AzTrials
AzTrials

High-risk Smoldering Multiple MyelomaPhase 2NCT01484275

A Study of Siltuximab (Anti- IL 6 Monoclonal Antibody) in Patients With High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 2 study testing Siltuximab in people with High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 40 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of siltuximab compared with placebo (an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial) in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
What is being tested?
Siltuximab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
85 participants
Where
40 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
1 Mar 2012to 21 Aug 2019
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) for <4 years
  • Diagnosis of high-risk SMM (defined as bone marrow plasma cells >=10% and either serum monoclonal protein >=3 g/dL, or abnormal free light chain ratio <0.126 or >8 and serum M-protein <3 g/dL but >=1 g/dL)
  • Patients must be within certain limits for protocol-specified laboratory tests
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status score of 0 or 1
  • Women not of childbearing potential must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized, or otherwise incapable of pregnancy
  • Women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate birth control measures and agree to not donate eggs for the purpose of assisted reproduction during the study and for 3 months after receiving the last dose of study agent, and must have a negative pregnancy test at screening
  • Men must agree to use a double-barrier method of birth control and to not donate sperm during the study and for 3 months after receiving the last dose of study agent

Who cannot join

  • Having symptomatic multiple myeloma, defined by any of the following (if due to myeloma): lytic bone lesions, severe osteopenia (low bone density), pathologic fractures, hypercalcemia (too much calcium in the blood), kidney insufficiency; symptomatic hyperviscosity of the blood, or recurrent serious bacterial infections such as pneumonia
  • Primary systemic amyloid light (AL) chain amyloidosis (a build-up of amyloid light chain proteins in the blood)
  • Prior or concurrent exposure to approved or investigational multiple myeloma treatments (concurrent treatment with bone-protecting agents (eg, bisphosphonates, denosumab), or steroids (not exceeding 10 mg prednisone per day or equivalent) are only allowed if given in a stable dose and for a nonmalignant condition; concurrent treatment with erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) are not allowed.)
  • Prior exposure to agents targeting interleukin 6 (IL 6) or the IL 6 receptor
  • Other malignancy within the past 3 years, except for the following, if treated and not active: basal cell or nonmetastatic (non-spreading) squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical carcinoma or International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage 1 carcinoma of the cervix

Trial locations and contacts

40 sites in 11 countries.

40 sites in 11 countries

United States8 sites
  • Study site

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas

  • Study site

    Detroit, Michigan

  • Study site

    Greenville, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Kittanning, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    New York, New York

  • Study site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Rockville, Maryland

Other trials in United States

Israel6 sites
  • Study site

    Ashkelon

  • Study site

    Jerusalem

  • Study site

    Nahariya

  • Study site

    Netanya

  • Study site

    Petah Tikva

  • Study site

    Tel Aviv

Other trials in Israel

Spain5 sites
  • Study site

    Barcelona

  • Study site

    Barcleona

  • Study site

    Madrid

  • Study site

    Salamanca

  • Study site

    Valencia

Other trials in Spain

France4 sites
  • Study site

    Dijon

  • Study site

    Nantes

  • Study site

    Tours

  • Study site

    Villejuif

Other trials in France

Australia3 sites
  • Study site

    Camperdown

  • Study site

    East Melbourne

  • Study site

    Randwick

Other trials in Australia

Belgium3 sites
  • Study site

    Antwerp

  • Study site

    Brussels

  • Study site

    Ghent

Other trials in Belgium

Germany3 sites
  • Study site

    Berlin

  • Study site

    Hamburg

  • Study site

    Heidelberg

Other trials in Germany

Sweden3 sites
  • Study site

    Gothenburg

  • Study site

    Linköping

  • Study site

    Stockholm

Other trials in Sweden

South Korea2 sites
  • Study site

    Daejeon

  • Study site

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Study site

    London

  • Study site

    Manchester

Other trials in United Kingdom

Greece1 site
  • Study site

    Athens

Other trials in Greece

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study of Siltuximab (Anti IL 6 Monoclonal Antibody) in Subjects With High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of siltuximab compared with placebo (an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial) in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM).

