Allergic RhinoconjunctivitisPhase 2NCT01490411
Dose Range Finding Study With rBet v1-FV - in Adult Patients With Birch Pollen-Allergic Seasonal Rhinoconjunctivitis
A Phase 2 study testing rBet v1-FV in people with Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis, run by Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to find out if rBet v1-FV works to relieve Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis symptoms compared to Placebo (an inactive substance that looks like rBet v1-FV and also contains Aluminum Hydroxide but does not contain the experimental drug). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
- What is being tested?
- rBet v1-FV
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 37 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to Sep 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must meet all of the following to be eligible for enrollment:
- Is a male or female, aged 18 to 65 years, inclusive.
- Has a clinical history of allergic rhinitis to birch pollen at least during each of the last 2 years.
- Has a birch pollen specific IgE result (EAST) greater than 0.75 kU/L on blood sample drawn at Visit 1.
- Has a positive skin prick test to birch allergen(s) at Visit 1, with a wheal diameter of at least 4 mm.
- Has minimum qualifying symptom scores at Visit 2.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients with sensitization to cat epithelia, dog epithelia, Dermatophagoides farinae or Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus as per the skin prick test and/or EAST, may be included if sensitization is not clinically relevant.
- Meets the concomitant medication restrictions described in the protocol.
- Is normally active and otherwise judged to be in good health on the basis of medical history, physical examination and routine laboratory tests.
- Is willing and able to give signed informed consent, and must have provided this consent.
- Is willing and able to attend required study visits.
Who cannot join
- A patient will not be included in this study if any of the following criteria apply:
- For female subjects:
- Female subjects with childbearing potential (i.e., females are not chemically or surgically sterilised or females who are not post-menopausal) with a positive pregnancy test at Visit 1.
- Female subjects with a negative pregnancy test at enrolment and not willing to use a reliable and highly effective method of birth control with a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly during the trial, as judged by the investigator.
- Pregnancy and lactation.
- Female subjects seeking to become pregnant.
Show all 25Show fewer
- General criteria:
- Individuals weighing less than 40 Kg.
- Not able to understand and comply with the requirements of the trial, as judged by the investigator.
- Concurrent participation in any other clinical trial or participation in any other clinical trial during the previous 30 days.
- Treatment with beta-blockers (locally and systemically).
- Contraindication for adrenalin (e.g. acute or chronic symptomatic coronary heart disease, severe hypertension).
- Immunotherapy criteria:
- Previous specific immunotherapy with birch or other early blossoming trees (e.g. Alder, Hazel) in any formulation within the past 5 years.
- Any current immunotherapy.
- Any previous specific immunotherapy with unknown or mixed allergens.
- Other allergies:
- Clinically relevant perennial allergies.
- Diseases and health status:
- Clinically relevant rhinoconjunctival or respiratory symptoms related to other reasons.
- Has diagnosed asthma.
- Has PEF or FEV1 < 80% of predicted normal
- Any acute or chronic disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would affect the study objectives or subject safety (e.g., Diabetes mellitus type I, malignant neoplasia, chronic renal failure, inflammatory diseases of liver or kidneys, emphysema, bronchiectasis).
- Autoimmune diseases, immune-defects including immune-suppression, immune-complex-induced immunopathies (e.g. HIV, post-transplant patients, lupus erythematodes [SLE], Grave's disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis) at time of screening.
- Has a history of other clinically significant diseases which might impact efficacy analysis.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Relative Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy With rBet v1-FV Compared to Placebo in Birch Pollen-Allergic Patients With IgE-Mediated Seasonal Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
The purpose of this study is to find out if rBet v1-FV works to relieve Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis symptoms compared to Placebo (an inactive substance that looks like rBet v1-FV and also contains Aluminum Hydroxide but does not contain the experimental drug). rBet v1-FV is a vaccine that works by exposing your immune system to something that resembles birch. This vaccine may help to lessen your allergy symptoms during the natural birch season.
Read the detailed description
Type I allergy is an immune-disorder which stems from the formation of IgE antibodies against proteins and glycoproteins from plants, insects, animals and fungi, most of which are normally considered harmless. The cross-linking of specific IgE antibodies on effector cells by allergens activates an immunological cascade leading to the symptoms of Type I allergy including rhinitis, conjunctivitis, asthma, and anaphylactic shock. Allergic Rhinitis is the most common chronic atopic disease and is associated with considerable cost and co-morbidity. Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), triggered by pollen from trees, grasses and weeds, is characterized by sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching, rhinorrhea, and pruritic, watery, red eyes.
