AzTrials
AzTrials

CataractPhase 3NCT01475643

Loteprednol vs Prednisolone for the Treatment of Intraocular Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery in Children.

A Phase 3 study testing Loteprednol etabonate and Prednisolones acetate in people with Cataract, run by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety for the treatment of postoperative inflammation following ocular surgery for childhood cataract. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 11 years
Conditions the study is for
Cataract
What is being tested?
Loteprednol etabonate and Prednisolones acetate
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
107 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2013to Jul 2017
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 11 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is a candidate for routine, uncomplicated surgery for childhood cataract

Who cannot join

  • Subjects who have a severe/serious ocular condition, or any other unstable medical condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, may preclude study treatment or follow-up.
  • Subjects with glaucoma, ocular hypertension, or those receiving intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering therapy in either eye or systemically.
  • Subjects with a history of steroid-induced IOP elevation in either eye.
  • Subjects who have known hypersensitivity or other contraindication to the study drug(s) or any components in the drug formulation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Bausch & Lomb Inc

    Rochester, New York, 14609

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Safety and Efficacy of Topical Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5%, Versus Prednisolone Acetate 1%, for the Treatment of Intraocular Inflammation Following Surgery for Childhood Cataract

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety for the treatment of postoperative inflammation following ocular surgery for childhood cataract.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of topical Loteprednol Etabonate (LE), 0.5%, to Prednisolone Acetate 1%, for the treatment of postoperative inflammation following ocular surgery for childhood cataract.

Conditions
Cataract
Being tested
Loteprednol etabonate, Prednisolones acetate
Keywords
Pediatric cataract
Medical subject headings
Cataract

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Loteprednol etabonateDrug

    Also called LE

    1-2 Ophthalmic drops administered to study eye four times daily (QID) for 14 days post surgery. Tapered to twice daily (BID) for 7 days. Then once daily (QD) for 7 days.

  • Prednisolones acetateDrug

    Also called PA

    1-2 Ophthalmic drops administered to study eye four times daily (QID) for 14 days post surgery. Tapered to twice daily (BID) for 7 days. Then once daily (QD) for 7 days.

Study groups in NCT01475643
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Loteprednol etabonateExperimentalLoteprednol etabonate 0.5%
Receives: Drug: Loteprednol etabonate
Prednisolones acetateActive comparatorPrednisolone acetate 1.0%
Receives: Drug: Prednisolones acetate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Anterior Chamber Inflammation

    Anterior Chamber Inflammation (for subjects that could only be examined with a pen light and a 20D [g20 Diopter] magnifying lens): 0 = None Clear anterior chamber with no visible clouding (Tyndall effect and cells combined). Red reflex normal

    1. = Mild Mild anterior chamber clouding. Clear iris pattern on visualization. Red reflex normal
    2. = Moderate Moderate anterior chamber clouding
    3. = Severe Severe anterior chamber clouding. Iris pattern not clearly visualized. Red reflex diminished
    4. = Very severe Severe anterior chamber clouding with a white and/or milky appearance of the anterior chamber. Red reflex absent or severely diminished

    Measured: Postoperative Day 29

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Anterior Chamber Cells & Flare

    Anterior Chamber Flare (for those subjects that could be examined with a slit lamp):

    Assessed scattering of a slit lamp light beam when directed into the anterior chamber (Tyndall effect). 0 = None No Tyndall effect

    1. = Mild Tyndall effect barely discernible
    2. = Moderate Tyndall effect in anterior chamber is moderately intense. Iris pattern is seen clearly
    3. = Severe Tyndall effect in anterior chamber is severely intense. Iris pattern cannot be seen clearly
    4. = Very severe Tyndall effect is very severely intense. The aqueous has a white and milky appearance

    Measured: Over all visits 42 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Nov 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2013
  3. Primary completion2 Jun 2017
  4. Study completionJul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
107 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01475643
Sponsor's protocol ID
670
Status last verified
Jun 2019
First submitted
17 Nov 2011
Last updated
11 Jun 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Loteprednol etabonate and Prednisolones acetate in people with Cataract, run by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Jun 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Anterior Chamber Inflammation (time frame: Postoperative Day 29). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in