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized (treatment assigned by chance), double-blind (neither patient nor investigator know which treatment is given), multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of siltuximab compared with placebo in patients with high-risk SMM (defined as bone marrow plasma cells >=10% and either serum monoclonal protein >=3 g/dL, or abnormal free light chain ratio <0.126 or >8 and serum M-protein <3 g/dL but >=1 g/dL). Approximately 74 patients will receive either siltuximab or placebo by intravenous (IV, injection into a vein) infusion every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study (approximately 4 years after randomization of the last patient). Efficacy, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and potential biomarkers will be assessed at time points defined in the protocol. Patient reported outcomes (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, Brief Pain Inventory [worst pain], Non-Chemotherapy Anemia Symptom Scale) will be administered before any procedure or treatment at each visit. Patient safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Being tested
Siltuximab, Placebo
Keywords
High-risk smoldering multiple myeloma, Multiple myeloma, Siltuximab
Medical subject headings
Multiple Myeloma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SiltuximabDrug

    Type=exact, unit=mg/kg, number=15, form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use, every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use route=intravenous, use every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study.

Study groups in NCT01484275
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SiltuximabExperimentalType=exact, unit=mg/kg, number=15, form=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use, every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study.
Receives: Drug: Siltuximab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorForm=intravenous infusion, route=intravenous use route=intravenous, use every 4 weeks until progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. One-Year Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate

    One-year PFS rate is defined as the percentage (%) of participants surviving 1 year after randomization without progression to multiple myeloma or death estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and based on the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) calcium, renal, anemia, and bone lesions (CRAB) criteria. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as presence of an M- component in serum plus clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow plus 1 or more of the following: Calcium elevation (greater than [>] 11.5 milligram per deciliter [mg/dL] [> 2.88 millimoles per liter {mmol/L}]); Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 2 mg/dL [177 micromoles per liter or more]; Anemia (hemoglobin less than [<] 10 gram per deciliter [g/dL] or 2 g/dL lower than lower limit of normal [LLN] [hemoglobin < 6.5 mmol/L or 1.25 mmol/L lower than LLN]); Bone disease (lytic lesions or osteopenia).

    Measured: Up to 1 Year

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Progressive Disease Indicator Rate (PDIR) at 6 Months

    PDIR is defined as percentage of participants who meet any of following criteria occurring within 6 months of start of treatment. a) CRAB criteria: true progression events, b) Serum M-protein: increase by 25 % compared with baseline at 2 consecutive assessments, c) Magnetic resonance imaging: unequivocal increase in focal bone lesions, d) Immunoparesis: decrease by 25% compared with baseline of 2 other non-affected immunoglobulin (Ig) (IgG, IgM, IgA) at 2 consecutive assessments, e) Hemoglobin: decrease of 1.5 g/dL (with at least 1 read below LLN) at 2 consecutive assessments, with no other identifiable cause. PD is defined as presence of M-component in serum plus clonal plasma cells in bone marrow plus 1 or more of following: Calcium elevation (> 11.5 mg/dL [> 2.88 mmol/L]); Renal insufficiency (creatinine >2 mg/dL [177 micro mol/L or more]); Anemia (hemoglobin <10 or 2 g/dL lower than LLN) [hemoglobin < 6.5 or 1.25 mmol/L lower than LLN]); Bone disease (lytic lesions or osteopenia).

    Measured: At 6 Months

  2. Progression-Free Survival

    PFS is defined as the time between randomization and initial documented PD according to the CRAB - International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria or date of death, whichever occurs first. PD is defined as presence of an M-component in serum plus clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow plus 1 or more of the following: Calcium elevation (> 11.5 mg/dL [> 2.88 mmol/L]); Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 2 mg/dL [177 [micro mol/L or more]); Anemia (<10 g/dL or 2 g/dL) lower than LLN) [hemoglobin < 6.5 mmol/L or 1.25 mmol/L lower than LLN]); Bone disease (lytic lesions or osteopenia).

