AzTrials
AzTrials

TuberculosisTBNEATXpertNCT01554384

Trial of Point-of-treatment Xpert MTB/RIF Assay

A study testing Xpert MTB/RIF assay and Smear microscopy in people with Tuberculosis, run by University of Cape Town at 4 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Xpert MTB/RIF assay is a novel automated molecular tool for the diagnosis of TB. Xpert can detect TB genetic material in sputum samples as well as test for genetic resistance to rifampicin providing results within 2 hours. Xpert received WHO endorsement in December 2010. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tuberculosis
What is being tested?
Xpert MTB/RIF assay and Smear microscopy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,472 participants
Where
4 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
Oct 2010to Jul 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Able and willing to give informed consent
  • Ambulant patient presenting to TB clinic
  • IF HIV negative requires 2 or more of the following:
  • Cough ≥ 2 weeks
  • loss of weight
  • persistent fever ≥ 2 weeks and/or
Show all 17Show fewer
  • a single recorded temp > 38°C
  • night sweats
  • generalized fatigue
  • hemoptysis or
  • chest pain
  • OR if HIV positive - any one of the following:
  • current cough
  • night sweats
  • fever
  • loss of weight
  • Patient 18 years or above

Who cannot join

  • Inability to provide informed consent (e.g. mentally impaired)
  • Unable to produce 2 sputa of ≥ 1ml
  • TB treatment within the last 60 days
  • Unable to potentially return for study follow-up at 2 and 6 months (i.e. leaving community)
  • Patient not meeting inclusion criteria

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 3 countries.

4 sites in 3 countries

South Africa2 sites
  • University of Cape Town

    Cape Town, Western Cape, 7945

  • Medical Research Council

    Durban, KwaZulu-Natal

Other trials in South Africa

Zambia1 site
  • University Teaching Hospital of Zambia

    Lusaka

Other trials in Zambia

Zimbabwe1 site
  • University of Zimbabwe

    Harare

Other trials in Zimbabwe

About this study

Official title: Multicentre Randomised Control Trial of Point-of-treatment (Clinic-based) Xpert MTB/RIF Assay

Xpert MTB/RIF assay is a novel automated molecular tool for the diagnosis of TB. Xpert can detect TB genetic material in sputum samples as well as test for genetic resistance to rifampicin providing results within 2 hours. Xpert received WHO endorsement in December 2010. There is limited data on the impact of Xpert on time-to-treatment and TB-related patient morbidity in primary care clinics. No studies have yet evaluated Xpert performed at the point-of-treatment (POT) i.e. in primary care clinic location. The investigators hypothesize that one sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay performed at the POT will improve time-to-diagnosis, time-to-treatment and TB related patient morbidity for patients with suspected TB presenting to primary level TB clinics in high HIV prevalent settings.

Read the detailed description

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the world's most important infectious causes of mortality and continues to kill 1.8 million people annually. Despite intensified standard measure of TB control, TB case detection rates are low, posing major hurdles for TB control. It is estimated that approximately 50% of patients with TB are still not diagnosed and treated appropriately. The problem is compounded by the increasing prevalence of multi drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug resistant (XDR) TB and the close association between TB and HIV infection.

Diagnostic tools introduced 100 years ago are still in routine use and increasingly inaccurate if the face of the HIV and TB syndemics. Consequently, many patients with active TB remain undiagnosed and continue to spread the disease within the community. Thus, missed or delayed diagnosis results in ongoing transmission, patient morbidity and mortality, and social and economic consequences. Currently, there is no available point-of-care, or even point-of-treatment test that allows early detection of active tuberculosis at the peripheral health clinic level. Lack of rapid, simple and accurate diagnostic tests at this level is a major hurdle in controlling the global burden of TB. A number of promising new TB diagnostics have shown initial promise but there remains an urgent need to assess their impact when used at the point-of-treatment in primary care level.

In 2009, Cepheid released the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay, which is the only system able to deliver answers directly from unprocessed samples by combining on-board preparation of the sample with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in less than 2 hours. Additionally, the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay allows for simultaneous on-demand molecular testing for the detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) and rifampicin (frontline anti-TB drug) resistance. . The GeneXpert™ system consists of a GeneXpert instrument, personal computer and disposable fluidic cartridges. The system combines cartridge-based sample preparation with amplification and detection in a fully integrated and automated nucleic acid analysis instrument. Xpert has now been shown to be an accurate tool for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in both smear-positive and smear-negative samples in both a multicentre evaluation and demonstration study with a sensitivity of approximately 70% in smear negative culture positive TB. Xpert testing in both these studies was performed at microscopy laboratories. In December 2010, on the basis of these results, Xpert was endorsed for TB diagnosis by the World Health Organisation (WHO) but is yet to be integrated into national tuberculosis control programmes.

