Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT01543503
An Global Comparative Observational Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 154 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
This prospective, multi-center, observational study will assess the efficacy and safety of treatment in patients who are treated with a TNF Inhibitor or RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) as the first biologic therapy. Data will be collected for 52 weeks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- How many people
- 1,225 participants
- Where
- 154 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2012to Feb 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients, >/=18 years of age
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
- Non-respondent or intolerant to non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy
- Patient has been prescribed a first biologic therapy up to 6 weeks prior to the inclusion visit, irrespective of the treatment prescribed
Who cannot join
- Patients whose first biologic therapy is given as part of a clinical trial studying rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment
- Patients who are receiving or have received experimental DMARDs as part of a clinical trial studying RA treatment in the last 12 months
- Patients whose first biologic is rituximab, abatacept or anakinra.
- Patients who have received any biologic therapy for more than 6 weeks prior to the inclusion visit
Trial locations and contacts
154 sites in 16 countries.
154 sites in 16 countries
United Kingdom39 sites
Study site
Barnsley, S75 2EP
Study site
Basildon, SS16 5NL
Study site
Basingstoke, RG24 9NA
Study site
Brighton, BN2 5BE
Study site
Cannock, WS11 5XY
Study site
Cardiff, CF14 4XW
Study site
Chertsey, KT16 0PZ
Study site
Crawley, RH11 7DH
Study site
Darlington, DL3 6HX
Study site
Enfield, EN2 8JL
Study site
Grimsby, DN33 2BA
Study site
Guildford, GU2 7XX
Study site
Ipswich, IP4 5PD
Study site
Kettering, NN16 8UZ
Study site
Lancaster, LA1 4RP
Study site
Leeds, LS7 4SA
Study site
Llandudno, LL30 1LB
Study site
London, SE18 4QH
Study site
London, SW17 0QT
Study site
London, W6 8RF
Study site
Luton, LU4 0DZ
Study site
Maidstone, ME16 9QQ
Study site
Margate, CT9 4AN
Study site
Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, CH49 5PE
Study site
North Shields, NE29 8NH
Study site
Oswestry, SY10 7AG
Study site
Plymouth, PL6 8DH
Study site
Portsmouth, PO6 3LY
Study site
Reading, RG1 5AN
Study site
Rhyl, LL18 5UJ
Study site
Romford, RM7 0AG
Study site
Sheffield, S10 2JF
Study site
Stockport, SK2 7JE
Study site
Sunderland, SR4 7TP
Study site
Swindon, SN3 6BB
Study site
Torquay, TQ2 7AA
Study site
Warrington, WA5 1QG
Study site
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
Study site
Wrightington, WN6 9EP
Italy25 sites
Study site
Agnone, Molise, 86081
Study site
Arenzano, Liguria, 16011
Study site
Avellino, Campania, 83100
Study site
Brescia, Lombardy, 25123
Study site
Brindisi, Apulia, 72100
Study site
Catania, Sicily, 95124
Study site
Coppito, Abruzzo, 67100
Study site
Jesi Ancona, The Marches, 60035
Study site
Legnano, Lombardy, 20025
Study site
Martina Franca, Apulia, 74015
Study site
Milan, Lombardy, 20157
Study site
Milan, Lombardy, 20162
Study site
Naples, Campania, 80131
Study site
Naples, Campania, 80144
Study site
Perugia, Umbria, 06122
Study site
Pescara, Abruzzo, 65100
Study site
Prato, Tuscany, 59100
Study site
Reggio Calabria, Calabria, 89133
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00133
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00189
Study site
Salerno, Campania, 84131
Study site
San Cesario di Lecce, Apulia, 73016
Study site
Turin, Piedmont, 10126
Study site
Turin, Piedmont, 10128
Study site
Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, 33100
Germany22 sites
Study site
Aachen, 52064
Study site
Bad Aibling, 83043
Study site
Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, 53474
Study site
Bayreuth, 95445
Study site
Berlin, 13055
Study site
Cologne, 50937
Study site
Dresden, 01109
Study site
Erfurt, 99096
Study site
Erlangen, 91056
Study site
Fulda, 36043
Study site
Hamburg, 22147
Study site
Hamburg, 22767
Study site
Heidelberg, 69121
Study site
Herne, 44652
Study site
Ludwigsfelde, 14974
Study site
München, 80639
Study site
München, 81541
Study site
Passau, 94032
Study site
Rostock, 18059
Study site
Stuttgart, 70178
Study site
Traunstein, 83278
Study site
Wuppertal, 42105
Belgium14 sites
Study site
Aalst, 9300
Study site
Assebroek, 8310
Study site
Aye, 6900
Study site
Brussels, 1000
Study site
Brussels, 1050
Study site
Edegem, 2650
Study site
Genk, 3600
Study site
Ghent, 9000
Study site
Godinne, 5530
Study site
Heusy, 4802
Study site
Liège, 4000
Study site
Ostend, 8400
Study site
Verviers, 4800
Study site
Westmalle, 2390
Ukraine9 sites
Study site
Donetsk, 83045
Study site
Kharkiv, 61052
Study site
Kmelnytskyy, 29000
Study site
Kyiv, 02125
Study site
Kyiv, 03151
Study site
Kyiv, 1023
Study site
Odesa, 65026
Study site
Uzhhorod, 88000
Study site
Zaporizhzhya, 69600
Ecuador7 sites
Study site
Cuenca
Study site
Esmeraldas, EC080150
Study site
Guayaquil, EC090114
Study site
Portoviejo
Study site
Quito, 005932
Study site
Quito, EC170135
Study site
Quito, EC170412
Portugal7 sites
Study site
Almada, 2801-951
Study site
Amadora, 2720-276
Study site
Lisbon, 1069-166
Study site
Lisbon, 1649-035
Study site
Porto, 4099-001
Study site
Porto, 4200-319
Study site
Vila Nova de Gaia, 4400-129
Greece5 sites
Study site
Athens, 11527
Study site
Athens, 155 62
Study site
Pátrai, 26335
Study site
Thessaloniki, 544 65
Study site
Thessaloniki, 56429
Mexico5 sites
Study site
Guadalajara, 44600
Study site
Guadalajara, 44650
Study site
Guadalajara, 45040
Study site
Mexicali, 21100
Study site
Mexico Ctiy, 07760
Spain5 sites
Study site
Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 28942
Study site
Madrid, Madrid, 28006
Study site
Madrid, Madrid, 28007
