Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 3NCT01431287
Tiotropium +Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Versus Tiotropium and Olodaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Phase 3 study testing tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium and olodaterol in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 240 sites in 24 countries.
Trial summary
The overall objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 52 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) compared with the individual components (tiotropium, olodaterol) (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) in patients with COPD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium and olodaterol
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,539 participants
- Where
- 240 sitesin 24 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2011to Nov 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Relatively stable airway obstruction with post FEV1< 80% predicted normal and post FEV1/FVC <70%.
- Male or female patients, 40 years of age or older.
- Smoking history of more than 10 pack years.
Who cannot join
- Significant disease other than COPD
- Clinically relevant abnormal lab values.
- History of asthma.
- Diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis
- Diagnosis of paroxysmal tachycardia
- History of myocardial infarction within 1 year of screening visit
Show all 24Show fewer
- Unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia.
- Hospitalization for heart failure within the past year.
- Known active tuberculosis.
- Malignancy for which patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within last five years
- History of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction.
- History of cystic fibrosis.
- Clinically evident bronchiectasis.
- History of significant alcohol or drug abuse.
- Thoracotomy with pulmonary resection
- Oral ß-adrenergics.
- Oral corticosteroid medication at unstable doses
- Regular use of daytime oxygen therapy for more than one hour per day
- Pulmonary rehabilitation program in the six weeks prior to the screening visit
- Investigational drug within one month or six half lives (whichever is greater) prior to screening visit
- Known hypersensitivity to ß-adrenergic drugs, anticholinergics, BAC, EDTA
- Pregnant or nursing women.
- Women of childbearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control
- Patients who are unable to comply with pulmonary medication restrictions
Trial locations and contacts
240 sites in 24 countries.
240 sites in 24 countries
Japan43 sites
1237.6.81127 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Abeno-ku, Osaka, Osaka
1237.6.81123 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Aoi-ku, Shizuoka, Shizuoka
1237.6.81132 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo
1237.6.81121 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Fukui, Fukui
1237.6.81137 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Fukuyama, Hiroshima
1237.6.81109 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hachioji, Tokyo
1237.6.81134 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Himeji, Hyogo
1237.6.81106 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hitachi, Ibaraki
1237.6.81139 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Iizuka, Fukuoka
1237.6.81102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Iwamizawa, Hokkaido
1237.6.81117 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kamakura, Kanagawa
1237.6.81120 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kanazawa, Ishikawa
1237.6.81113 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kanazawa, Yokohama, Kanagawa
1237.6.81108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kashiwa, Chiba
1237.6.81114 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa
1237.6.81135 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kita-ku, Okayama, Okayama
1237.6.81126 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kita-ku, Sakai, Osaka
1237.6.81101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido
1237.6.81136 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kurashiki, Okayama
1237.6.81116 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa
1237.6.81118 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa
1237.6.81112 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mitaka, Tokyo
1237.6.81105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mito, Ibaraki
1237.6.81142 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Naha, Okinawa
1237.6.81131 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nishi-ku, Kobe, Hyogo
1237.6.81104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Obihiro, Hokkaido
1237.6.81141 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Okinawa, Okinawa
1237.6.81110 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ota-ku, Tokyo
1237.6.81138 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sakaide, Kagawa
1237.6.81103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sapporo, Hokkaido
1237.6.81140 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shimajiri-gun, Okinawa
1237.6.81144 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shimajiri-gun, Okinawa
1237.6.81111 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo
1237.6.81145 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo
1237.6.81107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Soka, Saitama
1237.6.81133 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Takarazuka, Hyogo
1237.6.81122 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Takayama, Gifu
1237.6.81143 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tomigusuku, Okinawa
1237.6.81128 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toyonaka, Osaka
1237.6.81124 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Uji, Kyoto
1237.6.81130 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yabu, Hyogo
1237.6.81129 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yao, Osaka
1237.6.81119 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yokosuka, Kanagawa
United States38 sites
1237.6.01108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
1237.6.01134 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia
1237.6.01128 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland
1237.6.01127 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bayside, New York
1237.6.01122 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina
1237.6.01135 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
1237.6.01114 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio
1237.6.01102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio
1237.6.01107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Couer d'Alene, Idaho
1237.6.01131 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Danbury, Connecticut
1237.6.01118 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
DeLand, Florida
1237.6.01113 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
East Providence, Rhode Island
1237.6.01120 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Fort Collins, Colorado
1237.6.01139 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Great Neck, New York
1237.6.01132 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Greenville, South Carolina
1237.6.01137 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Greenville, South Carolina
1237.6.01106 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Greer, California
1237.6.01129 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Henderson, Nevada
1237.6.01138 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Killeen, Texas
1237.6.01110 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lafayette, Louisiana
1237.6.01136 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Marlton, New Jersey
