High-risk Smoldering Multiple MyelomaPhase 2NCT01484275
A Study of Siltuximab (Anti- IL 6 Monoclonal Antibody) in Patients With High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
A Phase 2 study testing Siltuximab in people with High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 40 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of siltuximab compared with placebo (an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial) in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Siltuximab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 85 participants
- Where
- 40 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2012to 21 Aug 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) for <4 years
- Diagnosis of high-risk SMM (defined as bone marrow plasma cells >=10% and either serum monoclonal protein >=3 g/dL, or abnormal free light chain ratio <0.126 or >8 and serum M-protein <3 g/dL but >=1 g/dL)
- Patients must be within certain limits for protocol-specified laboratory tests
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status score of 0 or 1
- Women not of childbearing potential must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized, or otherwise incapable of pregnancy
- Women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate birth control measures and agree to not donate eggs for the purpose of assisted reproduction during the study and for 3 months after receiving the last dose of study agent, and must have a negative pregnancy test at screening
- Men must agree to use a double-barrier method of birth control and to not donate sperm during the study and for 3 months after receiving the last dose of study agent
Who cannot join
- Having symptomatic multiple myeloma, defined by any of the following (if due to myeloma): lytic bone lesions, severe osteopenia (low bone density), pathologic fractures, hypercalcemia (too much calcium in the blood), kidney insufficiency; symptomatic hyperviscosity of the blood, or recurrent serious bacterial infections such as pneumonia
- Primary systemic amyloid light (AL) chain amyloidosis (a build-up of amyloid light chain proteins in the blood)
- Prior or concurrent exposure to approved or investigational multiple myeloma treatments (concurrent treatment with bone-protecting agents (eg, bisphosphonates, denosumab), or steroids (not exceeding 10 mg prednisone per day or equivalent) are only allowed if given in a stable dose and for a nonmalignant condition; concurrent treatment with erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) are not allowed.)
- Prior exposure to agents targeting interleukin 6 (IL 6) or the IL 6 receptor
- Other malignancy within the past 3 years, except for the following, if treated and not active: basal cell or nonmetastatic (non-spreading) squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical carcinoma or International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage 1 carcinoma of the cervix
Trial locations and contacts
40 sites in 11 countries.
40 sites in 11 countries
United States8 sites
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Detroit, Michigan
Study site
Greenville, South Carolina
Study site
Kittanning, Pennsylvania
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Rockville, Maryland
Israel6 sites
Study site
Ashkelon
Study site
Jerusalem
Study site
Nahariya
Study site
Netanya
Study site
Petah Tikva
Study site
Tel Aviv
Spain5 sites
Study site
Barcelona
Study site
Barcleona
Study site
Madrid
Study site
Salamanca
Study site
Valencia
France4 sites
Study site
Dijon
Study site
Nantes
Study site
Tours
Study site
Villejuif
Australia3 sites
Study site
Camperdown
Study site
East Melbourne
Study site
Randwick
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study of Siltuximab (Anti IL 6 Monoclonal Antibody) in Subjects With High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of siltuximab compared with placebo (an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial) in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM).
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized (treatment assigned by chance), double-blind (neither patient nor investigator know which treatment is given), multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of siltuximab compared with placebo in patients with high-risk SMM (defined as bone marrow plasma cells >=10% and either serum monoclonal protein >=3 g/dL, or abnormal free light chain ratio <0.126 or >8 and serum M-protein <3 g/dL but >=1 g/dL). Approximately 74 patients will receive either siltuximab or placebo by intravenous (IV, injection into a vein) infusion every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study (approximately 4 years after randomization of the last patient). Efficacy, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and potential biomarkers will be assessed at time points defined in the protocol. Patient reported outcomes (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, Brief Pain Inventory [worst pain], Non-Chemotherapy Anemia Symptom Scale) will be administered before any procedure or treatment at each visit. Patient safety will be monitored throughout the study.
- Conditions
- High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Siltuximab, Placebo
- Keywords
- High-risk smoldering multiple myeloma, Multiple myeloma, Siltuximab
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SiltuximabDrug
Type=exact, unit=mg/kg, number=15, form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use, every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study.
