AzTrials
AzTrials

InfluenzaPhase 3NCT01527825

Immunogenicity and Safety of Different Dosing Schedules of Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in HIV-infected Pregnant Women

A Phase 3 study testing Trivalent influenza vaccine (seasonal) and Normal saline in people with Influenza, run by University of Witwatersrand, South Africa at 1 site in South Africa.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The overall aim of this project is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of 3 different dosing options of trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) vaccination of HIV-infected pregnant women: single dose, double dose (at same time point) and two-doses (1 month apart). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 39 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Influenza
What is being tested?
Trivalent influenza vaccine (seasonal) and Normal saline
Type of treatment
Vaccines
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
800 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Africa
Study dates
Sep 2012to Jun 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 39 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pregnant women age under 18 years to under 39 years.
  • Gestational age greater or equal 12 weeks to under 36 weeks documented by the approximate date of the last menstrual period and corroborated by physical/ sonar examination.
  • Documented to be HIV-infected on two assays prior to study-enrolment.
  • Able to understand and comply with planned study procedures.
  • Provides written informed consent prior to initiation of study.

Who cannot join

  • Features of WHO clinical category 3 or 4 of AIDS at the time of enrolment.
  • Receipt of TIV, other than through the study, during the current influenza season documented by medical history or record.
  • Receipt of any live licensed vaccine 28 days or less or inactivated licensed vaccine (EXCEPT tetanus toxoid) 14 days or less prior to study-vaccine.
  • Receipt of a non-licensed agent (vaccine, drug, biologic, device, blood product, or medication) 28 days or less prior to vaccination in this study, or expects to receive another non-licensed agent before delivery unless study approval is obtained.
  • Any significant (in the opinion of the site investigator) acute illness and/or oral temperature greater than or equal to 38 degrees Celcius ≤ 24 hours prior to study entry.
  • Use of anti-cancer systemic chemotherapy or radiation therapy ≤ 48 weeks of study enrollment, or has immunosuppression as a result of an underlying illness or treatment.
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Long term use of glucocorticoids, including oral or parenteral prednisone ≥ 20 mg/day or equivalent for more than 2 consecutive weeks (or 2 weeks total) ≤ 12 weeks of study entry, or high-dose inhaled steroids (>800 mcg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent) ≤ 12 weeks before study entry (nasal and topical steroids are allowed).
  • Receipt of corticosteroids for preterm labor ≤ 14 days before study entry.
  • Receipt of immunoglobulin or other blood products (with exception of Rho D immune globulin) ≤ 12 weeks prior to enrollment in this study or is scheduled to receive immunoglobulin or other blood products (with the exception of Rho D immune globulin) during pregnancy or for the first 24 weeks after delivery.
  • Receipt of interleucin 2 (IL2), interferon (IFN), GMCSF or other immune mediators ≤ 12 weeks before enrollment.
  • Uncontrolled major psychiatric disorder.
  • History of a severe adverse reaction to previous TIV.
  • Any condition that would, in the opinion of the site investigator, place the subject at an unacceptable risk of injury or render the subject unable to meet the requirements of the protocol.
  • Pregnancy complications (in the current pregnancy) such as pre-term labor, hypertension (BP >140/90 in the presence of proteinuria or BP >150/100, with or without proteinuria or currently on antihypertensive medication) and pre-eclampsia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Africa1 site
  • Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens research unit

    Soweto, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2013

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

Official title: Immunogenicity and Safety of Different Dosing Schedules of Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in HIV-infected Pregnant Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The overall aim of this project is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of 3 different dosing options of trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) vaccination of HIV-infected pregnant women: single dose, double dose (at same time point) and two-doses (1 month apart).

Read the detailed description

Determining the contribution of influenza to early childhood morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa and the potential to prevent influenza disease through vaccination may contribute to reducing childhood deaths; since influenza illness is a vaccine preventable disease for which vaccines are developed, licensed and available at reasonable cost. Unfortunately, infants at highest risk for serious disease are those under 6 months of age, for whom trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) is poorly immunogenic and not licensed. As pregnant women also have an increased risk of serious illness (3.3-5.5 fold for hospitalization for influenza-associated acute cardio-respiratory illness) from influenza infection, one strategy to prevent the complications of influenza in pregnant women and young infants is through maternal TIV immunization, which is recommended by the WHO. This could result in direct protection of the women and protection of the young infant consequent to transplacental transfer of TIV induced antibody.