1237.6.01124 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
McKinney, Texas
1237.6.01104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota
1237.6.01130 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
North Dartmouth, Massachusetts
1237.6.01115 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
1237.6.01101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
1237.6.01116 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Plymouth, Minnesota
1237.6.01112 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia
1237.6.01133 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia
1237.6.01111 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Spartanburg, South Carolina
1237.6.01125 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Spokane, Washington
1237.6.01121 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri
1237.6.01123 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri
1237.6.01103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington
1237.6.01126 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida
1237.6.01105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Union, South Carolina
1237.6.01117 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Waterbury, Connecticut
1237.6.01109 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Winter Park, Florida
China16 sites
1237.6.86117 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Baotou
1237.6.86102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Beijing
1237.6.86104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Beijing
1237.6.86105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Beijing
1237.6.86115 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Changsha
1237.6.86110 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chengdu
1237.6.86111 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chongqing
1237.6.86109 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Haikou
1237.6.86108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hangzhou
1237.6.86116 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hohhot
1237.6.86114 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jinan
1237.6.86106 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nanjing
1237.6.86101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shanghai
1237.6.86113 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shenyang
1237.6.86107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Suzhou
1237.6.86112 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Xi'an
Germany13 sites
1237.6.49022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Aschaffenburg
1237.6.49017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1237.6.49026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Frankfurt
1237.6.49027 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Frankfurt
1237.6.49025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Großhansdorf
1237.6.49016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Halle
1237.6.49024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hamburg
1237.6.49021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hanover
1237.6.49019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Leipzig
1237.6.49028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mainz
1237.6.49018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rodgau/Dudenhofen
1237.6.49020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Schwerin
1237.6.49023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Teuchern
Brazil11 sites
1237.6.55013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Botucatu
1237.6.55010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Florianópolis
1237.6.55012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Passo Fundo
1237.6.55001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Porto Alegre
1237.6.55002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Porto Alegre
1237.6.55003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Porto Alegre
1237.6.55005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Porto Alegre
1237.6.55009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Porto Alegre
1237.6.55006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
São Paulo
1237.6.55007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
São Paulo
1237.6.55011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
São Paulo
Canada11 sites
1237.6.02110 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Courtice, Ontario
1237.6.02101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Downsview, Ontario
1237.6.02109 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Edmonton, Alberta
1237.6.02106 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moncton, New Brunswick
1237.6.02104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Point Claire, Quebec
1237.6.02112 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sarnia, Ontario
1237.6.02105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sherbrooke, Quebec
1237.6.02108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ste-Foy, Quebec
1237.6.02103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario
1237.6.02111 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Vancouver, British Columbia
1237.6.02102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Windsor, Ontario
Belgium9 sites
1237.6.32005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Brussels
1237.6.32007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Brussels
1237.6.32004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ghent
1237.6.32002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jambes
1237.6.32009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lebbeke
1237.6.32001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Leuven
1237.6.32006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Liège
1237.6.32008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ostend
1237.6.32010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Turnhout
India8 sites
1237.6.91003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chennai
1237.6.91011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Coimbatore
1237.6.91004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jaipur
1237.6.91002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kolkata
1237.6.91007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Maharastra
1237.6.91006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mumbai
1237.6.91009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nashik, Maharashtra
1237.6.91008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pune
Spain8 sites
1237.6.34008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Badalona (Barcelona)
1237.6.34003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Barcelona
1237.6.34009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Barcelona
1237.6.34001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat
1237.6.34002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mérida
1237.6.34005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pozuelo de Alarcón
1237.6.34004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sant Joan d'Alacant
1237.6.34006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Vic (Barcelona)
Norway7 sites
1237.6.47005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Elverum
1237.6.47001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hønefoss
1237.6.47002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kløfta
1237.6.47004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lierskogen
1237.6.47003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Oslo
1237.6.47007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ski
1237.6.47008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Svelvik
Sweden7 sites
1237.6.46003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Boden
