Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPhase 2NCT01546038
A Study To Evaluate PF-04449913 With Chemotherapy In Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
A Phase 2 study testing PF-04449913, Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) and Decitabine in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Pfizer at 81 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
This is a study to evaluate PF-04449913 (an inhibitor of the Hedgehog pathway) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and high-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome in combination with standard agents used to treat these diseases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- PF-04449913, Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) and Decitabine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 255 participants
- Where
- 81 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Jun 2012to 4 Mar 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with AML or RAEB 2 High Risk MDS who are newly diagnosed according to the WHO 2008 Classification and previously untreated.
- Patients with AML (arising from an antecedent hematologic disease [AHD]) or MDS who may have had one prior regimen with commercially available agents for the treatment of their prior hematologic disease. The patients may not have had a prior therapy for their AML.
- AML patients include de novo AML, AML evolving from MDS or other AHD and AML after previous cytotoxic therapy or radiation (secondary AML)
- For a diagnosis of AML, a bone marrow blast count of 20% or more is required.
- For a diagnosis of high-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome RAEB 2 the patient must have 10-19% bone marrow blasts
- Adequate Organ Function
- ECOG Performance Status 0, 1, or 2
Who cannot join
- AML M3 Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) or patients with a t(9:22) cytogenetic translocation.
- Patients with known active uncontrolled central nervous system (CNS) leukemia.
Trial locations and contacts
81 sites in 6 countries.
81 sites in 6 countries
United States52 sites
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-2800
University of Michigan Health System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Investigational Drug Service, Emory University Clinic
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
The Emory Clinic
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
University of Colorado Denver
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249-6909
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Northwestern Medicine Developmental Therapeutics Institute
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
The University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
The University of Chicago's Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Siteman Cancer Center - West County
Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141
University of Kansas Clinical Research Center
Fairway, Kansas, 66205
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Kansas Hospital
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center - Investigational Drug Services
La Jolla, California, 92037-0845
UC San Diego Medical Center - La Jolla
La Jolla, California, 92037
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093-0698
Keck Hospital of USC
Los Angeles, California, 90033
LAC & USC Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center / Investigational Drug Services
Los Angeles, California, 90033
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center Drug Information Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
UCLA Drug lnformation/lnvestigational Drugs
Los Angeles, California, 90095
UCLA Hematology/Oncology Clinic
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Centennial Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
UC San Diego Medical Center - Hillcrest
San Diego, California, 92103
University of Washington-Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, Washington, 98109
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Barnes Jewish Hospital North Campus
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Washington University School of Medicine - Division of Bone Marrow Transplant & Leukemia
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Washington University School of Medicine, Siteman Cancer Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
H.Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612
University of Kansas Cancer Center and Medical Pavilion
Westwood, Kansas, 66205
Germany11 sites
Charite -Universitatsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin
Berlin, 12203
Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 13353
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590
Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625
Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
Kiel, 24105
Universitaetsklinikum Magdeburg A.oe.R.
Magdeburg, 39120
Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz
Mainz, 55131
Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
Münster, 48149
Universitaetsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, 89081
Universitaetsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, 89081
Spain8 sites
Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, 08916
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, 08003
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
Hospital Ramon y Cajal
Madrid, 28034
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville, Andalusia, 41013
Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe
Valencia, 46026
Italy5 sites
Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna, Province OF Bologna, 40138
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
Milan, 20162
Policlinico Universitario "Umberto I" Universita degli Studi "La Sapienza" Sezione di Ematologia
Rome, 00161
A.O. Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - S.C. Ematologia
Torino, 10126
Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine
Udine, 33100
Poland3 sites
Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne Gdanskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego
Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 80-952
Oddzial Hematologii Z pododzialem chemioterapii-Klinika Hematologii Wojewodzkie Wielospecjalistyczne
Lodz, 93-513
Dolnoslaskie Centrum Transplantacji Komorkowych z Krajowym Bankiem Dawcow Szpiku
Wroclaw, 53-439
Canada2 sites
Centre de Sante et de Services Sociaux (CSSS) Champlain - Charles-Le Moyne
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1
Juravinski Cancer Centre @ Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 1B/2 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PF-04449913, AN ORAL HEDGEHOG INHIBITOR, IN COMBINATION WITH INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY, LOW DOSE ARA-C OR DECITABINE IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA OR HIGH-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME
This is a study to evaluate PF-04449913 (an inhibitor of the Hedgehog pathway) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and high-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome in combination with standard agents used to treat these diseases.
