controlled trial comparing a single sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay performed at point-of-treatment with same-day standard fluorescent smear microscopy for TB diagnosis at the primary level of care. A single liquid MGIT culture performed a regional laboratory will be used as the reference standard.
- Conditions
- Tuberculosis
- Being tested
- Xpert MTB/RIF assay, Smear microscopy
- Keywords
- Tuberculosis, diagnosis, Xpert MTB/RIF, point-of-treatment, randomized controlled trial
- Medical subject headings
- Tuberculosis, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Xpert MTB/RIF assayProcedure or surgery
Also called Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF assay
Automated nucleic-acid amplification test (fully integrated) test for TB
Smear microscopyProcedure or surgery
Smear microscopy involve sputum smear with either ziehl-neelsen or auramine-O staining of slides and light or fluorescence microscopy reading
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Xpert MTB/RIF | Experimental | Patients in this arm will receive 1 sputum Xpert MTB/RIF test (point-of-treatment) and 1 sputum sample for MGIT liquid TB culture (regional lab) Receives: Procedure: Xpert MTB/RIF assay |
| Sputum smear microscopy | Active comparator | Patients in this study arm will receive 2 sputum samples for same-day smear microscopy and 1 of the sputum samples will have a MGIT Liquid culture (regional lab). Receives: Procedure: Smear microscopy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in TB-related Morbidity
Time-specific (2 month) difference in morbidity between the Xpert MTB/RIF and smear microscopy study arms.
Morbidity will be assessed using the TB Score and Karnosky performance scale
Measured: 2 months
Difference in TB-related Morbidity
Time-specific (6 month) difference in morbidity between the Xpert MTB/RIF and smear microscopy study arms.
Morbidity will be assessed using the TB Score and Karnosky performance scale
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Time-to-diagnosis
Time from study enrollment to TB diagnosis in each study arm
A diagnosis of TB will include:
- Smear microscopy: WHO classification for smear grading considered positive ii) Xpert MTB/RIF positive (mtb detected) iii) MGIT liquid culture positive
Measured: 6 months
Drop-out and lost-to-follow up rates
Number of patients that are enrolled, randomized to a study arm, and then do not return to receive a positive test result, and Number of patients that are enrolled, randomized to a study arm, diagnosed with TB, and then are lost-to-follow up prior to completion of prescribed standard TB treatment
Measured: 1 year
Feasibility of clinic-based performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay performed by nursing staff without formal research training
Feasibility indicators for the performance of Xpert at POT will be recorded. These include indeterminate rates, turn-around-time, user appraisal and assessments and performance comparisons between laboratory and clinic-based Xpert MTB/RIF.
Measured: 6 months
Individual patient-level cost analysis, cost-effectiveness evaluation and quality of health indices evaluation
Detailed documentation of patient and health system costs for TB diagnosis and treatment will be done at baseline, 2 month and 6 month time-points as well as quality of life health questionaires.
