DiabetesPhase 3Ellipse™NCT01541215
Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide in Combination With Metformin Compared to Metformin Alone, in Children and Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes
A Phase 3 study testing liraglutide and metformin in people with Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Novo Nordisk A/S at 185 sites in 36 countries.
Trial summary
This trial is conducted globally. The aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in the paediatric population in order to potentially address the unmet need for treatment of children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- liraglutide and metformin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 135 participants
- Where
- 185 sitesin 36 countries
- Study dates
- 13 Nov 2012to 20 May 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Inclusion Criteria: - Children and adolescents between the ages of 10-16 years. Subjects cannot turn 17 years and 11 months before the end of treatment (52 weeks) - Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and treated for at least 30 days with: diet and exercise alone, diet and exercise in combination with metformin monotherapy, diet and exercise in combination with metformin and a stable (Stable is defined as basal insulin adjustments up to 15%) dose of basal insulin, diet and exercise in combination with a stable (Stable is defined as basal insulin adjustments up to 15%) dose of basal insulin - HbA1c: 7.0-11% (inclusive) if diet and exercise treated or 6.5-11% (inclusive) if treated with metformin as monotherapy, basal insulin as monotherapy or metformin and basal insulin in combination - Body mass index (BMI) above 85% percentile of the general age and gender matched population Exclusion Criteria: - Type 1 diabetes - Maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) - Use of any antidiabetic agent other than metformin and/or basal insulin within 90 days prior to screening - Recurrent severe hypoglycaemia or hypoglycaemic unawareness as judged by the investigator - History of chronic pancreatitis or idiopathic acute pancreatitis - Any clinically significant disorder, except for conditions associated with type 2 diabetes history which in the investigator's opinion could interfere with results of the trial - Uncontrolled hypertension, treated or untreated above 99th percentile for age and gender in children - Known or suspected abuse of alcohol or drugs/narcotics
Trial locations and contacts
185 sites in 36 countries.
185 sites in 36 countries
United States71 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Amarillo, Texas, 79106
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30318
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bloomington, Indiana, 47401
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Buffalo, New York, 14203
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Charleston, West Virginia, 25302
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Columbia, Missouri, 65201
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Corona, California, 92880
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Costa Mesa, California, 92626
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Edinburg, Texas, 78539
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77054
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77061
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kerrville, Texas, 78028
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0284
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, 90806
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90048-1869
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Melbourne, Florida, 32901
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119-3821
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33126
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33144
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33155
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Moreno Valley, California, 92555
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10003
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10016
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10029
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Palo Alto, California, 94304-1503
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19134
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85053
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78233
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92123
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sleepy Hollow, New York, 10591
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63104
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Toledo, Ohio, 43606
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Topeka, Kansas, 66606
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85724-0001
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ventura, California, 93003
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20011
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
West Orange, New Jersey, 07052
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Wilmington, Delaware, 19803
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
India17 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 017
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560041
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560052
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560054
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chandigarh, Punjab, 160012
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600086
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, 522001
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500072
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hyderbad, Telangana, 500 012
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302006
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kolkata, West Bengal, 700020
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kolkata, 700017
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ludhiana, Punjab, 141001
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400008
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400703
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
New Dehli, New Delhi, 110029
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pune, Maharashtra, 411001
Russia10 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chelyabinsk, 454087
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Izhevsk, 426009
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Krasnoyarsk, 660022
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Moscow, 117036
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Moscow, 125373
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Novosibirsk, 630048
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 191144
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 194100
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saratov, 410054
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tomsk, 634050
Hungary5 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Budapest, 1023
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Budapest, 1089
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Budapest, 1094
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Miskolc, 3501
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Szombathely, H-9700
Israel5 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Beersheba, 84101
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Haifa, 31096
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Jerusalem, 91240
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Petah Tikva, 49202
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tel HaShomer, 52621
Spain5 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Leganés, 28911
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Madrid, 28009
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Madrid, 28046
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Vigo, 36312
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01009
United Kingdom5 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Birmingham, B4 6NH