Barriers to administration of vaccines during pregnancy including lack of information on effectiveness and concerns about safety probably explain the virtual non-existent use of TIV in pregnant women from low-middle income countries, including South Africa. Although there was a national campaign for influenza vaccination of pregnant women in South Africa during 2010 due to the concern of continued circulation of H1N1-2009pdm influenza virus, the uptake of vaccine remains poor. TIV immunization of pregnant women is still not provided as standard of care to pregnant women attending antenatal-clinics in South Africa, in part because of absence of any data from any African setting with regard to its risk-benefit ratio.

The immunogenicity and efficacy of TIV in HIV-infected adults was only recently documented in an African setting. This placebo-controlled, community-based randomized, placebo controlled trial, conducted at Themba Lethu HIV clinic, Helen Joseph hospital, reported that TIV was associated with a 75% reduction in influenza-confirmed illness. The results of the study also confirmed the safety of TIV among African HIV-infected adults. The study, however, only included 7 women who were pregnant. In addition to no differences in solicited adverse event rates, there was also no difference in either cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4+) cell count changes or HIV viral control in those on antiretroviral treatment between TIV vaccinees compared to placebo recipients. This allayed previous concerns regarding the potential negative effect of TIV which centered around the observed transient increase in HIV-1 viral load, even in HIV infected individuals on ART and who were virologically suppressed (viral load <400 copies/ml). Decreases in CD4+ lymphocyte counts have also been observed in HIV-infected individuals post TIV vaccination. These changes, however, even in past studies were infrequent (4-18%) and resolved at later time-points and were considered to be clinically non-significant.

Only recently has data become available from another low-income country (Bangladesh) in which the benefit of maternal TIV vaccination was demonstrated by a 63% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5 to 85) reduction in laboratory-confirmed influenza illness in infants under 24 weeks of age in children born to mothers vaccinated with TIV and a 36% reduction in clinical illness in vaccinated mothers. There has, however, not been any study on the effectiveness of maternal immunization with TIV on influenza- associated morbidity and mortality either in the mothers or infants in African settings.

Much of influenza virus associated morbidity and mortality may be due to the synergistic lethality of influenza with bacterial pathogens leading to pneumonia as well as other viral co-infections. Superimposed bacterial infections, especially Streptococcus pneumoniae and in patients treated with antibiotics, Staphylococcus aureus, contribute to a large proportion (28-65%) of pneumonia deaths associated with influenza illness during pandemics. Unpublished data from the Bangladeshi study show that infants of mothers who received TIV (with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, 7 valent (PCV7) given to infants) were better protected from acquisition of pneumococcal carriage during influenza season than infants of TIV-unimmunized mothers. No data in the African setting are available to support or refute this observation from Bangladesh. As introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) in low-income countries is a priority of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), with 7 African countries already approved, and many others to follow, to introduce PCV within the next five years.

Despite the encouraging results on maternal immunization from Bangladesh, and the preliminary data supporting that TIV is efficacious mainly in HIV-infected non-pregnant adults, further data are needed to advocate for routine use of TIV during pregnancy in settings with a high prevalence of HIV. Reasons for this include that the impact of maternal HIV on the kinetics of TIV induced transplacental antibody transfer cannot be derived from available data. This is important as the primary focus of this proposal, and major potential public health benefit of maternal TIV vaccination, is targeted at protection of young infants. HIV infection is known to decrease placental integrity and lower antibody levels in the fetus and newborn. Furthermore, maternal hypergamma-globulinemia that is characteristic of HIV-infection may be associated with decreased neonatal antibody levels. This paradox is explained by the limited number of placental antibody receptors, resulting in immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies competing for available receptors and thereby decreasing vaccine-specific antibody transport. Preterm birth increases with HIV, chronic maternal disease or malnutrition. Transfer of maternal antibody which is gestational age dependant, may be more affected by maternal immunization in sub-Saharan Africa where these conditions are common.

In 2011, two Maternal influenza vaccination trials are being conducted in pregnant women from the Soweto community, one in HIV-infected women, and the other in HIV-uninfected women. In both these trials (HREC reference number 101106 and 101107) the immunogenicity of a single dose of TIV administered between 20 and 36 weeks of gestation was investigated.

