AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 3NCT01431274

Tiotropium+Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Versus Tiotropium and Olodaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

A Phase 3 study testing tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium and olodaterol in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 239 sites in 25 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The overall objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 52 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) compared with the individual components ( tiotropium, olodaterol) (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) in patients with Chronic… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What is being tested?
tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium and olodaterol
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,624 participants
Where
239 sitesin 25 countries
Study dates
Sep 2011to Sep 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
  • Relatively stable airway obstruction with post FEV1< 80% predicted normal and post FEV1/FVC <70%.
  • Male or female patients, 40 years of age or older.
  • Smoking history of more than 10 pack years.

Who cannot join

  • Significant disease other than COPD
  • Clinically relevant abnormal lab values.
  • History of asthma.
  • Diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis
  • Diagnosis of paroxysmal tachycardia
  • History of myocardial infarction within 1 year of screening visit
Show all 24Show fewer
  • Unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Hospitalization for heart failure within the past year.
  • Known active tuberculosis.
  • Malignancy for which patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within last five years
  • History of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction.
  • History of cystic fibrosis.
  • Clinically evident bronchiectasis.
  • History of significant alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Thoracotomy with pulmonary resection
  • Oral ß-adrenergics.
  • Oral corticosteroid medication at unstable doses
  • Regular use of daytime oxygen therapy for more than one hour per day
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation program in the six weeks prior to the screening visit
  • Investigational drug within one month or six half lives (whichever is greater) prior to screening visit
  • Known hypersensitivity to ß-adrenergic drugs, anticholinergics, BAC, EDTA
  • Pregnant or nursing women.
  • Women of childbearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control
  • Patients who are unable to comply with pulmonary medication restrictions

Trial locations and contacts

239 sites in 25 countries.

239 sites in 25 countries

Japan45 sites
  • 1237.5.81003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi

  • 1237.5.81001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Asahikawa, Hokkaido

  • 1237.5.81006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo

  • 1237.5.81044 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto

  • 1237.5.81035 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Gifu, Gifu

  • 1237.5.81017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hakata-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka

  • 1237.5.81031 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hamamatsushi, Shizuoka

  • 1237.5.81014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Himeji, Hyogo

  • 1237.5.81037 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ikoma, Nara

  • 1237.5.81024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki

  • 1237.5.81008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Itabashi-ku, Tokyo

  • 1237.5.81016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka

  • 1237.5.81021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kagoshima, Kagoshima

  • 1237.5.81020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kagoshima, Kagoshima,

  • 1237.5.81005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kamogawa, Chiba

  • 1237.5.81011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kishiwada, Osaka

  • 1237.5.81018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kitakyusyu,Fukuoka

  • 1237.5.81042 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Koga, Fukuoka

  • 1237.5.81032 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Komaki, Aichi

  • 1237.5.81033 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Komaki, Aichi

  • 1237.5.81019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Koshi, Kumamoto

  • 1237.5.81027 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Koto-ku, Tokyo

  • 1237.5.81025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kuki, Saitama

  • 1237.5.81038 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kure, Hiroshima

  • 1237.5.81015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kurume, Fukuoka

  • 1237.5.81029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Matsumoto, Nagano

  • 1237.5.81030 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Matsumoto, Nagano

  • 1237.5.81010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Matsusaka, Mie

  • 1237.5.81041 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Minami-ku. Fukuoka, Fukuoka

  • 1237.5.81002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Morioka, Iwate

  • 1237.5.81034 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nagoya, Aichi

  • 1237.5.81036 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nagoya, Aichi

  • 1237.5.81004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Naka-gun, Ibaraki

  • 1237.5.81022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Okinawa, Urasoe

  • 1237.5.81023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Okinawa, Urasoe

  • 1237.5.81012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sayama, Osaka

  • 1237.5.81045 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sendai, Miyagi

  • 1237.5.81009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Seto, Aichi

  • 1237.5.81026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shinagawa, Tokyo

  • 1237.5.81007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo

  • 1237.5.81039 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Takamatsu, Kagawa

  • 1237.5.81040 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Takamatsu, Kagawa

  • 1237.5.81013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Wakayama, Wakayama

  • 1237.5.81043 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Yanagawa-shi, Fukuoka,

  • 1237.5.81028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Yokohama, Kanagawa

Other trials in Japan

United States35 sites
  • 1237.5.01017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Biddeford, Maine

  • 1237.5.01015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Boulder, Colorado

  • 1237.5.01032 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Charleston, Pennsylvania

