AzTrials
AzTrials

Eosinophilic AsthmaPhase 3NCT01508936

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe Asthma

A Phase 3 study testing Reslizumab in people with Eosinophilic Asthma, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 66 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of the study is to characterize the efficacy of reslizumab treatment, at a dosage of 3.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses, in improving pulmonary function in relation to baseline blood eosinophil levels in patients with moderate to severe asthma, as assessed by… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Eosinophilic Asthma
What is being tested?
Reslizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
511 participants
Where
66 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2012to Aug 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients are included in the study if all of the following criteria are met:
  • The patient is a man or woman, 18 through 65 years of age, with a diagnosis of asthma.
  • The patient has an ACQ score of at least 1.5.
  • At screening, the patient has airway reversibility of at least 12% to beta-agonist administration.
  • The patient is currently taking fluticasone at a dosage of at least 440 µg daily (or equivalent). Patients' baseline asthma therapy regimens (including but not limited to inhaled corticosteroids, leukotriene antagonists, 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors, cromolyn) must be stable for 30 days before screening and continue without dosage changes throughout study.
  • Female patients must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or must have a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ßHCG) result for a pregnancy test at screening (serum) and baseline (urine).
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Female patients of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study. Acceptable methods of contraception include barrier method with spermicide, abstinence, intrauterine device (IUD), or steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected).
  • Written informed consent is obtained.
  • The patient is in reasonable health (except for diagnosis of asthma) as judged by the investigator, and as determined by a medical history, medical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG) evaluation, serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and serology.
  • The patient must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions and to remain at the clinic for the required duration during the study period, and be willing to return to the clinic for the follow-up evaluation as specified in this protocol.

Who cannot join

  • Patients are excluded from participating in this study if 1 or more of the following criteria are met:
  • The patient has another confounding underlying lung disorder (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, lung cancer). The patient has other pulmonary conditions with symptoms of asthma and blood eosinophilia (eg, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis).
  • The patient has a clinically meaningful comorbidity that would interfere with the study schedule or procedures, or compromise the patient's safety.
  • The patient has known hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES).
  • The patient is a current smoker (ie, has smoked within the last 6 months prior to screening).
  • The patient has a history of use of systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents (anti-immunoglobulin E [anti-IgE] mAb, methotrexate, cyclosporin, interferon-α, anti-tumor necrosis factor mAb, or omalizumab) within 6 months prior to study entry (randomization).
Show all 18Show fewer
  • The patient is currently using or has used systemic corticosteroids (includes use of oral corticosteroids) within 30 days prior to the screening visit.
  • The patient is expected to be poorly compliant with study drug administration, study procedures, or visits.
  • The patient has any aggravating factors that are inadequately controlled, and thus would aggravate asthma symptoms (eg, gastroesophageal reflux disease).
  • The patient has participated in any investigative drug or device study within 30 days prior to screening.
  • The patient has participated in any investigative biologics study within 90 days prior to screening.
  • The patient has previously received reslizumab or other anti-hIL-5 mAbs (eg, mepolizumab).
  • The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any women becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.)
  • The patient has a current infection or disease that may preclude assessment of asthma.
  • The patient has a history of concurrent immunodeficiency (human immunodeficiency, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or congenital immunodeficiency).
  • The patient is suspected of current drug or alcohol abuse as specified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria.
  • The patient has presence of or suspected parasitic infestation/infection.
  • Patients may not have received any live attenuated vaccine within the 12-week period before study entry.

Trial locations and contacts

66 sites in 1 country.

