AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveNCT01431911

Outcomes Associated With Early or Delayed Maintenance Treatment Post-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation

An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by GlaxoSmithKline.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The timing of initiating short-term treatment for COPD exacerbations with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotic therapy has been shown to influence the recovery time of exacerbations with early initiation of exacerbation therapy having a faster symptom recovery compared to delayed initiation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What is being tested?
Early maintenance treatment and Delayed Maintenance treatment
How many people
3,806 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2010to Mar 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients meeting study criteria mentioned belowwere classified into two cohorts, early and delayed, based on timing of (maintenance treatment) MTx after the index date - 0 to 30 days and 31 to 180 days, respectively. A 30-day period was chosen to define early initiation based on sample size considerations and recent evidence demonstrating the increased risk of subsequent exacerbations during an 8-week period following an initial exacerbation [Hurst JR 2009]. Outcomes were computed for and compared between these two cohorts. An incremental analysis evaluating the effect of delaying MTx by every 30 days was also done classifying patients into six categories based on 30-day increments of starting MTx (0 to 30 days, 31 to 60 days, 61 to 90 days, 91 to 120 days, 121 to 150 days, and 151 to 180 days) (Figure 1). Outcomes were then compared across the 6 categories thereby allowing assessment for every 30-day increment up to 180 days after the index date.

Who may be able to join

  • at least 40 years of age,
  • continuously enrolled for medical and pharmacy benefits during their pre- and post-period
  • diagnosis of COPD (ICD 491.xx, 492.xx, 496.xx)

Who cannot join

  • Patients were excluded if they had MTx in the pre-index period (to ensure inclusion of MTx-naïve patients) or if they received their first MTx during 181 to 365 days of the post-period (as dispensing of MTx unlikely to be related to the index exacerbation).
  • Additionally, patients were excluded if they had any of the following comorbid conditions anytime during the study period: respiratory cancer, cystic fibrosis, fibrosis due to, bronchiectasis, pneumonociosis, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, or sarcoidosis, and
  • also if they had other doses (unapproved in the US) of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol xinafoate combination (100/50 mcg or 500/50 mcg) or budesonide dipropionate-formoterol fumarate fixed dose combination (any dose).

About this study

The timing of initiating short-term treatment for COPD exacerbations with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotic therapy has been shown to influence the recovery time of exacerbations with early initiation of exacerbation therapy having a faster symptom recovery compared to delayed initiation. While oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotic therapy are crucial for immediate exacerbation therapy, maintenance therapy with controller medications for COPD has been recommended to reduce the risk of future exacerbations. The initiation of maintenance therapy after a COPD exacerbation has been shown to be beneficial in the reduction of risk of future exacerbations. However, there is a lack of information on whether the timing of this initiation influences the risk of future exacerbations. The following study evaluates the impact of early versus delayed initiation of controller medication therapy for maintenance treatment following a COPD-related exacerbation on outcomes of future exacerbations and costs in patients with COPD.

Read the detailed description

Study period for this analysis will range from January 2003 through June 2009. Patients with at least one COPD exacerbation will be selected as the initial population. Three types of COPD exacerbations will be identified: 1) hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis code for COPD, 2) an emergency department (ED) visit with a primary diagnosis code for COPD, 3) physician visit with a dispensing of oral corticosteroid (OCS) or antibiotic (ABX) within 5 days of the visit. Only the first two will be selected as index exacerbations, which is defined as the first chronologically occurring exacerbation for a patient. For hospitalization exacerbations the discharge date of the hospitalization will be the index date and for ED exacerbations the date of the visit will be the index date. The pre-index period will be defined as the 1-year period before index date and the post-index period will be defined as 1-year period after index date. The enrollment period will thus range from January 1, 2004 through June 30, 2008. The post-index period will be used to identify the date of receipt of prescription for first COPD maintenance medication. This date of receipt will be used to compute the time to start maintenance treatment. Maintenance treatment refers to the use of controller medications.

Specifically the study hypothesis for the primary outcome being tested was:

Ho: There is no difference in risk of COPD-related hospitalization/ED visit between early and delayed cohorts Ha: There is a difference in risk of COPD-related hospitalization/ED visit between early and delayed cohorts

Hypothesis for the key secondary outcome of COPD-related costs that was tested was:

Ho: There is no difference in COPD-related costs between early and delayed cohorts Ha: There is a difference in COPD-related costs between early and delayed cohorts

Being tested
Early maintenance treatment, Delayed Maintenance treatment
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Early maintenance treatmentDrug

    Various classes of COPD maintenance treatment initiated within 30 days post index COPD exacerbation (hospitalization/ED visit)

  • Delayed Maintenance treatmentDrug

    Various classes of COPD maintenance treatment initiated after 30 days post index COPD exacerbation (hospitalization/ED visit)

Study groups in NCT01431911
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients diagnosed with COPDPatients diagnosed with COPD using ICD codes with a COPD-related exacerbation and receiving maintenance therapy
Receives: Drug: Early maintenance treatment; Drug: Delayed Maintenance treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. COPD hospitalization/ED visit

    Risk and number of COPD exacerbations will be computed in the post-index period. Hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis code (ICD code 491.xx, 492.xx, and 496.xx) for COPD. ED visit will be defined as COPD related if accompanied by diagnosis code for COPD.

    Measured: Up to 6 years (January 1, 2003 through June 30, 2009)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. COPD-related ED visit

    The risk and proportion of patients with a COPD-related exacerbation requiring ED visit was defined as a COPD-related ED visit.

    Measured: Up to 6 years (January 1, 2003 through June 30, 2009)

  2. COPD-related hospitalization

    risk and number of COPD hospitalizations will be computed in the post-index period. Hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis code (ICD code 491.xx, 492.xx, and 496.xx) for COPD will be captured.

    Measured: Up to 6 years (January 1, 2003 through June 30, 2009)

  3. COPD-related Phy+Rx visit

    Risk and number of COPD-related physician office visit with a dispensing for oral corticosteroid (OCS) or antibiotic (ABX) within 5 days of the visit

    Measured: January 1, 2003 through June 30, 2009 (up to 6 years)

  4. COPD related Costs

    COPD related medical, pharmacy and total costs. Costs were standardized to 2009 US dollars (USD) using consumer price index for US medical care.

    Measured: January 1, 2003 through June 30, 2009 (up to 6 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Sep 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2010
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionMar 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
3,806 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01431911
Sponsor's protocol ID
113898
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
23 Jun 2011
Last updated
16 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by GlaxoSmithKline.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

COPD hospitalization/ED visit (time frame: Up to 6 years (January 1, 2003 through June 30, 2009)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in