AzTrials
AzTrials

Diseases of Mitral ValvePhase 4NCT01536717

Comparison of the Local Anaesthetics Articaine and Bupivacaine in Treatment of Acute Sternum Pain After Heart Surgery

A Phase 4 study testing Articaine hydrochloride 2% solution and Sodium Chloride in people with Diseases of Mitral Valve and Aortic Valve Disorder, run by Helsinki University Central Hospital at 2 sites in Finland.

Suspended

Paused. Enrolment is on hold for now and may resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the wound infusion of articaine for treatment of acute post-sternotomy pain in a placebo-controlled manner using a prospective and randomized design and an active control (bupivacaine) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
Articaine hydrochloride 2% solution and Sodium Chloride
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
36 participants
Where
2 sitesFinland
Study dates
Mar 2012to Dec 2022
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • elective procedure
  • open heart surgery
  • aortic valve surgery
  • mitral valve surgery
  • atrial septal defect repair surgery
  • intracardial myxoma removal surgery

Who cannot join

  • local anesthetic allergy
  • sulphide allergy
  • asthma
  • pregnant women
  • neurological disease (TIA excluded)
  • congestive heart failure
Show all 12Show fewer
  • left ventricle ejection fracture under 0.3
  • liver failure
  • diabetes mellitus with documented polyneuropathy
  • chronic pain condition
  • mother tongue not finnish or swedish
  • patients, who do not agree blood transfusions

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Finland2 sites
  • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care medicine, Divison of Surgery, Meilahti hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital

    Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00029

  • Department of Cardiothoracic surgery, Division of Surgery, Meilahti hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital

    Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00029

Other trials in Finland

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Periosteal and Subcutaneous Infusions of Articaine and Bupivacaine in Treatment of Acute Pain After Sternotomy

The purpose of this study is to examine the wound infusion of articaine for treatment of acute post-sternotomy pain in a placebo-controlled manner using a prospective and randomized design and an active control (bupivacaine)

Read the detailed description

Acute pain after open heart surgery can be moderate or strong and is mostly caused by sternotomy. Pain is the worst during the first two post-operative days and, if not adequately treated, can delay the patient´s recovery from surgery. Sternotomy pain can be alleviated by using paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids. All these drugs may have remarkable side-effects which may delay the recovery from surgery: opioids are respiratory depressants and slower the gastrointestinal motility, NSAIDs reduce intrarenal blood flow and may disturb coagulation. Post-operative opioid consumption can be reduced by using wound infiltration analgesia.

The use of wound infiltration analgesia has not been extensively investigated in treatment of acute pain after sternotomy. There is some evidence, that 0.5% bupivacaine reduces the acute post-sternotomy pain when infused constantly via catheters placed under the fascia (periosteal placement) and the skin.

During 48 hours infusion toxic bupivacaine plasma levels were not observed. There is an evidence that local anesthetics can be bacteriostatic both in vitro and in vivo.

Articaine is an amide-type local anesthetics, which has been used extensively in dental procedures since more than forty years. It has been successfully used in infiltration, epidural, spinal and other regional anesthesia procedures. Articaine is quickly hydrolyzed in plasma and excreted by kidneys. Clearance of articain (500-1110l/h) is faster than that of lidocaine (68l/h) and it is also the reason for articaine´s low toxicity profile. Because of it´s low toxicity and high ability to penetrate the periosteal tissue, articaine may be advantageous in treatment of acute pain after sternotomy, but aforementioned indication for use of articaine has not been investigated. Compared to other local anesthetics, articaine in high concentration has the same neurotoxicity profile, when injected directly into rat´s sciatic nerve. Articaine has not been extensively compared to other local anesthetics, but according the latest odontologic investigation, single dose 0.5% bupivacaine and single-dose 4% articaine were comparable in their analgesic effects during tooth extraction procedure. There are no controlled randomized trials comparing analgesic effect of articaine and other local anesthetics infusions.

In our investigation bupivacain 0.5 % was chosen as an active control, because it has appeared effective in acute postoperative pain and it has reduced the need for opioid analgetics after sternotomy

Being tested
Articaine hydrochloride 2% solution, Sodium Chloride
Keywords
atrial septal defect, mitral valve annuloplasty, aortic valve annuloplasty, open heart surgery, oxycodone consumption, articain, bupivacaine, pain after sternotomy, postoperative pain, wound infusion
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Disease, Heart Septal Defects, Atrial, Atrial myxoma, familial, Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Articaine hydrochloride 2% solutionDrug

    Also called Ultracain D ohne Adrenalin 20 mg/ml, ATC code N01BB08

    • 4 ml/h periosteal wound infusion
    • duration of 72 h
  • Sodium ChlorideDrug