1237.6.46002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gothenburg
1237.6.46006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Härnösand
1237.6.46005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Höllviken
1237.6.46001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lund
1237.6.46004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Stockholm
1237.6.46007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Uddevalla
Taiwan7 sites
1237.6.88607 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kaohsiung City
1237.6.88608 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kaohsiung City
1237.6.88602 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
New Taipei City
1237.6.88604 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Taichung
1237.6.88605 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tainan
1237.6.88601 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Taipei
1237.6.88603 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Taoyuan County
United Kingdom7 sites
1237.6.44002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Blackpool
1237.6.44009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Blackpool
1237.6.44007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bristol
1237.6.44010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chertsey
1237.6.44011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Fleetwood
1237.6.44001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Manchester
1237.6.44008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Midsomer Norton
Austria6 sites
1237.6.43006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Feldbach
1237.6.43005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gänserndorf
1237.6.43002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Innsbruck
1237.6.43004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Leoben
1237.6.43001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Linz
1237.6.43003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Salzburg
Colombia6 sites
1237.6.57008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bogotá
1237.6.57001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bogota DC
1237.6.57003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bogota DC
1237.6.57007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bogota DC
1237.6.57006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cali
1237.6.57004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Floridablanca
Slovakia6 sites
1237.6.42101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bardejov
1237.6.42102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bojnice
1237.6.42104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Košice
1237.6.42107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nitra
1237.6.42103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Spišská Nová Ves
1237.6.42106 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Žilina
Hungary5 sites
1237.6.36001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Debrecen
1237.6.36004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gödöllö
1237.6.36005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pécs
1237.6.36003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sopron
1237.6.36002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Szeged
Romania5 sites
1237.6.40004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Arad
1237.6.40005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Arad
1237.6.40001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bucharest
1237.6.40002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bucharest
1237.6.40003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cluj-Napoca
Russia5 sites
1237.6.07004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
1237.6.07005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
1237.6.07002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
1237.6.07003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
1237.6.07001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yaroslavl
Serbia5 sites
1237.6.38103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Belgrade
1237.6.38104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Belgrade
1237.6.38105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Belgrade
1237.6.38102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kragujevac
1237.6.38101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Niš
South Africa5 sites
1237.6.27002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bellville
1237.6.27001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cape Town
1237.6.27003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cape Town
1237.6.27004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cape Town
1237.6.27005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pretoria
Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
1237.6.90105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ankara
1237.6.90103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Denizli
1237.6.90104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Istanbul
1237.6.90101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Izmir
1237.6.90102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Izmir
Croatia4 sites
1237.6.38503 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Petrinja
1237.6.38504 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rijeka
1237.6.38502 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Zadar
1237.6.38501 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Zagreb
Ireland3 sites
1237.6.35304 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
County Limerick
1237.6.35301 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Dublin
1237.6.35303 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Dublin
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) Compared With the Individual Components (2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium, 5 µg Olodaterol) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [TOnado TM 2]
The overall objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 52 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) compared with the individual components (tiotropium, olodaterol) (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) in patients with COPD.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Being tested
- tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium, olodaterol, Respimat
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tiotropium + olodaterolDrug
fixed dose combination
tiotropium + olodaterolDrug
fixed dose combination
tiotropiumDrug
low dose or high dose
tiotropiumDrug
low dose or high dose
olodaterolDrug
one dose only
RespimatDevice
Respimat inhaler
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropium+olodaterol high dose FDC | Experimental | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: tiotropium + olodaterol; Device: Respimat |
| tiotropium+olodaterol low dose FDC | Experimental | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: tiotropium + olodaterol; Device: Respimat |
| olodaterol | Active comparator | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: olodaterol; Device: Respimat |
| tiotropium low dose | Active comparator | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: tiotropium; Device: Respimat |
| tiotropium high dose | Active comparator | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: tiotropium; Device: Respimat |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Response on Day 169
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the MMRM model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 170
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) and was calculated as the mean of the 2 FEV1 measurements performed at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at the clinic visit on the previous day.
Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an MMRM including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication on Day 170
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274).
The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 169
Secondary outcomes (27)
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274) is the key secondary endpoint.
The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 169
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 1
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on the first day of randomized treatment
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 85
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 85 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 85
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 365
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 365 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 365
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 15
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 15
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 43
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 43
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 85
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 85
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 169
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 169
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 365
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 365
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 1
FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.
FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC.Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on the first day of randomized treatment
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 85
FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.
FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC.Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 85 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 85
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 169
FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.
FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 365
FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.
FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 365 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 365
Trough FVC Response on Day 15
Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 15
Trough FVC Response on Day 43
Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 43
Trough FVC Response on Day 85
Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and on day 85
Trough FVC Response on Day 170
Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) and was calculated as the mean of the 2 FVC measurements performed at 23h and at 23h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at the clinic visit on the previous day.
Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an MMRM including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 23h and at 23h 50 min after inhalation of study medication on day 170
Trough FVC Response on Day 365
Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and on day 365
FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
FEV1 AUC(0-12h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 12 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (12 h) to report in litres.
FEV1 AUC(0-12h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-12h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h post-dose on Day 169
FEV1 AUC(0-24h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
FEV1 AUC(0-24h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 24 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (24 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-24h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-24h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 23 h, 23 h and 50 min post-dose on Day 169
FVC AUC(0-12h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour PFTs on Day 169 From Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
FVC AUC(0-12h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 12 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (12 h) to report in litres.
FVC AUC(0-12h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-12h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h post-dose on Day 169
FVC AUC(0-24h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
FVC AUC(0-24h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 24 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (24 h) to report in litres.
FVC AUC(0-24h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-24h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 23 h, 23 h and 50 min post-dose on Day 169
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 85
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 365
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 43 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Mahler TDI focal score on Day 43 From the two twin trials, present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274).
The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 43
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Mahler TDI focal score on Day 85 From the two twin trials, present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274).
The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 85
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Mahler TDI focal score on Day 365 From the two twin trials, present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274).
The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 365
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2011
- Primary completionNov 2013
- Study completionNov 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 2,539 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Study chair, Boehringer Ingelheim
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01431287
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1237.6
- Other IDs
- 2009-010669-22, 2009
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2011
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Rabe KF, Chalmers JD, Miravitlles M, Kocks JWH, Tsiligianni I, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT, Wedzicha J. Tiotropium/Olodaterol Delays Clinically Important Deterioration Compared with Tiotropium Monotherapy in Patients with Early COPD: a Post Hoc Analysis of the TONADO(R) Trials. Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):579-593. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01528-2. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
PubMed 33175291Singh D, Wedzicha JA, Siddiqui S, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Magnussen H, Miravitlles M, Chalmers JD, Calverley PMA. Blood eosinophils as a biomarker of future COPD exacerbation risk: pooled data from 11 clinical trials. Respir Res. 2020 Sep 17;21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01482-1.
PubMed 32943047Andreas S, Bothner U, de la Hoz A, Kloer I, Trampisch M, Alter P. No Influence on Cardiac Arrhythmia or Heart Rate from Long-Term Treatment with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus Monocomponents by Holter ECG Analysis in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1945-1953. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246350. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32848380Andreas S, McGarvey L, Bothner U, Trampisch M, de la Hoz A, Flezar M, Buhl R, Alter P. Absence of Adverse Effects of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with the Monocomponents on Long-Term Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1935-1944. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246348. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32848379Wedzicha JA, Buhl R, Singh D, Vogelmeier CF, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Anzueto A, Calverley PMA. Tiotropium/Olodaterol Decreases Exacerbation Rates Compared with Tiotropium in a Range of Patients with COPD: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R)/DYNAGITO(R) Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4266-4279. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01438-3. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
PubMed 32776202Buhl R, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT. Efficacy of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium as a First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Patients with COPD Who Are Naive to LAMA, LABA and ICS: Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4175-4189. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01411-0. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
PubMed 32671684Buhl R, Singh D, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Ferguson GT. Benefits of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium in Patients with COPD Receiving only LAMA at Baseline: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R) and OTEMTO(R) Studies. Adv Ther. 2020 Aug;37(8):3485-3499. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01373-3. Epub 2020 May 27.