Measured: 1 year
Time-to-treatment initiation
The time-to-treatment initiation for TB culture positive patients in each study arm will be compared Treatment commencement will be considered as the initiation of the first dose of anti-TB treatment at a registered DOTs facility
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completionJul 2012
- Study completionJul 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TuberculosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,472 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cape Town
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biomedical Research and Training Institute, University of Zimbabwe, University of Zambia, Medical Research Council, South Africa, Mbeya medical research program, McGill University, Radboud University Medical Center, University of Cape Town Lung Institute
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Keertan Dheda, University of Cape Town
- Investigators
- Keertan Dheda, MD PhD, Principal investigator, University of Cape Town
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01554384
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TBNEATXpertRCT
- Other IDs
- IP.09.32040.009
- Acronym
- TBNEATXpert
- Status last verified
- Jun 2013
- First submitted
- 7 Jul 2011
- Last updated
- 6 Jun 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Theron G, Zijenah L, Chanda D, Clowes P, Rachow A, Lesosky M, Bara W, Mungofa S, Pai M, Hoelscher M, Dowdy D, Pym A, Mwaba P, Mason P, Peter J, Dheda K; TB-NEAT team. Feasibility, accuracy, and clinical effect of point-of-care Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis in primary-care settings in Africa: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):424-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62073-5. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
PubMed 24176144
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jun 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicentre Randomised Control Trial of Point-of-treatment (Clinic-based) Xpert MTB/RIF Assay
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01554384
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TBNEATXpert / TBNEATXpertRCT
- Conditions
- Tuberculosis
- Keywords
- Tuberculosis, diagnosis, Xpert MTB/RIF, point-of-treatment, randomized controlled trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,472 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cape TownUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biomedical Research and Training Institute, University of Zimbabwe, University of Zambia, Medical Research Council, South Africa, Mbeya medical research program, McGill University, Radboud University Medical Center, University of Cape Town Lung Institute
- Study start
- Oct 2010
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Xpert MTB/RIF assay is a novel automated molecular tool for the diagnosis of TB. Xpert can detect TB genetic material in sputum samples as well as test for genetic resistance to rifampicin providing results within 2 hours. Xpert received WHO endorsement in December 2010. There is limited data on the impact of Xpert on time-to-treatment and TB-related patient morbidity in primary care clinics. No studies have yet evaluated Xpert performed at the point-of-treatment (POT) i.e. in primary care clinic location. The investigators hypothesize that one sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay performed at the POT will improve time-to-diagnosis, time-to-treatment and TB related patient morbidity for patients with suspected TB presenting to primary level TB clinics in high HIV prevalent settings.
Detailed description
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the world's most important infectious causes of mortality and continues to kill 1.8 million people annually. Despite intensified standard measure of TB control, TB case detection rates are low, posing major hurdles for TB control. It is estimated that approximately 50% of patients with TB are still not diagnosed and treated appropriately. The problem is compounded by the increasing prevalence of multi drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug resistant (XDR) TB and the close association between TB and HIV infection.
Diagnostic tools introduced 100 years ago are still in routine use and increasingly inaccurate if the face of the HIV and TB syndemics. Consequently, many patients with active TB remain undiagnosed and continue to spread the disease within the community. Thus, missed or delayed diagnosis results in ongoing transmission, patient morbidity and mortality, and social and economic consequences. Currently, there is no available point-of-care, or even point-of-treatment test that allows early detection of active tuberculosis at the peripheral health clinic level. Lack of rapid, simple and accurate diagnostic tests at this level is a major hurdle in controlling the global burden of TB. A number of promising new TB diagnostics have shown initial promise but there remains an urgent need to assess their impact when used at the point-of-treatment in primary care level.
In 2009, Cepheid released the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay, which is the only system able to deliver answers directly from unprocessed samples by combining on-board preparation of the sample with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in less than 2 hours. Additionally, the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay allows for simultaneous on-demand molecular testing for the detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) and rifampicin (frontline anti-TB drug) resistance. . The GeneXpert™ system consists of a GeneXpert instrument, personal computer and disposable fluidic cartridges. The system combines cartridge-based sample preparation with amplification and detection in a fully integrated and automated nucleic acid analysis instrument. Xpert has now been shown to be an accurate tool for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in both smear-positive and smear-negative samples in both a multicentre evaluation and demonstration study with a sensitivity of approximately 70% in smear negative culture positive TB. Xpert testing in both these studies was performed at microscopy laboratories. In December 2010, on the basis of these results, Xpert was endorsed for TB diagnosis by the World Health Organisation (WHO) but is yet to be integrated into national tuberculosis control programmes.
