Vertebral Compression FracturesNCT01482793
A Controlled Trial of Vertebroplasty for Acute Painful Osteoporotic Fractures
A study testing Vertebroplasty in people with Vertebral Compression Fractures and Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures, run by Optimus Clinical Research at 1 site in Australia.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to gather data regarding the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the acute fracture group with fractures less than 6 weeks old. The AVAMAX vertebroplasty kits (Care Fusion) will be used for all vertebroplasties. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Vertebral Compression Fractures, Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures, Acute Vertebral Fractures
- What is being tested?
- Vertebroplasty
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustralia
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to May 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient is greater than 60 years of age.
- Patient has pain which is not adequately controlled by oral analgesia or which has required hospitalisation and prevents early mobilisation
- Patient has pain from one or two compression fractures of the vertebrae in the areas T4 to L5 confirmed with a sagittal STIR (short tau inversion recovery) and sagittal T1 weighted MRI scan of the spine. Patients with three or more recent fractures are excluded.
- Clinical history verifies that patient's fracture occurred in the previous 6 weeks.
- Patient does not have a known coagulopathy. If on warfarin, the INR should be less than 2.5 within the last three days.
- Patient has no contraindications for conscious sedation.
Show all 23Show fewer
- Patient reports pain during ambulation or movement from the compression fracture(s) of at least seven (7) out of ten (10) on a numerical pain scale.
- Patient has access to a telephone.
- Patient speaks English well enough to answer all health questions via telephone.
- Patient has a confirmed diagnosis of osteoporosis via a BMD within 6 months of baseline or a QCT at baseline.
- Patient does not have a history of debilitating chronic back pain which requires regular analgesia.
- Patients with chronic back pain who regularly use medication containing any narcotic for a period greater than 6 weeks, that is prior to the acute fracture.
- Patient does not have significant retropulsed fragment or spinal canal compromise of greater than 20% by retropulsed fragment.
- Patient has no mental incapacity or dementia that makes him/her unable to give informed consent.
- Patient has no history of vertebral osteomyelitis.
- Patient has vertebral body collapse not greater than 60% relative to closest intact vertebra.
- Patient has no pedicle fractures.
- Patient has no active local or systemic infection.
- Patient has not had surgery (within the last 60 days).
- Patient has no concomitant hip fracture.
- Patient has no malignant tumour deposit (multiple myeloma), tumour mass, or tumour extension into the epidural space at the level of the fracture to be treated on MRI.
- Patient does not have severely immunocompromised health status (including any patient who is HIV positive, currently on chemotherapy, taking high doses of long term corticosteroids - defined as a dose of prednisone exceeding 10mg for greater than 3 months in the last 12 months, has a hematologic malignancy, or a transplant recipient.)
- Patient able to attend face to face visits.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Controlled Trial of Vertebroplasty for Acute Painful Osteoporotic Fractures.
The objective of this study is to gather data regarding the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the acute fracture group with fractures less than 6 weeks old. The AVAMAX vertebroplasty kits (Care Fusion) will be used for all vertebroplasties.
The primary effectiveness analysis will be based on the number of patients whose numeric rating pain score drops from above 7 out of 10 at baseline to below 4 out of 10 at two weeks post-intervention. Our hypothesis is that the vertebroplasty group will have a significantly larger proportion of patients achieving pain reduction than the control group. A secondary analysis will compare the change in mean pain scores and specific activity related pain scores between the two groups at 3 days, 14 days and at 1, 3 and 6 months. Another secondary effectiveness analysis will include the mean change in the back-pain specific limitation in function as quantified by the Roland Scale at these same data collection time points.
Read the detailed description
The study will be a two arm randomised, blind placebo controlled trial of vertebroplasty for acute (< 6 weeks) osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Patients with substantial pain or immobility despite medical therapy will be recruited to the study, randomised to study treatments and followed for 6 months. The primary effectiveness variable is back-pain as recorded on a numerical verbal rating scale at two weeks post-procedure. Secondary effectiveness variable will be the Roland Morris back pain specific disability score.
In parallel with the trial an economic analysis will be conducted.