Study site
Madrid, Madrid, 28905
Study site
San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, 28702
Argentina4 sites
Study site
Catamarca Capital, 4700
Study site
Mendoza, 5500
Study site
Mendoza, 5501
Study site
Rosario, S2000PBJ
Colombia4 sites
Study site
Barranquilla
Study site
Bogotá
Study site
Bucaramanga
Study site
Medellín
Switzerland4 sites
Study site
Aarau, 5000
Study site
Basel, 4031
Study site
Chur, 7000
Study site
Sankt Gallen, 9007
About this study
Official title: A Global Comparative Observational Study In Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Who Are Treated With A TNF Inhibitor Or Tocilizumab As The First Biologic Therapy
This prospective, multi-center, observational study will assess the efficacy and safety of treatment in patients who are treated with a TNF Inhibitor or RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) as the first biologic therapy. Data will be collected for 52 weeks.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 24
Disease activity score based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) is a composite measure of disease severity and it incorporates four specific measures of disease: swollen joint count (SJC) of 28 joints, tender joint count (TJC) of 28 joints, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity by visual analogue scale (VAS), and acute-phase inflammatory marker [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in millimeter/hour (mm/h), or C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligram/liter (mg/L)]. For the purposes of this study, ESR was used whenever possible to calculate the DAS28 (DAS28-ESR). Higher the scores, greater is the disease activity. A DAS28 score of less than or equal to (</=) 3.2 = low disease activity, a DAS28 score of >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Secondary outcomes (19)
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 52
Disease activity score based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) is a composite measure of disease severity and it incorporates four specific measures of disease: swollen joint count (SJC) of 28 joints, tender joint count (TJC) of 28 joints, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity by visual analogue scale (VAS), and acute-phase inflammatory marker (ESR in mm/h, or CRP in mg/L). For the purposes of this study, ESR was used whenever possible to calculate the DAS28 (DAS28-ESR). Higher the scores, greater is the disease activity. A DAS28 score of </= 3.2 = low disease activity, a DAS28 score of >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Blood samples were collected for ESR, which is an acute phase reactant and a measure of inflammation. BL = baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein
Blood samples were collected for C-reactive protein (CRP). CRP is an inflammation marker. High levels of this protein indicate inflammation in diseases such as RA.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count
A swollen joint count (SJC) is the most specific clinical method to quantify abnormalities in participants with RA. It reflects the amount of inflamed synovial tissue. Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling. Joints were classified as swollen (1)/ not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count
A tender joint count (TJC) is the most specific clinical method to quantify abnormalities in participants with RA. It is associated with the level of pain. Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness. Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 28.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simplified Disease Activity Index Score
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was calculated as the sum of the following parameters: SJC + TJC + VAS Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity + VAS Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity. VAS assessments involved a 10-cm horizontal scale from 'no disease activity' to 'maximum disease activity'. CDAI scores ranged from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased disease activity. Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) was calculated as the sum of the following parameters: SJC +TJC + Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity + Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity + CRP. SDAI scores ranged from 0 to 86, with higher scores also indicating increased disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Score
The Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Change from baseline = scores at observation minus score at baseline. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Loss of Efficacy or Development of Intolerance to Biologic Therapy
Events that are clearly consistent with the expected pattern of progression of the underlying disease may contribute to lack of efficacy. Lack of efficacy was one of the reasons for termination of biology therapy. The number of participants showing lack of efficacy to biologic therapy is presented.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Proportion of Participants Who Terminated Biologic Treatment
The proportion of participants who discontinued biologic treatment was compared between tocilizumab-treated and TNF inhibitor-treated participants.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation
The reasons for discontinuation of tocilizumab or TNF inhibitor is presented.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Cumulative Number of Participants Who Discontinued Biologic Therapy at the End of Each Study Period
The total number of participants who discontinued biologic therapy at the end of each study period (Week 0 - 24, Week 24 - 52, Week 52 - 57 and Week 57 - end of treatment) is presented. Participants who did not have a biologic therapy discontinuation or discontinued before having one, were considered as 'censored' at the date study termination.
