Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3C-earlyNCT01521923
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol in Combination With Methotrexate in the Treatment of Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARD)-naïve Adults With Early Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 3 study testing Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (MTX) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by UCB Pharma at 178 sites in 22 countries.
Trial summary
This study is intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) in combination with Methotrexate (MTX) for sustaining clinical response achieved in study RA0055 Period 1 [NCT01519791]. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (MTX)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 359 participants
- Where
- 178 sitesin 22 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2012to Sep 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Those subjects in previous study RA0055 Period 1 who are in sustained LDA (defined as DAS28[ESR] ≤ 3.2 at Weeks 40 and 52) at Week 52 in previous study RA0055 Period 1
Who cannot join
- Those subjects in previous study RA0055 Period 1 who are NOT in sustained LDA (defined as DAS28[ESR] ≤ 3.2 at Weeks 40 and 52) at Week 52 in previous study RA0055 Period 1
Trial locations and contacts
178 sites in 22 countries.
178 sites in 22 countries
United States70 sites
207
Albuquerque, New Mexico
217
Allen, Texas
185
Amarillo, Texas
161
Austin, Texas
195
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
209
Birmingham, Alabama
176
Brooklyn, New York
215
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
189
Charleston, South Carolina
183
Clarksburg, West Virginia
228
Clifton, New Jersey
226
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
205
Columbia, South Carolina
178
Corpus Christi, Texas
160
Covina, California
162
Dallas, Texas
167
Duncansville, Pennsylvania
236
Durham, North Carolina
198
Eagan, Minnesota
190
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
247
Glendale, Arizona
174
Glendale, Wisconsin
177
Hagerstown, Maryland
257
Hemet, California
204
Hendersonville, Tennessee
184
Houston, Texas
206
Houston, Texas
223
Houston, Texas
170
Huntsville, Alabama
196
Jupiter, Florida
199
Kalamazoo, Michigan
233
Kennewick, Washington
238
Lake Mary, Florida
229
Lebanon, New Hampshire
181
Lincoln, Nebraska
159
Los Angeles, California
158
Mesquite, Texas
232
Miami, Florida
245
Middleburg Heights, Ohio
180
Mobile, Alabama
213
Naples, Florida
175
Nassau Bay, Texas
214
Ocala, Florida
241
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
237
Orange Park, Florida
255
Orlando, Florida
163
Palm Harbor, Florida
165
Paradise Valley, Arizona
234
Paradise Valley, Arizona
243
Phoenix, Arizona
242
Plainview, New York
249
Plano, Texas
166
Plantation, Florida
186
Portland, Oregon
256
Reno, Nevada
227
Rochester, New York
197
San Antonio, Texas
201
San Leandro, California
192
Sarasota, Florida
224
South Bend, Indiana
244
Springfield, Illinois
179
St Louis, Missouri
251
Tucson, Arizona
203
Tupelo, Mississippi
202
Upland, California
200
Vero Beach, Florida
172
Whittier, California
191
Wichita, Kansas
210
Wichita, Kansas
168
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania
Germany16 sites
52
Bad Doberan
17
Bayreuth
113
Berlin
120
Berlin
89
Erfurt
70
Frankfurt
71
Hamburg
81
Hildesheim
127
Lingen
61
München
53
Planegg
132
Ratingen
49
Rendsburg
69
Rheine
114
Würzburg
59
Zerbst
Australia8 sites
6
Coffs Harbour, New South Wales
5
Fitzroy, Victoria
4
Geelong, Victoria
2
Herson, Queensland
3
Malvern, Victoria
1
Maroochydore, Queensland
7
Perth, Western Australia
8
Woodville South, South Australia
Colombia8 sites
303
Barranquilla
272
Bogotá
293
Bogotá
299
Bogotá
297
Bucaramanga
288
Chía
271
Medellín
298
Medellín
Poland7 sites
128
Bydgoszcz
67
Elblag
99
Krakow
92
Poznan
74
Torun
100
Warsaw
44
Wroclaw
Romania7 sites
58
Brasov
111
Bucharest
22
Bucharest
25
Bucharest
26
Bucharest
24
Iași
57
LASI
United Kingdom7 sites
125
Cannock
105
Dudley
56
Leeds
121
London
27
London
80
Sheffield
119
York
Hungary6 sites
18
Budapest
21
Budapest
86
Eger
131
Szolnok
110
Szombathely
19
Veszprém
Mexico6 sites
281
Durango
286
Guadalajara
302
Mérida
292
Mexico City
280
Monterrey
294
San Luis Potosí City
France5 sites
16
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre
85
Le Mans
88
Montpellier
34
Orléans
79
Strasbourg
Argentina4 sites
276
Buenos Aires
284
Rosario
279
San Juan
291
San Miguel de Tucumán
Canada4 sites
235
Hamilton, Ontario
240
Kelowna, British Columbia
188
Montreal, Quebec
194
Trois-Rivières, Quebec
About this study
Official title: A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol in Combination With Methotrexate for Inducing and Sustaining Clinical Response in the Treatment of DMARD-Naïve Adults With Early Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
This study is intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) in combination with Methotrexate (MTX) for sustaining clinical response achieved in study RA0055 Period 1 [NCT01519791]. Subjects entering this study RA0055 Period 2 achieved sustained Low Disease Activity at Week 52 in study RA0055 Period 1.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (MTX), Placebo + Methotrexate (MTX)
- Keywords
- Certolizumab Pegol - Cimzia, Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (MTX)Biological
Also called Cimzia, CZP, MTX
Prefilled syringes containing an injectable volume of 1 ml of solution for injection CZP for single use at dosage strength of 200 mg/ml.
