AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 3NCT01431287

Tiotropium +Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Versus Tiotropium and Olodaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

A Phase 3 study testing tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium and olodaterol in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 240 sites in 24 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The overall objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 52 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) compared with the individual components (tiotropium, olodaterol) (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) in patients with COPD. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What is being tested?
tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium and olodaterol
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,539 participants
Where
240 sitesin 24 countries
Study dates
Sep 2011to Nov 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
  • Relatively stable airway obstruction with post FEV1< 80% predicted normal and post FEV1/FVC <70%.
  • Male or female patients, 40 years of age or older.
  • Smoking history of more than 10 pack years.

Who cannot join

  • Significant disease other than COPD
  • Clinically relevant abnormal lab values.
  • History of asthma.
  • Diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis
  • Diagnosis of paroxysmal tachycardia
  • History of myocardial infarction within 1 year of screening visit
Show all 24Show fewer
  • Unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Hospitalization for heart failure within the past year.
  • Known active tuberculosis.
  • Malignancy for which patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within last five years
  • History of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction.
  • History of cystic fibrosis.
  • Clinically evident bronchiectasis.
  • History of significant alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Thoracotomy with pulmonary resection
  • Oral ß-adrenergics.
  • Oral corticosteroid medication at unstable doses
  • Regular use of daytime oxygen therapy for more than one hour per day
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation program in the six weeks prior to the screening visit
  • Investigational drug within one month or six half lives (whichever is greater) prior to screening visit
  • Known hypersensitivity to ß-adrenergic drugs, anticholinergics, BAC, EDTA
  • Pregnant or nursing women.
  • Women of childbearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control
  • Patients who are unable to comply with pulmonary medication restrictions

Trial locations and contacts

240 sites in 24 countries.

240 sites in 24 countries

Japan43 sites
  • 1237.6.81127 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Abeno-ku, Osaka, Osaka

  • 1237.6.81123 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Aoi-ku, Shizuoka, Shizuoka

  • 1237.6.81132 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo

  • 1237.6.81121 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Fukui, Fukui

  • 1237.6.81137 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Fukuyama, Hiroshima

  • 1237.6.81109 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hachioji, Tokyo

  • 1237.6.81134 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Himeji, Hyogo

  • 1237.6.81106 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hitachi, Ibaraki

  • 1237.6.81139 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Iizuka, Fukuoka

  • 1237.6.81102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Iwamizawa, Hokkaido

  • 1237.6.81117 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kamakura, Kanagawa

  • 1237.6.81120 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kanazawa, Ishikawa

  • 1237.6.81113 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kanazawa, Yokohama, Kanagawa

  • 1237.6.81108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kashiwa, Chiba

  • 1237.6.81114 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa

  • 1237.6.81135 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kita-ku, Okayama, Okayama

  • 1237.6.81126 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kita-ku, Sakai, Osaka

  • 1237.6.81101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido

  • 1237.6.81136 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kurashiki, Okayama

  • 1237.6.81116 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa

  • 1237.6.81118 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa

  • 1237.6.81112 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mitaka, Tokyo

  • 1237.6.81105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mito, Ibaraki

  • 1237.6.81142 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Naha, Okinawa

  • 1237.6.81131 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nishi-ku, Kobe, Hyogo

  • 1237.6.81104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Obihiro, Hokkaido

  • 1237.6.81141 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Okinawa, Okinawa

  • 1237.6.81110 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ota-ku, Tokyo

  • 1237.6.81138 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sakaide, Kagawa

  • 1237.6.81103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sapporo, Hokkaido

  • 1237.6.81140 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shimajiri-gun, Okinawa

  • 1237.6.81144 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shimajiri-gun, Okinawa

  • 1237.6.81111 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo

  • 1237.6.81145 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo

  • 1237.6.81107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Soka, Saitama

  • 1237.6.81133 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Takarazuka, Hyogo

  • 1237.6.81122 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Takayama, Gifu

  • 1237.6.81143 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tomigusuku, Okinawa

  • 1237.6.81128 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Toyonaka, Osaka

  • 1237.6.81124 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Uji, Kyoto

  • 1237.6.81130 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Yabu, Hyogo

  • 1237.6.81129 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Yao, Osaka

  • 1237.6.81119 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Yokosuka, Kanagawa

Other trials in Japan

United States38 sites
  • 1237.6.01108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • 1237.6.01134 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Atlanta, Georgia

  • 1237.6.01128 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • 1237.6.01127 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bayside, New York

