AzTrials
AzTrials

Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearNCT01447277

Prospective Femoral Versus Femoral and Sciatic Nerve Block for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction

A study testing Sciatic Block and Femoral Block only in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators propose that a preoperative femoral and sciatic blocks vs a femoral block only, prior to ambulatory anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction will lead to a decrease in opiate consumption, pain scores, and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
What is being tested?
Sciatic Block and Femoral Block only
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
68 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2011to Jun 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 and over
  • ASA status I-II
  • Scheduled for ambulatory Arthroscopic ACL Surgery

Who cannot join

  • Allergy to Local anesthetics or opiates used in the study
  • Contraindications for regional anesthesia
  • coagulopathy, anticoagulation, Thrombocytopenia
  • infection at site of injection
  • Chronic pain and high preoperative opiate requirements
  • High risk for PONV

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UCSF Orthopedic Institute

    San Francisco, California, 94158

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Addition of a Preoperative Sciatic Nerve Block to a Femoral Nerve Block for Ambulatory Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction

The investigators propose that a preoperative femoral and sciatic blocks vs a femoral block only, prior to ambulatory anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction will lead to a decrease in opiate consumption, pain scores, and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay. The investigators are prospectively randomizing patients to either a femoral or a fem/sciatic block and monitor outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Although femoral nerve blocks improve analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, patients often complain of posterior knee pain, which can be treated with a sciatic nerve block. In a prospective randomized study, we compare preoperative femoral nerve block to a combined femoral and sciatic block in patients undergoing ambulatory ACL reconstruction. We hypothesize that the combined femoral/sciatic nerve block patients would have improved analgesia, fewer opioid-related side effects, and shorter PACU length of stay and improved patient satisfaction.

Being tested
Sciatic Block, Femoral Block only
Keywords
ACL reconstruction, Femoral Block, Sciatic Block
Medical subject headings
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sciatic BlockProcedure or surgery

    Performing a sciatic block in addition to a femoral block preoperatively

  • Femoral Block onlyProcedure or surgery

    Performing a preoperative sciatic nerve block only

Study groups in NCT01447277
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Femoral and Sciatic BlockExperimentalAdministration of preoperative femoral and sciatic nerve blocks
Receives: Procedure: Sciatic Block
Femoral Block OnlyOtherAdministration of a femoral nerve block prior to surgery
Receives: Procedure: Femoral Block only

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Scores

    Measured: PACU and POD1, 2 and 3.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Length of stay

    Measured: Duration of stay in the recovery room

  2. Opiate consumption

    Measured: During surgery, recovery room and for 3 days after discharge

  3. PONV

    Measured: During the recovery room stay and after discharge from surgery center for up to 3 days.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Oct 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2011
  3. Primary completionMay 2013
  4. Study completionJun 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
68 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01447277
Sponsor's protocol ID
11-06776
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
30 Sep 2011
Last updated
21 Feb 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Sciatic Block and Femoral Block only in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Scores (time frame: PACU and POD1, 2 and 3.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in