On a maintenance dose of 200 mg every 2 Weeks (Q2W) until Week 102. On a maintenance dose of 200 mg every 4 Weeks (Q4W) until Week 102/ Placebo (PBO) 1 syringe every 4 Weeks (Q4W).
CZP and PBO administration to be staggered 2 Weeks apart to maintain blind.
The MTX treatment is to remain between 15-25 mg/week.
Placebo + Methotrexate (MTX)Biological
Also called MTX
1 syringe of Placebo every 2 Weeks and MTX.
The MTX treatment is to remain between 15-25 mg/week.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CZP 200 mg Q2W + Methotrexate | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (MTX) |
| CZP 200 mg Q4W + Methotrexate | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (MTX) |
| Placebo + Methotrexate | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Placebo + Methotrexate (MTX) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Score [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) <= 3.2 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2 Without Flaring
This Outcome Measure includes all subjects that have a DAS28 [ESR] <= 3.2 from the start of RA0055 Period 2 (Week 52 of RA0055 Period 1) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2 without flaring.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Secondary outcomes (37)
Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Score 28 [ESR] (DAS28 [ESR]) < 2.6 at Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 Who Maintain a DAS28 [ESR] < 2.6 From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 Through Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2 Without Flaring
DAS28[ESR] is calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √(TJC) + 0.28 x √(SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x PtGADA, where 28 joints are examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity.
Measured: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a methodology to assess the degree of joint damage by quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 44 and 42 joints, respectively. The mTSS ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores representing greater damage.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a methodology to assess the degree of joint damage by quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 44 and 42 joints, respectively. The mTSS ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores representing greater damage.
Measured: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With Radiographic Non-progression From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Radiographic nonprogression is defined as change in modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) <= 0.5.
Van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a methodology to assess the degree of joint damage by quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 44 and 42 joints, respectively. The mTSS ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores representing greater damage.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With Radiographic Non-progression From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Radiographic nonprogression is defined as change in modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) <= 0.5.
Van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a methodology to assess the degree of joint damage by quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 44 and 42 joints, respectively. The mTSS ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores representing greater damage.
Measured: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in the Joint Erosion Score to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Erosions were assessed in 16 locations per hand and 6 joints per foot. Erosions for each hand location were scored from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no erosion. Scores 1 to 5 may have included combinations of discrete erosion(s) and/or large erosions. Erosions for each foot joint were scored from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no erosions.
The minimum possible total erosion score for all 32-hand joints was 0, the maximum possible erosion score for all 32-hand joints was 160. The minimum possible total erosion score for all 12-feet joints was 0, the maximum possible erosion score for all 12 feet joints was 120. Thus, the minimum possible total erosion score for hands and feet was 0, the maximum possible total erosion score for hands and feet was 280. Higher values represent greater damage.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in the Joint Erosion Score to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Erosions were assessed in 16 locations per hand and 6 joints per foot. Erosions for each hand location were scored from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no erosion. Scores 1 to 5 may have included combinations of discrete erosion(s) and/or large erosions. Erosions for each foot joint were scored from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no erosions.
The minimum possible total erosion score for all 32-hand joints was 0, the maximum possible erosion score for all 32-hand joints was 160. The minimum possible total erosion score for all 12-feet joints was 0, the maximum possible erosion score for all 12 feet joints was 120. Thus, the minimum possible total erosion score for hands and feet was 0, the maximum possible total erosion score for hands and feet was 280. Higher values represent greater damage.
