AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT01543503

An Global Comparative Observational Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 154 sites in 16 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective, multi-center, observational study will assess the efficacy and safety of treatment in patients who are treated with a TNF Inhibitor or RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) as the first biologic therapy. Data will be collected for 52 weeks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
How many people
1,225 participants
Where
154 sitesin 16 countries
Study dates
Feb 2012to Feb 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients, >/=18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Non-respondent or intolerant to non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy
  • Patient has been prescribed a first biologic therapy up to 6 weeks prior to the inclusion visit, irrespective of the treatment prescribed

Who cannot join

  • Patients whose first biologic therapy is given as part of a clinical trial studying rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment
  • Patients who are receiving or have received experimental DMARDs as part of a clinical trial studying RA treatment in the last 12 months
  • Patients whose first biologic is rituximab, abatacept or anakinra.
  • Patients who have received any biologic therapy for more than 6 weeks prior to the inclusion visit

Trial locations and contacts

154 sites in 16 countries.

154 sites in 16 countries

United Kingdom39 sites
  • Study site

    Barnsley, S75 2EP

  • Study site

    Basildon, SS16 5NL

  • Study site

    Basingstoke, RG24 9NA

  • Study site

    Brighton, BN2 5BE

  • Study site

    Cannock, WS11 5XY

  • Study site

    Cardiff, CF14 4XW

  • Study site

    Chertsey, KT16 0PZ

  • Study site

    Crawley, RH11 7DH

  • Study site

    Darlington, DL3 6HX

  • Study site

    Enfield, EN2 8JL

  • Study site

    Grimsby, DN33 2BA

  • Study site

    Guildford, GU2 7XX

  • Study site

    Ipswich, IP4 5PD

  • Study site

    Kettering, NN16 8UZ

  • Study site

    Lancaster, LA1 4RP

  • Study site

    Leeds, LS7 4SA

  • Study site

    Llandudno, LL30 1LB

  • Study site

    London, SE18 4QH

  • Study site

    London, SW17 0QT

  • Study site

    London, W6 8RF

  • Study site

    Luton, LU4 0DZ

  • Study site

    Maidstone, ME16 9QQ

  • Study site

    Margate, CT9 4AN

  • Study site

    Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, CH49 5PE

  • Study site

    North Shields, NE29 8NH

  • Study site

    Oswestry, SY10 7AG

  • Study site

    Plymouth, PL6 8DH

  • Study site

    Portsmouth, PO6 3LY

  • Study site

    Reading, RG1 5AN

  • Study site

    Rhyl, LL18 5UJ

  • Study site

    Romford, RM7 0AG

  • Study site

    Sheffield, S10 2JF

  • Study site

    Stockport, SK2 7JE

  • Study site

    Sunderland, SR4 7TP

  • Study site

    Swindon, SN3 6BB

  • Study site

    Torquay, TQ2 7AA

  • Study site

    Warrington, WA5 1QG

  • Study site

    Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP

  • Study site

    Wrightington, WN6 9EP

Other trials in United Kingdom

Italy25 sites
  • Study site

    Agnone, Molise, 86081

  • Study site

    Arenzano, Liguria, 16011

  • Study site

    Avellino, Campania, 83100

  • Study site

    Brescia, Lombardy, 25123

  • Study site

    Brindisi, Apulia, 72100

  • Study site

    Catania, Sicily, 95124

  • Study site

    Coppito, Abruzzo, 67100

  • Study site

    Jesi Ancona, The Marches, 60035

  • Study site

    Legnano, Lombardy, 20025

  • Study site

    Martina Franca, Apulia, 74015

  • Study site

    Milan, Lombardy, 20157

  • Study site

    Milan, Lombardy, 20162

  • Study site

    Naples, Campania, 80131

  • Study site

    Naples, Campania, 80144

  • Study site

    Perugia, Umbria, 06122

  • Study site

    Pescara, Abruzzo, 65100

  • Study site

    Prato, Tuscany, 59100

  • Study site

    Reggio Calabria, Calabria, 89133

  • Study site

    Rome, Lazio, 00133

  • Study site

    Rome, Lazio, 00189

  • Study site

    Salerno, Campania, 84131

  • Study site

    San Cesario di Lecce, Apulia, 73016

  • Study site

    Turin, Piedmont, 10126

  • Study site

    Turin, Piedmont, 10128

  • Study site

    Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, 33100

Other trials in Italy

Germany22 sites
  • Study site

    Aachen, 52064

  • Study site

