Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 2NCT01500720
Cabazitaxel Compared to Topotecan for the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Cabazitaxel and Topotecan in people with Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Sanofi at 58 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: To demonstrate progression free survival (PFS) improvement for cabazitaxel compared to topotecan in participants with sensitive or resistant/refractory small cell lung cancer following a first line platinum based chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Cabazitaxel and Topotecan
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 179 participants
- Where
- 58 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2012to Apr 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histological/cytological proven locally advanced or metastatic small cell lung cancer with progressive disease during or after first line platinum based chemotherapy
- Male or female greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years (or country's legal age of majority if greater than [>]18 years)
- Participants with measurable disease, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.1)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to (<=) 1
Who cannot join
- Absence of signed and dated Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved participant informed consent form prior to enrollment into the study
- More than one prior chemotherapy regimen. Prior treatment with topotecan or taxanes
- Less than 28 days elapsed from prior treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery to the time of randomization (Radiotherapy for bone pain palliation is allowed)
- Adverse events (excluding alopecia) from any prior anticancer therapy of grade >1 (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria [NCI CTCAE] v4.03) at the time of randomization
- Uncontrolled Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases: participants with CNS metastases may have previous irradiation, only participants with stable disease or response to irradiation who are without CNS symptoms and on a maximum steroid dose of dexamethasone 8 mg daily or equivalent could be included
- Participants with known leptomeningeal metastases
Show all 23Show fewer
- History of other, invasive neoplasm requiring ongoing therapy
- Participation in another clinical trial and any concurrent treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days prior to randomization
- Any of the following within 6 months prior to study enrollment: myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina pectoris, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack
- Any severe acute or chronic medical condition, which could impair the ability of the participant to participate in the study or interfere with interpretation of study results
- Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) disease, or active hepatitis B or C (systematic testing was not required)
- Pregnant or breast-feeding woman. Positive serum or urine pregnancy test prior to randomization
- Participant with reproductive potential (M/F) who did not agree to use an accepted and effective method of contraception during the study treatment period and for at least 6 months after the completion of the study treatment. The definition of "effective method of contraception" was based on the investigator's judgment. Effective method of contraception should also be adapted to local regulation
- History of hypersensitivity to polysorbate 80
- Inadequate organ and bone marrow function as evidenced by:
- Hemoglobin less than [<] 9.0 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
- Absolute neutrophil count <1.5 x 10^9 per liter
- Platelet count <100 x 10^9 per liter
- Aspartate Aminotransferase/Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (AST/SGOT) and/or alanine aminotransferase/Serum Glutamic-Pyruvic Transaminase (ALT/SGPT) >2.5 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
- Alkaline Phosphatase (AP) >2.5 x ULN. In case of liver metastases AP >5 x ULN
- Total bilirubin >1.0 x ULN
- Serum Creatinine >1.5 x ULN. If creatinine 1.0 - 1.5 x ULN, creatinine clearance will be calculated according to Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula, and creatinine clearance <60 milliliter per minute (mL/min) was exclude the participant.
- The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
58 sites in 16 countries.
58 sites in 16 countries
France6 sites
Investigational Site Number 250005
Brest, 29609
Investigational Site Number 250004
Caen, 14033
Investigational Site Number 250006
La Tronche, 38700
Investigational Site Number 250002
Lille, 59800
Investigational Site Number 250003
Saint-Herblain, 44805
Investigational Site Number 250007
Villejuif, 94805
United States5 sites
Investigational Site Number 840006
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Investigational Site Number 840003
Middletown, Ohio, 45042
Investigational Site Number 840007
Muscle Shoals, Alabama, 35661
Investigational Site Number 840005
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Investigational Site Number 840001
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Greece5 sites
Investigational Site Number 300005
Athens, 11522
Investigational Site Number 300003
Athens, 11527
Investigational Site Number 300001
Heraklion, 71110
Investigational Site Number 300002
Thessaloniki, 54629
Investigational Site Number 300004
Thessaloniki, 57010
Canada4 sites