Measured: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in the Joint Narrowing Score to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed in 15 locations per hand and 6 locations per foot. Joint space narrowing for each location was scored from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating no narrowing. The minimum possible score for JSN in all 30 hand joints was 0, the maximum possible score for JSN in all 30 hand joints was 120. The minimum possible score for JSN in all 12 feet joints was 0, the maximum possible score for JSN in all 12 feet joints was 48. Thus, the minimum possible total JSN score for hands and feet was 0, the the maximum possible total JSN score for Hands and feet was 168. Higher values represent greater damage.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in the Joint Narrowing Score to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed in 15 locations per hand and 6 locations per foot. Joint space narrowing for each location was scored from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating no narrowing. The minimum possible score for JSN in all 30 hand joints was 0, the maximum possible score for JSN in all 30 hand joints was 120. The minimum possible score for JSN in all 12 feet joints was 0, the maximum possible score for JSN in all 12 feet joints was 48. Thus, the minimum possible total JSN score for hands and feet was 0, the the maximum possible total JSN score for Hands and feet was 168. Higher values represent greater damage.
Measured: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
The assessments are based on a 20 % or greater improvement from Baseline in previous study RA0055 Period 1 in the number of tender joints, a 20 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 20 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
The assessments are based on a 50 % or greater improvement from Baseline in previous study RA0055 Period 1 in the number of tender joints, a 50 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 50 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
The assessments are based on a 70 % or greater improvement from Baseline in previous study RA0055 Period 1 in the number of tender joints, a 70 % or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 70 % or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the 2011 American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Remission Criteria at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
The ACR/EULAR 2011 remission criteria is defined as:
Tender Joint Count (TJC) <= 1, Swollen Joint Count (SJC) <= 1, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) <= 1 mg/dl and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA) <= 10 mm.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <= 2.8 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in mm). 28 joints are examined where a lower score indicates less disease activity.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <= 3.3 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in mm) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP in mg/L). 28 joints are examined where a lower score indicates less disease activity.
The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with a negative value in SDAI change from Baseline indicating an improvement from Baseline.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Score [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28[ESR]) < 2.6 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
DAS28[ESR] is calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √(TJC) + 0.28 x √(SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x PtGADA, where 28 joints are examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the 2011 American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Remission Criteria Simplified for Clinical Practice at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
The 2011 ACR/EULAR remission criteria simplified for clinical practice is defined as:
Tender Joint Count (TJC) <= 1, Swollen Joint Count (SJC) <= 1 and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA) <= 10 mm.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Good response is defined as:
DAS28[ESR] <= 3.2 and decrease from Baseline by >1.2;
moderate response is defined as achievement of one of the following:
- DAS28[ESR] <= 3.2 and decrease from Baseline > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2
- DAS28[ESR] > 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 and decrease from Baseline > 0.6
- DAS28[ESR] > 5.1 and decrease from Baseline >1.2.
LOCF= Last Observation Carried Forward
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Disease Activity Score [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
DAS28[ESR] is calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √(TJC) + 0.28 x √(SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x PtGADA, where 28 joints are examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. DAS28[ESR] ranges from 0-10 with higher values representing higher disease activity.
A negative value in DAS28[ESR] change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Disease Activity Score [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
DAS28[ESR] is calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √(TJC) + 0.28 x √(SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x PtGADA, where 28 joints are examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. DAS28[ESR] ranges from 0-10 with higher values representing higher disease activity.
A negative value in DAS28[ESR] change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Measured: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in mm). 28 joints are examined. CDAI ranges from 0-76 with lower scores indicating less disease activity and higher scores indicating higher disease activity.
A negative value in CDAI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in mm). 28 joints are examined. CDAI ranges from 0-76 with lower scores indicating less disease activity and higher scores indicating higher disease activity.A negative value in CDAI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Measured: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in mm) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP in mg/L). 28 joints are examined where a lower score indicates less disease activity.
The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with a negative value in SDAI change from Baseline indicating an improvement from Baseline.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in mm) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP in mg/L). 28 joints are examined where a lower score indicates less disease activity.
The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with a negative value in SDAI change from Baseline indicating an improvement from Baseline.
Measured: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With a Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤ 0.5 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Normative physical function is defined as HAQ-DI score <= 0.5. The domains of the HAQ-DI are dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.
The total score ranges from 0 to 3 with lower scores meaning lower disability.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) <= 3.2 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
DAS28[ESR] is calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √(TJC) + 0.28 x √(SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x PtGADA, where 28 joints are examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time to Flare From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time to flare, defined as an increase of DAS28[ESR] >= 0.6 above Week 52 DAS28[ESR] level, having a DAS28[ESR] >= 3.2 and judged by the Investigator as due to RA and all three criteria confirmed at an additional visit two weeks thereafter, from Week 52 onwards.