  • 1237.5.01006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • 1237.5.01003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Clearwater, Florida

  • 1237.5.01010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Clearwater, Florida

  • 1237.5.01028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Columbia, Maryland

  • 1237.5.01040 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Columbus, Ohio

  • 1237.5.01039 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Dayton, Ohio

  • 1237.5.01021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Easley, South Carolina

  • 1237.5.01029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Fort Worth, Texas

  • 1237.5.01012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Gaffney, South Carolina

  • 1237.5.01038 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Jasper, Alabama

  • 1237.5.01005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Johnston, Rhode Island

  • 1237.5.01025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Larchmont, New York

  • 1237.5.01013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Livonia, Michigan

  • 1237.5.01026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Lynchburg, Virginia

  • 1237.5.01036 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mobile, Alabama

  • 1237.5.01001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Morgantown, West Virginia

  • 1237.5.01031 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    O'Fallon, Illinois

  • 1237.5.01009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

  • 1237.5.01019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Omaha, Nebraska

  • 1237.5.01035 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Opelousas, Louisiana

  • 1237.5.01027 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Panama City, Florida

  • 1237.5.01023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Raleigh, North Carolina

  • 1237.5.01008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Rochester, New York

  • 1237.5.01002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    San Antonio, Texas

  • 1237.5.01004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shreveport, Louisiana

  • 1237.5.01014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Spartanburg, South Carolina

  • 1237.5.01007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Spokane, Washington

  • 1237.5.01034 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Stamford, Connecticut

  • 1237.5.01016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tabor City, North Carolina

  • 1237.5.01033 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tacoma, Washington

  • 1237.5.01037 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Toledo, Ohio

  • 1237.5.01024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Wheat Ridge, Colorado

Other trials in United States

China16 sites
  • 1237.5.86003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Beijing

  • 1237.5.86004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Beijing

  • 1237.5.86011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Changsha

  • 1237.5.86012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Changsha

  • 1237.5.86014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Foshan

  • 1237.5.86001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Guangzhou

  • 1237.5.86015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nanning

  • 1237.5.86002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shanghai

  • 1237.5.86005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shanghai

  • 1237.5.86006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shanghai

  • 1237.5.86007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shanghai

  • 1237.5.86009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shenyang

  • 1237.5.86016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Wuhan

  • 1237.5.86010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Xi'an

  • 1237.5.86008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Yangzhou

  • 1237.5.86017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Yinchuan

Other trials in China

Argentina13 sites
  • 1237.5.54010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Buenos Aires

  • 1237.5.54013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Caba

  • 1237.5.54016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Caba

  • 1237.5.54003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Capital Federal

  • 1237.5.54002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cuidad Autonoma de Buenos Airess A

  • 1237.5.54006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mar del Plata

  • 1237.5.54007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mar del Plata

  • 1237.5.54009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mendoza

  • 1237.5.54012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Monte Grande

  • 1237.5.54008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Quilmes

  • 1237.5.54005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Rosario

  • 1237.5.54004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    San Miguel de Tucuma

  • 1237.5.54011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    San Miguel de Tucumán

Other trials in Argentina

Germany13 sites
  • 1237.5.49006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bamberg

  • 1237.5.49002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Berlin

  • 1237.5.49003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Berlin

  • 1237.5.49013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Berlin

  • 1237.5.49011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Erfurt

  • 1237.5.49005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hamburg

  • 1237.5.49010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hamburg

  • 1237.5.49009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Koblenz

  • 1237.5.49014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Neu-Isenburg

  • 1237.5.49012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Oschersleben

  • 1237.5.49001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Rüdersdorf

  • 1237.5.49004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Weinheim

  • 1237.5.49008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Wiesloch

Other trials in Germany

Canada10 sites
  • 1237.5.02005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Burlington, Ontario

  • 1237.5.02002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Calgary, Alberta

  • 1237.5.02007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Grimsby, Ontario

  • 1237.5.02011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ottawa, Ontario

  • 1237.5.02003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Québec, Quebec

  • 1237.5.02006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Québec, Quebec

  • 1237.5.02009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

  • 1237.5.02008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sherbrooke, Quebec

  • 1237.5.02001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Vancouver, British Columbia

  • 1237.5.02004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Winnipeg, Manitoba

Other trials in Canada

Denmark10 sites
  • 1237.5.45002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Aalborg

  • 1237.5.45009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hvidovre

  • 1237.5.45001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    København NV