Investigational Site Number 124003
Montreal, H3T 1E2
Investigational Site Number 124002
Oshawa, L1G 2B9
Investigational Site Number 124004
Rimouski, G5L 5T1
Investigational Site Number 124001
Toronto, M5G 2M9
Hungary4 sites
Investigational Site Number 348001
Budapest, 1121
Investigational Site Number 348004
Budapest, 1121
Investigational Site Number 348002
Budapest, 1125
Investigational Site Number 348003
Törökbálint, 2045
Italy4 sites
Investigational Site Number 380001
Genova, 16132
Investigational Site Number 380002
Livorno, 57123
Investigational Site Number 380005
Novara, 28100
Investigational Site Number 380004
Parma, 43100
Poland4 sites
Investigational Site Number 616004
Gdansk, 80-952
Investigational Site Number 616003
Lublin, 20-954
Investigational Site Number 616002
Poznan, 60-569
Investigational Site Number 616001
Warsaw, 02-781
Romania4 sites
Investigational Site Number 642003
Cluj-Napoca, 400015
Investigational Site Number 642005
Cluj-Napoca, 400015
Investigational Site Number 642001
Craiova, 200385
Investigational Site Number 642002
Timișoara
Russia4 sites
Investigational Site Number 643001
Moscow, 115478
Investigational Site Number 643005
Saint Petersburg, 197758
Investigational Site Number 643006
Tula, 300053
Investigational Site Number 643003
Yaroslavl, 150054
Spain4 sites
Investigational Site Number 724002
Badalona, 08916
Investigational Site Number 724004
Barcelona, 08035
Investigational Site Number 724005
Málaga, 29010
Investigational Site Number 724001
Valencia, 46026
Norway3 sites
Investigational Site Number 578001
Oslo, 0440
Investigational Site Number 578003
Stavanger, 4011
Investigational Site Number 578002
Trondheim, 7006
South Korea3 sites
Investigational Site Number 410001
Seoul, 120-752
Investigational Site Number 410003
Seoul, 135-710
Investigational Site Number 410002
Seoul, 138-736
Ukraine3 sites
Investigational Site Number 804002
Dnipropetrovsk, 49102
Investigational Site Number 804004
Donetsk, 83092
Investigational Site Number 804001
Lviv, 70031
Chile2 sites
Investigational Site Number 152001
Santiago, 8380456
Investigational Site Number 152005
Santiago
Germany2 sites
Investigational Site Number 276003
Großhansdorf, 22927
Investigational Site Number 276006
Löwenstein, 74245
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase II Study of Cabazitaxel Versus Topotecan in Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Progressive Disease During or After a First Line Platinum Based Chemotherapy
Primary Objective:
To demonstrate progression free survival (PFS) improvement for cabazitaxel compared to topotecan in participants with sensitive or resistant/refractory small cell lung cancer following a first line platinum based chemotherapy.
Secondary Objectives:
- To assess disease progression free rate at 12 weeks
- To assess Response Rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor [RECIST] 1.1) and duration of response
- To assess Overall Survival (OS)
- To assess the Safety (National Cancer Institute - Common Toxicity Criteria [NCI-CTC] version 4.03)
- To assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Read the detailed description
Participants are to be treated until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or refusal for further study treatment.
All participants are to be followed for disease progression documentation and for participant status until the study cut-off date.
- Conditions
- Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Cabazitaxel, Topotecan
- Medical subject headings
- Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CabazitaxelDrug
Also called XRP6258
Cabazitaxel 25 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) intravenously (IV) on Day 1 every 3 weeks (21-day cycle) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression or withdrawal consent.
TopotecanDrug
Topotecan 1.5 mg/m^2 IV on Day 1 to Day 5 every 3 weeks (21-Day cycle) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression or withdrawal consent.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cabazitaxel | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Cabazitaxel |
| Topotecan | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Topotecan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of occurrence of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.1) as: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm). The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression.
Measured: Randomization to first tumor progression/clinical deterioration or death (maximum 7.6 months)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was to be censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. Median time was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curve.
Measured: From randomization to date of death (maximum 15 months)
Progression Free Rate at Week 12
Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.1) as: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression. Death due to disease progression within 12 weeks without radiological documentation of progressive disease was counted as an event. Percentage of participants who were progression free at week 12 are reported.
Measured: Week 12
Overall Objective Tumor Response Rate
Overall objective tumor response was defined as the proportion of participants with confirmed RECIST 1.1 achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as disappearance of all target/non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Percentage of participants with overall objective tumor response is reported.