Limited data is available on the impacts of Xpert on patient important outcomes such as TB-related morbidity. No data is available about the feasibility and robustness of performing Xpert in primary care clinics at the POT using minimally trained nursing staff. The objective of this study will be to examine the feasibility and impact of a single point-of-treatment Gene Xpert MTB/RIF Assay performed by clinic staff compared to standard microscopy-centre based diagnostics. Special focus will be on the patient-related outcomes of time-to-treatment initiation, drop out rates and the mean difference in TB-morbidity scores in patients diagnosed with Xpert.

The Xpert POT study will be a multicentre patient-level randomised controlled trial comparing a single sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay performed at point-of-treatment with same-day standard fluorescent smear microscopy for TB diagnosis at the primary level of care. A single liquid MGIT culture performed a regional laboratory will be used as the reference standard.

Conditions
Tuberculosis
Being tested
Xpert MTB/RIF assay, Smear microscopy
Keywords
Tuberculosis, diagnosis, Xpert MTB/RIF, point-of-treatment, randomized controlled trial
Medical subject headings
Tuberculosis, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Xpert MTB/RIF assayProcedure or surgery

    Also called Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF assay

    Automated nucleic-acid amplification test (fully integrated) test for TB

  • Smear microscopyProcedure or surgery

    Smear microscopy involve sputum smear with either ziehl-neelsen or auramine-O staining of slides and light or fluorescence microscopy reading

Study groups in NCT01554384
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Xpert MTB/RIFExperimentalPatients in this arm will receive 1 sputum Xpert MTB/RIF test (point-of-treatment) and 1 sputum sample for MGIT liquid TB culture (regional lab)
Receives: Procedure: Xpert MTB/RIF assay
Sputum smear microscopyActive comparatorPatients in this study arm will receive 2 sputum samples for same-day smear microscopy and 1 of the sputum samples will have a MGIT Liquid culture (regional lab).
Receives: Procedure: Smear microscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in TB-related Morbidity

    Time-specific (2 month) difference in morbidity between the Xpert MTB/RIF and smear microscopy study arms.

    Morbidity will be assessed using the TB Score and Karnosky performance scale

    Measured: 2 months

  2. Difference in TB-related Morbidity

    Time-specific (6 month) difference in morbidity between the Xpert MTB/RIF and smear microscopy study arms.

    Morbidity will be assessed using the TB Score and Karnosky performance scale

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Time-to-diagnosis

    Time from study enrollment to TB diagnosis in each study arm

    A diagnosis of TB will include:

    1. Smear microscopy: WHO classification for smear grading considered positive ii) Xpert MTB/RIF positive (mtb detected) iii) MGIT liquid culture positive

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Drop-out and lost-to-follow up rates

    Number of patients that are enrolled, randomized to a study arm, and then do not return to receive a positive test result, and Number of patients that are enrolled, randomized to a study arm, diagnosed with TB, and then are lost-to-follow up prior to completion of prescribed standard TB treatment

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Feasibility of clinic-based performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay performed by nursing staff without formal research training

    Feasibility indicators for the performance of Xpert at POT will be recorded. These include indeterminate rates, turn-around-time, user appraisal and assessments and performance comparisons between laboratory and clinic-based Xpert MTB/RIF.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Individual patient-level cost analysis, cost-effectiveness evaluation and quality of health indices evaluation

    Detailed documentation of patient and health system costs for TB diagnosis and treatment will be done at baseline, 2 month and 6 month time-points as well as quality of life health questionaires.

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Time-to-treatment initiation

    The time-to-treatment initiation for TB culture positive patients in each study arm will be compared Treatment commencement will be considered as the initiation of the first dose of anti-TB treatment at a registered DOTs facility

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Mar 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2010
  3. Primary completionJul 2012
  4. Study completionJul 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,472 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01554384
Sponsor's protocol ID
TBNEATXpertRCT
Other IDs
IP.09.32040.009
Acronym
TBNEATXpert
Status last verified
Jun 2013
First submitted
7 Jul 2011
Last updated
6 Jun 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Theron G, Zijenah L, Chanda D, Clowes P, Rachow A, Lesosky M, Bara W, Mungofa S, Pai M, Hoelscher M, Dowdy D, Pym A, Mwaba P, Mason P, Peter J, Dheda K; TB-NEAT team. Feasibility, accuracy, and clinical effect of point-of-care Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis in primary-care settings in Africa: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):424-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62073-5. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

    PubMed 24176144

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Xpert MTB/RIF assay and Smear microscopy in people with Tuberculosis, run by University of Cape Town at 4 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in TB-related Morbidity (time frame: 2 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01554384, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in