AzTrials
AzTrials

KeratoconusNCT01471873

Variability of Pentacam-derived Back Elevation Measurements in Keratoconus and Cross-linked Corneas

An observational study of Keratoconus, run by Democritus University of Thrace at 1 site in Greece.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary objective of this study was to assess the intrasession, intersession and interobserver variability of the Pentacam-derived posterior corneal elevation measurements in keratoconus eyes and eyes that underwent Corneal Collagen Cross-liknking (CxL) treatment due to progressive keratoconus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Keratoconus
What is being tested?
Corneal Collagen Cross-linking (CXL)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
67 participants
Where
1 siteGreece
Study dates
Mar 2011to Nov 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants were recruited from the Cornea service of the EIT in a consecutive-if-eligible basis.

Who may be able to join

  • Progressive keratoconus (Keratoconus group)
  • Corneal collagen cross linking (CxL) treatment at least one year prior to enrollment (CxL group)

Who cannot join

  • Glaucoma
  • Suspicion of glaucoma
  • history of herpetic keratitis
  • corneal scarring
  • severe eye dryness
  • pregnancy or nursing
  • current corneal infection
  • underlying autoimmune disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Greece1 site
  • Eye Institute of Thrace (EIT)

    Alexandroupoli, Thrace, 67100

Other trials in Greece

About this study

Primary objective of this study was to assess the intrasession, intersession and interobserver variability of the Pentacam-derived posterior corneal elevation measurements in keratoconus eyes and eyes that underwent Corneal Collagen Cross-liknking (CxL) treatment due to progressive keratoconus.

Read the detailed description

The Pentacam Classic (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany, software version 1.14r04) was used for the sake of the study.Two study groups were formed: 1) Keratoconus group (KC) included patients with progressive keratoconus and 2) Collagen-Cross-linking group (CXL) included keratoconus patients that had been treated with uneventful CXL at least on year prior to their enrollment in the study.

Three consecutive scans were obtained by two experienced operators. The same procedure was repeated within two weeks for the assessment of intersession variability. In all cases acceptable maps had at least 10.0mm of corneal coverage.All back elevation points were codified in order to facilitate statistical processing of data. Further to single point analysis, three additional parameters were evaluated: a) zone 4 parameter (z4) which derived by the analysis of all points at the central 4.0mm diameter zone, b) zone 8 parameter (z8) which derived by the analysis of all points at the central 8.0mm diameter zone, and, c) highest elevation point parameter (HEP), which derived by the analysis of the highest elevation points for all participants. Reproducibility of measurements was evaluated by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Three different ICC types were calculated: a) intrasession ICC for both operators (ICC1 \& ICC2), b) interobserver ICC, and, c) intersession ICC. Moreover, Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the level of agreement between the two operators.

Conditions
Keratoconus
Being tested
Corneal Collagen Cross-linking (CXL)
Keywords
Posterior corneal surface elevation, Pentacam-Scheimpflung imaging, variability, progressive keratoconus, corneal cross-linking
Medical subject headings
Keratoconus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Corneal Collagen Cross-linking (CXL)Procedure or surgery

    The same surgical procedure was applied to all CXLG patients that included:

    Instillation of proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% drops for topical anaesthesia, application of a sponge saturated with 10% alcohol to the central cornea for 20-30 seconds and subsequent de-epithelialization by means of a hockey knife. Following de-epithelialization, a mixture of 0.1% riboflavin in 20% Dextran solution was instilled to the cornea for 30 minutes (2 drops every 2 minutes) prior to the irradiation. In details, an 8.0mm diameter of central cornea was irradiated for 30 minutes by UVA light with a wavelength of 370nm and an irradiance of 3mW/cm2.The UVA radiation source that was used is the UV-XTM (IROC AG, Zurich, Switzerland). Instillation of riboflavin drops (1 drop every 2 minutes) was continued during irradiation, as well.

Study groups in NCT01471873
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Keratoconus Group (KG)Keratoconus group (KG) included patients with progressive keratoconus.
Collagen-Cross-linking group (CXLG)Collagen-Cross-linking group (CXLG) included keratoconus patients that had been treated with uneventful corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) at least on year prior to their enrolment in the study.
Receives: Procedure: Corneal Collagen Cross-linking (CXL)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Variability of posterior corneal surface elevation measurements within and between sessions and within and between observers.

    The Pentacam Classic (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany, software version 1.14r04) was used for the sake of the study. Three consecutive scans were obtained by two experienced operators for the assessment of intrasession and interobserver variability. The same procedure was repeated within two weeks for the assessment of intersession variability.Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement between the 2 operators. The reproducibility of all measurements was evaluated by means of the intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC).

    Measured: 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Nov 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2011
  3. Primary completionSep 2011
  4. Study completionNov 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
67 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01471873
Sponsor's protocol ID
25/27-09-2011
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
9 Nov 2011
Last updated
18 Jan 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Labiris G, Giarmoukakis A, Sideroudi H, Bougatsou P, Lazaridis I, Kozobolis VP. Variability in Scheimpflug image-derived posterior elevation measurements in keratoconus and collagen-crosslinked corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Sep;38(9):1616-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.039.

    PubMed 22906447

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Keratoconus, run by Democritus University of Thrace at 1 site in Greece.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Variability of posterior corneal surface elevation measurements within and between sessions and within and between observers. (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01471873, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in