Study participants will be recruited from patients who are referred for vertebroplasty evaluations from five clinical sites of the Sydney metropolitan area. The sites will be St George Private Hospital, Kareena Private Hospital, St George Public Hospital, Sutherland Hospital and Liverpool Hospital. These sites have the advantage of having robust, established vertebroplasty programs and high levels of technical operator experience with vertebroplasty in acute fractures. Potential patients are patients identified with a recent vertebral fracture that requires assessment for a vertebroplasty. The referring physician will request an MRI and spinal radiograph as part of routine assessment and standard clinical care. Potential involvement in the study will be discussed at this point between patient and referring physician. Patients will be given a consent form to read and consider. The research team will then contact potential subjects and ask them a series of questions to determine eligibility. The investigator and the research coordinator will then describe the study to eligible patients and informed consent will be obtained prior to conducting baseline evaluations and randomization.
Treatment Intervention (Vertebroplasty Procedure):
5.1.1 The procedure is performed under strict aseptic conditions. All personnel wear surgical masks and caps in addition to gowns and gloves for operators, to minimize the risk of infection. 1G ceftriaxone will be administered at the commencement of the procedure unless the patient is allergic. In case of allergy then antibiotics are not mandatory.
5.1.2 The patient is placed prone on the angiographic table and oxygen mask applied. Conscious sedation will be induced by IV administration of fentanyl and midazolam.
5.1.3 Continuously monitor heart rate and pulse oximetry throughout the procedure.
5.1.4 Standard fluoroscopy with a dedicated DSA interventional fluoroscope will be used for localization of the vertebral body to be treated (Levels T4-L5) and needle placement within the vertebral body.
5.1.5 A 25g needle will be used to raise a wheal of 1% lignocaine subcutaneously. A small skin nick will be made with a scalpel blade. A 25g needle will be placed into the skin at the site of the wheal and advanced under fluoroscopic guidance to the periosteum over the pedicle. This periosteum will be infiltrated with 6-7 cc of 1% lignocaine. (Injections will be made at each fracture level, i.e., 2 separate injections will be performed for patients with 2 fracture levels.) 5.1.6 A small incision is made on the skin in the vicinity of the pedicle, and the access needle is positioned for a transpedicular approach.
5.1.7 13G or 11G vertebroplasty needles will be placed using trans-pedicular or para-pedicular approach into the anterior one third of the vertebral body. Whether a unilateral or bilateral approach is used is up to the discretion of the radiologist doing the procedure, but a bi-pedicular approach is recommended for the T12 vertebral body and all of the lumbar vertebral bodies (due to their increased size). An effort should be made to fill both the fractured fragment of the vertebral body and the more normal trabecular component in order to stop ongoing fracture and volume loss.
5.1.8 Prepare the AVAMAX™ injecting system in the approved manner as per system instruction. Wait for 5 minutes after mixing cement before cement injection to allow for optimal viscosity prior to commencing injection. Product accountability forms will be completed which include batch numbers.
5.1.9 Cement injection should be performed using continuous fluoroscopic screening in the lateral projection. Cement injection should continue until adequate vertebral body filling is obtained. This ideally means cement filling from the superior to inferior vertebral body end-plate in at least the anterior three quarters of the vertebral body in lateral projection. In frontal projection, the cement should reach at least from middle of the pedicle to middle of the contra-lateral pedicle in a distribution considered adequate (by the radiologist) to stabilize the acute fracture. Upon completion of injection, the cannula is removed and haemostasis at the puncture site is achieved by gentle pressure. If adequate fill was not obtained, place another needle in the contra lateral pedicle and treat in the same fashion.
5.1.10 Patient should be left in prone position for 3 minutes following cement injection to allow for cement to harden.
5.1.11 Contingency plans should an outpatient have a sudden life threatening event occur in the radiology suite and require immediate medical or surgical attention: patient will be examined and appropriate life support measures instituted. In case of suspected spinal cord compromise, immediate CT scanning and surgical consultation will be made. In the case of hemodynamic compromise from idiosyncratic reaction, life support will be instituted.
5.2 Control Intervention: 5.2.1 The procedure is performed under strict aseptic conditions. All personnel wear surgical masks and caps in addition to gowns and gloves for operators, to minimize the risk of infection and to simulate a true vertebroplasty. Prophylactic antibiotics may be administered by the treating physician according to their usual practice, but are not mandated by the study protocol.