HIV-uninfected women showed a good response one month post vaccination with 85.3%, 92.7% and 98.5% of women having seroprotective levels of antibodies to the vaccine strains, H3N2, H1N1 and B respectively, however, HIV-infected women showed an inferior response to vaccination. The CD4+ cell count at baseline (prior to vaccination) affected the immunological response mounted by HIV-infected women: 12.5%, 12.5% and 62.5% of women with CD4+ cell count <200, and 50%, 66.7% and 77.8% of women with CD4+ count ≥500 had seroprotective levels to vaccine strains, H3N2, H1N1 and B respectively, one month post receipt of single-dose TIV.

The overall aim of this project is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of 3 different dosing options of TIV vaccination of HIV-infected pregnant women: single dose, double dose (at same time point) and two-doses (1 month apart)

Conditions
Influenza
Being tested
Trivalent influenza vaccine (seasonal), Normal saline
Medical subject headings
Influenza, Human

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Trivalent influenza vaccine (seasonal)Biological

    Also called Vaxigrip

    Single 0.5ml dose of Southern hemisphere 2012 TIV, formulation containing:

    • An A/California/7/2009 (H1N1)pdm-like virus
    • An A/Perth/16/2009 (H3N2)-like virus*
    • A B/Brisbane/60/2008-like virus * A/Wisconsin/15/2009 and A/Victoria/210/2009 are A/Perth/16/2009-like viruses for use in the 2012 Southern Hemisphere winter. This vaccine is the same as the vaccine used for the 2011 Southern hemisphere influenza season.
  • Normal salineBiological

    Also called NaCl

    0.5ml normal saline will be used as 'placebo' vaccine to maintain blinding

Study groups in NCT01527825
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single doseActive comparatorTrivalent Influenza Vaccine (seasonal)
Receives: Biological: Trivalent influenza vaccine (seasonal); Biological: Normal saline
Double dose TIVExperimentalTrivalent Influenza vaccine (seasonal) Two doses will be administered at enrolment
Receives: Biological: Trivalent influenza vaccine (seasonal); Biological: Normal saline
Two dose TIVExperimentalTrivalent Influenza vaccine (seasonal) Participants will receive two doses of TIV, one month apart
Receives: Biological: Trivalent influenza vaccine (seasonal); Biological: Normal saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of participants who mount an adequate immune response one month post vaccination to a double dose compared to single dose of TIV

    Determine the sero-response rate to each of the vaccine viral strains, defined as post vaccination hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) levels of ≥1:40 AND ≥4 fold increase over baseline HAI levels, in HIV-infected pregnant women receiving a double strength TIV dose compared to mothers receiving a single dose of TIV one-month after completion of the dosing schedule.

    Measured: One month (28-35 days) post vaccination

  2. Number of participants who mount an adequate immune response one month post completing vaccination to two-dose TIV administered 1 month apart, compared to single dose TIV

    Determine the sero-response rate to each of the vaccine viral strains, defined as post vaccination HAI levels of ≥1:40 AND ≥4 fold increase over baseline HAI levels, in HIV-infected pregnant women receiving two-doses of TIV spaced 21-35 days apart compared to women receiving a single dose of TIV one-month after completion of the dosing schedule.

    Measured: One month (28-35 days) post vaccination

  3. Number of participants in each treatment arm who have local and/ or systemic reactions post vaccination with TIV

    Evaluate the safety of the three dosing schedules of TIV in HIV-infected pregnant women vaccinated between 12-36 weeks of gestational age.

    Measured: One week post vaccination

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Number of infants born to mothers who received double- or two doses of TIV who are seroprotected against influenza compared to infants born to mothers in single dose arm.

    Compare the proportion of newborns born to HIV-infected mothers in the double dose and two-dose arms with HAI antibody titers of ≥1:40 to each of the three TIV strains to newborns of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women (enrolled in separate parallel cohort) who received single dose of TIV.

    Measured: Within first week of life (0-7 days)

  2. Number of infants with protective maternal antibody levels against TIV at birth and at 8, 16 and 24 weeks of age

    Determine the kinetics of transplacental transfer of maternal Hemagglutinin (HA) antibodies and persistence thereof until 24 weeks post-partum in the infants.

