Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 3NCT01431274
Tiotropium+Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Versus Tiotropium and Olodaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Phase 3 study testing tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium and olodaterol in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 239 sites in 25 countries.
Trial summary
The overall objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 52 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) compared with the individual components ( tiotropium, olodaterol) (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) in patients with Chronic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium and olodaterol
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,624 participants
- Where
- 239 sitesin 25 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2011to Sep 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Relatively stable airway obstruction with post FEV1< 80% predicted normal and post FEV1/FVC <70%.
- Male or female patients, 40 years of age or older.
- Smoking history of more than 10 pack years.
Who cannot join
- Significant disease other than COPD
- Clinically relevant abnormal lab values.
- History of asthma.
- Diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis
- Diagnosis of paroxysmal tachycardia
- History of myocardial infarction within 1 year of screening visit
Show all 24Show fewer
- Unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia.
- Hospitalization for heart failure within the past year.
- Known active tuberculosis.
- Malignancy for which patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within last five years
- History of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction.
- History of cystic fibrosis.
- Clinically evident bronchiectasis.
- History of significant alcohol or drug abuse.
- Thoracotomy with pulmonary resection
- Oral ß-adrenergics.
- Oral corticosteroid medication at unstable doses
- Regular use of daytime oxygen therapy for more than one hour per day
- Pulmonary rehabilitation program in the six weeks prior to the screening visit
- Investigational drug within one month or six half lives (whichever is greater) prior to screening visit
- Known hypersensitivity to ß-adrenergic drugs, anticholinergics, BAC, EDTA
- Pregnant or nursing women.
- Women of childbearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control
- Patients who are unable to comply with pulmonary medication restrictions
Trial locations and contacts
239 sites in 25 countries.
239 sites in 25 countries
Japan45 sites
1237.5.81003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi
1237.5.81001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Asahikawa, Hokkaido
1237.5.81006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo
1237.5.81044 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto
1237.5.81035 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gifu, Gifu
1237.5.81017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hakata-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka
1237.5.81031 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hamamatsushi, Shizuoka
1237.5.81014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Himeji, Hyogo
1237.5.81037 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ikoma, Nara
1237.5.81024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki
1237.5.81008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Itabashi-ku, Tokyo
1237.5.81016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka
1237.5.81021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kagoshima, Kagoshima
1237.5.81020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kagoshima, Kagoshima,
1237.5.81005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kamogawa, Chiba
1237.5.81011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kishiwada, Osaka
1237.5.81018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kitakyusyu,Fukuoka
1237.5.81042 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Koga, Fukuoka
1237.5.81032 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Komaki, Aichi
1237.5.81033 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Komaki, Aichi
1237.5.81019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Koshi, Kumamoto
1237.5.81027 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Koto-ku, Tokyo
1237.5.81025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kuki, Saitama
1237.5.81038 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kure, Hiroshima
1237.5.81015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kurume, Fukuoka
1237.5.81029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Matsumoto, Nagano
1237.5.81030 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Matsumoto, Nagano
1237.5.81010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Matsusaka, Mie
1237.5.81041 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Minami-ku. Fukuoka, Fukuoka
1237.5.81002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Morioka, Iwate
1237.5.81034 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nagoya, Aichi
1237.5.81036 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nagoya, Aichi
1237.5.81004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Naka-gun, Ibaraki
1237.5.81022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Okinawa, Urasoe
1237.5.81023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Okinawa, Urasoe
1237.5.81012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sayama, Osaka
1237.5.81045 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sendai, Miyagi
1237.5.81009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seto, Aichi
1237.5.81026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shinagawa, Tokyo
1237.5.81007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo
1237.5.81039 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Takamatsu, Kagawa
1237.5.81040 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Takamatsu, Kagawa
1237.5.81013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wakayama, Wakayama
1237.5.81043 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yanagawa-shi, Fukuoka,
1237.5.81028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yokohama, Kanagawa
United States35 sites
1237.5.01017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Biddeford, Maine
1237.5.01015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Boulder, Colorado
1237.5.01032 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Charleston, Pennsylvania
1237.5.01006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio
1237.5.01003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Clearwater, Florida
1237.5.01010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Clearwater, Florida
1237.5.01028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Columbia, Maryland
1237.5.01040 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio
1237.5.01039 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Dayton, Ohio
1237.5.01021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Easley, South Carolina
1237.5.01029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Fort Worth, Texas
1237.5.01012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gaffney, South Carolina
1237.5.01038 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jasper, Alabama
1237.5.01005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Johnston, Rhode Island
1237.5.01025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Larchmont, New York
1237.5.01013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Livonia, Michigan
1237.5.01026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lynchburg, Virginia
