Bloodstream InfectionCOATNCT01544686
Antimicrobial Catheter Securement Dressings for the Prevention of Cvc-related Bloodstream Infections in Cancer Patients
A study testing 3M™ Tegaderm™ CHG IV and 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IV in people with Bloodstream Infection, run by University of Cologne at 5 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
In neutropenic cancer patients, catheter-related bloodstream infections may cause severe infections and even death. To assess the prophylactic effect of a chlorhexidine coated catheter securement dressing on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections, this open, randomized trial is being carried out. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bloodstream Infection
- What is being tested?
- 3M™ Tegaderm™ CHG IV and 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IV
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 630 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Feb 2012to Oct 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients receiving a central venous catheter for chemotherapy of AML or ALL
- Patients receiving a central venous catheter for high-dose chemotherapy with consecutive autologous stem cell transplantation or any other condition with an expected duration of chemotherapy-associated neutropenia of at least 5 days and an expected duration of central venous catheter use of at least 10 days
- Age >= 18 years
Who cannot join
- Condition with an expected duration of chemotherapy-associated neutropenia of at less than 5 days and an expected duration of central venous catheter use of less than 10 days
- Use of a central venous catheter with antimicrobial coating other than chlorhexidine and/or silver-sulfadiazine
- Limited venous status, impeding acquisition of peripheral blood cultures in case of febrile neutropenia
- Patients previously enrolled in the study
- Tunneled central venous catheters
- Shaldon catheters
Show all 11Show fewer
- CVC insertion via the V. femoralis
- Fever (T > 37.8°C) related to a suspected or confirmed bacterial infection at randomization
- Known allergic/hypersensitivity reaction to any compounds of the treatment
- Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
- Medical or psychological condition which in the opinion of the investigator would not permit the patient to complete the study or sign meaningful informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Germany5 sites
Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52074
Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Charité
Berlin, State of Berlin, 10117
University Hospital Cologne
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937
Klinikum Schwabing
Munich, Bavaria, 80804
Klinikum Neuperlach
Munich, Bavaria, 81737
About this study
Official title: Chlorhexidine Containing Iv-securement Dressings for the Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-related Blood Stream Infections in Neutropenic Patients: a Randomized Trial
In neutropenic cancer patients, catheter-related bloodstream infections may cause severe infections and even death. To assess the prophylactic effect of a chlorhexidine coated catheter securement dressing on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections, this open, randomized trial is being carried out. CHG iv Tegaderm securement dressing will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion against Tegaderm Advanced iv securement dressing.
- Conditions
- Bloodstream Infection
- Being tested
- 3M™ Tegaderm™ CHG IV and 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IV
- Keywords
- neutropenia, cancer, fever, central venous catheter, infection
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis, Neutropenia, Neoplasms, Fever, Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3M™ Tegaderm™ CHG IV and 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IVDevice
Patients receive the 3M™ Tegaderm CHG IV securement dressing or the 3M Tegaderm Advanced IV securement dressing after placement of a central venous catheter.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 3M™ Tegaderm CHG IV | Active comparator | Patients receive the 3M Tegaderm CHG IV securement dressing after placement of a central venous catheter. Receives: Device: 3M™ Tegaderm™ CHG IV and 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IV |
| 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IV' | Placebo comparator | Patients receive the 3M Tegaderm Advanced IV securement dressing after placement of a central venous catheter. Receives: Device: 3M™ Tegaderm™ CHG IV and 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IV |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of definite catheter-related bloodstream infection during the first 14 days after placement of the central venous catheter
Incidence of definite catheter-related bloodstream infection during the first 14 days after placement of the central venous catheter
Measured: 14 days
Secondary outcomes (11)
Incidence of definite catheter related bloodstream infection-related severe sepsis during the first 14 days after placement of the central venous catheter
Incidence of definite catheter related bloodstream infection-related severe sepsis during the first 14 days after placement of the central venous catheter
Measured: 14 days
Definite catheter-related bloodstream infection-related mortality during the first 14 days after placement of the central venous catheter
Definite catheter-related bloodstream infection-related mortality during the first 14 days after placement of the central venous catheter
Measured: 14 days
Overall incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection
Overall incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (evaluated by definite, probable and proven criteria)
Measured: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Overall catheter-related bloodstream infection-related severe sepsis
Overall catheter-related bloodstream infection-related severe sepsis (evaluated by definite, probable and proven criteria)
Measured: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Overall catheter-related bloodstream infection-related mortality
Overall catheter-related bloodstream infection-related mortality(evaluated by definite, probable and proven criteria)
Measured: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Overall mortality
Overall mortality
Measured: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Time to removal of central venous catheter
Time to removal of central venous catheter
Measured: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Time to central venous catheter-related blood stream infections
Time to central venous catheter-related blood stream infections
Measured: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Time to first neutropenic fever
Time to first neutropenic fever
Measured: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Rate of unplanned changes
Rate of unplanned changes of the catheter securement dressing.
Measured: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Tolerability/safety
Tolerability/safety is defined as the number of toxicity-related study therapy discontinuations.
Measured: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2012
- Primary completionOct 2015
- Study completionOct 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bloodstream InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 630 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cologne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- 3M
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maria J.G.T. Vehreschild, University of Cologne
- Investigators
- Maria JG Vehreschild, Dr. med., Principal investigator, University Hospital of Cologne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01544686
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DRKS00003368
- Acronym
- COAT
- Status last verified
- Dec 2015
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Schalk E, Teschner D, Hentrich M, Boll B, Panse J, Schmidt-Hieber M, Vehreschild MJGT, Biehl LM. Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies: Comparison of data from a clinical registry and a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;41(2):254-256. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.335. No abstract available.