Measured: Randomization to disease progression/occurrence (maximum 7.6 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2012
- Primary completionApr 2014
- Study completionApr 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 179 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01500720
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ARD12166
- Other IDs
- 2011-003415-31, U1111-1123-3503
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2011
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Beaumont H, Evans TL, Klifa C, Guermazi A, Hong SR, Chadjaa M, Monostori Z. Discrepancies of assessments in a RECIST 1.1 phase II clinical trial - association between adjudication rate and variability in images and tumors selection. Cancer Imaging. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40644-018-0186-0.
PubMed 30537991Evans TL, Cho BC, Udud K, Fischer JR, Shepherd FA, Martinez P, Ramlau R, Syrigos KN, Shen L, Chadjaa M, Wolf M. Cabazitaxel Versus Topotecan in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Progressive Disease During or After First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Aug;10(8):1221-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000588.
PubMed 26200278
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase II Study of Cabazitaxel Versus Topotecan in Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Progressive Disease During or After a First Line Platinum Based Chemotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01500720
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARD12166
- Conditions
- Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 179 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2012
- Primary completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Apr 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective:
To demonstrate progression free survival (PFS) improvement for cabazitaxel compared to topotecan in participants with sensitive or resistant/refractory small cell lung cancer following a first line platinum based chemotherapy.
Secondary Objectives:
- To assess disease progression free rate at 12 weeks
- To assess Response Rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor [RECIST] 1.1) and duration of response
- To assess Overall Survival (OS)
- To assess the Safety (National Cancer Institute - Common Toxicity Criteria [NCI-CTC] version 4.03)
- To assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Detailed description
Participants are to be treated until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or refusal for further study treatment.
All participants are to be followed for disease progression documentation and for participant status until the study cut-off date.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cabazitaxel | Experimental | Drug: Cabazitaxel |
| Topotecan | Active comparator | Drug: Topotecan |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Histological/cytological proven locally advanced or metastatic small cell lung cancer with progressive disease during or after first line platinum based chemotherapy
- Male or female greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years (or country's legal age of majority if greater than [>]18 years)
- Participants with measurable disease, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.1)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to (<=) 1
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- Absence of signed and dated Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved participant informed consent form prior to enrollment into the study
- More than one prior chemotherapy regimen. Prior treatment with topotecan or taxanes
- Less than 28 days elapsed from prior treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery to the time of randomization (Radiotherapy for bone pain palliation is allowed)
- Adverse events (excluding alopecia) from any prior anticancer therapy of grade >1 (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria [NCI CTCAE] v4.03) at the time of randomization
- Uncontrolled Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases: participants with CNS metastases may have previous irradiation, only participants with stable disease or response to irradiation who are without CNS symptoms and on a maximum steroid dose of dexamethasone 8 mg daily or equivalent could be included
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CabazitaxelAlso: XRP6258Cabazitaxel 25 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) intravenously (IV) on Day 1 every 3 weeks (21-day cycle) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression or withdrawal consent. | Drug | Cabazitaxel |
| TopotecanTopotecan 1.5 mg/m^2 IV on Day 1 to Day 5 every 3 weeks (21-Day cycle) until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression or withdrawal consent. | Drug | Topotecan |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Randomization to first tumor progression/clinical deterioration or death (maximum 7.6 months)
PFS was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of occurrence of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.1) as: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm). The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression.
3 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival
Time frame: From randomization to date of death (maximum 15 months)
Progression Free Rate at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Overall Objective Tumor Response Rate
Time frame: Randomization to disease progression/occurrence (maximum 7.6 months)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30537991Beaumont H, Evans TL, Klifa C, Guermazi A, Hong SR, Chadjaa M, Monostori Z. Discrepancies of assessments in a RECIST 1.1 phase II clinical trial - association between adjudication rate and variability in images and tumors selection. Cancer Imaging. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40644-018-0186-0.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26200278Evans TL, Cho BC, Udud K, Fischer JR, Shepherd FA, Martinez P, Ramlau R, Syrigos KN, Shen L, Chadjaa M, Wolf M. Cabazitaxel Versus Topotecan in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Progressive Disease During or After First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Aug;10(8):1221-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000588.
Related trials for Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
RecruitingPhase 2
A UGT1A1 Genotype-Directed Study of Belinostat Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine, Tumor, Neuroendocrine
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
58 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cabazitaxel and Topotecan in people with Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Sanofi at 58 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 58 sites in France, United States, Greece, Canada, Hungary and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Apr 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (PFS) (time frame: Randomization to first tumor progression/clinical deterioration or death (maximum 7.6 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01500720, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2015.