1237.5.01036 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mobile, Alabama
1237.5.01001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Morgantown, West Virginia
1237.5.01031 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
O'Fallon, Illinois
1237.5.01009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
1237.5.01019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska
1237.5.01035 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Opelousas, Louisiana
1237.5.01027 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Panama City, Florida
1237.5.01023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Raleigh, North Carolina
1237.5.01008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rochester, New York
1237.5.01002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas
1237.5.01004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shreveport, Louisiana
1237.5.01014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Spartanburg, South Carolina
1237.5.01007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Spokane, Washington
1237.5.01034 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Stamford, Connecticut
1237.5.01016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tabor City, North Carolina
1237.5.01033 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington
1237.5.01037 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toledo, Ohio
1237.5.01024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado
China16 sites
1237.5.86003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Beijing
1237.5.86004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Beijing
1237.5.86011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Changsha
1237.5.86012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Changsha
1237.5.86014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Foshan
1237.5.86001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guangzhou
1237.5.86015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nanning
1237.5.86002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shanghai
1237.5.86005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shanghai
1237.5.86006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shanghai
1237.5.86007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shanghai
1237.5.86009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shenyang
1237.5.86016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wuhan
1237.5.86010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Xi'an
1237.5.86008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yangzhou
1237.5.86017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yinchuan
Argentina13 sites
1237.5.54010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Buenos Aires
1237.5.54013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Caba
1237.5.54016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Caba
1237.5.54003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Capital Federal
1237.5.54002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cuidad Autonoma de Buenos Airess A
1237.5.54006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mar del Plata
1237.5.54007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mar del Plata
1237.5.54009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mendoza
1237.5.54012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Monte Grande
1237.5.54008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Quilmes
1237.5.54005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rosario
1237.5.54004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
San Miguel de Tucuma
1237.5.54011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
San Miguel de Tucumán
Germany13 sites
1237.5.49006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bamberg
1237.5.49002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1237.5.49003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1237.5.49013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1237.5.49011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Erfurt
1237.5.49005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hamburg
1237.5.49010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hamburg
1237.5.49009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Koblenz
1237.5.49014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Neu-Isenburg
1237.5.49012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Oschersleben
1237.5.49001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rüdersdorf
1237.5.49004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Weinheim
1237.5.49008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wiesloch
Canada10 sites
1237.5.02005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Burlington, Ontario
1237.5.02002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Calgary, Alberta
1237.5.02007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Grimsby, Ontario
1237.5.02011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ottawa, Ontario
1237.5.02003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Québec, Quebec
1237.5.02006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Québec, Quebec
1237.5.02009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
1237.5.02008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sherbrooke, Quebec
1237.5.02001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Vancouver, British Columbia
1237.5.02004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Denmark10 sites
1237.5.45002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Aalborg
1237.5.45009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hvidovre
1237.5.45001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
København NV
1237.5.45007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kolding
1237.5.45011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Næstved
1237.5.45006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Odense C
1237.5.45008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Roskilde
1237.5.45003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Silkeborg
1237.5.45005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sønderborg
1237.5.45004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Vaerløse
Netherlands10 sites
1237.5.31004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Almelo
1237.5.31006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Breda
1237.5.31001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Eindhoven
1237.5.31008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Harderwijk
1237.5.31007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Heerlen
1237.5.31010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hengelo
1237.5.31009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hoorn
1237.5.31005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nieuwegein
1237.5.31002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Veldhoven
1237.5.31003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Zutphen
India9 sites
1237.5.91010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ahmedabad
1237.5.91002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bangalore
1237.5.91007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bangalore
1237.5.91004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Coimbatore
1237.5.91011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hyderabad
1237.5.91001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jaipur
1237.5.91008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jaipur
1237.5.91009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mysore
1237.5.91006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pune
South Korea8 sites