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Being tested
- PF-04449913, Low dose ARA-C (LDAC), Decitabine, Daunorubicin, Cytarabine
- Keywords
- Hedgehog Inhibitor, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic syndrome, Intensive chemotherapy, LDAC, glasdegib
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PF-04449913Drug
PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28-days.
Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)Drug
Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) administered at 20 mg SQ, BID on Days 1 through 10.
PF-04449913Drug
PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days.
DecitabineDrug
Decitabine given at 20 mg/m2 over 1 hour infusion for 5-days
PF-04449913Drug
PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days
DaunorubicinDrug
Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days
CytarabineDrug
Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7
PF-04449913Drug
PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days
DaunorubicinDrug
Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days
CytarabineDrug
Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7
PF-04449913Drug
PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days (if randomized to receive PF-04449913)
Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)Drug
Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) administered at 20 mg SQ, BID on Days 1 through 10.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A (Phase 1B) | Experimental | PF-04449913 in combination with low dose ARA-C (LDAC) Receives: Drug: PF-04449913; Drug: Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) |
| Arm B (Phase 1B) | Experimental | PF-04449913 in combination with Decitabine Receives: Drug: PF-04449913; Drug: Decitabine |
| Arm C (Phase 1B) | Experimental | PF-04449913 in combination with intensive chemotherapy: PF-04449913 administered continuously for 28 days. Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days together with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7 followed by cytarabine 1g/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 during 2-4 cycles of consolidation therapy. Receives: Drug: PF-04449913; Drug: Daunorubicin; Drug: Cytarabine |
| P2 Fit (Phase 2 Single Arm) | Experimental | PF-04449913 in combination with intensive chemotherapy: PF-04449913 administered continuously for 28 days. Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days together with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7 followed by cytarabine 1g/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 during 2-4 cycles of consolidation therapy. Receives: Drug: PF-04449913; Drug: Daunorubicin; Drug: Cytarabine |
| P2 Unfit (Phase 2 Randomized) | Other | Patients will be randomized 2:1 (low dose ARA-C in combination with PF-04449913: low dose ARA-C alone). Receives: Drug: PF-04449913; Drug: Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) at Phase 1B
A DLT was any of the following adverse events (AEs) in Cycle 1 and considered by the investigator possibly related to glasdegib in combination with chemotherapy: (1) Grade >= 3 non-hematologic toxicity, excluding Grade >= 3 infection, fever (including febrile neutropenia), infusion related AEs, electrolyte abnormalities and ALT/AST elevation that returned to Grade <= 1 or baseline within 7 days; (2) prolonged myelosuppression that lasted longer than 42 days from the point of detection, defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 500/microliter(mcL) or platelet count < 10 *10^9/L with a normal bone marrow (<5% blasts and no evidence of disease or dysplasia); (3) inability to deliver at least 80% of the planned study doses for all agents in a combination due to non-hematologic toxicities; (4) Delay of >28 days in receiving the next scheduled cycle due to persisting non-hematologic toxicities. Arm A: Glasdegib+LDAC; Arm B: Glasdegib+Decitabine; Arm C: Glasdegib+Cytarabine/Daunorubicin.
Measured: Arms A and B: Cycle 1, Day 1 to Day 28; Arm C: Cycle 1, Day -3 to Day 21 or to Day 28 depending on when the next chemotherapy cycle was started
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Phase 2 Fit
For AML participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts,spicules present and no Auer rods, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL and platelets>=100,000/mcL, transfusion independent and no extramedullary disease. For MDS participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL, 0% blast and hemoglobin (Hgb)>= 11 g/dL, normal maturation of all cell lines.
Measured: 4 years
Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 2 Unfit
OS was defined as duration from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate median OS. In this method, every participant had a follow-up time which was associated with an indicator, 1=event (death in our case), and 0 =censored. If the participants were not known to have died, time to date of last known to be alive was used as to calculate the follow-up time and indicator was 0 for these participants. KM method estimates the median OS based on the K-M curve. The K-M curve only drops when we had an event and censor data are the ticks in the graph. To estimate median OS, the K-M curve usually will be smoothed first and a line will be drawn at 50%. The median OS is the point when K-M curve and the horizontal hit. Survival status was collected every month for the first 2 months after discontinuation of study treatment and thereafter every 2 months until death or 4 years from time of randomization for each participant.