PubMed 32462607Ferguson GT, Buhl R, Bothner U, Hoz A, Voss F, Anzueto A, Calverley PMA. Safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis of three large, 52-week, randomized clinical trials. Respir Med. 2018 Oct;143:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
PubMed 30261995Maltais F, Buhl R, Koch A, Amatto VC, Reid J, Gronke L, Bothner U, Voss F, McGarvey L, Ferguson GT. beta-Blockers in COPD: A Cohort Study From the TONADO Research Program. Chest. 2018 Jun;153(6):1315-1325. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
PubMed 29355547Buhl R, Magder S, Bothner U, Tetzlaff K, Voss F, Loaiza L, Vogelmeier CF, McGarvey L. Long-term general and cardiovascular safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2017 Jan;122:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
PubMed 27993292Ferguson GT, Flezar M, Korn S, Korducki L, Gronke L, Abrahams R, Buhl R. Efficacy of Tiotropium + Olodaterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Initial Disease Severity and Treatment Intensity: A Post Hoc Analysis. Adv Ther. 2015 Jun;32(6):523-36. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0218-0. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
PubMed 26112656Buhl R, Maltais F, Abrahams R, Bjermer L, Derom E, Ferguson G, Flezar M, Hebert J, McGarvey L, Pizzichini E, Reid J, Veale A, Gronke L, Hamilton A, Korducki L, Tetzlaff K, Waitere-Wijker S, Watz H, Bateman E. Tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combination versus mono-components in COPD (GOLD 2-4). Eur Respir J. 2015 Apr;45(4):969-79. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00136014. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
PubMed 25573406
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) Compared With the Individual Components (2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium, 5 µg Olodaterol) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [TOnado TM 2]
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01431287
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1237.6
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,539 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Jul 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 52 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) compared with the individual components (tiotropium, olodaterol) (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) in patients with COPD.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropium+olodaterol high dose FDC | Experimental | Drug: tiotropium + olodaterol, Device: RespimatOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| tiotropium+olodaterol low dose FDC | Experimental | Drug: tiotropium + olodaterol, Device: RespimatOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| olodaterol | Active comparator | Drug: olodaterol, Device: RespimatOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| tiotropium low dose | Active comparator | Drug: tiotropium, Device: RespimatOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| tiotropium high dose | Active comparator | Drug: tiotropium, Device: RespimatOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Relatively stable airway obstruction with post FEV1< 80% predicted normal and post FEV1/FVC <70%.
- Male or female patients, 40 years of age or older.
- Smoking history of more than 10 pack years.
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Significant disease other than COPD
- Clinically relevant abnormal lab values.
- History of asthma.
- Diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis
- Diagnosis of paroxysmal tachycardia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropium + olodaterolfixed dose combination | Drug | tiotropium+olodaterol low dose FDC |
| tiotropium + olodaterolfixed dose combination | Drug | tiotropium+olodaterol high dose FDC |
| tiotropiumlow dose or high dose | Drug | tiotropium low dose |
| tiotropiumlow dose or high dose | Drug | tiotropium high dose |
| olodaterolone dose only | Drug | olodaterol |
| RespimatRespimat inhaler | Device | olodaterol, tiotropium high dose, tiotropium low dose, tiotropium+olodaterol high dose FDC, tiotropium+olodaterol low dose FDC |
Primary outcome
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Response on Day 169
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1). The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the MMRM model in each treatment group.
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 170
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication on Day 170
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) and was calculated as the mean of the 2 FEV1 measurements performed at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at the clinic visit on the previous day. Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1). The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an MMRM including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274).