1237.5.82004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bucheon-si
1237.5.82008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Daegu
1237.5.82001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seoul
1237.5.82002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seoul
1237.5.82003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seoul
1237.5.82007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seoul
1237.5.82005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Suwon
1237.5.82006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wŏnju
Bulgaria7 sites
1237.5.35905 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Plovdiv
1237.5.35901 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rousse
1237.5.35906 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shumen
1237.5.35902 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sofia
1237.5.35904 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sofia
1237.5.35903 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Troyan Municipality
1237.5.35908 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Veliko Tarnovo
France7 sites
1237.5.33004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Béthune
1237.5.33007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Montpellier
1237.5.33005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nantes
1237.5.33006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nîmes
1237.5.33008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Perpignan
1237.5.33001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint-Pierre
1237.5.33002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Strasbourg
Guatemala7 sites
1237.5.50201 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guatemala City
1237.5.50202 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guatemala City
1237.5.50203 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guatemala City
1237.5.50204 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guatemala City
1237.5.50205 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guatemala City
1237.5.50206 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guatemala City
1237.5.50207 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guatemala City
Portugal7 sites
1237.5.35105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Amadora
1237.5.35101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Coimbra
1237.5.35102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lisbon
1237.5.35104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lisbon
1237.5.35103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Porto
1237.5.35106 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Vila Nova de Gaia
1237.5.35107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Viseu
Italy6 sites
1237.5.39008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cagliari
1237.5.39002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Genova
1237.5.39006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Montescano (PV)
1237.5.39009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Monza
1237.5.39004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Parma
1237.5.39001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pisa
Czechia5 sites
1237.5.42004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Beroun
1237.5.42002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cvikov
1237.5.42001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Prague
1237.5.42005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rokycany
1237.5.42003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Znojmo
Hungary5 sites
1237.5.36005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Debrecen
1237.5.36001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Deszk
1237.5.36006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kapuvár
1237.5.36003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Szombathely
1237.5.36002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Törökbálint
Russia5 sites
1237.5.07001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gatchina (Leningradskaya Oblast)
1237.5.07003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kazan'
1237.5.07004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
1237.5.07005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
1237.5.07002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
1237.5.90003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Istanbul
1237.5.90004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Istanbul
1237.5.90002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Izmir
1237.5.90005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
İzmit
1237.5.90001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mersin
Mexico4 sites
1237.5.52002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hermosillo
1237.5.52003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
México
1237.5.52007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Monterrey
1237.5.52001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tijuana
Australia3 sites
1237.5.61004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Frankston, Victoria
1237.5.61001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toorak Gardens, South Australia
1237.5.61002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Woodville, South Australia
Finland3 sites
1237.5.35801 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Helsinki
1237.5.35804 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pori
1237.5.35802 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Turku
Estonia2 sites
1237.5.37002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tallinn
1237.5.37001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tartu
New Zealand2 sites
1237.5.64002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Dunedin
1237.5.64001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Greenlane East Auckland NZ
Slovenia2 sites
1237.5.38601 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Golnik
1237.5.38602 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Golnik
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) Compared With the Individual Components (2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium, 5 µg Olodaterol) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). [TOnado TM 1]
The overall objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 52 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) compared with the individual components ( tiotropium, olodaterol) (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Being tested
- tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium, olodaterol, Respimat
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tiotropium + olodaterolDrug
fixed dose combination
tiotropiumDrug
low dose
olodaterolDrug
one dose only
tiotropiumDrug
high dose
tiotropium + olodaterolDrug
fixed dose combination
RespimatDevice
Respimat inhaler
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropium+olodaterol low dose FDC | Experimental | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: tiotropium + olodaterol; Device: Respimat |
| tiotropium+olodaterol high dose FDC | Experimental | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: tiotropium + olodaterol; Device: Respimat |
| olodaterol | Active comparator | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: olodaterol; Device: Respimat |
| tiotropium low dose | Active comparator | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: tiotropium; Device: Respimat |
| tiotropium high dose | Active comparator | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: tiotropium; Device: Respimat |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Response on Day 169.