    Measured: Up to 4.7 Years

  3. Percentage of Participants With Serum M-protein Response

    Serum M-protein response is defined as a decrease of greater than or equal to (>=) 50% in serum M-protein compared with baseline at 2 consecutive assessments.

    Measured: Up to 4.7 Years

  4. Time to Worsening in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Scale Score

    Time to worsening in EORTC-QLQ-C30 (physical function scale) is defined as time between randomization and first documentation of a worsening in EORTC-QLQ-C-30. Worsening in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 is defined as 10 points decrease from baseline. It comprises module with 30 items. Questionnaire includes 9 multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), a global health and quality of life scale, and a number of single items assessing symptoms (dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, diarrhoea). Instrument contains 28 items using a Likert scale with 4 response options: "Not at All," "A Little," "Quite a Bit," "Very Much" (scored 1-4). Two additional items use response options (1-7): 1=Very Poor, to 7=Excellent. All scale and item scores were linearly transformed to be in range from 0-100. A higher score represents a higher (better) level of functioning, or a higher (worse) level of symptoms.

    Measured: Up to 4.7 Years

  5. Time to Worsening in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Item Scores

    Time to worsening in the BPI worst item is defined as the time between randomization and the first documentation of a worsening in the BPI worst item. It has 2 domains reflecting pain severity and pain interference with domains of functioning and well-being. The selected item refers to the "worst" pain the patient has experienced over the past 24 hours. This item has been found to be most responsive to interference with key domains of functioning and well-being and may be used as a single item. Responses are provided on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 "no pain" to 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine". Responses are described as mild (1 to 4), moderate (5 to 6) and severe (7 to 10). Worsening in the BPI worst item is defined as 2 points increase from baseline.

    Measured: Up to 4.7 Years

  6. Number of Participants With Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma With Adverse Prognostic Features

    Number of participants who progressed to symptomatic multiple myeloma with stage III of International Staging System (ISS) or abnormal cytogenetic findings were assessed. The ISS system consists of stage I: beta2-microglobulin < 3.5 milligram per liter (mg/L) and albumin >= 3.5 gram (g)/100 ml; stage II: neither stage I nor stage III and stage III: beta2-microglobulin >= 5.5 mg/L.

    Measured: Up to 4.7 Years

  7. Number of Participants With Best Response to First Subsequent Multiple Myeloma Treatment

    Best response to first subsequent anti-myeloma therapy was assessed by physician report at 6-month intervals and classified as: complete response (CR) (negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasms cells (PCs) in bone marrow); stringent CR (CR plus a normal FLC ratio, absence of clonal cells in bone marrow); near CR (< 5% PCs in a bone marrow aspirate, no increase in lytic bone lesions); very good partial response (VGPR) (serum and urine component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or >= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hour); partial response (PR): >= 50 reduction of serum M-protein, reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by >=90 % or to < 200 mg/24 hours); minimal response (>=25% but <= 49% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in urine M-protein by 50%-89%); stable disease (not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or PD); PD; not evaluable and unknown.

    Measured: Up to 4.7 Years

  8. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is defined as the time between randomization and death due to any cause.

    Measured: Up to 4.7 Years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Dec 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Mar 2012
  3. Primary completion12 May 2015
  4. Study completion21 Aug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
85 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01484275
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR100755
Other IDs
CNTO328SMM2001, 2011-001735-22
Status last verified
Jan 2020
First submitted
1 Dec 2011
Last updated
27 Jan 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Brighton TA, Khot A, Harrison SJ, Ghez D, Weiss BM, Kirsch A, Magen H, Gironella M, Oriol A, Streetly M, Kranenburg B, Qin X, Bandekar R, Hu P, Guilfoyle M, Qi M, Nemat S, Goldschmidt H. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Siltuximab in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 1;25(13):3772-3775. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3470. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

    PubMed 30890552

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Siltuximab in people with High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 40 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 40 sites in United States, Israel, Spain, France, Australia and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jan 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

One-Year Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate (time frame: Up to 1 Year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01484275, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in