66 sites in 1 country

United States66 sites
  • Investigational Site 805

    Albany, Georgia

  • Investigational Site 857

    Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • Investigational Site 828

    Anaheim, California

  • Investigational Site 859

    Ashland, Oregon

  • Investigational Site 861

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Investigational Site 837

    Centennial, Colorado

  • Investigational Site 844

    Charlotte, North Carolina

  • Investigational Site 816

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Investigational Site 880

    Dallas, Texas

  • Investigational Site 851

    Denver, Colorado

  • Investigational Site 858

    Dickinson, Texas

  • Investigational Site 883

    Evansville, Indiana

  • Investigational Site 840

    Fairfax, Virginia

  • Investigational Site 871

    Fall River, Massachusetts

  • Investigational Site 802

    Florence, South Carolina

  • Investigational Site 878

    Fort Wayne, Indiana

  • Investigational Site 900

    Fresno, California

  • Investigational Site 806

    Greenfield, Wisconsin

  • Investigational Site 842

    Homewood, Alabama

  • Investigational Site 862

    Huntington Beach, California

  • Investigational Site 855

    Jacksonville, Florida

  • Investigational Site 887

    Jasper, Alabama

  • Investigational Site 854

    Jenkintown, Pennsylvania

  • Investigational Site 850

    Knoxville, Tennessee

  • Investigational Site 823

    La Crosse, Wisconsin

  • Investigational Site 801

    Lafayette, Louisiana

  • Investigational Site 820

    Lenexa, Kansas

  • Investigational Site 846

    Little Rock, Arkansas

  • Investigational Site 869

    Live Oak, Texas

  • Investigational Site 852

    Los Angeles, California

  • Investigational Site 909

    Los Angeles, California

  • Investigational Site 877

    Mandeville, Louisiana

  • Investigational Site 865

    Miami, Florida

  • Investigational Site 881

    Miami, Florida

  • Investigational Site 845

    Middleburg Heights, Ohio

  • Investigational Site 803

    Nashville, Tennessee

  • Investigational Site 819

    Newburgh, New York

  • Investigational Site 864

    Newport Beach, California

  • Investigational Site 834

    North Dartmouth, Massachusetts

  • Investigational Site 814

    Orangeburg, South Carolina

  • Investigational Site 873

    Owensboro, Kentucky

  • Investigational Site 879

    Plano, Texas

  • Investigational Site 859

    Portland, Oregon

  • Investigational Site 843

    Providence, Rhode Island

  • Investigational Site 812

    Rancho Mirage, California

  • Investigational Site 836

    Richmond, Virginia

  • Investigational Site 808

    Riverside, California

  • Investigational Site 838

    Rolla, Missouri

  • Investigational Site 804

    Sacramento, California

  • Investigational Site 847

    Salt Lake City, Utah

  • Investigational Site 867

    Seattle, Washington

  • Investigational Site 824

    Shiloh, Illinois

  • Investigational Site 821

    Spartanburg, South Carolina

  • Investigational Site 829

    Spartanburg, South Carolina

  • Investigational Site 833

    Spokane, Washington

  • Investigational Site 818

    St Louis, Missouri

  • Investigational Site 841

    St Louis, Missouri

  • Investigational Site 870

    Stockbridge, Georgia

  • Investigational Site 889

    Troy, Michigan

  • Investigational Site 809

    Tucson, Arizona

  • Investigational Site 892

    Tucson, Arizona

  • Investigational Site 810

    Tulsa, Oklahoma

  • Investigational Site 904

    Vancouver, Washington

  • Investigational Site 876

    West Jordan, Utah

  • Investigational Site 832

    Wheat Ridge, Colorado

  • Investigational Site 875

    White Marsh, Maryland

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A 16-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe Asthma

The primary objective of the study is to characterize the efficacy of reslizumab treatment, at a dosage of 3.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses, in improving pulmonary function in relation to baseline blood eosinophil levels in patients with moderate to severe asthma, as assessed by the change from baseline to week 16 in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1).

Being tested
Reslizumab, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Eosinophilia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ReslizumabDrug

    Also called Cinquil, humanized monoclonal antibody, CEP-38072

    Reslizumab administered at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg by intravenous (iv) infusion by qualified study personnel every 4 weeks for 16 weeks (for a total of 4 doses).

  • PlaceboDrug

    Matching placebo administered by intravenous (iv) infusion by qualified study personnel every 4 weeks for 16 weeks (for a total of 4 doses).

Study groups in NCT01508936
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo intravenous injection every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kgExperimentalReslizumab intravenous injection at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg every 4 weeks for a total of 4 doses.
Receives: Drug: Reslizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in Full Analysis Set

    FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry.

    Data represent the slope estimate of change from baseline in FEV1 (measured in liters) at Week 16 versus baseline eosinophil count (measured in 10^9/liter) by treatment group.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 16

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures

    FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

    During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value was calculated using a mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment (reslizumab or placebo), blood eosinophil count at baseline, and the interaction of treatment and eosinophil count as a random effect.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16

  2. Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures

    The ACQ score was measured using the ACQ-7. Six questions are-self assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's % predicted FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A score of 0 indicates good asthma control; higher scores indicate increasingly poorer asthma control. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

    During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value was calculated from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, history of asthma exacerbation in the previous year, height, baseline value, and sex as fixed factors, and patient as a random effect.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16

  3. Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in FEV1 Subpopulation

    FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry.

