Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1ABACUSNCT01460446
ACCU-CHEK® Aviva Expert Study: Does Use of a Bolus Advisor Improve Glycemic Control in Patients Not Achieving Optimal Control Using Multiple Daily Injections (MDI)?
A study testing Aviva Expert blood glucose meter and Aviva Nano blood glucose meter in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 33 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This clinical, prospective, randomized, multi-center study determined if the use of an insulin bolus advisor improves glycemic control as measured by a change in HbA1c in patients failing multiple daily injection/intensified conventional therapy (MDI/ICT). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Aviva Expert blood glucose meter and Aviva Nano blood glucose meter
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 218 participants
- Where
- 33 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2011to Sep 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be 18 years of age or older.
- Diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes.
- Recent HbA1c > 7.5% (measured within the last 6 weeks at local laboratory).
- On multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy for at least 6 months consisting of 1-2 injections per day of long-acting basal insulin (Lantus® or Detemir®) and at least 2 injections per day of regular or rapid-acting analog insulin for meal coverage.
- Subject adjusts meal insulin doses based on carbohydrate content of meals.
- Subject with Type 2 diabetes may be on stable metformin therapy (therapy unchanged during 3 months prior to study).
- Subject has been in Investigator's practice for at least 3 months but may have been seen by another physician in the practice.
- Subject has completed carbohydrate (CHO) training within the last 2 years.
Who cannot join
- Subject is on a therapy regimen that conflicts with the study:
- Neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) or pre-mixed insulin;
- oral anti-diabetic agents, with the exception of metformin;
- injectable anti-diabetic agents other than long-acting insulin and rapid-acting insulin analogs or regular insulin (eg, fixed dose therapy);
- use of sliding scale insulin therapy that determines insulin dosages based exclusively on specific blood glucose (bG) results.
- Subject has participated in another interventional trial within 6 weeks prior to study.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Subject has been diagnosed with any clinically significant infectious disease or major organ system disease, such as gastroparesis or renal disease (at Investigator's discretion).
- Subject has used systemic oral or inhaled steroids for more than 7 days within the last 3 months.
- Subject is on chemotherapy or radiation therapy (self-reported).
- Subject is pregnant or lactating or is currently planning a pregnancy.
Trial locations and contacts
33 sites in 2 countries.
33 sites in 2 countries
Germany17 sites
Study site
Aschaffenburg, 63739
Study site
Augsburg, 86150
Study site
Berlin, 01627
Study site
Berlin, 12351
Study site
Berlin, 13088
Study site
Berlin, 13597
Study site
Duisburg, 47179
Study site
Essen, 45335
Study site
Furth im Wald, 93437
Study site
Köln-Weiden, 50858
Study site
Leipzig, 04103
Study site
München, 81479
Study site
Münster, 48155
Study site
Rostock, 18057
Study site
Simmern, 55469
Study site
Unterhaching, 82008
Study site
Wurzen, 04808
United Kingdom16 sites
Study site
Blackburn, BB23HH
Study site
Bournemouth, BH7 7DW
Study site
Bradford, BD96RJ
Study site
Chester, CH21UL
Study site
Cosham, PO63LY
Study site
Coventry, CV22DX
Study site
Derby, DE223NE
Study site
Exeter, EX25DW
Study site
Leicester, LE15WW
Study site
Lindley, Huddersfield, HD33EA
Study site
Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW
Study site
Northampton, NN15BD
Study site
Nottingham, NG72UH
Study site
Rotherham, S602UD
Study site
Scunthorpe, DN157BH
Study site
Sheffield, S57AU
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multi-centre Study With Diabetic Patients Randomized to 24 Weeks Treatment Supported by Either Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter With an Integrated Bolus Advisor or MDI Standard Therapy With Accu-Chek® Aviva Nano Meter (Without Bolus Advisor)
This clinical, prospective, randomized, multi-center study determined if the use of an insulin bolus advisor improves glycemic control as measured by a change in HbA1c in patients failing multiple daily injection/intensified conventional therapy (MDI/ICT).
Read the detailed description
Eligible participants were randomized to 24 weeks multiple daily injection therapy using either the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter with an integrated bolus advisor or the Accu-Chek® Aviva Nano blood glucose meter and manual bolus calculation.
- Being tested
- Aviva Expert blood glucose meter, Aviva Nano blood glucose meter
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Aviva Expert blood glucose meterDevice
Aviva Nano blood glucose meterDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aviva Expert blood glucose meter | Experimental | Participants used the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter with an integrated bolus advisor to determine the dose of insulin for each injection in their 24 week multiple daily injection therapy. Receives: Device: Aviva Expert blood glucose meter |
| Aviva Nano blood glucose meter | Active comparator | Participants used the Accu-Chek® Aviva Nano blood glucose meter and manual bolus calculation to determine the dose of insulin for each injection in their 24 week multiple daily injection therapy. Receives: Device: Aviva Nano blood glucose meter |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 24
HbA1C was measured in blood samples at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Secondary outcomes (12)
Percentage of Blood Glucose Measurements Within the Blood Glucose Target Range From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24
Participants measured their blood glucose at least 3-4 times daily throughout the study. The mean blood glucose level was calculated for each 3-day period from Baseline to Week 24 and the percentage of 3-day blood glucose levels with the target range of 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10 mmol/L) was calculated for the 2 reporting periods of Screening to Baseline and Week 23 to Week 24.