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the MMRM model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169.
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 170.
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) and was calculated as the mean of the 2 FEV1 measurements performed at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at the clinic visit on the previous day.
Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an MMRM including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication on Day 170
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 169
Secondary outcomes (27)
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287) is the key secondary endpoint.
The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 169
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 1
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on the first day of randomized treatment.
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 85
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 85 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 85.
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 365
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 365 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 365.
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 15.
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed
1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 15
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 43
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed
1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 43.
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 85
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed
1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 85.
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 169
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed
1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 10 min pre-dose on Day 169
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 365
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed
1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose of randomised treatment at Day1.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 365
FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 1
FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.
FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on the first day of randomized treatment.
FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 85
FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.
FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC.Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 85 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 85.
FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 169
FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.
FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169.
FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 365
FVC AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres.
FVC AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 365 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 365.
Trough FVC Response on Day 15.
Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 15
Trough FVC Response on Day 43.
Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 43
Trough FVC Response on Day 85.
Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and on day 85
Trough FVC Response on Day 170.
Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) and was calculated as the mean of the 2 FVC measurements performed at 23h and at 23h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at the clinic visit on the previous day.
Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an MMRM including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication on Day 170
Trough FVC Response on Day 365.
Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours), calculated as the mean of the pre-dose measurements.
Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and on Day 365.
FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Response in the Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
FEV1 AUC(0-12h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 12 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (12 h) to report in litres.
FEV1 AUC(0-12h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-12h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h post-dose on Day 169.
FEV1 AUC(0-24h) Response in the Sub-set of Patients With 12-h PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
FEV1 AUC(0-24h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 24 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (24 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-24h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-24h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 23 h, 23 h and 50 min post-dose on Day 169.
FVC AUC(0-12h) Response in the Sub-set of Patients With 12-h PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
FVC AUC(0-12h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 12 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (12 h) to report in litres.
FVC AUC(0-12h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-12h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h post-dose on Day 169.
FVC AUC(0-24h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 24-h PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
FVC AUC(0-24h) was calculated as the area under the FVC- time curve from 0 to 24 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (24 h) to report in litres.
FVC AUC(0-24h) response was defined as FVC AUC(0-24h) minus baseline FVC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1).
The adjusted mean (SE) were obtained from fitting an ANCOVA model with categorical effect of treatment and baseline as covariate.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the ANCOVA model in each treatment group.
Measured: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 23 h, 23 h and 50 min post-dose on Day 169.
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 85
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 365
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 43 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score on Day 43 From the Two Twin Trials, present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287).
The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 43
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287).
The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome.
Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 85
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287).