PlaceboDrug
Form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use route=intravenous, use every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Siltuximab | Experimental | Type=exact, unit=mg/kg, number=15, form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use, every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study. Receives: Drug: Siltuximab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use route=intravenous, use every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
One-Year Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate
One-year PFS rate is defined as the percentage (%) of participants surviving 1 year after randomization without progression to multiple myeloma or death estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and based on the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) calcium, renal, anemia, and bone lesions (CRAB) criteria. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as presence of an M- component in serum plus clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow plus 1 or more of the following: Calcium elevation (greater than [>] 11.5 milligram per deciliter [mg/dL] [> 2.88 millimoles per liter {mmol/L}]); Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 2 mg/dL [177 micromoles per liter or more]; Anemia (hemoglobin less than [<] 10 gram per deciliter [g/dL] or 2 g/dL lower than lower limit of normal [LLN] [hemoglobin < 6.5 mmol/L or 1.25 mmol/L lower than LLN]); Bone disease (lytic lesions or osteopenia).
Measured: Up to 1 Year
Secondary outcomes (8)
Progressive Disease Indicator Rate (PDIR) at 6 Months
PDIR is defined as percentage of participants who meet any of following criteria occurring within 6 months of start of treatment. a) CRAB criteria: true progression events, b) Serum M-protein: increase by 25 % compared with baseline at 2 consecutive assessments, c) Magnetic resonance imaging: unequivocal increase in focal bone lesions, d) Immunoparesis: decrease by 25% compared with baseline of 2 other non-affected immunoglobulin (Ig) (IgG, IgM, IgA) at 2 consecutive assessments, e) Hemoglobin: decrease of 1.5 g/dL (with at least 1 read below LLN) at 2 consecutive assessments, with no other identifiable cause. PD is defined as presence of M-component in serum plus clonal plasma cells in bone marrow plus 1 or more of following: Calcium elevation (> 11.5 mg/dL [> 2.88 mmol/L]); Renal insufficiency (creatinine >2 mg/dL [177 micro mol/L or more]); Anemia (hemoglobin <10 or 2 g/dL lower than LLN) [hemoglobin < 6.5 or 1.25 mmol/L lower than LLN]); Bone disease (lytic lesions or osteopenia).
Measured: At 6 Months
Progression-Free Survival
PFS is defined as the time between randomization and initial documented PD according to the CRAB - International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria or date of death, whichever occurs first. PD is defined as presence of an M-component in serum plus clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow plus 1 or more of the following: Calcium elevation (> 11.5 mg/dL [> 2.88 mmol/L]); Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 2 mg/dL [177 [micro mol/L or more]); Anemia (<10 g/dL or 2 g/dL) lower than LLN) [hemoglobin < 6.5 mmol/L or 1.25 mmol/L lower than LLN]); Bone disease (lytic lesions or osteopenia).
Measured: Up to 4.7 Years
Percentage of Participants With Serum M-protein Response
Serum M-protein response is defined as a decrease of greater than or equal to (>=) 50% in serum M-protein compared with baseline at 2 consecutive assessments.
Measured: Up to 4.7 Years
Time to Worsening in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Scale Score
Time to worsening in EORTC-QLQ-C30 (physical function scale) is defined as time between randomization and first documentation of a worsening in EORTC-QLQ-C-30. Worsening in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 is defined as 10 points decrease from baseline. It comprises module with 30 items. Questionnaire includes 9 multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), a global health and quality of life scale, and a number of single items assessing symptoms (dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, diarrhoea). Instrument contains 28 items using a Likert scale with 4 response options: "Not at All," "A Little," "Quite a Bit," "Very Much" (scored 1-4). Two additional items use response options (1-7): 1=Very Poor, to 7=Excellent. All scale and item scores were linearly transformed to be in range from 0-100. A higher score represents a higher (better) level of functioning, or a higher (worse) level of symptoms.