    Measured: Birth to 24 weeks post delivery

  3. Number of infants born to women in double- and two dose TIV arms, compared to single TIV dose arm who are protected against laboratory confirmed influenza

    Compare the relative efficacy of a double-strength or two-dose dose TIV schedule compared to a single dose TIV schedule in pregnant HIV-infected women in protecting against laboratory-confirmed influenza illness in their infants up to 24 weeks of chronological age.

    Measured: Birth to 24 weeks

  4. Number of infants born to women in double- and two- dose TIV arms compared to single dose arm who are protected against clinical influenza like illness

    Compare the relative efficacy of a double-strength or two-dose dose TIV schedule compared to a single dose TIV schedule in pregnant HIV-infected women in protecting against protocol defined clinical influenza like illness (ILI) in their infants up to 24 weeks of chronological age.

    Measured: Birth to 24 weeks post delivery

  5. Number of women protected against laboratory confirmed influenza in each treatment arm

    Compare the relative efficacy of a double-strength or two-dose dose TIV schedule compared to a single dose TIV schedule in pregnant HIV-infected women in protecting against laboratory-confirmed influenza illness in maternal participants up to 24 weeks post partum.

    Measured: From date of vaccination (12 to 36 weeks gestational age [GA]) until infant is 24 weeks old. Anticipated mean GA at randomisation is 20 weeks, and at delivery is 39 weeks, so average follow up period is 43 weeks, however it could be as long as a year.

  6. Number of women protected against clinical influenza like illness in each treatment arm

    Compare the relative efficacy of a double-strength or two-dose dose TIV schedule compared to a single dose TIV schedule in pregnant HIV-infected women in protecting against protocol defined clinical ILI in maternal participants up to 24 weeks post partum.

    Measured: From date of vaccination (12 to 36 weeks gestational age [GA]) until infant is 24 weeks old. Anticipated mean GA at randomisation is 20 weeks, and at delivery is 39 weeks, so average follow up period is 43 weeks, however it could be as long as a year.

  7. Number of women who mount immune responses (seroconversion /seroprotection)in each treatment arm

    Define and compare cell mediated immune responses to different dosing options of TIV in HIV-infected pregnant women.

    Measured: From date of vaccination (12 to 36 weeks gestational age [GA]) until infant is 24 weeks old. Anticipated mean GA at randomisation is 20 weeks, and at delivery is 39 weeks, so average follow up period is 43 weeks, however it could be as long as a year.

  8. Number of women who have changes to CD4+ and/ or viral load results post vaccination in each treatment arm

    Evaluate the effect of TIV (single, double and two doses) on CD4+ cell count and HIV-viral load changes comparing baseline levels to levels at delivery.

    Measured: From date of vaccination (12 to 36 weeks gestational age [GA]) until infant is born. Anticipated mean GA at randomisation is 20 weeks, and at delivery is 39 weeks, so average follow up period is 19 weeks, however it could be as long as 30 weeks.

  9. Number of participants in each treatment arm who suffer adverse pregnancy outcomes (maternal or foetal) after TIV-vaccination

    Describe safety outcome measures (maternal and foetal) of TIV-vaccination of HIV-infected pregnant women

    Measured: From date of vaccination (12 to 36 weeks gestational age [GA]) until infant is born. Anticipated mean GA at randomisation is 20 weeks, and at delivery is 39 weeks, so average follow up period is 19 weeks, however it could be as long as 30 weeks.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Feb 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
800 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01527825
Sponsor's protocol ID
MatfluHIVpos_3dosingschedule
Status last verified
Jan 2015
First submitted
14 Dec 2011
Last updated
12 Jan 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Nunes MC, Cutland CL, Moultrie A, Jones S, Ortiz JR, Neuzil KM, Klugman KP, Simoes EAF, Weinberg A, Madhi SA; Maternal Flu Trial Team. Immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women with HIV: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2020 Feb;7(2):e91-e103. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30322-4. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

    PubMed 31911146

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Trivalent influenza vaccine (seasonal) and Normal saline in people with Influenza, run by University of Witwatersrand, South Africa at 1 site in South Africa.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of participants who mount an adequate immune response one month post vaccination to a double dose compared to single dose of TIV (time frame: One month (28-35 days) post vaccination). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01527825, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in