5.22 The patient is placed prone on the angiographic table and oxygen mask applied. Conscious sedation will be induced by IV administration of fentanyl, morphine or pethidine and midazolam.
5.2.3 Continuously monitor heart rate and pulse oximetry throughout the procedure.
5.2.4 Standard fluoroscopy will be used for localization of the vertebral body to be treated (Levels T4-L5) and needle placement within the vertebral body.
5.2.5 A 25g needle will be used to raise a wheal of 1% lignocaine subcutaneously. A skin incision measuring approximately 5mm will be made. The 25G needle will then be reintroduced and 2 cc of 1% lignocaine injected into the subcutaneous tissues.. (These sham injections will be made at each fracture level, i.e., 2 separate injections will be performed for patients with 2 fracture levels.) 5.2.6 Verbal clues will be given, including but not limited to comments that needle placement and/or cement injection is progressing appropriately. Manual palpation of the area over the fracture will be done to simulate needle placement.
5.2.8 The procedure will be terminated.(Note: The patient will be unaware as to whether the control procedure or vertebroplasty had been performed since full sterile preparation, sedation and simulated injection procedure will be used.
5.2.9 Contingency plans should an outpatient have a sudden life threatening or limb threatening event occur in the radiology suite and require immediate medical or surgical attention: patient will be examined and appropriate life support measures instituted. In case of suspected spinal cord compromise, immediate CT scanning and surgical consultation will be made. In the case of hemodynamic compromise from idiosyncratic reaction life support will be instituted.
5.3 Post Operative Care: 5.3.1 Following the procedure, all patients should be observed in the supine position for at least one hour.
5.3.2 Patients may gradually sit up and/or stand over the next hour, as tolerated, under direct nursing or physician supervision.
5.3.3 Outpatients may be discharged to the care of an adult after 2 hours. 5.3.4 Non-narcotic pain medication may be taken as needed, but patients are encouraged to limit use of narcotics so efficacy can be determined.
5.3.5 One hour after the procedure, patients are evaluated for pain, or complications of the procedure. Vital signs will also be recorded.
5.3.6 If determined to be necessary by the physician, an outpatient may be admitted and monitored overnight in the hospital. The reason for keeping the patient overnight will be documented on the post treatment assessment form and the serious adverse event form.
5.3.7 Evaluation of any potential complication will be conducted immediately so that appropriate treatment can be instituted.
5.3.8 Dressings applied to the injection/incision site may be removed the following day.
5.3.9 Skin incisions should be kept clean and dry. Patients are to notify physician of any redness or discharge.
5.3.10 Inpatients will continue to be managed by attending physician in usual fashion.
5.4 Patient Evaluations \& Follow Up Examinations We will administer the following measures of pain and pain-related disability questionnaires: numeric and visual pain-rating scale, the Roland-Morris Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire, Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (QUALEFFO), SF-36 and EQ-5D to all subjects in this trial. We will also ask patients about their use of medications, other health care resources, medical history, co-morbidities and demographics. A timed up and go test, which is a reliable measure of function in older people, will be completed during patient clinic visits at baseline, day 14 and month 6 .
After obtaining informed consent during the baseline consultation, patients will be asked about demographic information and the patient questionnaires will be administered in a face-to-face interview. The two week and six month interviews will also be asked in person by research staff during patient visits. The other interviews (Days 3, day 7, weeks 4 and month 3) will be conducted by telephone for all participants at all sites. An exception to this will be inpatients that remain in hospital at day 3 who may be interviewed at bedside*.
- Conditions
- Vertebral Compression Fractures, Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures, Acute Vertebral Fractures
- Being tested
- Vertebroplasty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VertebroplastyProcedure or surgery
AVAmax radiopaque bone cement is injected into the vertebral body using a 13 G or 11 G vertebroplasty needle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AVAMAX | Active comparator | Avamax vertebroplasty kits provided by Care Fusion Receives: Procedure: Vertebroplasty |
| Simulated injection procedure | No intervention | Patient will be unaware as to whether the control procedure or vertebroplasty had been performed since full sterile preparation, sedation and simulated injection procedure will be used. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient rated pain intensity
Measured: two weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Functional Disability
Functional Disability (Roland Morris disability score) will be measured at 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 and 6 months.