PubMed 31818338Schalk E, Biehl LM, Farber J, Schluter D, Vehreschild MJGT, Fischer T. Determination of a Cutoff Time Point for Prophylactic Exchange of Central Venous Catheters for Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Hematological Malignancies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;38(7):888-889. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.92. Epub 2017 May 18. No abstract available.
PubMed 28514979Biehl LM, Huth A, Panse J, Kramer C, Hentrich M, Engelhardt M, Schafer-Eckart K, Kofla G, Kiehl M, Wendtner CM, Karthaus M, Ullmann AJ, Hellmich M, Christ H, Vehreschild MJ. A randomized trial on chlorhexidine dressings for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections in neutropenic patients. Ann Oncol. 2016 Oct;27(10):1916-22. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw275. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
PubMed 27456299
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Chlorhexidine Containing Iv-securement Dressings for the Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-related Blood Stream Infections in Neutropenic Patients: a Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01544686
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COAT / DRKS00003368
- Conditions
- Bloodstream Infection
- Keywords
- neutropenia, cancer, fever, central venous catheter, infection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 630 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CologneUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- 3M
- Study start
- Feb 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In neutropenic cancer patients, catheter-related bloodstream infections may cause severe infections and even death. To assess the prophylactic effect of a chlorhexidine coated catheter securement dressing on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections, this open, randomized trial is being carried out. CHG iv Tegaderm securement dressing will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion against Tegaderm Advanced iv securement dressing.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 3M™ Tegaderm CHG IV | Active comparator | Device: 3M™ Tegaderm™ CHG IV and 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IVPatients receive the 3M Tegaderm CHG IV securement dressing after placement of a central venous catheter. |
| 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IV' | Placebo comparator | Device: 3M™ Tegaderm™ CHG IV and 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IVPatients receive the 3M Tegaderm Advanced IV securement dressing after placement of a central venous catheter. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients receiving a central venous catheter for chemotherapy of AML or ALL
- Patients receiving a central venous catheter for high-dose chemotherapy with consecutive autologous stem cell transplantation or any other condition with an expected duration of chemotherapy-associated neutropenia of at least 5 days and an expected duration of central venous catheter use of at least 10 days
- Age >= 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Condition with an expected duration of chemotherapy-associated neutropenia of at less than 5 days and an expected duration of central venous catheter use of less than 10 days
- Use of a central venous catheter with antimicrobial coating other than chlorhexidine and/or silver-sulfadiazine
- Limited venous status, impeding acquisition of peripheral blood cultures in case of febrile neutropenia
- Patients previously enrolled in the study
- Tunneled central venous catheters
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3M™ Tegaderm™ CHG IV and 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IVPatients receive the 3M™ Tegaderm CHG IV securement dressing or the 3M Tegaderm Advanced IV securement dressing after placement of a central venous catheter. | Device | 3M™ Tegaderm CHG IV, 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IV' |
Primary outcome
Incidence of definite catheter-related bloodstream infection during the first 14 days after placement of the central venous catheter
Time frame: 14 days
Incidence of definite catheter-related bloodstream infection during the first 14 days after placement of the central venous catheter
11 secondary outcomes
Incidence of definite catheter related bloodstream infection-related severe sepsis during the first 14 days after placement of the central venous catheter
Time frame: 14 days
Definite catheter-related bloodstream infection-related mortality during the first 14 days after placement of the central venous catheter
Time frame: 14 days
Overall incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection
Time frame: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Overall catheter-related bloodstream infection-related severe sepsis
Time frame: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Overall catheter-related bloodstream infection-related mortality
Time frame: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Overall mortality
Time frame: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Time to removal of central venous catheter
Time frame: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Time to central venous catheter-related blood stream infections
Time frame: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Time to first neutropenic fever
Time frame: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Rate of unplanned changes
Time frame: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Tolerability/safety
Time frame: From placement of the central venous catheter until the follow-up at a maximum of 56 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31818338Schalk E, Teschner D, Hentrich M, Boll B, Panse J, Schmidt-Hieber M, Vehreschild MJGT, Biehl LM. Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies: Comparison of data from a clinical registry and a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;41(2):254-256. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.335. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28514979Schalk E, Biehl LM, Farber J, Schluter D, Vehreschild MJGT, Fischer T. Determination of a Cutoff Time Point for Prophylactic Exchange of Central Venous Catheters for Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Hematological Malignancies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;38(7):888-889. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.92. Epub 2017 May 18. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27456299Biehl LM, Huth A, Panse J, Kramer C, Hentrich M, Engelhardt M, Schafer-Eckart K, Kofla G, Kiehl M, Wendtner CM, Karthaus M, Ullmann AJ, Hellmich M, Christ H, Vehreschild MJ. A randomized trial on chlorhexidine dressings for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections in neutropenic patients. Ann Oncol. 2016 Oct;27(10):1916-22. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw275. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
Related trials for Bloodstream Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
Double Plasma Separation and Adsorption in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (DPMAS-ACLF Trial)
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maria JG Vehreschild, Dr. med. principal investigator
University Hospital of Cologne
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 3M™ Tegaderm™ CHG IV and 3M™ Tegaderm™ Advanced IV in people with Bloodstream Infection, run by University of Cologne at 5 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of definite catheter-related bloodstream infection during the first 14 days after placement of the central venous catheter (time frame: 14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01544686, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2015.