Recombinant preparations offer various advantages over those based on natural allergen extracts. Recombinant proteins can be produced in highly purified forms of pharmaceutical quality; proteins are molecularly defined thus ensuring product consistency and minimising problems related to allergen extract standardisation; preparations only include those proteins that are considered relevant for specific immunotherapy; the risk of contamination with other allergenic material is excluded; the whole production process can be designed to exclude any risk factors for the introduction of infectious agents; the relative dosages of individual components of a final preparation can be optimised to favour better clinical efficacy. Allergy vaccination (AV) mediates the immune response to allergen exposure by altering the TH2 response in favour of a TH1 T-cell response, increasing IgG production and decreasing the production of inflammatory cytokines. rBet v1-FV is an AV designed to enhance beneficial immune responses. The investigational product has demonstrated efficacy and good tolerability in one previous pivotal Phase III and two previous Phase II studies.
- Conditions
- Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
- Being tested
- Placebo, rBet v1-FV
- Keywords
- Specific immunotherapy, SIT, SCIT, recombinant
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
Also called Comparator
The drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations.
rBet v1-FVBiological
Also called Specific Immunotherapy
The drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations.
rBet v1-FVBiological
Also called Spicific Immunotherapy
The drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations.
rBet v1-FVBiological
Also called Specific Immunotherapy
The drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations.
rBet v1-FVBiological
Also called Spicific Immunotherapy
The drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo was given the same way as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| 20 µg rBet v1-FV Immunotherapy | Experimental | The drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. Receives: Biological: rBet v1-FV |
| 80 µg rBet v1-FV Immunotherapy | Experimental | The drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. Receives: Biological: rBet v1-FV |
| 160 µg rBet v1-FV Immunotherapy | Experimental | The drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. Receives: Biological: rBet v1-FV |
| 320 µg rBet v1-FV Immunotherapy | Experimental | The drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. Receives: Biological: rBet v1-FV |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Relative efficacy of four different doses compared to placebo.
To assess the relative efficacy of four different dose regimes of rBet v1-FV compared to Placebo based on post-treatment intracutaneous testing results. The post-treatment wheal size (length in mm) after intracutaneous injection of a birch pollen solution was determined.
Measured: 6 hours
Secondary outcomes (2)
Relative efficacy of four different dose regimes of rBet v1-FV compared to Placebo and to each other in the reduction of symptoms of allergic rhinitis in the Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC).
To assess the relative efficacy of four different dose regimes of rBet v1-FV compared to Placebo and to each other in the reduction of symptoms of allergic rhinitis in the Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC), based on the change from baseline in area under the curve (AUC) for Total Symptom Score (TSS), Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), Total Non-Nasal Symptom Score (TNNSS) and Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS).
Measured: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.0 hour(s) in the EEC
Relative safety and tolerability of four different dose regimes of rBet v1-FV compared to Placebo
Recording of all adverse events, the vital signs and clinical laboratory tests.
Measured: 3-12 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completionApr 2011
- Study completionSep 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Allergic RhinoconjunctivitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 37 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Deepen Patel, MD, CCFP, Principal investigator
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01490411
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AL0903rB
- Other IDs
- P2IX09001
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 18 Nov 2011
- Last updated
- 24 Jan 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Meyer W, Narkus A, Salapatek AM, Hafner D. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of new recombinant hypoallergenic Bet v 1 in an environmental exposure chamber. Allergy. 2013 Jun;68(6):724-31. doi: 10.1111/all.12148. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
PubMed 23621350
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jan 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Relative Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy With rBet v1-FV Compared to Placebo in Birch Pollen-Allergic Patients With IgE-Mediated Seasonal Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01490411
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AL0903rB
- Conditions
- Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
- Keywords
- Specific immunotherapy, SIT, SCIT, recombinant
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 37 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2010
- Primary completion
- Apr 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to find out if rBet v1-FV works to relieve Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis symptoms compared to Placebo (an inactive substance that looks like rBet v1-FV and also contains Aluminum Hydroxide but does not contain the experimental drug). rBet v1-FV is a vaccine that works by exposing your immune system to something that resembles birch. This vaccine may help to lessen your allergy symptoms during the natural birch season.
Detailed description
Type I allergy is an immune-disorder which stems from the formation of IgE antibodies against proteins and glycoproteins from plants, insects, animals and fungi, most of which are normally considered harmless. The cross-linking of specific IgE antibodies on effector cells by allergens activates an immunological cascade leading to the symptoms of Type I allergy including rhinitis, conjunctivitis, asthma, and anaphylactic shock. Allergic Rhinitis is the most common chronic atopic disease and is associated with considerable cost and co-morbidity. Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), triggered by pollen from trees, grasses and weeds, is characterized by sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching, rhinorrhea, and pruritic, watery, red eyes.