  • 1237.5.45007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kolding

  • 1237.5.45011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Næstved

  • 1237.5.45006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Odense C

  • 1237.5.45008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Roskilde

  • 1237.5.45003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Silkeborg

  • 1237.5.45005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sønderborg

  • 1237.5.45004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Vaerløse

Other trials in Denmark

Netherlands10 sites
  • 1237.5.31004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Almelo

  • 1237.5.31006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Breda

  • 1237.5.31001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Eindhoven

  • 1237.5.31008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Harderwijk

  • 1237.5.31007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Heerlen

  • 1237.5.31010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hengelo

  • 1237.5.31009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hoorn

  • 1237.5.31005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nieuwegein

  • 1237.5.31002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Veldhoven

  • 1237.5.31003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Zutphen

Other trials in Netherlands

India9 sites
  • 1237.5.91010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ahmedabad

  • 1237.5.91002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bangalore

  • 1237.5.91007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bangalore

  • 1237.5.91004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Coimbatore

  • 1237.5.91011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hyderabad

  • 1237.5.91001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Jaipur

  • 1237.5.91008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Jaipur

  • 1237.5.91009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mysore

  • 1237.5.91006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pune

Other trials in India

South Korea8 sites
  • 1237.5.82004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bucheon-si

  • 1237.5.82008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Daegu

  • 1237.5.82001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Seoul

  • 1237.5.82002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Seoul

  • 1237.5.82003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Seoul

  • 1237.5.82007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Seoul

  • 1237.5.82005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Suwon

  • 1237.5.82006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Wŏnju

Other trials in South Korea

Bulgaria7 sites
  • 1237.5.35905 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Plovdiv

  • 1237.5.35901 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Rousse

  • 1237.5.35906 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shumen

  • 1237.5.35902 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sofia

  • 1237.5.35904 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sofia

  • 1237.5.35903 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Troyan Municipality

  • 1237.5.35908 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Veliko Tarnovo

Other trials in Bulgaria

France7 sites
  • 1237.5.33004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Béthune

  • 1237.5.33007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Montpellier

  • 1237.5.33005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nantes

  • 1237.5.33006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nîmes

  • 1237.5.33008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Perpignan

  • 1237.5.33001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Saint-Pierre

  • 1237.5.33002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Strasbourg

Other trials in France

Guatemala7 sites
  • 1237.5.50201 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Guatemala City

  • 1237.5.50202 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Guatemala City

  • 1237.5.50203 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Guatemala City

  • 1237.5.50204 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Guatemala City

  • 1237.5.50205 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Guatemala City

  • 1237.5.50206 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Guatemala City

  • 1237.5.50207 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Guatemala City

Other trials in Guatemala

Portugal7 sites
  • 1237.5.35105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Amadora

  • 1237.5.35101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Coimbra

  • 1237.5.35102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Lisbon

  • 1237.5.35104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Lisbon

  • 1237.5.35103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Porto

  • 1237.5.35106 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Vila Nova de Gaia

  • 1237.5.35107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Viseu

Other trials in Portugal

Italy6 sites
  • 1237.5.39008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cagliari

  • 1237.5.39002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Genova

  • 1237.5.39006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Montescano (PV)

  • 1237.5.39009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Monza

  • 1237.5.39004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Parma

  • 1237.5.39001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pisa

Other trials in Italy

Czechia5 sites
  • 1237.5.42004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Beroun

  • 1237.5.42002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cvikov

  • 1237.5.42001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Prague

  • 1237.5.42005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Rokycany

  • 1237.5.42003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Znojmo

Other trials in Czechia

Hungary5 sites
  • 1237.5.36005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Debrecen

  • 1237.5.36001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Deszk

  • 1237.5.36006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kapuvár

  • 1237.5.36003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Szombathely

  • 1237.5.36002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Törökbálint

Other trials in Hungary

Russia5 sites
  • 1237.5.07001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Gatchina (Leningradskaya Oblast)

  • 1237.5.07003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kazan'

  • 1237.5.07004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Moscow

  • 1237.5.07005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Moscow

  • 1237.5.07002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg

Other trials in Russia

Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
  • 1237.5.90003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Istanbul

  • 1237.5.90004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Istanbul

  • 1237.5.90002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Izmir

  • 1237.5.90005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    İzmit

  • 1237.5.90001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mersin

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Mexico4 sites
  • 1237.5.52002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Hermosillo

  • 1237.5.52003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    México

  • 1237.5.52007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Monterrey

  • 1237.5.52001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tijuana

Other trials in Mexico

Australia3 sites
  • 1237.5.61004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Frankston, Victoria