Limited data is available on the impacts of Xpert on patient important outcomes such as TB-related morbidity. No data is available about the feasibility and robustness of performing Xpert in primary care clinics at the POT using minimally trained nursing staff. The objective of this study will be to examine the feasibility and impact of a single point-of-treatment Gene Xpert MTB/RIF Assay performed by clinic staff compared to standard microscopy-centre based diagnostics. Special focus will be on the patient-related outcomes of time-to-treatment initiation, drop out rates and the mean difference in TB-morbidity scores in patients diagnosed with Xpert.
The Xpert POT study will be a multicentre patient-level randomised controlled trial comparing a single sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay performed at point-of-treatment with same-day standard fluorescent smear microscopy for TB diagnosis at the primary level of care. A single liquid MGIT culture performed a regional laboratory will be used as the reference standard.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Xpert MTB/RIF | Experimental | Procedure: Xpert MTB/RIF assayPatients in this arm will receive 1 sputum Xpert MTB/RIF test (point-of-treatment) and 1 sputum sample for MGIT liquid TB culture (regional lab) |
| Sputum smear microscopy | Active comparator | Procedure: Smear microscopyPatients in this study arm will receive 2 sputum samples for same-day smear microscopy and 1 of the sputum samples will have a MGIT Liquid culture (regional lab). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Able and willing to give informed consent
- Ambulant patient presenting to TB clinic
- Patient 18 years or above
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Inability to provide informed consent (e.g. mentally impaired)
- Unable to produce 2 sputa of ≥ 1ml
- TB treatment within the last 60 days
- Unable to potentially return for study follow-up at 2 and 6 months (i.e. leaving community)
- Patient not meeting inclusion criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Xpert MTB/RIF assayAlso: Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF assayAutomated nucleic-acid amplification test (fully integrated) test for TB | Procedure or surgery | Xpert MTB/RIF |
| Smear microscopySmear microscopy involve sputum smear with either ziehl-neelsen or auramine-O staining of slides and light or fluorescence microscopy reading | Procedure or surgery | Sputum smear microscopy |
Primary outcome
Difference in TB-related Morbidity
Time frame: 2 months
Time-specific (2 month) difference in morbidity between the Xpert MTB/RIF and smear microscopy study arms. Morbidity will be assessed using the TB Score and Karnosky performance scale
Difference in TB-related Morbidity
Time frame: 6 months
Time-specific (6 month) difference in morbidity between the Xpert MTB/RIF and smear microscopy study arms. Morbidity will be assessed using the TB Score and Karnosky performance scale
5 secondary outcomes
Time-to-diagnosis
Time frame: 6 months
Drop-out and lost-to-follow up rates
Time frame: 1 year
Feasibility of clinic-based performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay performed by nursing staff without formal research training
Time frame: 6 months
Individual patient-level cost analysis, cost-effectiveness evaluation and quality of health indices evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
Time-to-treatment initiation
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jun 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24176144Theron G, Zijenah L, Chanda D, Clowes P, Rachow A, Lesosky M, Bara W, Mungofa S, Pai M, Hoelscher M, Dowdy D, Pym A, Mwaba P, Mason P, Peter J, Dheda K; TB-NEAT team. Feasibility, accuracy, and clinical effect of point-of-care Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis in primary-care settings in Africa: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):424-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62073-5. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
Related trials for Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 4
Short-term Antibiotic Therapy in Mycobacterium Avium Complex Pulmonary Disease
Mycobacterium Avium Complex Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Paradoxical Tuberculosis Reactions in Patients Without HIV Infection
Tuberculosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Re-evaluating the Duration in Children of TB Treatment
Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Daily Rifapentine Combined With Isoniazid (1HP) for Tuberculosis Prevention in Children Less Than 13 Years of Age With and Without HIV
Tuberculosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Protecting Households On Exposure to Newly Diagnosed Index Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients
Tuberculosis, MDR
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Keertan Dheda, MD PhD principal investigator
University of Cape Town
4 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Xpert MTB/RIF assay and Smear microscopy in people with Tuberculosis, run by University of Cape Town at 4 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in TB-related Morbidity (time frame: 2 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01554384, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2013.