Measured: Randomization to Follow-up (4 years)
Secondary outcomes (67)
Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 1B
OS was defined as duration from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate median OS. In this method, every participant had a follow-up time which was associated with an indicator, 1=event (death in our case), and 0 =censored. If the participants were not known to have died, time to date of last known to be alive was used as to calculate the follow-up time and indicator was 0 for these participants. KM method estimates the median OS based on the K-M curve. The K-M curve only drops when we had an event and censor data are the ticks in the graph. To estimate median OS, the K-M curve usually will be smoothed first and a line will be drawn at 50%. The median OS is the point when K-M curve and the horizontal hit. Survival status was collected every month for the first 2 months after discontinuation of study treatment and thereafter every 2 months until death or 4 years from each participant's first dose.
Measured: First dose to Follow-up (4 years)
Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 2 Fit
OS was defined as duration from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate median OS. In this method, every participant had a follow-up time which was associated with an indicator, 1=event (death in our case), and 0 =censored. If the participants were not known to have died, time to date of last known to be alive was used as to calculate the follow-up time and indicator was 0 for these participants. KM method estimates the median OS based on the K-M curve. The K-M curve only drops when we had an event and censor data are the ticks in the graph. To estimate median OS, the K-M curve usually will be smoothed first and a line will be drawn at 50%. The median OS is the point when K-M curve and the horizontal hit. Survival status was collected every month for the first 2 months after discontinuation of study treatment and thereafter every 2 months until death or 4 years from each participant's first dose.
Measured: First dose to Follow-up (4 years)
Percentage of Participants With CR / Complete Response With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) at Phase 1B
For AML participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts,spicules present and no Auer rods, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL and platelets>=100,000/mcL, transfusion independent and no extramedullary disease. For MDS participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL, 0% blast and hemoglobin (Hgb)>= 11 g/dL, normal maturation of all cell lines.For AML and MDS participants, complete response with incomplete blood count recovery(CRi)were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts with either platelets or neutrophils not recovered (platelets <100,000/mcL or neutrophils <1000/mcL).
Measured: 4 years
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Phase 2 Unfit
For AML participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts,spicules present and no Auer rods, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL and platelets>=100,000/mcL, transfusion independent and no extramedullary disease. For MDS participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL, 0% blast and hemoglobin (Hgb)>= 11 g/dL, normal maturation of all cell lines.
Measured: 4 years
Percentage of Participants With Disease-specific Efficacy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
AML participants,disease specific efficacy measures included:CRi;Morphologic Leukemia Free State(MLFS)(bone marrow<5%myeloblasts with spicules and no blasts with auer rods,neutrophils<1000/mcL and platelets<100,000/mcL);partial remission(PR)(bone marrow myeloblasts decrease to 5-25\&>=50%decrease from start, neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL);PR with incomplete blood count recovery(PRi)(bone marrow myeloblasts decrease to 5-25\&>=50%decrease from start,neutrophils<1000/mcL or platelets<100,000/mcL);minor response(MR)(bone marrow myeloblasts decrease to>=25% from start);stable disease(SD)(bone marrow myeloblasts stable+/-25% from screening value);cytogenetic complete response(CRc)(bone marrow<5%myeloblasts, neutrophils>1000/mcL, platelets>100,000/mcL and normal cytogenetics),molecular complete response(CRm)(bone marrow<5%myeloblasts, neutrophils>1000/mcL, platelets>100,000/mcL and molecular-negative).
Measured: 4 years
Percentage of Participants With Disease-specific Efficacy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
For all MDS participants, disease specific efficacy measures included: CRi (bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts with platelets <100,000/mcL or neutrophils <1000/mcL, including confirmed and unconfirmed responses); PR (repeat bone marrow myeloblasts showing decreased by >= 50% decrease but still >5%, peripheral blood showing neutrophils >= 1,000/mcL, platelets >= 100,000/mcL and Hgb>=11g/dL; including confirmed and unconfirmed responses); SD (including confirmed and unconfirmed responses, failure to achieve PR and no evidence of progression for >8 weeks); marrow complete response (mCR) (bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts and decreased by >= 50%), partial cytogenetic response (>=50% reduction of chromosomal abnormality) and complete cytogenetic response (CRc) (disappearance of chromosomal abnormality with no appearance of now ones).
Measured: 4 years
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2/Day 1
Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2/Day 1
AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2/Day 1
Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Cmax of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Ara-U is the major metabolite of cytarabine. LDAC (low dose cytarabine) is rapidly degraded to the stable metabolite Ara-U, Cmax levels of both LDAC and Ara-U were reported.
