AzTrials
AzTrials

Bone Mineral DensityInterscannerNCT01544660

Bone Quality by vQCT and HR-pQCT:Translation to Multi-center Clinical Research

An observational study of Bone Mineral Density, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Our overarching aim is to set up a procedural, analytic and developmental framework to establish CT of the central and peripheral skeleton as a clinically useful biomarker for skeletal strength in the clinical research and ultimately in the clinical setting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Bone Mineral Density
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2012to Mar 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Study population: Healthy men and women aged 65-80

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy men and women
  • must be able to lie down on bed

Who cannot join

  • on wheel chair
  • age above 80 years 0r less than 65 years

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Department of Radiology, UCSF

    San Francisco, California, 94107

Other trials in United States

About this study

Our overarching aim is to set up a procedural, analytic and developmental framework to establish CT of the central and peripheral skeleton as a clinically useful biomarker for skeletal strength in the clinical research and ultimately in the clinical setting. To accomplish this, the investigators will develop and validate phantoms and scanning procedures to standardize strength and structure measurements between different vQCT scanners and develop standardized acquisition, analytical, and quality control techniques for HR-pQCT with an emphasis on optimization for multi-center studies.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will develop new calibration phantoms to address inter and intra scanner variability in vQCT and HRpQCT. Phantom sets to evaluate inter-scanner disparity and determine corrections to apply to in vivo scan data in the multi-center settings. These methods will be validated in a multi-center phantom study and in a 120 patients

Keywords
spine and hip scan, BMD

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01544660
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Scanningno treatment
scanningno treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Develop and Validate phantoms and scanning procedures to standardize strength and structure measurements between different scanners.

    Correction of the in vivo images using the proposed inter-scanner calibration approaches will improve the quality of multi-site data by reducing the variability in CT structure and strength measures. To study the Multi-center standardization of vQCT and HR-pQCT imaging we will develop new calibration phantoms to address inter and intra-scanner variability in vQCT and HRpQCT bone strength and structure estimates.

    Measured: one visit lasting 3 hours for each subject.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Development of open-source image analysis metric for vQCT

    To provide standardized analysis of future clinical studies and retrospective analysis of past trials, we will develop a set of image analysis metrics for vQCT (trabecular, cortical and integral BMD, cortical thickness, cross-sectional areas, axial and bending strength estimates). These metrics will be made available to the community in an open source format, allowing them to be incorporated into commercial software platforms at the discretion of the manufacturer, incorporation as a plug-in for NIH supported programs such as MIPAV.

    Measured: Time frame will be 3 hours for a visit

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Mar 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionMar 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01544660
Sponsor's protocol ID
NIH-Multicenter Interscanner
Acronym
Interscanner
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
14 Feb 2012
Last updated
16 Apr 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Bone Mineral Density, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Develop and Validate phantoms and scanning procedures to standardize strength and structure measurements between different scanners. (time frame: one visit lasting 3 hours for each subject.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in