  • 1237.6.01122 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • 1237.6.01135 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina

  • 1237.6.01114 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • 1237.6.01102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Columbus, Ohio

  • 1237.6.01107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Couer d'Alene, Idaho

  • 1237.6.01131 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Danbury, Connecticut

  • 1237.6.01118 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    DeLand, Florida

  • 1237.6.01113 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    East Providence, Rhode Island

  • 1237.6.01120 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Fort Collins, Colorado

  • 1237.6.01139 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Great Neck, New York

  • 1237.6.01132 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Greenville, South Carolina

  • 1237.6.01137 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Greenville, South Carolina

  • 1237.6.01106 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Greer, California

  • 1237.6.01129 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Henderson, Nevada

  • 1237.6.01138 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Killeen, Texas

  • 1237.6.01110 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Lafayette, Louisiana

  • 1237.6.01136 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Marlton, New Jersey

  • 1237.6.01124 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    McKinney, Texas

  • 1237.6.01104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Minneapolis, Minnesota

  • 1237.6.01130 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    North Dartmouth, Massachusetts

  • 1237.6.01115 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

  • 1237.6.01101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • 1237.6.01116 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Plymouth, Minnesota

  • 1237.6.01112 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Richmond, Virginia

  • 1237.6.01133 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Richmond, Virginia

  • 1237.6.01111 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Spartanburg, South Carolina

  • 1237.6.01125 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Spokane, Washington

  • 1237.6.01121 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    St Louis, Missouri

  • 1237.6.01123 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    St Louis, Missouri

  • 1237.6.01103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tacoma, Washington

  • 1237.6.01126 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tampa, Florida

  • 1237.6.01105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Union, South Carolina

  • 1237.6.01117 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Waterbury, Connecticut

  • 1237.6.01109 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Winter Park, Florida

Other trials in United States

China16 sites
  • 1237.6.86117 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Baotou

  • 1237.6.86102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Beijing

  • 1237.6.86104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Beijing

  • 1237.6.86105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Beijing

  • 1237.6.86115 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Changsha

  • 1237.6.86110 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Chengdu

  • 1237.6.86111 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Chongqing

  • 1237.6.86109 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Haikou

  • 1237.6.86108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hangzhou

  • 1237.6.86116 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hohhot

  • 1237.6.86114 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Jinan

  • 1237.6.86106 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nanjing

  • 1237.6.86101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shanghai

  • 1237.6.86113 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shenyang

  • 1237.6.86107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Suzhou

  • 1237.6.86112 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Xi'an

Other trials in China

Germany13 sites
  • 1237.6.49022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Aschaffenburg

  • 1237.6.49017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Berlin

  • 1237.6.49026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Frankfurt

  • 1237.6.49027 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Frankfurt

  • 1237.6.49025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Großhansdorf

  • 1237.6.49016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Halle

  • 1237.6.49024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hamburg

  • 1237.6.49021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hanover

  • 1237.6.49019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Leipzig

  • 1237.6.49028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mainz

  • 1237.6.49018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Rodgau/Dudenhofen

  • 1237.6.49020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Schwerin

  • 1237.6.49023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Teuchern

Other trials in Germany

Brazil11 sites
  • 1237.6.55013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Botucatu

  • 1237.6.55010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Florianópolis

  • 1237.6.55012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Passo Fundo

  • 1237.6.55001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Porto Alegre

  • 1237.6.55002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Porto Alegre

  • 1237.6.55003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Porto Alegre

  • 1237.6.55005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Porto Alegre

  • 1237.6.55009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Porto Alegre

  • 1237.6.55006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    São Paulo

  • 1237.6.55007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    São Paulo

  • 1237.6.55011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    São Paulo

Other trials in Brazil

Canada11 sites
  • 1237.6.02110 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Courtice, Ontario

  • 1237.6.02101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Downsview, Ontario

  • 1237.6.02109 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Edmonton, Alberta

  • 1237.6.02106 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Moncton, New Brunswick

  • 1237.6.02104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Point Claire, Quebec

  • 1237.6.02112 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sarnia, Ontario

  • 1237.6.02105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sherbrooke, Quebec

  • 1237.6.02108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ste-Foy, Quebec

  • 1237.6.02103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Toronto, Ontario

  • 1237.6.02111 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Vancouver, British Columbia

  • 1237.6.02102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Windsor, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

Belgium9 sites
  • 1237.6.32005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Brussels