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
London, SE5 9RS
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Manchester, M13 9WL
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Norwich, NR4 7TJ
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Southampton, SO16 6YD
Austria4 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Graz, 8036
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Innsbruck, 6020
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Salzburg, 5020
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Wels, 4600
Canada4 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Brampton, Ontario, L6T 0G1
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Edmonton, Alberta, T5X 3N5
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Westmount, Quebec, H3Z 1E5
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 3P4
Egypt4 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Al Mansurah, 35516
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Alexandria, 21131
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cairo, 11562
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cairo, 11628
Greece4 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Athens, 151 23
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Athens, GR-17562
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Goudi/ Athens, GR-11527
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, GR-54643
Romania4 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bucharest, 020614
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bucharest, 041451
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Constanța, 900591
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Timișoara, Timiș County, 300011
Serbia4 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Belgrade, 11000
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Belgrade, 11070
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Niš, 18 000
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Novi Sad, 21000
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ankara, 06100
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ankara, 06230
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Istanbul, 34890
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kocaeli, 41380
Belgium3 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Brussels, 1090
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Brussels, 1200
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Leuven, 3000
Poland3 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Katowice, 40-752
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Warsaw, 04-730
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Wroclaw, 50-311
Portugal3 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Braga, 4710-243
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Lisbon, 1169-045
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Lisbon, 1649-035
Sweden3 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Gothenburg, 416 85
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Huddinge, 141 57
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Uppsala, 751 85
Croatia2 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Rijeka, 51000
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Zagreb, 10 000
Denmark2 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Herlev, 2730
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Næstved, 4700
France2 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Marseille, 13006
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Montpellier, 34295
Germany2 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ludwigshafen, 67059
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mayen, 56727
Lebanon2 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hazmiyeh, 9615
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Lebanon - Beirut, 9611
Mexico2 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Puebla City, 72190
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tampico, Tamaulipas, 89170
Morocco2 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Fes, 30000
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Rabat, 10000
Taiwan2 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tainan, 710
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Taoyuan, 333
Thailand2 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bangkok, 10700
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chiang Mai, 50200
Brazil1 site
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91350-250
Netherlands1 site
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
's-Hertogenbosch, 5223GZ
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide in Combination With Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy on Glycaemic Control in Children and Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes
This trial is conducted globally. The aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in the paediatric population in order to potentially address the unmet need for treatment of children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes.
- Conditions
- Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- liraglutide, placebo, metformin
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
liraglutideDrug
Administered subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily.1.8 mg or maximum tolerated dose (MTD: 0.6 mg, 1.2 mg, 1.8 mg) for 26 weeks. Subjects will continue treatment in a 26 week open-labelled extension. Rescue treatment will be allowed if rescue criteria are met.
placeboDrug
Administered subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily for 26 weeks. Subjects will discontinue placebo treatment in the open-labelled extension. Rescue treatment will be allowed if rescue criteria are met.
metforminDrug
Tablets administered for 26 weeks. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) between 1000-2000 mg at the discretion of the investigator. Subjects will continue treatment in a 26 week open-labelled extension.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lira + Met | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: liraglutide; Drug: metformin |
| Placebo + Met | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: placebo; Drug: metformin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. All available data were used for the primary analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Secondary outcomes (79)
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Change in FPG from baseline to week 26. All available data were used for the analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0%
Percentage of subjects having HbA1c <7.0%. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 26
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 26. BMI SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' BMI provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the world health organisation (WHO) Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0%
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <7.0% after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Maximum 6.5%
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <=6.5% after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 26
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Maximum 6.5%
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <=6.5% after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <7.0% without severe or minor hypoglycaemic episodes after 26 weeks.
Severe hypoglycaemia: An episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions.
Minor hypoglycaemia was defined as meeting either of the below criteria:
- an episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by blood glucose <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL), and which was handled by the subject him/herself
- any asymptomatic blood glucose value <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 26
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <7.0% without severe or minor hypoglycaemic episodes after 52 weeks.
Severe hypoglycaemia: An episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions.