Measured: two weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionMay 2015
- Study completionMay 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Vertebral Compression FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Optimus Clinical Research
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- C. R. Bard
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Paul Bird, Optimus Clinical Research
- Investigators
- William Clark, Principal investigator, St George Private Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01482793
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WGT4P
- Other IDs
- VAPOUR
- Status last verified
- Jul 2015
- First submitted
- 28 Nov 2011
- Last updated
- 13 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Clark W, Bird P, Gonski P, Diamond TH, Smerdely P, McNeil HP, Schlaphoff G, Bryant C, Barnes E, Gebski V. Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1408-1416. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31341-1. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
PubMed 27544377Clark W, Bird P, Diamond T, Gonski P. Vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Apr 12;16:159. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0671-8.
PubMed 25873274
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Controlled Trial of Vertebroplasty for Acute Painful Osteoporotic Fractures.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01482793
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WGT4P
- Conditions
- Vertebral Compression Fractures, Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures, Acute Vertebral Fractures
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Optimus Clinical ResearchUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- C. R. Bard
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to gather data regarding the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the acute fracture group with fractures less than 6 weeks old. The AVAMAX vertebroplasty kits (Care Fusion) will be used for all vertebroplasties.
The primary effectiveness analysis will be based on the number of patients whose numeric rating pain score drops from above 7 out of 10 at baseline to below 4 out of 10 at two weeks post-intervention. Our hypothesis is that the vertebroplasty group will have a significantly larger proportion of patients achieving pain reduction than the control group. A secondary analysis will compare the change in mean pain scores and specific activity related pain scores between the two groups at 3 days, 14 days and at 1, 3 and 6 months. Another secondary effectiveness analysis will include the mean change in the back-pain specific limitation in function as quantified by the Roland Scale at these same data collection time points.
Detailed description
The study will be a two arm randomised, blind placebo controlled trial of vertebroplasty for acute (< 6 weeks) osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Patients with substantial pain or immobility despite medical therapy will be recruited to the study, randomised to study treatments and followed for 6 months. The primary effectiveness variable is back-pain as recorded on a numerical verbal rating scale at two weeks post-procedure. Secondary effectiveness variable will be the Roland Morris back pain specific disability score.
In parallel with the trial an economic analysis will be conducted.
Study participants will be recruited from patients who are referred for vertebroplasty evaluations from five clinical sites of the Sydney metropolitan area. The sites will be St George Private Hospital, Kareena Private Hospital, St George Public Hospital, Sutherland Hospital and Liverpool Hospital. These sites have the advantage of having robust, established vertebroplasty programs and high levels of technical operator experience with vertebroplasty in acute fractures. Potential patients are patients identified with a recent vertebral fracture that requires assessment for a vertebroplasty. The referring physician will request an MRI and spinal radiograph as part of routine assessment and standard clinical care. Potential involvement in the study will be discussed at this point between patient and referring physician. Patients will be given a consent form to read and consider. The research team will then contact potential subjects and ask them a series of questions to determine eligibility. The investigator and the research coordinator will then describe the study to eligible patients and informed consent will be obtained prior to conducting baseline evaluations and randomization.
Treatment Intervention (Vertebroplasty Procedure):
5.1.1 The procedure is performed under strict aseptic conditions. All personnel wear surgical masks and caps in addition to gowns and gloves for operators, to minimize the risk of infection. 1G ceftriaxone will be administered at the commencement of the procedure unless the patient is allergic. In case of allergy then antibiotics are not mandatory.
5.1.2 The patient is placed prone on the angiographic table and oxygen mask applied. Conscious sedation will be induced by IV administration of fentanyl and midazolam.
5.1.3 Continuously monitor heart rate and pulse oximetry throughout the procedure.
5.1.4 Standard fluoroscopy with a dedicated DSA interventional fluoroscope will be used for localization of the vertebral body to be treated (Levels T4-L5) and needle placement within the vertebral body.
