AzTrials
AzTrials

HypertensionReSETNCT01459900

Renal Sympathectomy in Treatment Resistant Essential Hypertension, a Sham Controlled Randomized Trial

A study testing Renal artery ablation and Renal angiography in people with Hypertension, run by Aarhus University Hospital Skejby at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this double blind, randomized and sham controlled study is to determine whether renal denervation in terms of catheter based ablation in the renal arteries is effective in lowering blood pressure in patients with treatment resistant hypertension. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Hypertension
What is being tested?
Renal artery ablation and Renal angiography
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
69 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Sep 2011to Feb 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Systolic daytime ambulatory BP at least 145 mmHg and compliance to a minimum of 3 antihypertensive drugs, including a diuretic, or in case of diuretic intolerance at least 3 nondiuretic antihypertensive drugs.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Non compliance
  • Heart Failure (NYHA 3-4)
  • LV ejection fraction < 50 %
  • Renal insufficiency (eGFR<30)
  • Unstable coronary heart disease
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Coronary intervention within 6 months
  • Myocardial infarction within 6 months
  • Claudication
  • Orthostatic syncope within 6 months
  • Secondary Hypertension
  • Permanent atrial fibrillation
  • Significant Heart Valve Disease
  • Clinically Significant abnormal electrolytes, haemoglobin, Liver enzymes, TSH
  • Second and third degree heart block
  • Macroscopic haematuria
  • Proximal significant coronary stenosis
  • Renal artery anatomy not suitable for renal artery ablation (Stenosis, small diameter < 4 mm, length < 2 cm, multiple renal arteries, severe calcifications)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Skejby Hospital

    Aarhus, Aarhus N, 8200

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

The purpose of this double blind, randomized and sham controlled study is to determine whether renal denervation in terms of catheter based ablation in the renal arteries is effective in lowering blood pressure in patients with treatment resistant hypertension. The blood pressure lowering effect will be evaluated by 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure measurement at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months of follow up. Secondary end point evaluation concerns hemodynamic measures using echocardiography, applanation tonometry and forearm plethysmography.

Conditions
Hypertension
Being tested
Renal artery ablation, Renal angiography
Keywords
Treatment Resistant Hypertension
Medical subject headings
Hypertension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Renal artery ablationProcedure or surgery

    Catheter based renal denervation by applying low power radiofrequency to the renal artery using the Ardian Medtronic Simplicity Catheter, introduced by femoral artery access.

  • Renal angiographyProcedure or surgery

    Renal angiography by femoral access.

Study groups in NCT01459900
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Renal artery ablationActive comparatorBy femoral access, coronary and renal angiography are performed. The patient will be sedated. In case of vessel anatomy allowing renal ablation, the patient will be randomized in the card. lab. In case of randomization to active treatment, renal artery ablation will be carried out straight away.
Receives: Procedure: Renal artery ablation
ShamSham comparatorBy femoral access, coronary and renal angiography are performed. The patient will be sedated. In case of vessel anatomy allowing renal ablation, the patient will be randomized in the card. lab. In case of randomization to sham procedure, no renal artery ablation are performed.
Receives: Procedure: Renal angiography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. daytime systolic blood pressure assessed by 24 hours ambulatory BP measurement

    Changes in mean daytime systolic BP after 3 months is compared between groups. Also the proportion of responders versus nonresponders after 3 months is compared between groups, responders being defined as A) a minimum decrease in daytime systolic BP of 10 mmHg analysis together with and unchanged/increased number of antihypertensive drugs, or B) a decrease in daytime systolic BP of 0-10 mmHg together with a reduced number of antihypertensive drugs.

    Measured: 3 months follow up

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. ambulatory 24 hours BP measurements

    Systolic, diastolic and mean Blood Pressures at different time points. Daytime and night time BP, dipping status, morning BP surge and BP variation.

    Measured: 1, 3 and 6 months

  2. Echocardiography

    Coronary flow reserve (LAD), Diastolic and Systolic ventricular function. LV hypertrophy.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Biomarkers

    Biomarkers concerning renal sodium excretion

    Measured: 1 months

  4. Applanation tonometry

    Pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, central BP estimates

    Measured: 6 months

  5. forearm plethysmography

    Forearm minimum vascular resistance

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2011
  3. Primary completionFeb 2015
  4. Study completionFeb 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
69 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01459900
Sponsor's protocol ID
M-20110071
Acronym
ReSET
Status last verified
Sep 2016
First submitted
24 Oct 2011
Last updated
20 Sep 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Peters CD, Mathiassen ON, Vase H, Bech Norgaard J, Christensen KL, Schroeder AP, Rickers HJVH, Opstrup UK, Poulsen PL, Langfeldt S, Andersen G, Hansen KW, Botker HE, Engholm M, Bertelsen JB, Pedersen EB, Kaltoft A, Buus NH. The effect of renal denervation on arterial stiffness, central blood pressure and heart rate variability in treatment resistant essential hypertension: a substudy of a randomized sham-controlled double-blinded trial (the ReSET trial). Blood Press. 2017 Dec;26(6):366-380. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2017.1368368. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

    PubMed 28830251

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Renal artery ablation and Renal angiography in people with Hypertension, run by Aarhus University Hospital Skejby at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

daytime systolic blood pressure assessed by 24 hours ambulatory BP measurement (time frame: 3 months follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01459900, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in