AzTrials
AzTrials

DiarrheaPhase 4NCT01467570

Efficacy and Safety of a New Oral Rehydration Solution (Hipp ORS 200 Apple) in Children With Acute Gastroenteritis

A Phase 4 study testing oral rehydration solution Hipp ORS Apple 200 and ESPGHAN ORS in people with Diarrhea, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

It is generally recommended that oral rehydration should be used as first-line therapy to treat or prevent dehydration in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Refusal to drink regular Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) interfere with compliance with the recommended treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 48 months
Conditions the study is for
Diarrhea
What is being tested?
oral rehydration solution Hipp ORS Apple 200 and ESPGHAN ORS
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
147 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
Jun 2009to Dec 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 48 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • children age 4 to 48 months
  • diarrhoea defined as the passage of three or more loose or watery stools per day for >1 but <5 days
  • mild (3%) or moderate dehydration (3-9%) according to the World Health Organization criteria (Table 1)
  • informed consent signed by at least one parent / caregiver

Who cannot join

  • diarrhea for <1 or >5 days
  • severe dehydration (>9%)
  • recent history of diarrhea indicated either by parent/guardian or hospital case notes
  • underlying chronic gastrointestinal disease (i.e., celiac disease, cow's milk protein intolerance)
  • breastfeeding >50%
  • under nutrition (weight/height ratio below the fifth percentile)
  • systemic infections
  • immune defects or immunosuppressive treatment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Department of Peadiatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw

    Warsaw, 01-183

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Safety of a New Oral Rehydration Solution (Hipp ORS 200 Apple) in Children With Acute Gastroenteritis: Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial

It is generally recommended that oral rehydration should be used as first-line therapy to treat or prevent dehydration in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Refusal to drink regular Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) interfere with compliance with the recommended treatment.

The objective of this study is to compare the tolerance, acceptance, efficacy and safety of a new ORS (Hipp ORS 200 Apple) of improved palatability with regular ORS recommended by ESPGHAN in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE).

Read the detailed description

It is generally recommended that oral rehydration should be used as first-line therapy to treat or prevent dehydration in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Despite the proven efficacy of oral rehydration therapy it remains underused. The main reason for this is that an ORS neither reduces the frequency of bowel movements and fluid loss nor shortens the duration of illness, which decreases its acceptance. Moreover, unpalatability of regular ORS decrease its acceptance, especially in children with lower degrees of dehydration. Refusal to drink regular ORS interfere with compliance with the recommended treatment. Parents, but also health care professionals, demand safe, effective, inexpensive, but also well tolerated and accepted ORS for management of AGE.

Recently, a new ORS (Hipp ORS 200 Apple) with improved taste has been developed, and is now frequently employed for the management of AGE. The proposed study will be the first double-blind randomized trial of this ORS. It will evaluate clinically meaningful benefits to be derived by children and caregivers from its use. If positive, this new ORS may become a routine recommendation for children with AGE.

The objective of this study is to compare the tolerance, acceptance, efficacy and safety of a new ORS (Hipp ORS 200 Apple) with regular ORS recommended by ESPGHAN in children with AGE.

Conditions
Diarrhea
Being tested
oral rehydration solution Hipp ORS Apple 200, ESPGHAN ORS
Keywords
diarrhea
Medical subject headings
Diarrhea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • oral rehydration solution Hipp ORS Apple 200Dietary supplement

    Volume of the solution calculated by weight:

    • fast oral rehydration in 3-4 hours by mouth
    • ORS given for ongoing losses until diarrhea stops (maintenance phase)
  • ESPGHAN ORSDietary supplement

    Volume of the solution calculated by weight:

    • fast oral rehydration in 3-4 hours by mouth
    • ORS given for ongoing losses until diarrhea stops (maintenance phase)
Study groups in NCT01467570
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hipp ORS Apple 200Experimentaloral rehydration solution Hipp ORS 200 Apple
Receives: Dietary Supplement: oral rehydration solution Hipp ORS Apple 200
ESPGHAN ORSActive comparatorESPGHAN oral rehydration solution
Receives: Dietary Supplement: ESPGHAN ORS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants That Were Successfully Rehydrated

    The following components are included in primary outcome:

    • resolution of signs of dehydration
    • adequate weight gain
    • production of urine output during the trial

    Measured: Proportion of successfully rehydrated at 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Unscheduled Intravenous Therapy

    Need for intravenous therapy within 24 hours

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Vomiting

    Vomiting starting or progressing in the first 24 hours of therapy

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. ORS Intake in ml

    ORS intake in ml (in the first 24 hours, and total)

    Measured: 24 hours

  4. Weight Gain in Gram

    Weight gain in gram (in the first 24 hours, and total)

    Measured: 24 hours

  5. Duration of Diarrhea (Hrs)

    Time of diarrhea in hours

    Measured: 7days

  6. Return Visit to the Emergency Department

    Return visit to the emergency department within a week

    Measured: 1 week

  7. Hospitalization

    need for hospitalization within a week

    Measured: 1 week

  8. Adverse Events

    any adverse event, providing a description if related or not related to study intervention

    Measured: 24 hours

  9. ORS Intake at 4 h

    % of prescribed ORS that was consumed during first 4 hours

    Measured: 4 hrs

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Nov 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2011
  4. Study completionDec 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
147 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01467570
Sponsor's protocol ID
KB/191/2008
Status last verified
Nov 2013
First submitted
27 Oct 2011
Last updated
1 Apr 2014
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Guarino A, Albano F, Ashkenazi S, Gendrel D, Hoekstra JH, Shamir R, Szajewska H; ESPGHAN/ESPID Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of Acute Gastroenteritis in Children in Europe Expert Working Group. European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition/European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute gastroenteritis in children in Europe: executive summary. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008 May;46(5):619-21. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31816e219e. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18493225
  • Recommendations for composition of oral rehydration solutions for the children of Europe. Report of an ESPGAN Working Group. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1992 Jan;14(1):113-5. No abstract available.

    PubMed 1573500
  • Szajewska H, Hoekstra JH, Sandhu B; ESPGHAN Working Group on Acute Diarrhoea. Management of acute gastroenteritis in Europe and the impact of the new recommendations: a multicenter study. The Working Group on acute Diarrhoea of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000 May;30(5):522-7. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200005000-00011.

    PubMed 10817282
  • Piescik-Lech M, Szymanski H, Szajewska H. Efficacy and safety of a new apple-flavoured oral rehydration solution in children with acute gastroenteritis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Acta Paediatr. 2012 Oct;101(10):e458-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02782.x. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

    PubMed 22860693

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing oral rehydration solution Hipp ORS Apple 200 and ESPGHAN ORS in people with Diarrhea, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Apr 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants That Were Successfully Rehydrated (time frame: Proportion of successfully rehydrated at 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01467570, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in