AzTrials
AzTrials

Sickle Cell DiseasePhase 2NCT01518218

Effectiveness of Laying-on-of-hands for Sickle Cell Disease

A Phase 2 study testing laying-on-of-hands in people with Sickle Cell Disease and Pain Crisis Recurrent, run by MOA Health Science Foundation at 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of 1-year administration of laying-on-of-hands on the morbidity and mortality of patients with sickle cell disease in Africa. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 40 years
Conditions the study is for
Sickle Cell Disease, Pain Crisis Recurrent, Anemia
What is being tested?
laying-on-of-hands
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteDemocratic Republic of the Congo
Study dates
Mar 2006to Dec 2009
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients with symptoms associated with sickle cell disease
  • those able to receive laying-on-of-hands every weekday for 1 year
  • those able to receive conventional medical treatment whenever necessary
  • those able to receive blood test at the beginning, after 6 month and after 1 year

Who cannot join

  • those who wish to use other complementary and alternative therapies along with laying-on-of-hands

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Democratic Republic of the Congo1 site
  • The national medical center for sickle cell disease

    Kinshasa

Other trials in Democratic Republic of the Congo

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Laying-on-of-hands for Patients With Sickle Cell Disease in Africa

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of 1-year administration of laying-on-of-hands on the morbidity and mortality of patients with sickle cell disease in Africa.

Read the detailed description

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) have a high risk of premature death in Africa, mainly due to insufficient medical services. SCD patients often visit emergency department and need hospitalization when they suffer from severe pain; however, they manage most of painful episodes at home. Appropriate pain management at home is, therefore, crucial to improve their clinical course and quality of life. Laying-on-of-hands may be a good candidate for home care management, because family member(s) can become a practitioner of laying-on-of-hands without difficulty and administer it to their loved one as an initial treatment whenever necessary. There are no reports concerning the effectiveness of laying-on-of-hands for the outcomes of SCD patients, as far as we have investigated.

Being tested
laying-on-of-hands
Keywords
Sickle cell disease, laying-on-of-hands, morbidity, mortality
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Sickle Cell, Anemia, Infections, Death

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • laying-on-of-handsBehavioural

    Also called Okada Purifying Therapy, biofield therapy

    The intervention group received laying-on-of-hands every weekday for 1 year along with conventional medicine. The control group did not undergo any alternatives to OPT.

Study groups in NCT01518218
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
laying-on-of-handsExperimentalPatients of this arm received laying-on-of-hands twice a day (45 minutes each) every weekday for 1year, and received conventional medical treatment if necessary.
Receives: Behavioral: laying-on-of-hands
control groupNo interventionPatients of this arm did not receive any alternatives other than conventional treatment.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. disease-related episodes and mortality

    Measured: 3 years and 9 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. blood data

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jan 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2006
  3. Primary completionMar 2007
  4. Study completionDec 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01518218
Sponsor's protocol ID
MOA-002
Status last verified
Jan 2012
First submitted
21 Jan 2012
Last updated
13 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Minga TM, Koto FK, Egboki H, Suzuki K. Effectiveness of biofield therapy for individuals with sickle cell disease in Africa. Altern Ther Health Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):20-6.

    PubMed 24445353

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing laying-on-of-hands in people with Sickle Cell Disease and Pain Crisis Recurrent, run by MOA Health Science Foundation at 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

disease-related episodes and mortality (time frame: 3 years and 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01518218, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in