AzTrials
AzTrials

Cirrhosis of LiverPRIUSNCT01446666

Gadoxetic Acid-MRI Versus Ultrasonography for the Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-risk Patients

An observational study of Cirrhosis of Liver, run by Asan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Current practice guidelines recommend surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in liver cirrhosis patients with ultrasonography (USG) every 6 months. However, with the advancement of cirrhosis, the sensitivity of USG decreases, while the risk for HCC increases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cirrhosis of Liver
How many people
423 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Nov 2011to Dec 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Hospital out-patient clinic

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with liver cirrhosis with the 1 year risk of HCC of 5% or higher meeting all of following criteria;
  • The evidence of cirrhosis of any etiology within 12 months prior to screening Definition of cirrhosis by any of following methods
  • 1) Histologically by liver biopsy;
  • 2) Non-histologically by evidence of portal hypertension in the presence of chronic liver disease;
  • Evidence of portal hypertension, including any of followings;
  • The identification of splenomegaly on USG, CT, or MRI examinations with typical features of cirrhosis
Show all 14Show fewer
  • The identification of esophageal or gastric varices on endoscopic examination
  • High Risk Index (>=2.33); Risk Index = 1.65 (if the prothrombin activity is <=75%) + 1.41 (if the age is 50 years or older) + 0.92 (if the platelet count is <=100x10(3)/mm3) + 0.74 (if the presence of anti-hepatitis C virus [HCV] or hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] is positive).
  • Older than 20 years of age
  • Absence of previous or current history of HCC
  • Absence of HCC should be identified by liver USG, dynamic CT, or contrast-enhanced MRI within 6 months prior to screening
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-2
  • Patient is able to comply with scheduled visits, evaluation plans, and other study procedures.
  • Patient is willing to provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Presence of any of following criteria;
  • Active or suspected cancer other than HCC, or a history of malignancy where the risk of recurrence is >20% within 2 years
  • Child-Pugh score >9
  • Significant medical comorbidities in which survival is predicted to be less than 3 years
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73m2
  • Precautions for MRI (cardiac pacemaker, ferromagnetic implants, etc.)
  • Severe claustrophobia that may interfere with protocol compliance.
  • Any other condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for enrollment or could interfere with the completing the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 135-837

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Intra-individual Cohort Study to Compare Gadoxetic Acid (Primovist®)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Image and Ultrasonography for the Surveillance of Early Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients at High-risk

Current practice guidelines recommend surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in liver cirrhosis patients with ultrasonography (USG) every 6 months. However, with the advancement of cirrhosis, the sensitivity of USG decreases, while the risk for HCC increases. Gadoxetic acid (Primovist®)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been demonstrated to be of clinical value for diagnosis of HCC with the detection sensitivity of 90-95%, which is significantly higher than USG. The hypothesis to be proved by this study is as follows; Primovist-MRI should show significantly higher sensitivity compared to USG for the detection of early stage HCC when both of these imaging modalities are used with the interval of 6 months in patients with cirrhosis at high risk of developing HCC.

Read the detailed description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is currently the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Cirrhosis, particularly when related to viral hepatitis, is the most notable risk factor for HCC and is found in nearly 80-90% of cases.

The stage of disease at the time of diagnosis largely determines the effectiveness of treatment. The treatment of advanced HCC continues to be primarily palliative, with curative options only available for early HCC. Unfortunately, less than 30% of patients are diagnosed early enough to meet criteria for resection, transplantation, or local ablation.

Surveillance strives to detect HCC at an early stage when it is amenable to curative therapy to reduce mortality. Current practice guidelines recommend surveillance of cirrhotic patients with ultrasonography (USG) every 6 months. However, USG has been reported to have a sensitivity of between 65% and 80% when used as a screening test. However, with the advancement of cirrhosis, the sensitivity of USG decreases, while the risk for HCC increases.