    Placebo Sodium chloride 0,9%

Study groups in NCT01536717
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5%Active comparatorBupivacaine hydrochloride is related chemically and pharmacologically to the aminoacyl local anesthetics. Bupivacaine hydrochloride is indicated for the production of local or regional anesthesia or analgesia for surgery, for oral surgery procedures, for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and for obstetrical procedures.
Receives: Drug: Articaine hydrochloride 2% solution
Sodium chloride 0,9%Placebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sodium Chloride

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Oxycodone consumption

    Measured: 72 hours from initiation of treatment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Intensity of pain in rest/in movement (AUC)

    Measured: 72 hours from initiation of treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Feb 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01536717
Sponsor's protocol ID
2011-004307-20
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
16 Feb 2012
Last updated
7 May 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Kehlet H, Andersen LO. Local infiltration analgesia in joint replacement: the evidence and recommendations for clinical practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Aug;55(7):778-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02429.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4.

    PubMed 21463261
  • White PF, Rawal S, Latham P, Markowitz S, Issioui T, Chi L, Dellaria S, Shi C, Morse L, Ing C. Use of a continuous local anesthetic infusion for pain management after median sternotomy. Anesthesiology. 2003 Oct;99(4):918-23. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200310000-00026.

    PubMed 14508326
  • Magnano D, Montalbano R, Lamarra M, Ferri F, Lorini L, Clarizia S, Rescigno G. Ineffectiveness of local wound anesthesia to reduce postoperative pain after median sternotomy. J Card Surg. 2005 Jul-Aug;20(4):314-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2005.200318.x.

    PubMed 15985128
  • Pere P, Lindgren L, Vaara M. Poor antibacterial effect of ropivacaine: comparison with bupivacaine. Anesthesiology. 1999 Sep;91(3):884-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199909000-00047. No abstract available.

    PubMed 10485806
  • Vree TB, Gielen MJ. Clinical pharmacology and the use of articaine for local and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;19(2):293-308. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.12.006.

    PubMed 15966499
  • Pelz K, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Bogdan C, Otten JE. Analysis of the antimicrobial activity of local anaesthetics used for dental analgesia. J Med Microbiol. 2008 Jan;57(Pt 1):88-94. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47339-0.

    PubMed 18065672
  • Vree TB, Baars AM, van Oss GE, Booij LH. High-performance liquid chromatography and preliminary pharmacokinetics of articaine and its 2-carboxy metabolite in human serum and urine. J Chromatogr. 1988 Feb 26;424(2):440-4. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)81126-3. No abstract available.

    PubMed 3372637
  • Brinklov MM. Clinical effects of carticaine, a new local anesthetic. A survey and a double-blind investigation comparing carticaine with lidocaine in epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1977;21(1):5-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1977.tb01186.x.

    PubMed 320810
  • Kallio H, Snall EV, Luode T, Rosenberg PH. Hyperbaric articaine for day-case spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Nov;97(5):704-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael222. Epub 2006 Aug 5.

    PubMed 16891634
  • Pitkanen MT, Xu M, Haasio J, Rosenberg PH. Comparison of 0.5% articaine and 0.5% prilocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia of the arm: a cross-over study in volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999 Mar-Apr;24(2):131-5.

    PubMed 10204898
  • Simon MA, Vree TB, Gielen MJ, Booij LH, Lagerwerf AJ. Similar motor block effects with different disposition kinetics between lidocaine and (+ or -) articaine in patients undergoing axillary brachial plexus block during day case surgery. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Dec;37(12):598-607.

    PubMed 10599952
  • Trullenque-Eriksson A, Guisado-Moya B. Comparative study of two local anesthetics in the surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: bupivacaine and articaine. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 May 1;16(3):e390-6. doi: 10.4317/medoral.16.e390.

    PubMed 21196829
  • Pesonen A, Suojaranta-Ylinen R, Hammaren E, Kontinen VK, Raivio P, Tarkkila P, Rosenberg PH. Pregabalin has an opioid-sparing effect in elderly patients after cardiac surgery: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jun;106(6):873-81. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer083. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

    PubMed 21474474
  • Hillerup S, Bakke M, Larsen JO, Thomsen CE, Gerds TA. Concentration-dependent neurotoxicity of articaine: an electrophysiological and stereological study of the rat sciatic nerve. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jun;112(6):1330-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182172a2e. Epub 2011 Apr 5.

    PubMed 21467556
  • Tirotta CF, Munro HM, Salvaggio J, Madril D, Felix DE, Rusinowski L, Tyler C, Decampli W, Hannan RL, Burke RP. Continuous incisional infusion of local anesthetic in pediatric patients following open heart surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Jun;19(6):571-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03009.x.

    PubMed 19645974

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Articaine hydrochloride 2% solution and Sodium Chloride in people with Diseases of Mitral Valve and Aortic Valve Disorder, run by Helsinki University Central Hospital at 2 sites in Finland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Oxycodone consumption (time frame: 72 hours from initiation of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01536717, which also lists 20 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in