AzTrials
AzTrials

Keratoconjunctivitis SiccaNCT01547936

Effect of Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) on Tear Film Stability

An observational study of Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, run by ORA, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the controlled adverse environment (CAE) on Mean Break-Up Area in subjects diagnosed with Dry Eye Syndrome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
How many people
33 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2012to Feb 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients diagnosed with dry eye disease

Who may be able to join

  • At least 18 years of age \& either sex, any race
  • Willing and able to follow all instructions
  • Positive history of dry eye disease
  • Use or desire to use drops for dry eye within the past 6 months

Who cannot join

  • Have planned surgery during trial period
  • Female currently pregnant, planning a pregnancy or lactating
  • Use of disallowed medications
  • Have ocular infections, or ocular conditions that could affect study parameters
  • Have used an investigational drug or device within 30 days of start of study
  • Female that is currently pregnant, planning a pregnancy or lactating

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Andover Eye Associates

    Andover, Massachusetts, 01810

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Single-Center Study Evaluating the Effect of the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) on Tear Film Stability Using the OPI 2.0 System, Ocular Protection Index (OPI), Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) and Mean Break up Area by Region (MBA) in Patients Diagnosed With Dry Eye Evaluated During Their Natural Blink Pattern

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the controlled adverse environment (CAE) on Mean Break-Up Area in subjects diagnosed with Dry Eye Syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Single-Center, Pilot, controlled adverse environment (CAE) Study.

This is a single-center, one visit, pilot, CAE study. Dry Eye Subjects (N=30) who qualify will undergo tear film video recording, fluorescein staining, and break up time before CAE exposure and after CAE exposure.

All subjects will undergo baseline dry eye assessments including fluorescein staining, breakup time, conjunctival redness and tear film video recording. Subjects who qualify will then undergo CAE exposure for 90 minutes. At the end of CAE exposure subjects will undergo dry eye assessments again.

Medical subject headings
Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. change in tear film break up area

    Measured: change from baseline in tear film break up area at 30 minutes post-CAE at study visit

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. change in Fluorescein Staining

    Measured: change from baseline in staining at 30 minutes post-CAE

  2. Change in Tear film break up time (TFBUT)

    Measured: change from baseline in tear film break up time at 30 minutes post-CAE

  3. Change in Conjunctival Redness

    Measured: change from baseline in conjunctival redness at 30 minutes post-CAE

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2012
  3. Primary completionFeb 2012
  4. Study completionFeb 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
33 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01547936
Sponsor's protocol ID
12-270-0002
Status last verified
Mar 2012
First submitted
15 Feb 2012
Last updated
8 Mar 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, run by ORA, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

change in tear film break up area (time frame: change from baseline in tear film break up area at 30 minutes post-CAE at study visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in