Data not available as > 75% of the participants failed to meet flare criteria.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue- Multidimensional Questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ) Total Score to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
BRAF-MDQ total score ranges from 0 to 70 (with higher scores indicating worse fatigue), whereas the score for each dimension is different due to the varied number of questions (0 -22 for physical, 0- 21 for living, 0- 15 for cognition, and 0- 12 for emotion). A negative value in BRAF-MDQ change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of Work Days Missed (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of work days missed in the last month for employed subjects.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of Work Days With Reduced Productivity (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of work days with reduced productivity in the last month for employed subjects.
Only the employed subjects were analyzed.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Interference With Work Productivity (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
The Arthritis interference in the last month with work productivity is measured on a scale that ranges from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference) for employed subjects.
Only the employed subjects were analyzed.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of Days With no Household Work (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of days with no household work in the last month.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of Days With Reduced Household Work Productivity (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of days with reduced household work productivity in the last month.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of Days With Hired Outside Help (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of days with hired outside help days in the last month.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of Days Missed of Family/Social/Leisure Activities (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of days missed of family/social/leisure activities in the last month.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Interference With Household Work Productivity (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
The Arthritis interference in the last month with household productivity is measured on a scale that ranges from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference).
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
LDA is defined as achieving a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) <= 3.2.
DAS28 values range from 2.0 to 10.0 with a higher value indicating a higher disease activity.
Measured: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2012
- Primary completionJul 2015
- Study completionSep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 359 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Pharma
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- UCB Clinical Trial Call Center, Study director, +1 877 822 9493 (UCB)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01521923
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RA0055 Period 2
- Other IDs
- 2011-001729-25
- Acronym
- C-early
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Jan 2012
- Last updated
- 25 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Emery P, Bingham CO 3rd, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Furst DE, Mariette X, van der Heijde D, van Vollenhoven R, Arendt C, Mountian I, Purcaru O, Tatla D, VanLunen B, Weinblatt ME. Certolizumab pegol in combination with dose-optimised methotrexate in DMARD-naive patients with early, active rheumatoid arthritis with poor prognostic factors: 1-year results from C-EARLY, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):96-104. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-209057. Epub 2016 May 10.
PubMed 27165179Weinblatt ME, Bingham CO 3rd, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Furst DE, Mariette X, van der Heijde D, van Vollenhoven R, VanLunen B, Ecoffet C, Cioffi C, Emery P. A Phase III Study Evaluating Continuation, Tapering, and Withdrawal of Certolizumab Pegol After One Year of Therapy in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;69(10):1937-1948. doi: 10.1002/art.40196. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
PubMed 28666080Smolen JS, Taylor PC, Burmester G, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Curtis JR, Lopez-Medina C, Robinson WH, Huizinga T, Mahoney P, Lauwerys B, Ufuktepe B, Mikuls TR. Certolizumab inhibits radiographic progression in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and high rheumatoid factor levels: A pooled, post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 C-EARLY and C-OPERA trials. Joint Bone Spine. 2026 Jun 9;93(5):106087. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2026.106087. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42263998
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol in Combination With Methotrexate for Inducing and Sustaining Clinical Response in the Treatment of DMARD-Naïve Adults With Early Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01521923
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C-early / RA0055 Period 2
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- Certolizumab Pegol - Cimzia, Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 359 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UCB PharmaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2012
- Primary completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Jan 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) in combination with Methotrexate (MTX) for sustaining clinical response achieved in study RA0055 Period 1 [NCT01519791]. Subjects entering this study RA0055 Period 2 achieved sustained Low Disease Activity at Week 52 in study RA0055 Period 1.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CZP 200 mg Q2W + Methotrexate | Experimental | Biological: Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (MTX) |
| CZP 200 mg Q4W + Methotrexate | Experimental | Biological: Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (MTX) |
| Placebo + Methotrexate | Placebo comparator | Biological: Placebo + Methotrexate (MTX) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Those subjects in previous study RA0055 Period 1 who are in sustained LDA (defined as DAS28[ESR] ≤ 3.2 at Weeks 40 and 52) at Week 52 in previous study RA0055 Period 1
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Those subjects in previous study RA0055 Period 1 who are NOT in sustained LDA (defined as DAS28[ESR] ≤ 3.2 at Weeks 40 and 52) at Week 52 in previous study RA0055 Period 1
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (MTX)Also: Cimzia, CZP, MTXPrefilled syringes containing an injectable volume of 1 ml of solution for injection CZP for single use at dosage strength of 200 mg/ml. On a maintenance dose of 200 mg every 2 Weeks (Q2W) until Week 102. On a maintenance dose of 200 mg every 4 Weeks (Q4W) until Week 102/ Placebo (PBO) 1 syringe every 4 Weeks (Q4W). CZP and PBO administration to be staggered 2 Weeks apart to maintain blind. The MTX treatment is to remain between 15-25 mg/week. | Biological | CZP 200 mg Q2W + Methotrexate, CZP 200 mg Q4W + Methotrexate |
| Placebo + Methotrexate (MTX)Also: MTX1 syringe of Placebo every 2 Weeks and MTX. The MTX treatment is to remain between 15-25 mg/week. | Biological | Placebo + Methotrexate |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Score [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) <= 3.2 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2 Without Flaring
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
This Outcome Measure includes all subjects that have a DAS28 [ESR] <= 3.2 from the start of RA0055 Period 2 (Week 52 of RA0055 Period 1) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2 without flaring.