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Tmax of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Ara-U is the major metabolite of cytarabine. LDAC (low dose cytarabine) is rapidly degraded to the stable metabolite Ara-U, Tmax levels of both LDAC and Ara-U were reported.
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) of LDAC in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Ara-U is the major metabolite of cytarabine. LDAC (low dose cytarabine) is rapidly degraded to the stable metabolite Ara-U. Area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) levels of both LDAC and Ara-U were reported.
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Cmax of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour from start of infusion, 1 hour (at end of infusion) and 2, 3 and 4 hours from start of infusion on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
Tmax of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour from start of infusion, 1 hour (at end of infusion) and 2, 3 and 4 hours from start of infusion on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
AUCinf of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour from start of infusion, 1 hour (at end of infusion) and 2, 3 and 4 hours from start of infusion on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
AUCtau of Cytarabine and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Ara-U is the major metabolite of cytarabine. LDAC (low dose cytarabine) is rapidly degraded to the stable metabolite Ara-U, levels of both cytarabine and Ara-U were reported.
Measured: Pre-dose, 6 and 24 hours post start of cytarabine infusion on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Cmax of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Daunorubicinol is the major metabolite of daunorubicin, which has anti-neoplastic activity. Cmax values of daunorubicin and daunorubicinol are reported.
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post administration of daunorubicin on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Tmax of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Daunorubicinol is the major metabolite of daunorubicin, which has anti-neoplastic activity. Tmax values of daunorubicin and daunorubicinol are reported.
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post administration of daunorubicin on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
AUCtau of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Daunorubicinol is the major metabolite of daunorubicin, which has anti-neoplastic activity. AUCtau values of daunorubicin and daunorubicinol are reported.
Measured: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post administration of daunorubicin on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Pre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib in Phase 2 Fit on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Measured: Pre-dose, 1 and 4 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hour post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10
Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hour post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10
AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10
Measured: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hour post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10
Number of Participants With Disease-related Gene Mutations at Phase 1B
Peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate were collected for baseline mutational analyses. Genetic abnormalities frequently associated with AML were analyzed. These genetic abnormalities included known mutations in the genes NPM1, CEBPA, FLT3, RUNX1, IDH1, IDH2, KIT, K Ras, N Ras and WT1. Additional genes with mutations known to be associated with AML and MDS such as TET2 and DNMT3A were also evaluated.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose for Glasdegib + LDAC and Glasdegib + Decitabine Arms; Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose for Glasdegib +Cytarabine/Daunorubicin Arm)
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Baseline
Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Values showing statistically significant, ≥2-fold difference compared with baseline are reported here.
Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose)
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Values showing statistically significant, ≥2-fold difference compared with baseline are reported here. Statistically significant, >=2-fold baseline difference was only seen for MMP-3 (Matrix metalloproteinase-3) at Induction Cycle 1/Day 3.
Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Values showing statistically significant, ≥2-fold difference compared with baseline are reported here.
Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 10, 1 Hour Post dose
Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. The data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response in Arm C are reported. Baseline levels statistically associated with best overall response was only seen in SDF-1 (stromal cell-derived factor 1) in glasdegib+cytarabine/daunorubicin arm.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose for Glasdegib + LDAC and Glasdegib + Decitabine Arms; Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose for Glasdegib +Cytarabine/Daunorubicin Arm)
Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Lead-In
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. The data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. Post-baseline levels statistically significant associated with best overall response was only seen for MMP-3 (Matrix metalloproteinase-3) at Induction Cycle 1/Lead-in.
Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Lead-in, 1 Hour Post dose
Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. The data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. Post-baseline levels statistically significant associated with best overall response was only seen for SDF-1 (Stromal cell-derived factor 1) at Induction Cycle 1/Day 3.
Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose
Number of Participants With Disease-related Gene Mutations at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
Peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate were collected for baseline mutational analyses. Genetic abnormalities frequently associated with AML were analyzed. These genetic abnormalities included known mutations in the genes NPM1, CEBPA, FLT3, RUNX1, IDH1, IDH2, KIT, K Ras, N Ras and WT1. Additional genes with mutations known to be associated with AML and MDS such as TET2 and DNMT3A were also evaluated.
Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose for Phase 2 Fit; Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose for Phase 2 Unfit)
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here.
Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here.
Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 10, 1 Hour Post dose
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 1
Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here.
Measured: Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 1, 1 Hour Post dose
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 10
Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here.