    Bad Aibling, 83043

  • Study site

    Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, 53474

  • Study site

    Bayreuth, 95445

  • Study site

    Berlin, 13055

  • Study site

    Cologne, 50937

  • Study site

    Dresden, 01109

  • Study site

    Erfurt, 99096

  • Study site

    Erlangen, 91056

  • Study site

    Fulda, 36043

  • Study site

    Hamburg, 22147

  • Study site

    Hamburg, 22767

  • Study site

    Heidelberg, 69121

  • Study site

    Herne, 44652

  • Study site

    Ludwigsfelde, 14974

  • Study site

    München, 80639

  • Study site

    München, 81541

  • Study site

    Passau, 94032

  • Study site

    Rostock, 18059

  • Study site

    Stuttgart, 70178

  • Study site

    Traunstein, 83278

  • Study site

    Wuppertal, 42105

Other trials in Germany

Belgium14 sites
  • Study site

    Aalst, 9300

  • Study site

    Assebroek, 8310

  • Study site

    Aye, 6900

  • Study site

    Brussels, 1000

  • Study site

    Brussels, 1050

  • Study site

    Edegem, 2650

  • Study site

    Genk, 3600

  • Study site

    Ghent, 9000

  • Study site

    Godinne, 5530

  • Study site

    Heusy, 4802

  • Study site

    Liège, 4000

  • Study site

    Ostend, 8400

  • Study site

    Verviers, 4800

  • Study site

    Westmalle, 2390

Other trials in Belgium

Ukraine9 sites
  • Study site

    Donetsk, 83045

  • Study site

    Kharkiv, 61052

  • Study site

    Kmelnytskyy, 29000

  • Study site

    Kyiv, 02125

  • Study site

    Kyiv, 03151

  • Study site

    Kyiv, 1023

  • Study site

    Odesa, 65026

  • Study site

    Uzhhorod, 88000

  • Study site

    Zaporizhzhya, 69600

Other trials in Ukraine

Ecuador7 sites
  • Study site

    Cuenca

  • Study site

    Esmeraldas, EC080150

  • Study site

    Guayaquil, EC090114

  • Study site

    Portoviejo

  • Study site

    Quito, 005932

  • Study site

    Quito, EC170135

  • Study site

    Quito, EC170412

Other trials in Ecuador

Portugal7 sites
  • Study site

    Almada, 2801-951

  • Study site

    Amadora, 2720-276

  • Study site

    Lisbon, 1069-166

  • Study site

    Lisbon, 1649-035

  • Study site

    Porto, 4099-001

  • Study site

    Porto, 4200-319

  • Study site

    Vila Nova de Gaia, 4400-129

Other trials in Portugal

Greece5 sites
  • Study site

    Athens, 11527

  • Study site

    Athens, 155 62

  • Study site

    Pátrai, 26335

  • Study site

    Thessaloniki, 544 65

  • Study site

    Thessaloniki, 56429

Other trials in Greece

Mexico5 sites
  • Study site

    Guadalajara, 44600

  • Study site

    Guadalajara, 44650

  • Study site

    Guadalajara, 45040

  • Study site

    Mexicali, 21100

  • Study site

    Mexico Ctiy, 07760

Other trials in Mexico

Spain5 sites
  • Study site

    Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 28942

  • Study site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28006

  • Study site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28007

  • Study site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28905

  • Study site

    San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, 28702

Other trials in Spain

Argentina4 sites
  • Study site

    Catamarca Capital, 4700

  • Study site

    Mendoza, 5500

  • Study site

    Mendoza, 5501

  • Study site

    Rosario, S2000PBJ

Other trials in Argentina

Colombia4 sites
  • Study site

    Barranquilla

  • Study site

    Bogotá

  • Study site

    Bucaramanga

  • Study site

    Medellín

Other trials in Colombia

Switzerland4 sites
  • Study site

    Aarau, 5000

  • Study site

    Basel, 4031

  • Study site

    Chur, 7000

  • Study site

    Sankt Gallen, 9007

Other trials in Switzerland

Uruguay2 sites
  • Study site

    Montevideo, 11000

  • Study site

    Montevideo, 11800

Other trials in Uruguay

Guatemala1 site
  • Study site

    Guatemala City

Other trials in Guatemala

Panama1 site
  • Study site

    Panama City, 32400

Other trials in Panama

About this study

Official title: A Global Comparative Observational Study In Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Who Are Treated With A TNF Inhibitor Or Tocilizumab As The First Biologic Therapy

This prospective, multi-center, observational study will assess the efficacy and safety of treatment in patients who are treated with a TNF Inhibitor or RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) as the first biologic therapy. Data will be collected for 52 weeks.

Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01543503
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CohortNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 24

    Disease activity score based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) is a composite measure of disease severity and it incorporates four specific measures of disease: swollen joint count (SJC) of 28 joints, tender joint count (TJC) of 28 joints, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity by visual analogue scale (VAS), and acute-phase inflammatory marker [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in millimeter/hour (mm/h), or C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligram/liter (mg/L)]. For the purposes of this study, ESR was used whenever possible to calculate the DAS28 (DAS28-ESR). Higher the scores, greater is the disease activity. A DAS28 score of less than or equal to (</=) 3.2 = low disease activity, a DAS28 score of >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 52

    Disease activity score based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) is a composite measure of disease severity and it incorporates four specific measures of disease: swollen joint count (SJC) of 28 joints, tender joint count (TJC) of 28 joints, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity by visual analogue scale (VAS), and acute-phase inflammatory marker (ESR in mm/h, or CRP in mg/L). For the purposes of this study, ESR was used whenever possible to calculate the DAS28 (DAS28-ESR). Higher the scores, greater is the disease activity. A DAS28 score of </= 3.2 = low disease activity, a DAS28 score of >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 52

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

    Blood samples were collected for ESR, which is an acute phase reactant and a measure of inflammation. BL = baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein

    Blood samples were collected for C-reactive protein (CRP). CRP is an inflammation marker. High levels of this protein indicate inflammation in diseases such as RA.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count

    A swollen joint count (SJC) is the most specific clinical method to quantify abnormalities in participants with RA. It reflects the amount of inflamed synovial tissue. Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling. Joints were classified as swollen (1)/ not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count

    A tender joint count (TJC) is the most specific clinical method to quantify abnormalities in participants with RA. It is associated with the level of pain. Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness. Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 28.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simplified Disease Activity Index Score

    Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was calculated as the sum of the following parameters: SJC + TJC + VAS Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity + VAS Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity. VAS assessments involved a 10-cm horizontal scale from 'no disease activity' to 'maximum disease activity'. CDAI scores ranged from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased disease activity. Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) was calculated as the sum of the following parameters: SJC +TJC + Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity + Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity + CRP. SDAI scores ranged from 0 to 86, with higher scores also indicating increased disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Score

    The Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Change from baseline = scores at observation minus score at baseline. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  8. Loss of Efficacy or Development of Intolerance to Biologic Therapy

    Events that are clearly consistent with the expected pattern of progression of the underlying disease may contribute to lack of efficacy. Lack of efficacy was one of the reasons for termination of biology therapy. The number of participants showing lack of efficacy to biologic therapy is presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  9. Proportion of Participants Who Terminated Biologic Treatment

    The proportion of participants who discontinued biologic treatment was compared between tocilizumab-treated and TNF inhibitor-treated participants.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  10. Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation

    The reasons for discontinuation of tocilizumab or TNF inhibitor is presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  11. Cumulative Number of Participants Who Discontinued Biologic Therapy at the End of Each Study Period

    The total number of participants who discontinued biologic therapy at the end of each study period (Week 0 - 24, Week 24 - 52, Week 52 - 57 and Week 57 - end of treatment) is presented. Participants who did not have a biologic therapy discontinuation or discontinued before having one, were considered as 'censored' at the date study termination.

    Measured: Up to end of treatment

  12. Number of Participants of Infusion Reactions or Injection Site Reactions During the Study Following the Start of the First Biologic Therapy

    An infusion reaction was defined as an adverse event (AE) occurring during and within 24 hours after the infusion, which may include hypersensitivity reactions or anaphylactic reactions. Injection site reactions were included in the summaries for infusion reactions.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  13. Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Non-serious Adverse Events

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  14. Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events of Special Interest, Including Infections, During the Study

    Adverse events of special interest (AESI) for this study included: infections (including opportunistic infections), myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome, gastrointestinal perforation and related events, malignancies, anaphylaxis / hypersensitivity reactions, demyelinating disorders, stroke, bleeding events and hepatic events. Based on seriousness criteria, they were categorized as serious and non-serious adverse events of special interest.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  15. Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index Score

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 to 3 (0=no difficulty and 3=inability to perform a task in that area). HAQ-DI total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; more than 1=significant functional limitation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  16. Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Score

    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participant's fatigue. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  17. Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score

    VAS is a 100 mm scale. Intensity of pain range: 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. Change from baseline =scores at observation minus score at baseline. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  18. Shift From Baseline in Morning Stiffness

    Shift tables presenting the number of participants in each bivariate category Week (W) 0 versus Week 24 and Week 52, with regards to morning stiffness at the different time points, was presented for each treatment arm. For participants who experienced joint stiffness while waking up in the morning, duration of morning stiffness was categorized as follows: Less than 30 minutes (min), Between 30 and 60 minutes, Between 60 and 120 minutes, Between 120 to 240 minutes, More than 240 minutes and the whole day. Baseline = BL

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  19. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity

    The patient's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Mar 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2012
  3. Primary completionFeb 2015
  4. Study completionFeb 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,225 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01543503
Sponsor's protocol ID
MA27950
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
28 Feb 2012
Last updated
10 Feb 2016

Publications

  • Choy EH, Bernasconi C, Aassi M, Molina JF, Epis OM. Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor or Tocilizumab Therapy as First Biologic Agent in a Global Comparative Observational Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Oct;69(10):1484-1494. doi: 10.1002/acr.23303. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

    PubMed 28622454

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 154 sites in 16 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 154 sites in United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, Belgium, Ukraine and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01543503, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in