  • 1237.6.32007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Brussels

  • 1237.6.32004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ghent

  • 1237.6.32002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Jambes

  • 1237.6.32009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Lebbeke

  • 1237.6.32001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Leuven

  • 1237.6.32006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Liège

  • 1237.6.32008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ostend

  • 1237.6.32010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Turnhout

Other trials in Belgium

India8 sites
  • 1237.6.91003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Chennai

  • 1237.6.91011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Coimbatore

  • 1237.6.91004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Jaipur

  • 1237.6.91002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kolkata

  • 1237.6.91007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Maharastra

  • 1237.6.91006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mumbai

  • 1237.6.91009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nashik, Maharashtra

  • 1237.6.91008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pune

Other trials in India

Spain8 sites
  • 1237.6.34008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Badalona (Barcelona)

  • 1237.6.34003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Barcelona

  • 1237.6.34009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Barcelona

  • 1237.6.34001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat

  • 1237.6.34002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mérida

  • 1237.6.34005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pozuelo de Alarcón

  • 1237.6.34004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sant Joan d'Alacant

  • 1237.6.34006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Vic (Barcelona)

Other trials in Spain

Norway7 sites
  • 1237.6.47005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Elverum

  • 1237.6.47001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hønefoss

  • 1237.6.47002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kløfta

  • 1237.6.47004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Lierskogen

  • 1237.6.47003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Oslo

  • 1237.6.47007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ski

  • 1237.6.47008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Svelvik

Other trials in Norway

Sweden7 sites
  • 1237.6.46003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Boden

  • 1237.6.46002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Gothenburg

  • 1237.6.46006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Härnösand

  • 1237.6.46005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Höllviken

  • 1237.6.46001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Lund

  • 1237.6.46004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Stockholm

  • 1237.6.46007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Uddevalla

Other trials in Sweden

Taiwan7 sites
  • 1237.6.88607 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kaohsiung City

  • 1237.6.88608 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kaohsiung City

  • 1237.6.88602 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    New Taipei City

  • 1237.6.88604 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Taichung

  • 1237.6.88605 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tainan

  • 1237.6.88601 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Taipei

  • 1237.6.88603 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Taoyuan County

Other trials in Taiwan

United Kingdom7 sites
  • 1237.6.44002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Blackpool

  • 1237.6.44009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Blackpool

  • 1237.6.44007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bristol

  • 1237.6.44010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Chertsey

  • 1237.6.44011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Fleetwood

  • 1237.6.44001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Manchester

  • 1237.6.44008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Midsomer Norton

Other trials in United Kingdom

Austria6 sites
  • 1237.6.43006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Feldbach

  • 1237.6.43005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Gänserndorf

  • 1237.6.43002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Innsbruck

  • 1237.6.43004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Leoben

  • 1237.6.43001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Linz

  • 1237.6.43003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Salzburg

Other trials in Austria

Colombia6 sites
  • 1237.6.57008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bogotá

  • 1237.6.57001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bogota DC

  • 1237.6.57003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bogota DC

  • 1237.6.57007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bogota DC

  • 1237.6.57006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cali

  • 1237.6.57004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Floridablanca

Other trials in Colombia

Slovakia6 sites
  • 1237.6.42101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bardejov

  • 1237.6.42102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bojnice

  • 1237.6.42104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Košice

  • 1237.6.42107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nitra

  • 1237.6.42103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Spišská Nová Ves

  • 1237.6.42106 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Žilina

Other trials in Slovakia

Hungary5 sites
  • 1237.6.36001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Debrecen

  • 1237.6.36004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Gödöllö

  • 1237.6.36005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pécs

  • 1237.6.36003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sopron

  • 1237.6.36002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Szeged

Other trials in Hungary

Romania5 sites
  • 1237.6.40004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Arad

  • 1237.6.40005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Arad

  • 1237.6.40001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bucharest

  • 1237.6.40002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bucharest

  • 1237.6.40003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cluj-Napoca

Other trials in Romania

Russia5 sites
  • 1237.6.07004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Moscow

  • 1237.6.07005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Moscow

  • 1237.6.07002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg

  • 1237.6.07003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg

  • 1237.6.07001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Yaroslavl

Other trials in Russia

Serbia5 sites
  • 1237.6.38103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Belgrade

  • 1237.6.38104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Belgrade

  • 1237.6.38105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Belgrade

  • 1237.6.38102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kragujevac

  • 1237.6.38101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Niš

Other trials in Serbia

South Africa5 sites
  • 1237.6.27002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bellville