Minor hypoglycaemia was defined as meeting either of the below criteria:
- an episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by blood glucose <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL), and which was handled by the subject him/herself
- any asymptomatic blood glucose value <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.5%
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <7.5% after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 26
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.5%
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c <7.5% after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 52
Change in HbA1c
Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 52. All available data were used for the analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in FPG
Change in FPG from baseline to week 52. All available data were used for the analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Mean 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose
Change in mean 7-point self-measured plasma glucose after 26 weeks. Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point SMPG was defined as the area under the profile (calculated using the trapezoidal method) divided by time. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Change From Baseline in 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose
Change in mean 7-point self-measured plasma glucose after 52 weeks. Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point SMPG was defined as the area under the profile (calculated using the trapezoidal method) divided by time. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Change in post-prandial increments (from before meal to 90 min after breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 26 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Change in post-prandial increments (from before meal to 90 min after breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 52 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Mean Post-prandial Increment Across All Three Meals (Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Change in mean post-prandial increment across all three meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 26 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Change in Mean Post-prandial Increment Across All Three Meals (Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Change in mean post-prandial increment across all three meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 52 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Change from baseline in body weight after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Change from baseline in body weight after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change From Baseline in BMI Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 52. BMI SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' BMI provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Insulin
Ratio to baseline (fasting insulin) at week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Insulin
Ratio to baseline (fasting insulin) at week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Pro-insulin
Ratio to baseline (fasting pro-insulin) at week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Pro-insulin
Ratio to baseline (fasting pro-insulin) at week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio
Ratio to baseline (Pro-insulin/insulin ratio) after week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio
Ratio to baseline (Pro-insulin/insulin ratio) after week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Glucagon
Ratio to baseline (fasting glucagon) at week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Glucagon
Ratio to baseline (fasting glucagon) at week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting C-peptide
Ratio to baseline (fasting C-peptide) at week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting C-peptide
Ratio to baseline (fasting C-peptide) at week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B)
Ratio to baseline (HOMA-B) after 26 weeks. HOMA-B is an index of beta-cell function and was calculated from fasting insulin. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: HOMA-B
Ratio to baseline (HOMA-B) after 52 weeks. HOMA-B is an index of beta-cell function and was calculated from fasting insulin. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Homeostasis Model Assessment as an Index of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
Ratio to baseline (HOMA-IR) after 26 weeks. HOMA-IR is an index of insulin resistance and was calculated from fasting insulin. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: HOMA-IR
Ratio to baseline (HOMA-IR) after 52 weeks. HOMA-IR is an index of insulin resistance and was calculated from fasting insulin. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Total Cholesterol
Ratio to baseline (total cholesterol) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Total Cholesterol
Ratio to baseline (total cholesterol) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
Ratio to baseline (LDL cholesterol) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: LDL Cholesterol
Ratio to baseline (LDL cholesterol) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol
Ratio to baseline (VLDL cholesterol) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: VLDL Cholesterol
Ratio to baseline (VLDL cholesterol) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol
Ratio to baseline (HDL cholesterol) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: HDL Cholesterol
Ratio to baseline (HDL cholesterol) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Triglycerides
Ratio to baseline (triglycerides) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Triglycerides
Ratio to baseline (triglycerides) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Free Fatty Acids
Ratio to baseline (free fatty acids) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Free Fatty Acids
Ratio to baseline (free fatty acids) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change From Baseline in Pulse
Change from baseline in pulse 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Change From Baseline in Pulse
Change from baseline in pulse 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change From Baseline in Height SDS
Change in height SDS from baseline to week 26. Height SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Change From Baseline in Height SDS
Change in height SDS from baseline to week 52. Height SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Bone Age Assessment (X-ray of Left Hand and Wrist)
Change in bone age from baseline to week 52. If the baseline (week 0) bone age assessment indicated that all epiphyses were fused, then the assessment was not repeated at week 52.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubertal development was assessed in 3 areas (breast, penis and pubic hair development) by the Tanner staging in accordance with stages I-V. The Tanner staging assessment was no longer required to be performed once a subject reached the Tanner stage V, as judged by the investigator. Reported results are number of participants at different Tanner stages at week 0, week 26 and week 52.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52
Growth (Height Velocity)
Growth (i.e., height velocity) is the change in height per year and is measured in cm/year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by the time (in days) between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Growth (Height Velocity)
Growth (i.e., height velocity) is the change in height per year and is measured in cm/year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by the time (in days) between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Height Velocity SDS
Height velocity SDS scores at week 26. Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Height Velocity SDS
Height velocity SDS scores at week 52. Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Number of Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification from baseline (week 0) to week 26.