Measured: Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 10, Pre-dose
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - End of Treatment
Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here.
Measured: End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)
Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analyte for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.
Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose)
Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analyte for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.
Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose
Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analyte for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.
Measured: Induction Cycle 1/Day 10, 1 Hour Post dose
Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit - End of Treatment
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.
Measured: End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Unfit - Cycle 1/Day 1
Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected value showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline is reported here.
Measured: Cycle 1/Day 1, 1 Hour Post dose
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Unfit - Cycle 1/Day 10
Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant differences compared with baseline are reported here. ITAC (Interferon-inducible T-cell α chemoattractant) level in LDAC alone arm at Cycle 1/Day 10 exhibited non-significant change from baseline but similar trends as in Glasdegib 100 mg+LDAC arm.
Measured: Cycle 1/Day 10, Pre-dose
Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. The data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose)
Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit - Cycle 1/Day 1
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.
Measured: Cycle 1/Day 1, 1 Hour Post-dose
Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit - End of Treatment
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analyte for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.
Measured: End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)
Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Values showing statistically significant, ≥2-fold differences compared with baseline are reported here. CDKN1A: cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A; SMO: mRNA encoding the glasdegib target Smoothened; PTCH2: Patched 2; MYCN: Neuroblastoma Myc oncogene.
Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose); Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose
Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline at Phase 2 Fit - End of Treatment
Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Selected values showing statistically significant differences compared with baseline are reported here. CCND2:G1/S-Specific Cyclin D2; MSI2: Musashi RNA Binding Protein 2; PTCH2: Patched 2.
Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose); End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)
Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline at Phase 2 Unfit - End of Treatment
Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Only the analytes showing statistically significant change from baseline are reported here.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose); End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)
Baseline mRNA Levels Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Baseline mRNA level showing statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. Baseline mRNA levels statistically significant associated with best overall response was only seen for CCND2 (G1/S-Specific Cyclin D2).
Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose)
Baseline mRNA Levels Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Baseline mRNA level showing statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. FOXM1: Forkhead box M1; PTCH1: Patched 1.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose)
Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Ratios of mRNA level to baseline showing statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported.
Measured: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose); End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)
Ratios of mRNA Levels Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit
Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Ratios of mRNA level to baseline showing statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. Ratios of mRNA levels to baseline statistically significant associated with best overall response was only seen for MYCN (Neuroblastoma Myc oncogene) at Cycle 1/Day 1.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose); Cycle 1/Day 1, 1 Hour Post dose
Number of Participants With Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Values Meeting Predefined Criteria at Phase 1B
Maximum absolute values and increases from baseline were summarized for QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula). Number of participants with QTcF meeting the following criteria is presented: QTcF interval:<450 msec; QTcF interval: 450 to <480 msec; QTcF interval: 480 to <500 msec; QTcF interval >=500 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline: <30 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline: 30 to <60 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline >=60 msec. Arms in the time frame description are defined as: Arm A, Glasdegib +LDAC; Arm B, Glasdegib + Decitabine; Arm C, Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin. End of treatment in the time frame were defined as: maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first.
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Values Meeting Predefined Criteria at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
Maximum absolute values and increases from baseline were summarized for QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula). Number of participants with QTcF meeting the following criteria is presented:QTcF interval:<450 msec; QTcF interval: 450 to <480 msec; QTcF interval: 480 to <500 msec; QTcF interval >=500 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline: <30 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline: 30 to <60 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline >=60 msec. End of treatment in the time frame were defined as: maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first.
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) at Phase 1B (All Causality)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. AEs were graded by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 : Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.
Measured: 4 years
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs at Phase 1B (Treatment-related)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. Treatment-related AEs were AEs related to glasdegib and/or backbone chemotherapy. AEs were graded by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 : Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.
Measured: 4 years
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs Categorized by Seriousness at Phase 1B
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. An serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Measured: 4 years
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit (All Causality)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. AEs were graded by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 : Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.
Measured: 4 years
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit (Treatment-related)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. Treatment-related AEs were AEs related to glasdegib and/or backbone chemotherapy. AEs were graded by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 : Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.