5.1.5 A 25g needle will be used to raise a wheal of 1% lignocaine subcutaneously. A small skin nick will be made with a scalpel blade. A 25g needle will be placed into the skin at the site of the wheal and advanced under fluoroscopic guidance to the periosteum over the pedicle. This periosteum will be infiltrated with 6-7 cc of 1% lignocaine. (Injections will be made at each fracture level, i.e., 2 separate injections will be performed for patients with 2 fracture levels.) 5.1.6 A small incision is made on the skin in the vicinity of the pedicle, and the access needle is positioned for a transpedicular approach.
5.1.7 13G or 11G vertebroplasty needles will be placed using trans-pedicular or para-pedicular approach into the anterior one third of the vertebral body. Whether a unilateral or bilateral approach is used is up to the discretion of the radiologist doing the procedure, but a bi-pedicular approach is recommended for the T12 vertebral body and all of the lumbar vertebral bodies (due to their increased size). An effort should be made to fill both the fractured fragment of the vertebral body and the more normal trabecular component in order to stop ongoing fracture and volume loss.
5.1.8 Prepare the AVAMAX™ injecting system in the approved manner as per system instruction. Wait for 5 minutes after mixing cement before cement injection to allow for optimal viscosity prior to commencing injection. Product accountability forms will be completed which include batch numbers.
5.1.9 Cement injection should be performed using continuous fluoroscopic screening in the lateral projection. Cement injection should continue until adequate vertebral body filling is obtained. This ideally means cement filling from the superior to inferior vertebral body end-plate in at least the anterior three quarters of the vertebral body in lateral projection. In frontal projection, the cement should reach at least from middle of the pedicle to middle of the contra-lateral pedicle in a distribution considered adequate (by the radiologist) to stabilize the acute fracture. Upon completion of injection, the cannula is removed and haemostasis at the puncture site is achieved by gentle pressure. If adequate fill was not obtained, place another needle in the contra lateral pedicle and treat in the same fashion.
5.1.10 Patient should be left in prone position for 3 minutes following cement injection to allow for cement to harden.
5.1.11 Contingency plans should an outpatient have a sudden life threatening event occur in the radiology suite and require immediate medical or surgical attention: patient will be examined and appropriate life support measures instituted. In case of suspected spinal cord compromise, immediate CT scanning and surgical consultation will be made. In the case of hemodynamic compromise from idiosyncratic reaction, life support will be instituted.
5.2 Control Intervention: 5.2.1 The procedure is performed under strict aseptic conditions. All personnel wear surgical masks and caps in addition to gowns and gloves for operators, to minimize the risk of infection and to simulate a true vertebroplasty. Prophylactic antibiotics may be administered by the treating physician according to their usual practice, but are not mandated by the study protocol.
5.22 The patient is placed prone on the angiographic table and oxygen mask applied. Conscious sedation will be induced by IV administration of fentanyl, morphine or pethidine and midazolam.
5.2.3 Continuously monitor heart rate and pulse oximetry throughout the procedure.
5.2.4 Standard fluoroscopy will be used for localization of the vertebral body to be treated (Levels T4-L5) and needle placement within the vertebral body.
5.2.5 A 25g needle will be used to raise a wheal of 1% lignocaine subcutaneously. A skin incision measuring approximately 5mm will be made. The 25G needle will then be reintroduced and 2 cc of 1% lignocaine injected into the subcutaneous tissues.. (These sham injections will be made at each fracture level, i.e., 2 separate injections will be performed for patients with 2 fracture levels.) 5.2.6 Verbal clues will be given, including but not limited to comments that needle placement and/or cement injection is progressing appropriately. Manual palpation of the area over the fracture will be done to simulate needle placement.
5.2.8 The procedure will be terminated.(Note: The patient will be unaware as to whether the control procedure or vertebroplasty had been performed since full sterile preparation, sedation and simulated injection procedure will be used.
5.2.9 Contingency plans should an outpatient have a sudden life threatening or limb threatening event occur in the radiology suite and require immediate medical or surgical attention: patient will be examined and appropriate life support measures instituted. In case of suspected spinal cord compromise, immediate CT scanning and surgical consultation will be made. In the case of hemodynamic compromise from idiosyncratic reaction life support will be instituted.
5.3 Post Operative Care: 5.3.1 Following the procedure, all patients should be observed in the supine position for at least one hour.