Recombinant preparations offer various advantages over those based on natural allergen extracts. Recombinant proteins can be produced in highly purified forms of pharmaceutical quality; proteins are molecularly defined thus ensuring product consistency and minimising problems related to allergen extract standardisation; preparations only include those proteins that are considered relevant for specific immunotherapy; the risk of contamination with other allergenic material is excluded; the whole production process can be designed to exclude any risk factors for the introduction of infectious agents; the relative dosages of individual components of a final preparation can be optimised to favour better clinical efficacy. Allergy vaccination (AV) mediates the immune response to allergen exposure by altering the TH2 response in favour of a TH1 T-cell response, increasing IgG production and decreasing the production of inflammatory cytokines. rBet v1-FV is an AV designed to enhance beneficial immune responses. The investigational product has demonstrated efficacy and good tolerability in one previous pivotal Phase III and two previous Phase II studies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo was given the same way as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV. |
| 20 µg rBet v1-FV Immunotherapy | Experimental | Biological: rBet v1-FVThe drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. |
| 80 µg rBet v1-FV Immunotherapy | Experimental | Biological: rBet v1-FVThe drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. |
| 160 µg rBet v1-FV Immunotherapy | Experimental | Biological: rBet v1-FVThe drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. |
| 320 µg rBet v1-FV Immunotherapy | Experimental | Biological: rBet v1-FVThe drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Is a male or female, aged 18 to 65 years, inclusive.
- Has a clinical history of allergic rhinitis to birch pollen at least during each of the last 2 years.
- Has a birch pollen specific IgE result (EAST) greater than 0.75 kU/L on blood sample drawn at Visit 1.
- Has a positive skin prick test to birch allergen(s) at Visit 1, with a wheal diameter of at least 4 mm.
- Has minimum qualifying symptom scores at Visit 2.
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Female subjects with childbearing potential (i.e., females are not chemically or surgically sterilised or females who are not post-menopausal) with a positive pregnancy test at Visit 1.
- Female subjects with a negative pregnancy test at enrolment and not willing to use a reliable and highly effective method of birth control with a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly during the trial, as judged by the investigator.
- Pregnancy and lactation.
- Female subjects seeking to become pregnant.
- Individuals weighing less than 40 Kg.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboAlso: ComparatorThe drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. | Drug | Placebo |
| rBet v1-FVAlso: Specific ImmunotherapyThe drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. | Biological | 20 µg rBet v1-FV Immunotherapy |
| rBet v1-FVAlso: Spicific ImmunotherapyThe drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. | Biological | 80 µg rBet v1-FV Immunotherapy |
| rBet v1-FVAlso: Specific ImmunotherapyThe drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. | Biological | 160 µg rBet v1-FV Immunotherapy |
| rBet v1-FVAlso: Spicific ImmunotherapyThe drug tested in this study (rBet v1-FV) was given as a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. Patients received at least 10 injections of Placebo or rBet v1-FV, administered in increasing doses weekly for 10 weeks, up to one of the maximum concentrations. | Biological | 320 µg rBet v1-FV Immunotherapy |
Primary outcome
Relative efficacy of four different doses compared to placebo.
Time frame: 6 hours
To assess the relative efficacy of four different dose regimes of rBet v1-FV compared to Placebo based on post-treatment intracutaneous testing results. The post-treatment wheal size (length in mm) after intracutaneous injection of a birch pollen solution was determined.
2 secondary outcomes
Relative efficacy of four different dose regimes of rBet v1-FV compared to Placebo and to each other in the reduction of symptoms of allergic rhinitis in the Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC).
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.0 hour(s) in the EEC
Relative safety and tolerability of four different dose regimes of rBet v1-FV compared to Placebo
Time frame: 3-12 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jan 2014.
- Results publication: PubMed 23621350Meyer W, Narkus A, Salapatek AM, Hafner D. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of new recombinant hypoallergenic Bet v 1 in an environmental exposure chamber. Allergy. 2013 Jun;68(6):724-31. doi: 10.1111/all.12148. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
Related trials for Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Specific Immunotherapy With Mannan-Conjugated Allergoids for HDM-Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis_MM09-SIT-063.
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Specific Immunotherapy With Mannan-Conjugated Allergoids for HDM-Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis. MM09-SIT-063.
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating Nasal and Ocular Immune Response to Conjunctival Allergen Exposure
Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
Recruiting
Creating A Risk Assessment Tool for Thunderstorm Asthma: the CARISTA Study
Allergic Asthma, Thunderstorm Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of SLIT in Patients With Rhinitis/RC With/Without Mild-moderate Asthma, Due to Dpt and/or Df
Rhinitis, Rhinoconjunctivitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Deepen Patel, MD, CCFP principal investigator
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing rBet v1-FV in people with Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis, run by Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Relative efficacy of four different doses compared to placebo. (time frame: 6 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01490411, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2014.