Measured: 4 years
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs Categorized by Seriousness at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. An serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Measured: 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study start27 Jun 2012
- Primary completion3 Jan 2017
- Study completion4 Mar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 255 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01546038
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B1371003
- Other IDs
- 2012-000684-24
- Status last verified
- Feb 2020
- First submitted
- 1 Mar 2012
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Heuser M, Smith BD, Fiedler W, Sekeres MA, Montesinos P, Leber B, Merchant A, Papayannidis C, Perez-Simon JA, Hoang CJ, O'Brien T, Ma WW, Zeremski M, O'Connell A, Chan G, Cortes JE. Clinical benefit of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine in patients with de novo and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: long-term analysis of a phase II randomized trial. Ann Hematol. 2021 May;100(5):1181-1194. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04465-4. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
PubMed 33740113Lin S, Shaik N, Chan G, Cortes JE, Ruiz-Garcia A. An evaluation of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and the relationship with glasdegib treatment and exposure. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;86(4):451-459. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04132-x. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
PubMed 32885274Cortes JE, Heidel FH, Fiedler W, Smith BD, Robak T, Montesinos P, Candoni A, Leber B, Sekeres MA, Pollyea DA, Ferdinand R, Ma WW, O'Brien T, O'Connell A, Chan G, Heuser M. Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2020 Jul 14;13(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8.
PubMed 32664995Cortes JE, Heidel FH, Hellmann A, Fiedler W, Smith BD, Robak T, Montesinos P, Pollyea DA, DesJardins P, Ottmann O, Ma WW, Shaik MN, Laird AD, Zeremski M, O'Connell A, Chan G, Heuser M. Randomized comparison of low dose cytarabine with or without glasdegib in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 2019 Feb;33(2):379-389. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0312-9. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
PubMed 30555165Cortes JE, Douglas Smith B, Wang ES, Merchant A, Oehler VG, Arellano M, DeAngelo DJ, Pollyea DA, Sekeres MA, Robak T, Ma WW, Zeremski M, Naveed Shaik M, Douglas Laird A, O'Connell A, Chan G, Schroeder MA. Glasdegib in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin in patients with AML or high-risk MDS: Phase 2 study results. Am J Hematol. 2018 Nov;93(11):1301-1310. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25238. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
PubMed 30074259Savona MR, Pollyea DA, Stock W, Oehler VG, Schroeder MA, Lancet J, McCloskey J, Kantarjian HM, Ma WW, Shaik MN, Laird AD, Zeremski M, O'Connell A, Chan G, Cortes JE. Phase Ib Study of Glasdegib, a Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitor, in Combination with Standard Chemotherapy in Patients with AML or High-Risk MDS. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 May 15;24(10):2294-2303. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2824. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
PubMed 29463550
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 1B/2 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PF-04449913, AN ORAL HEDGEHOG INHIBITOR, IN COMBINATION WITH INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY, LOW DOSE ARA-C OR DECITABINE IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA OR HIGH-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01546038
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B1371003
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Keywords
- Hedgehog Inhibitor, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic syndrome, Intensive chemotherapy, LDAC, glasdegib
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 255 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 27 Jun 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 May 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a study to evaluate PF-04449913 (an inhibitor of the Hedgehog pathway) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and high-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome in combination with standard agents used to treat these diseases.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A (Phase 1B) | Experimental | Drug: PF-04449913, Drug: Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)PF-04449913 in combination with low dose ARA-C (LDAC) |
| Arm B (Phase 1B) | Experimental | Drug: PF-04449913, Drug: DecitabinePF-04449913 in combination with Decitabine |
| Arm C (Phase 1B) | Experimental | Drug: PF-04449913, Drug: Daunorubicin, Drug: CytarabinePF-04449913 in combination with intensive chemotherapy: PF-04449913 administered continuously for 28 days. Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days together with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7 followed by cytarabine 1g/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 during 2-4 cycles of consolidation therapy. |
| P2 Fit (Phase 2 Single Arm) | Experimental | Drug: PF-04449913, Drug: Daunorubicin, Drug: CytarabinePF-04449913 in combination with intensive chemotherapy: PF-04449913 administered continuously for 28 days. Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days together with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7 followed by cytarabine 1g/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 during 2-4 cycles of consolidation therapy. |
| P2 Unfit (Phase 2 Randomized) | Other | Drug: PF-04449913, Drug: Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)Patients will be randomized 2:1 (low dose ARA-C in combination with PF-04449913: low dose ARA-C alone). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with AML or RAEB 2 High Risk MDS who are newly diagnosed according to the WHO 2008 Classification and previously untreated.
- Patients with AML (arising from an antecedent hematologic disease [AHD]) or MDS who may have had one prior regimen with commercially available agents for the treatment of their prior hematologic disease. The patients may not have had a prior therapy for their AML.