5.3.2 Patients may gradually sit up and/or stand over the next hour, as tolerated, under direct nursing or physician supervision.
5.3.3 Outpatients may be discharged to the care of an adult after 2 hours. 5.3.4 Non-narcotic pain medication may be taken as needed, but patients are encouraged to limit use of narcotics so efficacy can be determined.
5.3.5 One hour after the procedure, patients are evaluated for pain, or complications of the procedure. Vital signs will also be recorded.
5.3.6 If determined to be necessary by the physician, an outpatient may be admitted and monitored overnight in the hospital. The reason for keeping the patient overnight will be documented on the post treatment assessment form and the serious adverse event form.
5.3.7 Evaluation of any potential complication will be conducted immediately so that appropriate treatment can be instituted.
5.3.8 Dressings applied to the injection/incision site may be removed the following day.
5.3.9 Skin incisions should be kept clean and dry. Patients are to notify physician of any redness or discharge.
5.3.10 Inpatients will continue to be managed by attending physician in usual fashion.
5.4 Patient Evaluations \& Follow Up Examinations We will administer the following measures of pain and pain-related disability questionnaires: numeric and visual pain-rating scale, the Roland-Morris Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire, Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (QUALEFFO), SF-36 and EQ-5D to all subjects in this trial. We will also ask patients about their use of medications, other health care resources, medical history, co-morbidities and demographics. A timed up and go test, which is a reliable measure of function in older people, will be completed during patient clinic visits at baseline, day 14 and month 6 .
After obtaining informed consent during the baseline consultation, patients will be asked about demographic information and the patient questionnaires will be administered in a face-to-face interview. The two week and six month interviews will also be asked in person by research staff during patient visits. The other interviews (Days 3, day 7, weeks 4 and month 3) will be conducted by telephone for all participants at all sites. An exception to this will be inpatients that remain in hospital at day 3 who may be interviewed at bedside*.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AVAMAX | Active comparator | Procedure: VertebroplastyAvamax vertebroplasty kits provided by Care Fusion |
| Simulated injection procedure | No intervention | –Patient will be unaware as to whether the control procedure or vertebroplasty had been performed since full sterile preparation, sedation and simulated injection procedure will be used. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (23 listed)
- Patient is greater than 60 years of age.
- Patient has pain which is not adequately controlled by oral analgesia or which has required hospitalisation and prevents early mobilisation
- Patient has pain from one or two compression fractures of the vertebrae in the areas T4 to L5 confirmed with a sagittal STIR (short tau inversion recovery) and sagittal T1 weighted MRI scan of the spine. Patients with three or more recent fractures are excluded.
- Clinical history verifies that patient's fracture occurred in the previous 6 weeks.
- Patient does not have a known coagulopathy. If on warfarin, the INR should be less than 2.5 within the last three days.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VertebroplastyAVAmax radiopaque bone cement is injected into the vertebral body using a 13 G or 11 G vertebroplasty needle. | Procedure or surgery | AVAMAX |
Primary outcome
Patient rated pain intensity
Time frame: two weeks
1 secondary outcome
Functional Disability
Time frame: two weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jul 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27544377Clark W, Bird P, Gonski P, Diamond TH, Smerdely P, McNeil HP, Schlaphoff G, Bryant C, Barnes E, Gebski V. Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1408-1416. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31341-1. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25873274Clark W, Bird P, Diamond T, Gonski P. Vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Apr 12;16:159. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0671-8.
Related trials for Vertebral Compression Fractures
RecruitingObservational study
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
Vertebra Compression Fracture
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Trial of Combined Radiotherapy and Vertebroplasty for Patients With Painful Metastatic Spinal Lesions
Spinal Metastases
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Evaluation of Therapeutic Combination in Treating Vertebral Compression Fractures
Vertebral Compression Fractures, Pathological Fracture
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Cement Augmentation in Preventing Vertebral Body Compression Fracture Following Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Solid Tumors and Spinal Metastases
Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Spine, Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Active, not recruiting
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Bone Pain Study
Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Anemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
William Clark principal investigator
St George Private Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Vertebroplasty in people with Vertebral Compression Fractures and Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures, run by Optimus Clinical Research at 1 site in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 23 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient rated pain intensity (time frame: two weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01482793, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2015.