37 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Score 28 [ESR] (DAS28 [ESR]) < 2.6 at Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 Who Maintain a DAS28 [ESR] < 2.6 From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 Through Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2 Without Flaring
Time frame: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With Radiographic Non-progression From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With Radiographic Non-progression From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in the Joint Erosion Score to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in the Joint Erosion Score to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in the Joint Narrowing Score to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in the Joint Narrowing Score to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Response Criteria (ACR20) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Response Criteria (ACR50) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Response Criteria (ACR70) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the 2011 American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Remission Criteria at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <= 2.8 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <= 3.3 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Score [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28[ESR]) < 2.6 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the 2011 American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Remission Criteria Simplified for Clinical Practice at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Disease Activity Score [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Disease Activity Score [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Week 52 in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With a Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤ 0.5 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) <= 3.2 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time to Flare From Week 52 in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Change From Baseline in Previous Study RA0055 Period 1 in the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue- Multidimensional Questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ) Total Score to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) in RA0055 Period 1 to Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of Work Days Missed (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of Work Days With Reduced Productivity (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Interference With Work Productivity (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of Days With no Household Work (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of Days With Reduced Household Work Productivity (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of Days With Hired Outside Help (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Number of Days Missed of Family/Social/Leisure Activities (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Interference With Household Work Productivity (Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Aug 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 27165179Emery P, Bingham CO 3rd, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Furst DE, Mariette X, van der Heijde D, van Vollenhoven R, Arendt C, Mountian I, Purcaru O, Tatla D, VanLunen B, Weinblatt ME. Certolizumab pegol in combination with dose-optimised methotrexate in DMARD-naive patients with early, active rheumatoid arthritis with poor prognostic factors: 1-year results from C-EARLY, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):96-104. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-209057. Epub 2016 May 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 28666080Weinblatt ME, Bingham CO 3rd, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Furst DE, Mariette X, van der Heijde D, van Vollenhoven R, VanLunen B, Ecoffet C, Cioffi C, Emery P. A Phase III Study Evaluating Continuation, Tapering, and Withdrawal of Certolizumab Pegol After One Year of Therapy in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;69(10):1937-1948. doi: 10.1002/art.40196. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 42263998Smolen JS, Taylor PC, Burmester G, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Curtis JR, Lopez-Medina C, Robinson WH, Huizinga T, Mahoney P, Lauwerys B, Ufuktepe B, Mikuls TR. Certolizumab inhibits radiographic progression in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and high rheumatoid factor levels: A pooled, post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 C-EARLY and C-OPERA trials. Joint Bone Spine. 2026 Jun 9;93(5):106087. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2026.106087. Online ahead of print.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Frequency and Complications of Major Orthopedic Procedures in Medicare Beneficiaries
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 2
A PHASE II PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-MASKED CONTROLLED STUDY ASSESSING THE SAFETY & EFFICACY OF RHPRG4 (450 µG/ML RECOMBINANT HUMAN PROTEOGLYCAN 4) COMPARED TO VEHICLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SJÖGREN'S RELATED DRY EYE DISEASE
Sjögren's Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Diseases With Salivary Gland Involvement
Healthy Volunteer, Sjogren's Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of MK-8690 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (MK-8690-004)
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
UCB Clinical Trial Call Center study director
+1 877 822 9493 (UCB)
178 sites in 22 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (MTX) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by UCB Pharma at 178 sites in 22 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 178 sites in United States, Germany, Australia, Colombia, Poland and 17 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Subjects With Disease Activity Score [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) <= 3.2 at Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2 Without Flaring (time frame: Week 104 in RA0055 Period 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01521923, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2026.