- AML patients include de novo AML, AML evolving from MDS or other AHD and AML after previous cytotoxic therapy or radiation (secondary AML)
- For a diagnosis of AML, a bone marrow blast count of 20% or more is required.
- For a diagnosis of high-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome RAEB 2 the patient must have 10-19% bone marrow blasts
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- AML M3 Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) or patients with a t(9:22) cytogenetic translocation.
- Patients with known active uncontrolled central nervous system (CNS) leukemia.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PF-04449913PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28-days. | Drug | Arm A (Phase 1B) |
| Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) administered at 20 mg SQ, BID on Days 1 through 10. | Drug | Arm A (Phase 1B) |
| PF-04449913PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days. | Drug | Arm B (Phase 1B) |
| DecitabineDecitabine given at 20 mg/m2 over 1 hour infusion for 5-days | Drug | Arm B (Phase 1B) |
| PF-04449913PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days | Drug | Arm C (Phase 1B) |
| DaunorubicinDaunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days | Drug | Arm C (Phase 1B) |
| CytarabineCytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7 | Drug | Arm C (Phase 1B) |
| PF-04449913PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days | Drug | P2 Fit (Phase 2 Single Arm) |
| DaunorubicinDaunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days | Drug | P2 Fit (Phase 2 Single Arm) |
| CytarabineCytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7 | Drug | P2 Fit (Phase 2 Single Arm) |
| PF-04449913PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days (if randomized to receive PF-04449913) | Drug | P2 Unfit (Phase 2 Randomized) |
| Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) administered at 20 mg SQ, BID on Days 1 through 10. | Drug | P2 Unfit (Phase 2 Randomized) |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) at Phase 1B
Time frame: Arms A and B: Cycle 1, Day 1 to Day 28; Arm C: Cycle 1, Day -3 to Day 21 or to Day 28 depending on when the next chemotherapy cycle was started
A DLT was any of the following adverse events (AEs) in Cycle 1 and considered by the investigator possibly related to glasdegib in combination with chemotherapy: (1) Grade >= 3 non-hematologic toxicity, excluding Grade >= 3 infection, fever (including febrile neutropenia), infusion related AEs, electrolyte abnormalities and ALT/AST elevation that returned to Grade <= 1 or baseline within 7 days; (2) prolonged myelosuppression that lasted longer than 42 days from the point of detection, defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 500/microliter(mcL) or platelet count < 10 *10^9/L with a normal bone marrow (<5% blasts and no evidence of disease or dysplasia); (3) inability to deliver at least 80% of the planned study doses for all agents in a combination due to non-hematologic toxicities; (4) Delay of >28 days in receiving the next scheduled cycle due to persisting non-hematologic toxicities. Arm A: Glasdegib+LDAC; Arm B: Glasdegib+Decitabine; Arm C: Glasdegib+Cytarabine/Daunorubicin.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Phase 2 Fit
Time frame: 4 years
For AML participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts,spicules present and no Auer rods, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL and platelets>=100,000/mcL, transfusion independent and no extramedullary disease. For MDS participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL, 0% blast and hemoglobin (Hgb)>= 11 g/dL, normal maturation of all cell lines.
Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 2 Unfit
Time frame: Randomization to Follow-up (4 years)
OS was defined as duration from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate median OS. In this method, every participant had a follow-up time which was associated with an indicator, 1=event (death in our case), and 0 =censored. If the participants were not known to have died, time to date of last known to be alive was used as to calculate the follow-up time and indicator was 0 for these participants. KM method estimates the median OS based on the K-M curve. The K-M curve only drops when we had an event and censor data are the ticks in the graph. To estimate median OS, the K-M curve usually will be smoothed first and a line will be drawn at 50%. The median OS is the point when K-M curve and the horizontal hit. Survival status was collected every month for the first 2 months after discontinuation of study treatment and thereafter every 2 months until death or 4 years from time of randomization for each participant.