Measured: Screening to Week 24
Number of Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Episodes Per Subject Year From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24
A symptomatic hypoglycemic episode was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia which was confirmed by a blood glucose reading < 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). Symptoms might include but were not limited to sweating, dizziness, lightheadedness, tremors, nervousness, hunger, headaches, and weakness or tiredness.
Measured: Screening to Week 24
Change in the Mean Amplitude of Glucose Excursion (MAGE) From Baseline to Week 24
Approximately half of the investigational sites monitored glucose levels in participants enrolled in this study using the DexCom Seven® Plus Continuous Glucose Monitoring device. The device provides glucose measurements every 5 minutes for up to 7 days. The system contains a sensor, transmitter, and receiver. The sensor is a flexible round wire that goes under the skin to read glucose levels. The transmitter snaps into the sensor and wirelessly sends glucose readings to the receiver. Data was obtained from approximately one-third of participants and was used to calculate MAGE. Data were collected in the 3 days prior to Baseline and the Week 24 visit. The standard deviation of the blood glucose measurements in each 3-day period was calculated. For each glucose measurement, the difference from the previous reading was calculated. Absolute differences smaller than the standard deviation were discarded. MAGE is the mean of the remaining difference scores.
Measured: 3 days prior to Baseline to Week 24
Percentage of Bolus Opportunities Where the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter Bolus Advisor Was Used During the Study
Participants using the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter were encouraged to use the Bolus Advisor utility incorporated into the meter. A bolus opportunity occurs, for example, just before eating a meal.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Number of Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter Bolus Advices Modified Per Day by Participants During the Study
Participants using the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter were encouraged to use the Bolus Advisor utility incorporated into the meter. A bolus opportunity occurs, for example, just before eating a meal.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Correct and Incorrect Use of Insulin:Carbohydrate Ratio (I:CHO) and Insulin Sensitivity Factor (ISF) Advice by Participants Using the Aviva Nano Blood Glucose Meter During the Study
Participants using the Aviva Nano blood glucose meter received individualized advice in how to use their insulin:carbohydrate ratio (I:CHO) and insulin sensitivity factor (ISF) values to determine their insulin dose. The I:CHO ratio advice was considered to have been used correctly if the meal bolus dose the participant indicated in his/her patient diary was in accordance with the dose which could be calculated based upon the participant's total carbohydrate intake and the I:CHO ratio. The ISF advice was considered to have been correctly used if the correction bolus dose the participant indicated in his/her patient diary was in accordance with the dose which could be calculated based upon the participant's blood glucose target, current blood glucose value, and the ISF.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change in Carbohydrate Counting Accuracy From Baseline to Week 24
Participants were asked to assess the carbohydrate content (grams) of 10 standardized meals by using a set of Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) plates, which provide standardized photographs of meals with known carbohydrate values. The mean meal error (MME), an indicator of accuracy, and mean meal absolute error (MMAE), an indicator of variability were calculated from their responses. The MME is defined as the mean of the differences between the estimated carbohydrate content and the actual carbohydrate content over the 10 DAFNE plates. A negative MME indicates an underestimation and a positive MME indicates an overestimation of the actual carbohydrate content. The MMAE is defined as the mean of the absolute value of the differences between the estimated carbohydrate content and the actual carbohydrate content over the 10 DAFNE plates. The MMAE is ≥ 0 with a lower value indicating a better ability to estimate the actual carbohydrate content.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) Score From Baseline to Week 24
The Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) contains 8 items which can be rated from 0='not at all' to 3='nearly every day'. The total PHQ-8 score is the sum of the responses to the 8 items and ranges from 0 to 24. A lower score indicates less depression. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Number of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24
The Major Depression Disorder (MDD) scale is derived from the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) and was used to categorize participants in regard to the severity of their depression. There are 5 categories on the MDD scale: None, mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe. The category for each participant is determined from their PHQ-8 score. A total PHQ-8 score of 0 to 4 represents no significant depressive symptoms. A total PHQ-8 score of 5 to 9 represents mild depressive symptoms; 10 to 14, moderate; 15 to 19, moderately severe; and 20 to 24, severe. A higher score indicates more depression.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change in the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) Scale Score From Baseline to Week 24
The Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) scale contains 20 items which can be rated from 0='not a problem' to 4='serious problem'. The total PAID scale score ranges from 0 to 80 with a higher score indicating more diabetes-related problems. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change in the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS-II) Score From Baseline to Week 24
The Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II (HFS-II) contains 33 items (15 items regarding behavior and 18 items regarding worry) which can be rated from 0='never' to 4='always'). The total HFS-II score ranges from 0 to 132 with a higher score indicating more fear. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) Score and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Change From Baseline (DTSQc) Score
The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) contains 6 items which can be scored from 0='very bad' to 6='very good'. The total score is the sum of the scores of the 6 items and ranges from 0 to 36. A higher score indicates more satisfaction. This questionnaire was administered at Baseline only.