  • 1237.6.27001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cape Town

  • 1237.6.27003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cape Town

  • 1237.6.27004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cape Town

  • 1237.6.27005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pretoria

Other trials in South Africa

Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
  • 1237.6.90105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ankara

  • 1237.6.90103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Denizli

  • 1237.6.90104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Istanbul

  • 1237.6.90101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Izmir

  • 1237.6.90102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Izmir

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Croatia4 sites
  • 1237.6.38503 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Petrinja

  • 1237.6.38504 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Rijeka

  • 1237.6.38502 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Zadar

  • 1237.6.38501 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Zagreb

Other trials in Croatia

Ireland3 sites
  • 1237.6.35304 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    County Limerick

  • 1237.6.35301 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Dublin

  • 1237.6.35303 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Dublin

Other trials in Ireland

About this study

Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) Compared With the Individual Components (2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium, 5 µg Olodaterol) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [TOnado TM 2]

The overall objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 52 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) compared with the individual components (tiotropium, olodaterol) (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) in patients with COPD.

Being tested
tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium, olodaterol, Respimat
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tiotropium + olodaterolDrug

    fixed dose combination

  • tiotropium + olodaterolDrug

    fixed dose combination

  • tiotropiumDrug

    low dose or high dose

  • tiotropiumDrug

    low dose or high dose

  • olodaterolDrug

    one dose only

  • RespimatDevice

    Respimat inhaler

Study groups in NCT01431287
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
tiotropium+olodaterol high dose FDCExperimentalOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat
Receives: Drug: tiotropium + olodaterol; Device: Respimat
tiotropium+olodaterol low dose FDCExperimentalOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat
Receives: Drug: tiotropium + olodaterol; Device: Respimat
olodaterolActive comparatorOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat
Receives: Drug: olodaterol; Device: Respimat
tiotropium low doseActive comparatorOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat
Receives: Drug: tiotropium; Device: Respimat
tiotropium high doseActive comparatorOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat
Receives: Drug: tiotropium; Device: Respimat

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Response on Day 169

    FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the MMRM model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169

  2. Trough FEV1 Response on Day 170

    Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) and was calculated as the mean of the 2 FEV1 measurements performed at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at the clinic visit on the previous day.

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an MMRM including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication on Day 170

  3. Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274).

    The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 169

Secondary outcomes (27)
  1. Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)

    Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274) is the key secondary endpoint.

    The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 169

  2. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 1

    FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.

    FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on the first day of randomized treatment

  3. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 85

    FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.

    FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 85 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 85

  4. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 365

    FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.

    FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 365 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 365

  5. Trough FEV1 Response on Day 15

    Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 15

  6. Trough FEV1 Response on Day 43

    Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 43

  7. Trough FEV1 Response on Day 85

    Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 85

  8. Trough FEV1 Response on Day 169

    Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 169

  9. Trough FEV1 Response on Day 365

    Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 365

  10. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 1

    FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.

    FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC.Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on the first day of randomized treatment

  11. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 85

    FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.

    FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC.Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 85 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 85

  12. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 169

    FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.

    FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169

  13. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 365

    FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.

    FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 365 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 365

  14. Trough FVC Response on Day 15

    Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 15

  15. Trough FVC Response on Day 43

    Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 43

  16. Trough FVC Response on Day 85

    Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and on day 85

  17. Trough FVC Response on Day 170

    Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) and was calculated as the mean of the 2 FVC measurements performed at 23h and at 23h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at the clinic visit on the previous day.

    Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an MMRM including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 23h and at 23h 50 min after inhalation of study medication on day 170

  18. Trough FVC Response on Day 365

    Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and on day 365

  19. FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)

    FEV1 AUC(0-12h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 12 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (12 h) to report in litres.

    FEV1 AUC(0-12h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-12h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h post-dose on Day 169

  20. FEV1 AUC(0-24h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)

    FEV1 AUC(0-24h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 24 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (24 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-24h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-24h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 23 h, 23 h and 50 min post-dose on Day 169

  21. FVC AUC(0-12h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour PFTs on Day 169 From Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)

    FVC AUC(0-12h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 12 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (12 h) to report in litres.

    FVC AUC(0-12h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-12h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h post-dose on Day 169

  22. FVC AUC(0-24h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)

    FVC AUC(0-24h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 24 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (24 h) to report in litres.

    FVC AUC(0-24h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-24h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 23 h, 23 h and 50 min post-dose on Day 169

  23. Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)

    The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 85

  24. Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)

    The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 365

  25. Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 43 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)

    Mahler TDI focal score on Day 43 From the two twin trials, present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274).