67 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 1B
Time frame: First dose to Follow-up (4 years)
Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 2 Fit
Time frame: First dose to Follow-up (4 years)
Percentage of Participants With CR / Complete Response With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) at Phase 1B
Time frame: 4 years
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Phase 2 Unfit
Time frame: 4 years
Percentage of Participants With Disease-specific Efficacy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
Time frame: 4 years
Percentage of Participants With Disease-specific Efficacy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
Time frame: 4 years
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2/Day 1
Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2/Day 1
AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2/Day 1
Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Cmax of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Tmax of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) of LDAC in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
Cmax of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour from start of infusion, 1 hour (at end of infusion) and 2, 3 and 4 hours from start of infusion on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
Tmax of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour from start of infusion, 1 hour (at end of infusion) and 2, 3 and 4 hours from start of infusion on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
AUCinf of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour from start of infusion, 1 hour (at end of infusion) and 2, 3 and 4 hours from start of infusion on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
AUCtau of Cytarabine and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Time frame: Pre-dose, 6 and 24 hours post start of cytarabine infusion on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Cmax of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post administration of daunorubicin on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Tmax of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post administration of daunorubicin on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
AUCtau of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post administration of daunorubicin on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Pre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib in Phase 2 Fit on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1 and 4 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hour post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10
Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hour post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10
AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hour post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10
Number of Participants With Disease-related Gene Mutations at Phase 1B
Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose for Glasdegib + LDAC and Glasdegib + Decitabine Arms; Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose for Glasdegib +Cytarabine/Daunorubicin Arm)
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Baseline
Time frame: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose)
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Time frame: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Time frame: Induction Cycle 1/Day 10, 1 Hour Post dose
Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B
Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose for Glasdegib + LDAC and Glasdegib + Decitabine Arms; Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose for Glasdegib +Cytarabine/Daunorubicin Arm)
Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Lead-In
Time frame: Induction Cycle 1/Lead-in, 1 Hour Post dose
Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Time frame: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose
Number of Participants With Disease-related Gene Mutations at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
Time frame: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose for Phase 2 Fit; Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose for Phase 2 Unfit)
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
Time frame: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose
Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Time frame: Induction Cycle 1/Day 10, 1 Hour Post dose
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33740113Heuser M, Smith BD, Fiedler W, Sekeres MA, Montesinos P, Leber B, Merchant A, Papayannidis C, Perez-Simon JA, Hoang CJ, O'Brien T, Ma WW, Zeremski M, O'Connell A, Chan G, Cortes JE. Clinical benefit of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine in patients with de novo and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: long-term analysis of a phase II randomized trial. Ann Hematol. 2021 May;100(5):1181-1194. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04465-4. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32885274Lin S, Shaik N, Chan G, Cortes JE, Ruiz-Garcia A. An evaluation of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and the relationship with glasdegib treatment and exposure. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;86(4):451-459. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04132-x. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32664995Cortes JE, Heidel FH, Fiedler W, Smith BD, Robak T, Montesinos P, Candoni A, Leber B, Sekeres MA, Pollyea DA, Ferdinand R, Ma WW, O'Brien T, O'Connell A, Chan G, Heuser M. Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2020 Jul 14;13(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30555165Cortes JE, Heidel FH, Hellmann A, Fiedler W, Smith BD, Robak T, Montesinos P, Pollyea DA, DesJardins P, Ottmann O, Ma WW, Shaik MN, Laird AD, Zeremski M, O'Connell A, Chan G, Heuser M. Randomized comparison of low dose cytarabine with or without glasdegib in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 2019 Feb;33(2):379-389. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0312-9. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30074259Cortes JE, Douglas Smith B, Wang ES, Merchant A, Oehler VG, Arellano M, DeAngelo DJ, Pollyea DA, Sekeres MA, Robak T, Ma WW, Zeremski M, Naveed Shaik M, Douglas Laird A, O'Connell A, Chan G, Schroeder MA. Glasdegib in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin in patients with AML or high-risk MDS: Phase 2 study results. Am J Hematol. 2018 Nov;93(11):1301-1310. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25238. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29463550Savona MR, Pollyea DA, Stock W, Oehler VG, Schroeder MA, Lancet J, McCloskey J, Kantarjian HM, Ma WW, Shaik MN, Laird AD, Zeremski M, O'Connell A, Chan G, Cortes JE. Phase Ib Study of Glasdegib, a Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitor, in Combination with Standard Chemotherapy in Patients with AML or High-Risk MDS. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 May 15;24(10):2294-2303. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2824. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
81 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing PF-04449913, Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) and Decitabine in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Pfizer at 81 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 81 sites in United States, Germany, Spain, Italy, Poland and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 May 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) at Phase 1B (time frame: Arms A and B: Cycle 1, Day 1 to Day 28; Arm C: Cycle 1, Day -3 to Day 21 or to Day 28 depending on when the next chemotherapy cycle was started). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01546038, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2020.