    As with the primary outcome, data represent the slope estimate of change from baseline in FEV1 (measured in liters) at Week 16 versus baseline eosinophil count (measured in 10^9/liter) by treatment group. However the FEV1 subpopulation includes participants with more impaired lung function (% predicted FEV1 <85% at baseline).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 16

  4. Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

    FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration. Improvement in FEV1 is a measure in the reduction of bronchospasm, the reduction of airway inflammation, or both. FEV1 was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  5. Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (% Predicted FEV1) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint

    The percent predicted FEV1 is the ratio of the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration to the patient's predicted FEV based on a similar population without asthma. Percent predicted lung function values were transcribed directly from the lung function report to the CRF, without any calculation by Teva. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  6. Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

    The FVC is the volume of air that can be forcibly blown out after full inspiration, measured in liters. FV was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  7. Change From Baseline in the Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% of the Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25%-75%) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

    The FEF25%-75% is the forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the forced vital capacity. FEF25%-75% was measured using forced expiratory air spirometry. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  8. Change From Baseline in Average Daily Use of Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Therapy (SABA) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

    SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. The number of times SABA therapy was used was assessed using 3 day recall at scheduled visits. Participants were asked to recall whether SABAs were used within 3 days of the scheduled visit and, if so, how many puffs were used. Daily use was the average of those 3 days. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

    Measured: Baseline (Day -2 to 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

  9. Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Counts at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28) and Endpoint

    Blood eosinophil counts were measured using a standard complete blood count with differential blood test at each scheduled visit. Follow-up was performed approximately 12 weeks after the 16 week treatment period. Endpoint is the last post-baseline assessment.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, Follow-up (Week 28)

  10. Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16

    The ACQ score was measured using the ACQ-7. Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item is the result of the patient's % predicted FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A score of 0 indicates good asthma control; higher scores indicate increasingly poorer asthma control. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16

  11. Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.

    Measured: Day 1 to Week 28

  12. Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values

    Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values during any of the lab tests conducted during the treatment period.

    Significance criteria:

    • Blood urea nitrogen: >=10.71 mmol/L
    • Creatinine: >=177 μmol/L
    • Uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 μmol/L
    • Aspartate aminotransferase: >=3*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L
    • Alanine aminotransferase: >=3*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L
    • GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: >= 3*ULN. Normal range is 4-49 U/L.
    • Total bilirubin: >=34.2 μmol/L
    • Creatinine phosphokinase: >5*ULN. Normal range is 24-207 U/L.
    • White blood cells: <=3.0 or >20 10^9/L
    • Hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL
    • Hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L
    • Platelets: <=75 10^9/L
    • Absolute neutrophil count: <=1.0 10^9/L
    • Urinalysis: blood, glucose, ketones and total protein: >=2 unit increase from baseline

    Measured: Week 4 to Week 16

  13. Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values

    Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values during any of the treatment period exams.

    Significance criteria

    • Heart rate - high: >100 and increase of >= 30 beats/minute (bpm)
    • Sitting systolic blood pressure - high: >160 and increase of >=30 mmHg
    • Sitting systolic blood pressure - low: <90 and decrease of >=30 mmHg
    • Sitting diastolic blood pressure - high: >100 and increase of >=12 mmHg
    • Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low: <50 and decrease of >=12 mmHg
    • Body temperature - high: >100.5° Fahrenheit or 38.1° Celsius and increase of >2°
    • Body temperature - low: <96.5° Fahrenheit or <35.8° Celsius

    Measured: Week 4 to Week 28

  14. Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

    Counts represent the number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities as assessed by the investigator.

    Measured: Week 16 or endpoint

  15. Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study

    Counts of participants with a positive anti-drug antibody (ADA) response during treatment is offered for the experimental treatment arm. Blood samples were collected for determination of ADAs before study drug infusion at screening, weeks 8 and 16 or early withdrawal. Serum samples from patients who were treated with reslizumab were analyzed for ADA by Teva (Teva Biopharmaceuticals USA, Rockville, MD) using a validated homogeneous solution-based bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    Endpoint =week 16 or early withdrawal.

    Counts represent the total number of participants at each time point with a positive immunogenicity test, and not 'new' participants with a positive test. An overall status of positive includes participants who had a positive ADA at any time point.

    Measured: Screening (Week -3), Weeks 8 and 16

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jan 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2012
  3. Primary completionAug 2013
  4. Study completionAug 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
511 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01508936
Sponsor's protocol ID
C38072/3084
Status last verified
May 2016
First submitted
3 Jan 2012
Last updated
27 Jun 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Corren J, Weinstein S, Janka L, Zangrilli J, Garin M. Phase 3 Study of Reslizumab in Patients With Poorly Controlled Asthma: Effects Across a Broad Range of Eosinophil Counts. Chest. 2016 Oct;150(4):799-810. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Mar 25.

    PubMed 27018175

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Reslizumab in people with Eosinophilic Asthma, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 66 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 66 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jun 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 16 in Full Analysis Set (time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01508936, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in