Measured: Up to end of treatment
Number of Participants of Infusion Reactions or Injection Site Reactions During the Study Following the Start of the First Biologic Therapy
An infusion reaction was defined as an adverse event (AE) occurring during and within 24 hours after the infusion, which may include hypersensitivity reactions or anaphylactic reactions. Injection site reactions were included in the summaries for infusion reactions.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Non-serious Adverse Events
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events of Special Interest, Including Infections, During the Study
Adverse events of special interest (AESI) for this study included: infections (including opportunistic infections), myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome, gastrointestinal perforation and related events, malignancies, anaphylaxis / hypersensitivity reactions, demyelinating disorders, stroke, bleeding events and hepatic events. Based on seriousness criteria, they were categorized as serious and non-serious adverse events of special interest.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index Score
The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 to 3 (0=no difficulty and 3=inability to perform a task in that area). HAQ-DI total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; more than 1=significant functional limitation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Score
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participant's fatigue. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score
VAS is a 100 mm scale. Intensity of pain range: 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. Change from baseline =scores at observation minus score at baseline. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Shift From Baseline in Morning Stiffness
Shift tables presenting the number of participants in each bivariate category Week (W) 0 versus Week 24 and Week 52, with regards to morning stiffness at the different time points, was presented for each treatment arm. For participants who experienced joint stiffness while waking up in the morning, duration of morning stiffness was categorized as follows: Less than 30 minutes (min), Between 30 and 60 minutes, Between 60 and 120 minutes, Between 120 to 240 minutes, More than 240 minutes and the whole day. Baseline = BL
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
The patient's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2012
- Primary completionFeb 2015
- Study completionFeb 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,225 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01543503
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MA27950
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Choy EH, Bernasconi C, Aassi M, Molina JF, Epis OM. Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor or Tocilizumab Therapy as First Biologic Agent in a Global Comparative Observational Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Oct;69(10):1484-1494. doi: 10.1002/acr.23303. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
PubMed 28622454
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Global Comparative Observational Study In Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Who Are Treated With A TNF Inhibitor Or Tocilizumab As The First Biologic Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01543503
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MA27950
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,225 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2012
- Primary completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Feb 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective, multi-center, observational study will assess the efficacy and safety of treatment in patients who are treated with a TNF Inhibitor or RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) as the first biologic therapy. Data will be collected for 52 weeks.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult patients, >/=18 years of age
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
- Non-respondent or intolerant to non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy
- Patient has been prescribed a first biologic therapy up to 6 weeks prior to the inclusion visit, irrespective of the treatment prescribed
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients whose first biologic therapy is given as part of a clinical trial studying rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment
- Patients who are receiving or have received experimental DMARDs as part of a clinical trial studying RA treatment in the last 12 months
- Patients whose first biologic is rituximab, abatacept or anakinra.
- Patients who have received any biologic therapy for more than 6 weeks prior to the inclusion visit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Disease activity score based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) is a composite measure of disease severity and it incorporates four specific measures of disease: swollen joint count (SJC) of 28 joints, tender joint count (TJC) of 28 joints, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity by visual analogue scale (VAS), and acute-phase inflammatory marker [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in millimeter/hour (mm/h), or C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligram/liter (mg/L)]. For the purposes of this study, ESR was used whenever possible to calculate the DAS28 (DAS28-ESR). Higher the scores, greater is the disease activity. A DAS28 score of less than or equal to (</=) 3.2 = low disease activity, a DAS28 score of >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
19 secondary outcomes
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simplified Disease Activity Index Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Loss of Efficacy or Development of Intolerance to Biologic Therapy
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Proportion of Participants Who Terminated Biologic Treatment
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Cumulative Number of Participants Who Discontinued Biologic Therapy at the End of Each Study Period
Time frame: Up to end of treatment
Number of Participants of Infusion Reactions or Injection Site Reactions During the Study Following the Start of the First Biologic Therapy
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Non-serious Adverse Events
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events of Special Interest, Including Infections, During the Study
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Shift From Baseline in Morning Stiffness
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28622454Choy EH, Bernasconi C, Aassi M, Molina JF, Epis OM. Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor or Tocilizumab Therapy as First Biologic Agent in a Global Comparative Observational Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Oct;69(10):1484-1494. doi: 10.1002/acr.23303. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
154 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 154 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 154 sites in United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, Belgium, Ukraine and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01543503, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2016.