Measured: Up to 4.7 Years
Time to Worsening in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Item Scores
Time to worsening in the BPI worst item is defined as the time between randomization and the first documentation of a worsening in the BPI worst item. It has 2 domains reflecting pain severity and pain interference with domains of functioning and well-being. The selected item refers to the "worst" pain the patient has experienced over the past 24 hours. This item has been found to be most responsive to interference with key domains of functioning and well-being and may be used as a single item. Responses are provided on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 "no pain" to 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine". Responses are described as mild (1 to 4), moderate (5 to 6) and severe (7 to 10). Worsening in the BPI worst item is defined as 2 points increase from baseline.
Measured: Up to 4.7 Years
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma With Adverse Prognostic Features
Number of participants who progressed to symptomatic multiple myeloma with stage III of International Staging System (ISS) or abnormal cytogenetic findings were assessed. The ISS system consists of stage I: beta2-microglobulin < 3.5 milligram per liter (mg/L) and albumin >= 3.5 gram (g)/100 ml; stage II: neither stage I nor stage III and stage III: beta2-microglobulin >= 5.5 mg/L.
Measured: Up to 4.7 Years
Number of Participants With Best Response to First Subsequent Multiple Myeloma Treatment
Best response to first subsequent anti-myeloma therapy was assessed by physician report at 6-month intervals and classified as: complete response (CR) (negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasms cells (PCs) in bone marrow); stringent CR (CR plus a normal FLC ratio, absence of clonal cells in bone marrow); near CR (< 5% PCs in a bone marrow aspirate, no increase in lytic bone lesions); very good partial response (VGPR) (serum and urine component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or >= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hour); partial response (PR): >= 50 reduction of serum M-protein, reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by >=90 % or to < 200 mg/24 hours); minimal response (>=25% but <= 49% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in urine M-protein by 50%-89%); stable disease (not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or PD); PD; not evaluable and unknown.
Measured: Up to 4.7 Years
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time between randomization and death due to any cause.
Measured: Up to 4.7 Years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Study start1 Mar 2012
- Primary completion12 May 2015
- Study completion21 Aug 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for High-risk Smoldering Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01484275
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR100755
- Other IDs
- CNTO328SMM2001, 2011-001735-22
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 1 Dec 2011
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Brighton TA, Khot A, Harrison SJ, Ghez D, Weiss BM, Kirsch A, Magen H, Gironella M, Oriol A, Streetly M, Kranenburg B, Qin X, Bandekar R, Hu P, Guilfoyle M, Qi M, Nemat S, Goldschmidt H. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Siltuximab in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 1;25(13):3772-3775. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3470. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
PubMed 30890552
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study of Siltuximab (Anti IL 6 Monoclonal Antibody) in Subjects With High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01484275
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR100755
- Conditions
- High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- High-risk smoldering multiple myeloma, Multiple myeloma, Siltuximab
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Aug 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Jan 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of siltuximab compared with placebo (an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial) in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM).
Detailed description
This is a randomized (treatment assigned by chance), double-blind (neither patient nor investigator know which treatment is given), multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of siltuximab compared with placebo in patients with high-risk SMM (defined as bone marrow plasma cells >=10% and either serum monoclonal protein >=3 g/dL, or abnormal free light chain ratio <0.126 or >8 and serum M-protein <3 g/dL but >=1 g/dL). Approximately 74 patients will receive either siltuximab or placebo by intravenous (IV, injection into a vein) infusion every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study (approximately 4 years after randomization of the last patient). Efficacy, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and potential biomarkers will be assessed at time points defined in the protocol. Patient reported outcomes (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, Brief Pain Inventory [worst pain], Non-Chemotherapy Anemia Symptom Scale) will be administered before any procedure or treatment at each visit. Patient safety will be monitored throughout the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Siltuximab | Experimental | Drug: SiltuximabType=exact, unit=mg/kg, number=15, form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use, every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboForm=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use route=intravenous, use every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) for <4 years
- Diagnosis of high-risk SMM (defined as bone marrow plasma cells >=10% and either serum monoclonal protein >=3 g/dL, or abnormal free light chain ratio <0.126 or >8 and serum M-protein <3 g/dL but >=1 g/dL)
- Patients must be within certain limits for protocol-specified laboratory tests
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status score of 0 or 1
- Women not of childbearing potential must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized, or otherwise incapable of pregnancy
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Having symptomatic multiple myeloma, defined by any of the following (if due to myeloma): lytic bone lesions, severe osteopenia (low bone density), pathologic fractures, hypercalcemia (too much calcium in the blood), kidney insufficiency; symptomatic hyperviscosity of the blood, or recurrent serious bacterial infections such as pneumonia
- Primary systemic amyloid light (AL) chain amyloidosis (a build-up of amyloid light chain proteins in the blood)
- Prior or concurrent exposure to approved or investigational multiple myeloma treatments (concurrent treatment with bone-protecting agents (eg, bisphosphonates, denosumab), or steroids (not exceeding 10 mg prednisone per day or equivalent) are only allowed if given in a stable dose and for a nonmalignant condition; concurrent treatment with erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) are not allowed.)
