AzTrials
AzTrials

BleedingPhase 3VASUSNCT01500135

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of TachoSil® Versus Surgicel® Original for the Secondary Hemostatic Treatment of Needle Hole Bleeding in Vascular Surgery

A Phase 3 study testing TachoSil® and Surgicel® Original in people with Bleeding, run by Takeda at 37 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Present trial is the third study that in combination with two completed studies (one being a trial in hepatic resection surgery also comparing TachoSil® and Surgicel® Original) targeted toward providing clinical safety and efficacy data to support extending the current label of TachoSil® to a general hemostasis… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bleeding
What is being tested?
TachoSil® and Surgicel® Original
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
37 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2012to Dec 2015
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Planned elective and subacute procedures with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft including at least one expected end-to-side anastomosis of a PTFE graft to the femoral artery (e.g. femoral-femoral cross-over, aorto-(bi)femoral, axillo-(bi)femoral, femoro-popliteal, femoro-crural bypass grafting), a PTFE patch angioplasty of the femoral artery, or an end-to-side anastomosis of a PTFE graft to an upper extremity artery in connection with arteriovenous bypass grafting for dialysis access.
  • The evaluation site for the planned femoral anastomosis must be a de novo site.
  • The participant must be heparinized during surgery.

Intra-operatively (before randomization)

  • The participant has a need for secondary hemostatic treatment
  • Verification of the evaluation site being a de novo site
  • Verification of the surgical procedure performed as being either an end-to-side or PTFE patch angioplasty.

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Thrombolytic therapy administered within 12 hours before surgery (e.g. the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) Alteplase).
  • Liver cirrhosis.

Intra-operatively (before randomization)

  • Severe bleeding at the anastomosis of the arterial bypass using PTFE graft prosthesis or the PTFE patch angioplasty
  • No bleeding (dry surgical field) at the targeted application area
  • Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC)
  • Application of topical hemostatic material including fibrin sealant/glue on the evaluation site.

Trial locations and contacts

37 sites in 1 country.

37 sites in 1 country

United States37 sites
  • Nycomed Investigational Site

    Austell, Georgia

  • Study site

    Austell, Georgia

  • Nycomed Investigational Site

    Bellevue, Washington

  • Study site

    Bellevue, Washington

  • Nycomed Investigational Site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Study site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Study site

    Charleston, West Virginia

  • Study site

    Durham, North Carolina

  • Study site

    East Setauket, New York

  • Study site

    Flushing, New York

  • Nycomed Investigational Site

    Galveston, Texas

  • Study site

    Galveston, Texas

  • Study site

    Hackensack, New Jersey

  • Nycomed Investigational Site

    Houston, Texas

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas

  • Study site

    Jacksonville, Florida

  • Nycomed Investigational Site

    Lexington, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Lexington, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Little Rock, Arkansas

  • Study site

    Long Beach, California

  • Nycomed Investigational Site

    Los Angeles, California

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California

  • Study site

    Loveland, Colorado

  • Study site

    Lubbock, Texas

  • Nycomed Investigational Site

    New York, New York

  • Study site

    New York, New York

  • Study site

    Portland, Oregon

  • Study site

    Raleigh, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Skokie, Illinois

  • Study site

    Southfield, Michigan

  • Nycomed Investigational Site

    Springfield, Illinois

  • Study site

    Springfield, Illinois

  • Study site

    St Louis, Missouri

  • Study site

    The Bronx, New York

  • Study site

    Toledo, Ohio

  • Study site

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Worcester, Massachusetts

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open Label, Parallel-group, Multi-center Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of TachoSil® Versus Surgicel® Original for the Secondary Hemostatic Treatment of Needle Hole Bleeding in Vascular Surgery

Present trial is the third study that in combination with two completed studies (one being a trial in hepatic resection surgery also comparing TachoSil® and Surgicel® Original) targeted toward providing clinical safety and efficacy data to support extending the current label of TachoSil® to a general hemostasis indication across several surgical procedures and organ systems in the USA.

Read the detailed description

The drug being tested in this study is called TachoSil®. TachoSil® was used to treat people undergoing scheduled subacute vascular surgery. This study looked at how well TachoSil® patches stopped bleeding at the surgical site compared to Surgicel® Original patches.

The study enrolled 150 patients. Participants were randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of the two open label treatment groups in a 2:1 ratio:

  • TachoSil®
  • Surgicel® Original

This multi-center trial was conducted in the United States. The overall time to participate in this study was approximately 6 months. Participants made multiple visits to the clinic, including safety follow-up visits at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery.

Conditions
Bleeding
Being tested
TachoSil®, Surgicel® Original
Keywords
Vascular Surgery, Secondary treatment of needle hole bleeding, Subjects undergoing vascular surgery and who need supportive treatment in order to control bleeding
Medical subject headings
Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TachoSil®Drug

    TachoSil® is a sterile, ready-to-use, absorbable patch for intra-operative topical application. It consists of an equine collagen patch coated with fibrin glue components: human fibrinogen and human thrombin.

  • Surgicel® OriginalDrug

    Surgicel® Original is an absorbable hemostat (oxidized regenerated cellulose)

Study groups in NCT01500135
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TachoSil®ExperimentalTachoSil® absorbable patches, applied topically, once, intraoperatively to stop bleeding. The patches were lightly compressed against the suture line for 3 minutes. The number of patches used was determined by the surgeon based on the size of the wound. If bleeding did not stop after 5 minutes treatment was repeated.
Receives: Drug: TachoSil®
Surgicel® OriginalActive comparatorSurgicel® Original absorbable patches, applied topically, once, intraoperatively to stop bleeding. The patches were lightly compressed against the suture line for 3 minutes. The number of patches used was determined by the surgeon based on the size of the wound. If bleeding did not stop after 5 minutes treatment was repeated.
Receives: Drug: Surgicel® Original

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Intra-operative Hemostasis at the Evaluation Site Within 3 Minutes After Application of the Randomized Treatment

    After application of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) light pressure was applied to the IMP with e.g. gauze pads. The first assessment of hemostasis was at minute 3: the pressure was carefully relieved, and the area was observed for visual bleeding at the site of the IMP. If no bleeding was visible, hemostasis was obtained and recorded.

    Measured: Within 3 minutes

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Intra-operative Hemostasis at the Evaluation Site Within 5 Minutes After Application of the Randomized Treatment

    After application of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) light pressure was applied to the IMP with e.g. gauze pads. If hemostasis was not obtained at minute 3, pressure was immediately reapplied. Hemostasis was re-assessed at minutes 4 and 5.

    Measured: Within 5 minutes

  2. Time to Intra-operative Hemostasis Within 10 Minutes at the Evaluation Site After Application of the Randomized Treatment

    After application of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) light pressure was applied to the IMP with e.g. gauze pads. Hemostasis was assessed at 3, 4, and 5 minutes. If hemostasis was not obtained after 5 minutes a second application of IMP was applied with 3 minutes of light pressure and hemostasis was re-assessed at 8, 9 and 10 minutes.

    Measured: Within 10 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Dec 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01500135
Sponsor's protocol ID
TC-2402-039-SP
Other IDs
U1111-1163-1653
Acronym
VASUS
Status last verified
Dec 2016
First submitted
21 Dec 2011
Last updated
8 Feb 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing TachoSil® and Surgicel® Original in people with Bleeding, run by Takeda at 37 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 37 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Feb 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Intra-operative Hemostasis at the Evaluation Site Within 3 Minutes After Application of the Randomized Treatment (time frame: Within 3 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in