Gadoxetic acid (Primovist®)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver has been demonstrated to be of clinical value for local staging before HCC surgery and for the assessment of patients with inconclusive conventional imaging findings. The detection sensitivity of Primovist-MRI has been known to be as high as 90-95%, which is significantly higher than USG or multiphase computer tomography (CT) scan. MRI does not have radiation exposure, which is a meaningful merit to be used as a surveillance test. However, MRI has never been considered for surveillance or screening of HCC.

Thus, the hypothesis to be proved by this study is as follows; Primovist-MRI should show significantly higher sensitivity compared to USG for the detection of early stage HCC when both of these imaging modalities are used with the interval of 6 months in patients with cirrhosis at high risk of developing HCC. The investigators will also analyze whether the specificity of Primovist-MRI are not compromised by its high sensitivity.

Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma, surveillance, gadoxetic acid, MRI
Medical subject headings
Fibrosis, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01446666
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HCC high-risk groupPatients with liver cirrhosis with the 1-year risk of HCC of 5% or higher ; High Risk Index (>=2.33) Risk Index = 1.65 (if the prothrombin activity is <=75%) + 1.41 (if the age is 50 years or older) + 0.92 (if the platelet count is <=100x10(3)/mm3) + 0.74 (if the presence of anti-hepatitis C virus [HCV] or hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] is positive).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Detection Rate of Patients With HCC

    • The number of patients with definite HCC detected by a given modality divided by the total number of patients with definite HCC detected by any of 2 modalities plus interval cancers

    Measured: during the 1.5-year study period (from the date of first screening to 6 months following the last screening)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Detection Rate of Patients With Early Stage HCC

    • The number of patients with early stage HCC detected by a given modality divided by the total number of patients with early stage HCC detected by any of 2 modalities plus interval cancers.
    • Early stage (stage A or 0) HCC is defined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system (BCLC): A single HCC <5 cm or <=3 lesions each <3 cm in diameter, without gross vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis.

    Measured: during the 1.5-year study period (from the date of first screening to 6 months following the last screening)

  2. Detection Rate of Patients With Very Early Stage HCC

    • The number of patients with HCC nodules of very early stage detected by a given modality divided by the total number of definite HCC nodules of very early stage detected by any of 2 modalities plus interval cancers.
    • Very early stage (stage 0) HCC is defined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system (BCLC): A single HCC <2 cm without gross vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis.

    Measured: during the 1.5-year study period (from the date of first screening to 6 months following the last screening)

  3. False Positive Rate

    The false-positive rate was defined as the number of tests with positive findings by a specific imaging modality in patients without a HCC.

    Measured: during the 1.5-year study period (from the date of first screening to 6 months following the last screening)

  4. Positive Predictive Value for HCC

    The positive predictive value was the number of true positive test results in patients with the positive tests in a specific modality.

    Measured: during the 1.5-year study period (from the date of first screening to 6 months following the last screening)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Oct 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2011
  3. Primary completionDec 2014
  4. Study completionDec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
423 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01446666
Sponsor's protocol ID
AMC2011-0587
Acronym
PRIUS
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
17 Sep 2011
Last updated
1 Feb 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Heo S, Kim SY, Lee SJ, Lee SS, Byun JH, Won HJ, Shin YM, Choi SH, Sirlin CB. LI-RADS Ultrasound Surveillance Version 2024: Comparison With Version 2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection and Risk Factors for Visualization Score C. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2025 Apr;224(4):e2432433. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.32433. Epub 2025 Jan 22.

    PubMed 39840963
  • Kim HL, An J, Park JA, Park SH, Lim YS, Lee EK. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Cost-Effective for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in High-Risk Patients With Cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2019 Apr;69(4):1599-1613. doi: 10.1002/hep.30330. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

    PubMed 30365164
  • Kim SY, An J, Lim YS, Han S, Lee JY, Byun JH, Won HJ, Lee SJ, Lee HC, Lee YS. MRI With Liver-Specific Contrast for Surveillance of Patients With Cirrhosis at High Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;3(4):456-463. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3147.

    PubMed 27657493

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cirrhosis of Liver, run by Asan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jan 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Detection Rate of Patients With HCC (time frame: during the 1.5-year study period (from the date of first screening to 6 months following the last screening)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01446666, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in