Time frame: Day 169
The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
27 secondary outcomes
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Time frame: Day 169
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 1
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on the first day of randomized treatment
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 85
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 85 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 85
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 365
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 365 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 365
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 15
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 15
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 43
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 43
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 85
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 85
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 169
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 169
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 365
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 365
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 1
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on the first day of randomized treatment
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 85
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 85 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 85
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 169
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 365
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 365 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 365
Trough FVC Response on Day 15
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 15
Trough FVC Response on Day 43
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 43
Trough FVC Response on Day 85
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and on day 85
Trough FVC Response on Day 170
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 23h and at 23h 50 min after inhalation of study medication on day 170
Trough FVC Response on Day 365
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and on day 365
FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h post-dose on Day 169
FEV1 AUC(0-24h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 23 h, 23 h and 50 min post-dose on Day 169
FVC AUC(0-12h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour PFTs on Day 169 From Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h post-dose on Day 169
FVC AUC(0-24h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 23 h, 23 h and 50 min post-dose on Day 169
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Time frame: Day 85
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Time frame: Day 365
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 43 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Time frame: Day 43
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Time frame: Day 85
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.6 (NCT01431287) and 1237.5 (NCT01431274)
Time frame: Day 365
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33175291Rabe KF, Chalmers JD, Miravitlles M, Kocks JWH, Tsiligianni I, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT, Wedzicha J. Tiotropium/Olodaterol Delays Clinically Important Deterioration Compared with Tiotropium Monotherapy in Patients with Early COPD: a Post Hoc Analysis of the TONADO(R) Trials. Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):579-593. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01528-2. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32943047Singh D, Wedzicha JA, Siddiqui S, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Magnussen H, Miravitlles M, Chalmers JD, Calverley PMA. Blood eosinophils as a biomarker of future COPD exacerbation risk: pooled data from 11 clinical trials. Respir Res. 2020 Sep 17;21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01482-1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32848380Andreas S, Bothner U, de la Hoz A, Kloer I, Trampisch M, Alter P. No Influence on Cardiac Arrhythmia or Heart Rate from Long-Term Treatment with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus Monocomponents by Holter ECG Analysis in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1945-1953. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246350. eCollection 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32848379Andreas S, McGarvey L, Bothner U, Trampisch M, de la Hoz A, Flezar M, Buhl R, Alter P. Absence of Adverse Effects of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with the Monocomponents on Long-Term Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1935-1944. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246348. eCollection 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32776202Wedzicha JA, Buhl R, Singh D, Vogelmeier CF, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Anzueto A, Calverley PMA. Tiotropium/Olodaterol Decreases Exacerbation Rates Compared with Tiotropium in a Range of Patients with COPD: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R)/DYNAGITO(R) Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4266-4279. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01438-3. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32671684Buhl R, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT. Efficacy of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium as a First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Patients with COPD Who Are Naive to LAMA, LABA and ICS: Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4175-4189. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01411-0. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32462607Buhl R, Singh D, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Ferguson GT. Benefits of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium in Patients with COPD Receiving only LAMA at Baseline: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R) and OTEMTO(R) Studies. Adv Ther. 2020 Aug;37(8):3485-3499. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01373-3. Epub 2020 May 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30261995Ferguson GT, Buhl R, Bothner U, Hoz A, Voss F, Anzueto A, Calverley PMA. Safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis of three large, 52-week, randomized clinical trials. Respir Med. 2018 Oct;143:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29355547Maltais F, Buhl R, Koch A, Amatto VC, Reid J, Gronke L, Bothner U, Voss F, McGarvey L, Ferguson GT. beta-Blockers in COPD: A Cohort Study From the TONADO Research Program. Chest. 2018 Jun;153(6):1315-1325. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27993292Buhl R, Magder S, Bothner U, Tetzlaff K, Voss F, Loaiza L, Vogelmeier CF, McGarvey L. Long-term general and cardiovascular safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2017 Jan;122:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26112656Ferguson GT, Flezar M, Korn S, Korducki L, Gronke L, Abrahams R, Buhl R. Efficacy of Tiotropium + Olodaterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Initial Disease Severity and Treatment Intensity: A Post Hoc Analysis. Adv Ther. 2015 Jun;32(6):523-36. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0218-0. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25573406Buhl R, Maltais F, Abrahams R, Bjermer L, Derom E, Ferguson G, Flezar M, Hebert J, McGarvey L, Pizzichini E, Reid J, Veale A, Gronke L, Hamilton A, Korducki L, Tetzlaff K, Waitere-Wijker S, Watz H, Bateman E. Tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combination versus mono-components in COPD (GOLD 2-4). Eur Respir J. 2015 Apr;45(4):969-79. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00136014. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boehringer Ingelheim study chair
Boehringer Ingelheim
240 sites in 24 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium and olodaterol in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 240 sites in 24 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 240 sites in Japan, United States, China, Germany, Brazil and 19 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jul 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Response on Day 169 (time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01431287, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2015.