  • 1237.5.61001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Toorak Gardens, South Australia

  • 1237.5.61002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Woodville, South Australia

Other trials in Australia

Finland3 sites
  • 1237.5.35801 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Helsinki

  • 1237.5.35804 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pori

  • 1237.5.35802 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Turku

Other trials in Finland

Estonia2 sites
  • 1237.5.37002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tallinn

  • 1237.5.37001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tartu

Other trials in Estonia

New Zealand2 sites
  • 1237.5.64002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Dunedin

  • 1237.5.64001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Greenlane East Auckland NZ

Other trials in New Zealand

Slovenia2 sites
  • 1237.5.38601 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Golnik

  • 1237.5.38602 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Golnik

Other trials in Slovenia

About this study

Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) Compared With the Individual Components (2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium, 5 µg Olodaterol) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). [TOnado TM 1]

The overall objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 52 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) compared with the individual components ( tiotropium, olodaterol) (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Being tested
tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium, olodaterol, Respimat
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tiotropium + olodaterolDrug

    fixed dose combination

  • tiotropiumDrug

    low dose

  • olodaterolDrug

    one dose only

  • tiotropiumDrug

    high dose

  • tiotropium + olodaterolDrug

    fixed dose combination

  • RespimatDevice

    Respimat inhaler

Study groups in NCT01431274
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
tiotropium+olodaterol low dose FDCExperimentalOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat
Receives: Drug: tiotropium + olodaterol; Device: Respimat
tiotropium+olodaterol high dose FDCExperimentalOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat
Receives: Drug: tiotropium + olodaterol; Device: Respimat
olodaterolActive comparatorOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat
Receives: Drug: olodaterol; Device: Respimat
tiotropium low doseActive comparatorOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat
Receives: Drug: tiotropium; Device: Respimat
tiotropium high doseActive comparatorOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat
Receives: Drug: tiotropium; Device: Respimat

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Response on Day 169.

    FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the MMRM model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169.

  2. Trough FEV1 Response on Day 170.

    Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) and was calculated as the mean of the 2 FEV1 measurements performed at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at the clinic visit on the previous day.

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an MMRM including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication on Day 170

  3. Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)

    The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 169

Secondary outcomes (27)
  1. Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)

    Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287) is the key secondary endpoint.

    The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 169

  2. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 1

    FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.

    FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on the first day of randomized treatment.

  3. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 85

    FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 85 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 85.

  4. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 365

    FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 365 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 365.

  5. Trough FEV1 Response on Day 15.

    Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed

    1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 15

  6. Trough FEV1 Response on Day 43

    Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed

    1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 43.

  7. Trough FEV1 Response on Day 85

    Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed

    1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 85.

  8. Trough FEV1 Response on Day 169

    Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed

    1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 10 min pre-dose on Day 169

  9. Trough FEV1 Response on Day 365

    Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed

    1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 365

  10. FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 1

    FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.

    FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on the first day of randomized treatment.

  11. FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 85

    FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.

    FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC.Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 85 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 85.

  12. FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 169

    FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.

    FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169.

  13. FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 365

    FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.

    FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 365 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 365.

  14. Trough FVC Response on Day 15.

    Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 15

  15. Trough FVC Response on Day 43.

    Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 43

  16. Trough FVC Response on Day 85.

    Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and on day 85

  17. Trough FVC Response on Day 170.

    Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) and was calculated as the mean of the 2 FVC measurements performed at 23h and at 23h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at the clinic visit on the previous day.

    Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an MMRM including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication on Day 170

  18. Trough FVC Response on Day 365.

    Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.

    Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.

    The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.

    Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and on Day 365.

  19. FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Response in the Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)

    FEV1 AUC(0-12h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 12 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (12 h) to report in litres.

    FEV1 AUC(0-12h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-12h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h post-dose on Day 169.

  20. FEV1 AUC(0-24h) Response in the Sub-set of Patients With 12-h PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)

    FEV1 AUC(0-24h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 24 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (24 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-24h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-24h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 23 h, 23 h and 50 min post-dose on Day 169.

  21. FVC AUC(0-12h) Response in the Sub-set of Patients With 12-h PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)

    FVC AUC(0-12h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 12 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (12 h) to report in litres.

    FVC AUC(0-12h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-12h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h post-dose on Day 169.

  22. FVC AUC(0-24h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 24-h PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)

    FVC AUC(0-24h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 24 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (24 h) to report in litres.

    FVC AUC(0-24h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-24h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).

    The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.

    Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 23 h, 23 h and 50 min post-dose on Day 169.

  23. Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)

    The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 85

  24. Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)

    The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 365

  25. Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 43 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)

    Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score on Day 43 From the Two Twin Trials, present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287).

    The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 43

  26. Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)

    Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287).

    The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome.

    Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 85

  27. Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)

    Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287).

    The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 365

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Sep 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2011
  3. Primary completionSep 2013
  4. Study completionSep 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
2,624 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01431274
Sponsor's protocol ID
1237.5
Other IDs
2009-010668-40, 2009
Status last verified
Jun 2015
First submitted
8 Sep 2011
Last updated
16 Jul 2015

Publications

  • Rabe KF, Chalmers JD, Miravitlles M, Kocks JWH, Tsiligianni I, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT, Wedzicha J. Tiotropium/Olodaterol Delays Clinically Important Deterioration Compared with Tiotropium Monotherapy in Patients with Early COPD: a Post Hoc Analysis of the TONADO(R) Trials. Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):579-593. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01528-2. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

    PubMed 33175291
  • Singh D, Wedzicha JA, Siddiqui S, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Magnussen H, Miravitlles M, Chalmers JD, Calverley PMA. Blood eosinophils as a biomarker of future COPD exacerbation risk: pooled data from 11 clinical trials. Respir Res. 2020 Sep 17;21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01482-1.

    PubMed 32943047
  • Andreas S, Bothner U, de la Hoz A, Kloer I, Trampisch M, Alter P. No Influence on Cardiac Arrhythmia or Heart Rate from Long-Term Treatment with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus Monocomponents by Holter ECG Analysis in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1945-1953. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246350. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32848380
  • Andreas S, McGarvey L, Bothner U, Trampisch M, de la Hoz A, Flezar M, Buhl R, Alter P. Absence of Adverse Effects of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with the Monocomponents on Long-Term Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1935-1944. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246348. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32848379
  • Wedzicha JA, Buhl R, Singh D, Vogelmeier CF, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Anzueto A, Calverley PMA. Tiotropium/Olodaterol Decreases Exacerbation Rates Compared with Tiotropium in a Range of Patients with COPD: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R)/DYNAGITO(R) Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4266-4279. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01438-3. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

    PubMed 32776202
  • Buhl R, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT. Efficacy of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium as a First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Patients with COPD Who Are Naive to LAMA, LABA and ICS: Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4175-4189. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01411-0. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

    PubMed 32671684
  • Buhl R, Singh D, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Ferguson GT. Benefits of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium in Patients with COPD Receiving only LAMA at Baseline: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R) and OTEMTO(R) Studies. Adv Ther. 2020 Aug;37(8):3485-3499. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01373-3. Epub 2020 May 27.

    PubMed 32462607
  • Ferguson GT, Buhl R, Bothner U, Hoz A, Voss F, Anzueto A, Calverley PMA. Safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis of three large, 52-week, randomized clinical trials. Respir Med. 2018 Oct;143:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

    PubMed 30261995
  • Maltais F, Buhl R, Koch A, Amatto VC, Reid J, Gronke L, Bothner U, Voss F, McGarvey L, Ferguson GT. beta-Blockers in COPD: A Cohort Study From the TONADO Research Program. Chest. 2018 Jun;153(6):1315-1325. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

    PubMed 29355547
  • Buhl R, Magder S, Bothner U, Tetzlaff K, Voss F, Loaiza L, Vogelmeier CF, McGarvey L. Long-term general and cardiovascular safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2017 Jan;122:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

    PubMed 27993292
  • Ferguson GT, Flezar M, Korn S, Korducki L, Gronke L, Abrahams R, Buhl R. Efficacy of Tiotropium + Olodaterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Initial Disease Severity and Treatment Intensity: A Post Hoc Analysis. Adv Ther. 2015 Jun;32(6):523-36. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0218-0. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

    PubMed 26112656
  • Buhl R, Maltais F, Abrahams R, Bjermer L, Derom E, Ferguson G, Flezar M, Hebert J, McGarvey L, Pizzichini E, Reid J, Veale A, Gronke L, Hamilton A, Korducki L, Tetzlaff K, Waitere-Wijker S, Watz H, Bateman E. Tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combination versus mono-components in COPD (GOLD 2-4). Eur Respir J. 2015 Apr;45(4):969-79. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00136014. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

    PubMed 25573406

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium and olodaterol in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 239 sites in 25 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 239 sites in Japan, United States, China, Argentina, Germany and 20 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jul 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Response on Day 169. (time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01431274, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in