    The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 43

  26. Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)

    Mahler TDI focal score on Day 85 From the two twin trials, present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274).

    The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 85

  27. Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)

    Mahler TDI focal score on Day 365 From the two twin trials, present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274).

    The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 365

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Sep 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2011
  3. Primary completionNov 2013
  4. Study completionNov 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
2,539 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01431287
Sponsor's protocol ID
1237.6
Other IDs
2009-010669-22, 2009
Status last verified
Jun 2015
First submitted
8 Sep 2011
Last updated
16 Jul 2015

Publications

  • Rabe KF, Chalmers JD, Miravitlles M, Kocks JWH, Tsiligianni I, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT, Wedzicha J. Tiotropium/Olodaterol Delays Clinically Important Deterioration Compared with Tiotropium Monotherapy in Patients with Early COPD: a Post Hoc Analysis of the TONADO(R) Trials. Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):579-593. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01528-2. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

    PubMed 33175291
  • Singh D, Wedzicha JA, Siddiqui S, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Magnussen H, Miravitlles M, Chalmers JD, Calverley PMA. Blood eosinophils as a biomarker of future COPD exacerbation risk: pooled data from 11 clinical trials. Respir Res. 2020 Sep 17;21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01482-1.

    PubMed 32943047
  • Andreas S, Bothner U, de la Hoz A, Kloer I, Trampisch M, Alter P. No Influence on Cardiac Arrhythmia or Heart Rate from Long-Term Treatment with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus Monocomponents by Holter ECG Analysis in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1945-1953. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246350. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32848380
  • Andreas S, McGarvey L, Bothner U, Trampisch M, de la Hoz A, Flezar M, Buhl R, Alter P. Absence of Adverse Effects of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with the Monocomponents on Long-Term Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1935-1944. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246348. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32848379
  • Wedzicha JA, Buhl R, Singh D, Vogelmeier CF, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Anzueto A, Calverley PMA. Tiotropium/Olodaterol Decreases Exacerbation Rates Compared with Tiotropium in a Range of Patients with COPD: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R)/DYNAGITO(R) Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4266-4279. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01438-3. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

    PubMed 32776202
  • Buhl R, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT. Efficacy of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium as a First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Patients with COPD Who Are Naive to LAMA, LABA and ICS: Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4175-4189. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01411-0. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

    PubMed 32671684
  • Buhl R, Singh D, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Ferguson GT. Benefits of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium in Patients with COPD Receiving only LAMA at Baseline: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R) and OTEMTO(R) Studies. Adv Ther. 2020 Aug;37(8):3485-3499. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01373-3. Epub 2020 May 27.

    PubMed 32462607
  • Ferguson GT, Buhl R, Bothner U, Hoz A, Voss F, Anzueto A, Calverley PMA. Safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis of three large, 52-week, randomized clinical trials. Respir Med. 2018 Oct;143:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

    PubMed 30261995
  • Maltais F, Buhl R, Koch A, Amatto VC, Reid J, Gronke L, Bothner U, Voss F, McGarvey L, Ferguson GT. beta-Blockers in COPD: A Cohort Study From the TONADO Research Program. Chest. 2018 Jun;153(6):1315-1325. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

    PubMed 29355547
  • Buhl R, Magder S, Bothner U, Tetzlaff K, Voss F, Loaiza L, Vogelmeier CF, McGarvey L. Long-term general and cardiovascular safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2017 Jan;122:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

    PubMed 27993292
  • Ferguson GT, Flezar M, Korn S, Korducki L, Gronke L, Abrahams R, Buhl R. Efficacy of Tiotropium + Olodaterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Initial Disease Severity and Treatment Intensity: A Post Hoc Analysis. Adv Ther. 2015 Jun;32(6):523-36. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0218-0. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

    PubMed 26112656
  • Buhl R, Maltais F, Abrahams R, Bjermer L, Derom E, Ferguson G, Flezar M, Hebert J, McGarvey L, Pizzichini E, Reid J, Veale A, Gronke L, Hamilton A, Korducki L, Tetzlaff K, Waitere-Wijker S, Watz H, Bateman E. Tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combination versus mono-components in COPD (GOLD 2-4). Eur Respir J. 2015 Apr;45(4):969-79. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00136014. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

    PubMed 25573406

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium and olodaterol in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 240 sites in 24 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 240 sites in Japan, United States, China, Germany, Brazil and 19 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jul 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Response on Day 169 (time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01431287, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in