Measured: 0-26 weeks
Number of Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification from baseline (week 0) to week 52.
Measured: 0-52 weeks
Number of Adverse Events (Week 0-26)
Total number of adverse events during 26 weeks.
Measured: 0-26 weeks
Number of Adverse Events (Week 0-52)
Total number of adverse events during entire treatment period.
Measured: 0-52 weeks
Number of Serious Adverse Events (Week 0-26)
Total number of serious adverse events during 26 weeks.
Measured: 0-26 weeks
Number of Serious Adverse Events (Week 0-52)
Total number of serious adverse events during entire treatment period.
Measured: 0-52 weeks
Number of Adverse Events (Week 53-104)
This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. Number of adverse events reported during follow-up 1 (week 53 to 104).
Measured: Week 53-104
Number of Serious Adverse Events (Week 53-104)
This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. Number of serious adverse events reported during follow up 1 (week 53 to 104).
Measured: Weeks 53-104
Growth (Height Velocity)- Week 104
Growth (i.e., height velocity) is the change in height per year and is measured in cm/year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by the time (in days) between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.
Measured: Week 0, week 104
Height Velocity SDS- Week 104
The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.
Measured: Week 0, week 104
Change From Week 52 in Height SDS- Week 104
Change in height SDS from week 52 to week 104. Height SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.
Measured: Week 52, week 104
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Pubertal development was assessed in 3 areas (breast, penis and pubic hair development) by the Tanner staging in accordance with stages I-V, where stage I represents "pre-adoloscent development" and stage V represents "pubertal development equivalent to that of an adult". The Tanner staging assessment was no longer required to be performed once a subject reached the Tanner stage V, as judged by the investigator. Reported results are number of subjects at different Tanner stages at week 52 and week 104. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.
Measured: Week 52, week 104
Change From Week 52 in Bone Age Assessment (X-ray of Left Hand and Wrist)- Week 104
Change in bone age from week 52 to week 104. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.
Measured: Week 52, week 104
Number of Adverse Events (Week 53-156)
This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. Number of adverse events reported during the follow-up period (weeks 53 to 156).
Measured: Week 53-156
Number of Serious Adverse Events (Week 53-156)
This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. Number of serious adverse events reported during the follow up period (week 53 to 156).
Measured: Weeks 53-156
Growth (Height Velocity)- Week 156
Growth (i.e., height velocity) is the change in height per year and is measured in cm/year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by the time (in days) between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.
Measured: Week 0, week 156
Height Velocity SDS- Week 156
The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.
Measured: Week 0, week 156
Change From Week 52 in Height SDS- Week 156
Change in height SDS from week 52 to week 156. Height SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(value /M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.
Measured: Week 52, week 156
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Pubertal development was assessed in 3 areas (breast, penis and pubic hair development) by the Tanner staging in accordance with stages I-V, where stage I represents "pre-adoloscent development" and stage V represents "pubertal development equivalent to that of an adult". The Tanner staging assessment was no longer required to be performed once a subject reached the Tanner stage V, as judged by the investigator. Reported results are number of subjects at different Tanner stages at week 52 and week 156. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.
Measured: Week 52, week 156
Change From Week 52 in Bone Age Assessment (X-ray of Left Hand and Wrist)- Week 156
Change in bone age from week 52 to week 156. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.