The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for change from Baseline (DTSQc) to study end contains 6 items which can be rated from -3='much worse now' to 3='much better now'). The total score is the sum of the scores of the 6 items and ranges from -18 to 18. A higher score indicates more satisfaction. This questionnaire was administered at the end of the study (Week 24) only.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2011
- Primary completionSep 2012
- Study completionSep 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 218 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Iris Vesper, Study director, Roche Diagnostics GmbH
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01460446
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RD001333
- Acronym
- ABACUS
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 22 Sep 2011
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Cavan DA, Ziegler R, Cranston I, Barnard K, Ryder J, Vogel C, Parkin CG, Koehler W, Vesper I, Petersen B, Wagner RS. Automated bolus advisor control and usability study (ABACUS): does use of an insulin bolus advisor improve glycaemic control in patients failing multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) therapy? [NCT01460446]. BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Oct 13;13:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-102.
PubMed 23062116
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multi-centre Study With Diabetic Patients Randomized to 24 Weeks Treatment Supported by Either Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter With an Integrated Bolus Advisor or MDI Standard Therapy With Accu-Chek® Aviva Nano Meter (Without Bolus Advisor)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01460446
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ABACUS / RD001333
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 218 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2011
- Primary completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Feb 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical, prospective, randomized, multi-center study determined if the use of an insulin bolus advisor improves glycemic control as measured by a change in HbA1c in patients failing multiple daily injection/intensified conventional therapy (MDI/ICT).
Detailed description
Eligible participants were randomized to 24 weeks multiple daily injection therapy using either the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter with an integrated bolus advisor or the Accu-Chek® Aviva Nano blood glucose meter and manual bolus calculation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aviva Expert blood glucose meter | Experimental | Device: Aviva Expert blood glucose meterParticipants used the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter with an integrated bolus advisor to determine the dose of insulin for each injection in their 24 week multiple daily injection therapy. |
| Aviva Nano blood glucose meter | Active comparator | Device: Aviva Nano blood glucose meterParticipants used the Accu-Chek® Aviva Nano blood glucose meter and manual bolus calculation to determine the dose of insulin for each injection in their 24 week multiple daily injection therapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Must be 18 years of age or older.
- Diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes.
- Recent HbA1c > 7.5% (measured within the last 6 weeks at local laboratory).
- On multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy for at least 6 months consisting of 1-2 injections per day of long-acting basal insulin (Lantus® or Detemir®) and at least 2 injections per day of regular or rapid-acting analog insulin for meal coverage.
- Subject adjusts meal insulin doses based on carbohydrate content of meals.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Subject is on a therapy regimen that conflicts with the study:
- Subject has participated in another interventional trial within 6 weeks prior to study.
- Subject has been diagnosed with any clinically significant infectious disease or major organ system disease, such as gastroparesis or renal disease (at Investigator's discretion).
- Subject has used systemic oral or inhaled steroids for more than 7 days within the last 3 months.
- Subject is on chemotherapy or radiation therapy (self-reported).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Aviva Expert blood glucose meter | Device | Aviva Expert blood glucose meter |
| Aviva Nano blood glucose meter | Device | Aviva Nano blood glucose meter |
Primary outcome
Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
HbA1C was measured in blood samples at a central laboratory.
12 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Blood Glucose Measurements Within the Blood Glucose Target Range From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24
Time frame: Screening to Week 24
Number of Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Episodes Per Subject Year From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24
Time frame: Screening to Week 24
Change in the Mean Amplitude of Glucose Excursion (MAGE) From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: 3 days prior to Baseline to Week 24
Percentage of Bolus Opportunities Where the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter Bolus Advisor Was Used During the Study
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Number of Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter Bolus Advices Modified Per Day by Participants During the Study
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Correct and Incorrect Use of Insulin:Carbohydrate Ratio (I:CHO) and Insulin Sensitivity Factor (ISF) Advice by Participants Using the Aviva Nano Blood Glucose Meter During the Study
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change in Carbohydrate Counting Accuracy From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) Score From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Number of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change in the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) Scale Score From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change in the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS-II) Score From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) Score and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Change From Baseline (DTSQc) Score
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23062116Cavan DA, Ziegler R, Cranston I, Barnard K, Ryder J, Vogel C, Parkin CG, Koehler W, Vesper I, Petersen B, Wagner RS. Automated bolus advisor control and usability study (ABACUS): does use of an insulin bolus advisor improve glycaemic control in patients failing multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) therapy? [NCT01460446]. BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Oct 13;13:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-102.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Comparison of Bmab1700 and Opdivo® as Adjuvant Monotherapy in Participants With Melanoma
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Botensilimab and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Inter-Arm Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings in Adults With Diabetes
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Iris Vesper study director
Roche Diagnostics GmbH
33 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Aviva Expert blood glucose meter and Aviva Nano blood glucose meter in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 33 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 33 sites in Germany, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Feb 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 24 (time frame: Baseline to Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01460446, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2014.