- Prior exposure to agents targeting interleukin 6 (IL 6) or the IL 6 receptor
- Other malignancy within the past 3 years, except for the following, if treated and not active: basal cell or nonmetastatic (non-spreading) squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical carcinoma or International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage 1 carcinoma of the cervix
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SiltuximabType=exact, unit=mg/kg, number=15, form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use, every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study. | Drug | Siltuximab |
| PlaceboForm=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use route=intravenous, use every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
One-Year Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate
Time frame: Up to 1 Year
One-year PFS rate is defined as the percentage (%) of participants surviving 1 year after randomization without progression to multiple myeloma or death estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and based on the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) calcium, renal, anemia, and bone lesions (CRAB) criteria. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as presence of an M- component in serum plus clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow plus 1 or more of the following: Calcium elevation (greater than [>] 11.5 milligram per deciliter [mg/dL] [> 2.88 millimoles per liter {mmol/L}]); Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 2 mg/dL [177 micromoles per liter or more]; Anemia (hemoglobin less than [<] 10 gram per deciliter [g/dL] or 2 g/dL lower than lower limit of normal [LLN] [hemoglobin < 6.5 mmol/L or 1.25 mmol/L lower than LLN]); Bone disease (lytic lesions or osteopenia).
8 secondary outcomes
Progressive Disease Indicator Rate (PDIR) at 6 Months
Time frame: At 6 Months
Progression-Free Survival
Time frame: Up to 4.7 Years
Percentage of Participants With Serum M-protein Response
Time frame: Up to 4.7 Years
Time to Worsening in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Scale Score
Time frame: Up to 4.7 Years
Time to Worsening in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Item Scores
Time frame: Up to 4.7 Years
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma With Adverse Prognostic Features
Time frame: Up to 4.7 Years
Number of Participants With Best Response to First Subsequent Multiple Myeloma Treatment
Time frame: Up to 4.7 Years
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 4.7 Years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30890552Brighton TA, Khot A, Harrison SJ, Ghez D, Weiss BM, Kirsch A, Magen H, Gironella M, Oriol A, Streetly M, Kranenburg B, Qin X, Bandekar R, Hu P, Guilfoyle M, Qi M, Nemat S, Goldschmidt H. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Siltuximab in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 1;25(13):3772-3775. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3470. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Related trials for High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare Linvoseltamab and Daratumumab Treatment in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (HR-SMM)
High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (HR-SMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Isatuximab and Iberdomide as Immunotherapy for High Risk in Smouldering Myeloma
Smouldering Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Isatuximab With or Without Lenalidomide in Patients With High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (ISAMAR)
Smoldering Plasma Cell Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Lenalidomide or Observation in Treating Patients With Asymptomatic High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Light Chain Deposition Disease, Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of JNJ-79635322 in Combination With Daratumumab With or Without Lenalidomide for Multiple Myeloma, Newly Diagnosed AL Amyloidosis, and High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma or JNJ-79635322 in Combination With Pomalidomide for Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma, Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
40 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Siltuximab in people with High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 40 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 40 sites in United States, Israel, Spain, France, Australia and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jan 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
One-Year Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate (time frame: Up to 1 Year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01484275, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2020.