Measured: Week 52, week 156
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Study start13 Nov 2012
- Primary completion15 Nov 2017
- Study completion20 May 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novo Nordisk A/SThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 135 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novo Nordisk A/S
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01541215
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NN2211-3659
- Other IDs
- 2011-002605-29, P/288/2010, U1111-1121-8743, CTRI/2013/10/004082
- Acronym
- Ellipse™
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 23 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 2 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: According to the Novo Nordisk disclosure commitment on novonordisk-trials.com
Publications
Tamborlane WV, Barrientos-Perez M, Fainberg U, Frimer-Larsen H, Hafez M, Hale PM, Jalaludin MY, Kovarenko M, Libman I, Lynch JL, Rao P, Shehadeh N, Turan S, Weghuber D, Barrett T; Ellipse Trial Investigators. Liraglutide in Children and Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):637-646. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903822. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
PubMed 31034184Bensignor MO, Bomberg EM, Bramante CT, Divyalasya TVS, Hale PM, Ramesh CK, Rudser KD, Kelly AS. Effect of liraglutide treatment on body mass index and weight parameters in children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes: Post hoc analysis of the ellipse trial. Pediatr Obes. 2021 Aug;16(8):e12778. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12778. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
PubMed 33634589
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide in Combination With Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy on Glycaemic Control in Children and Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01541215
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Ellipse™ / NN2211-3659
- Conditions
- Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 135 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novo Nordisk A/SIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 13 Nov 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Dec 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial is conducted globally. The aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in the paediatric population in order to potentially address the unmet need for treatment of children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lira + Met | Experimental | Drug: liraglutide, Drug: metformin |
| Placebo + Met | Placebo comparator | Drug: placebo, Drug: metformin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| liraglutideAdministered subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily.1.8 mg or maximum tolerated dose (MTD: 0.6 mg, 1.2 mg, 1.8 mg) for 26 weeks. Subjects will continue treatment in a 26 week open-labelled extension. Rescue treatment will be allowed if rescue criteria are met. | Drug | Lira + Met |
| placeboAdministered subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily for 26 weeks. Subjects will discontinue placebo treatment in the open-labelled extension. Rescue treatment will be allowed if rescue criteria are met. | Drug | Placebo + Met |
| metforminTablets administered for 26 weeks. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) between 1000-2000 mg at the discretion of the investigator. Subjects will continue treatment in a 26 week open-labelled extension. | Drug | Lira + Met, Placebo + Met |
Primary outcome
Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. All available data were used for the primary analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
79 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0%
Time frame: Week 26
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0%
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Maximum 6.5%
Time frame: Week 26
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Maximum 6.5%
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time frame: Week 26
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.5%
Time frame: Week 26
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.5%
Time frame: Week 52
Change in HbA1c
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in FPG
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Mean 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Change From Baseline in 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Mean Post-prandial Increment Across All Three Meals (Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Change in Mean Post-prandial Increment Across All Three Meals (Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change From Baseline in BMI Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Insulin
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Insulin
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Pro-insulin
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Pro-insulin
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Glucagon
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Glucagon
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting C-peptide
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting C-peptide
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B)
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: HOMA-B
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Homeostasis Model Assessment as an Index of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: HOMA-IR
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Total Cholesterol
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Ratio to Baseline: Total Cholesterol
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Ratio to Baseline: Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jul 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 31034184Tamborlane WV, Barrientos-Perez M, Fainberg U, Frimer-Larsen H, Hafez M, Hale PM, Jalaludin MY, Kovarenko M, Libman I, Lynch JL, Rao P, Shehadeh N, Turan S, Weghuber D, Barrett T; Ellipse Trial Investigators. Liraglutide in Children and Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):637-646. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903822. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33634589Bensignor MO, Bomberg EM, Bramante CT, Divyalasya TVS, Hale PM, Ramesh CK, Rudser KD, Kelly AS. Effect of liraglutide treatment on body mass index and weight parameters in children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes: Post hoc analysis of the ellipse trial. Pediatr Obes. 2021 Aug;16(8):e12778. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12778. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
- Clinical Trials at Novo NordiskLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. According to the Novo Nordisk disclosure commitment on novonordisk-trials.com
Related trials for Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
185 sites in 36 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing liraglutide and metformin in people with Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Novo Nordisk A/S at 185 sites in 36 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 185 sites in United States, India, Russia, Hungary, Israel and 31 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Dec 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) (time frame: Week 0, week 26). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01541215, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2021.