The Mahler Dyspnoea questionnaire is an instrument which measures change from the baseline state The TDI focal score was used to measure the effect of Tio+Olo FDC on patients' dyspnoea after 24 weeks of treatment (Day 169). The focal score is the sum of the subscale scores for Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Effort and Magnitude of Task. Scores for each subscale range from -3 to 3 so that the Focal score ranges from -9 to 9. For all subscale scores and the Focal score a higher value indicates a better outcome. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
Measured: Day 365
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2011
- Primary completionSep 2013
- Study completionSep 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 2,624 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Study chair, Boehringer Ingelheim
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01431274
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1237.5
- Other IDs
- 2009-010668-40, 2009
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2011
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Rabe KF, Chalmers JD, Miravitlles M, Kocks JWH, Tsiligianni I, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT, Wedzicha J. Tiotropium/Olodaterol Delays Clinically Important Deterioration Compared with Tiotropium Monotherapy in Patients with Early COPD: a Post Hoc Analysis of the TONADO(R) Trials. Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):579-593. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01528-2. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
PubMed 33175291Singh D, Wedzicha JA, Siddiqui S, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Magnussen H, Miravitlles M, Chalmers JD, Calverley PMA. Blood eosinophils as a biomarker of future COPD exacerbation risk: pooled data from 11 clinical trials. Respir Res. 2020 Sep 17;21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01482-1.
PubMed 32943047Andreas S, Bothner U, de la Hoz A, Kloer I, Trampisch M, Alter P. No Influence on Cardiac Arrhythmia or Heart Rate from Long-Term Treatment with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus Monocomponents by Holter ECG Analysis in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1945-1953. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246350. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32848380Andreas S, McGarvey L, Bothner U, Trampisch M, de la Hoz A, Flezar M, Buhl R, Alter P. Absence of Adverse Effects of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with the Monocomponents on Long-Term Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1935-1944. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246348. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32848379Wedzicha JA, Buhl R, Singh D, Vogelmeier CF, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Anzueto A, Calverley PMA. Tiotropium/Olodaterol Decreases Exacerbation Rates Compared with Tiotropium in a Range of Patients with COPD: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R)/DYNAGITO(R) Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4266-4279. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01438-3. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
PubMed 32776202Buhl R, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT. Efficacy of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium as a First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Patients with COPD Who Are Naive to LAMA, LABA and ICS: Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4175-4189. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01411-0. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
PubMed 32671684Buhl R, Singh D, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Ferguson GT. Benefits of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium in Patients with COPD Receiving only LAMA at Baseline: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R) and OTEMTO(R) Studies. Adv Ther. 2020 Aug;37(8):3485-3499. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01373-3. Epub 2020 May 27.
PubMed 32462607Ferguson GT, Buhl R, Bothner U, Hoz A, Voss F, Anzueto A, Calverley PMA. Safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis of three large, 52-week, randomized clinical trials. Respir Med. 2018 Oct;143:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
PubMed 30261995Maltais F, Buhl R, Koch A, Amatto VC, Reid J, Gronke L, Bothner U, Voss F, McGarvey L, Ferguson GT. beta-Blockers in COPD: A Cohort Study From the TONADO Research Program. Chest. 2018 Jun;153(6):1315-1325. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
PubMed 29355547Buhl R, Magder S, Bothner U, Tetzlaff K, Voss F, Loaiza L, Vogelmeier CF, McGarvey L. Long-term general and cardiovascular safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2017 Jan;122:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
PubMed 27993292Ferguson GT, Flezar M, Korn S, Korducki L, Gronke L, Abrahams R, Buhl R. Efficacy of Tiotropium + Olodaterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Initial Disease Severity and Treatment Intensity: A Post Hoc Analysis. Adv Ther. 2015 Jun;32(6):523-36. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0218-0. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
PubMed 26112656Buhl R, Maltais F, Abrahams R, Bjermer L, Derom E, Ferguson G, Flezar M, Hebert J, McGarvey L, Pizzichini E, Reid J, Veale A, Gronke L, Hamilton A, Korducki L, Tetzlaff K, Waitere-Wijker S, Watz H, Bateman E. Tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combination versus mono-components in COPD (GOLD 2-4). Eur Respir J. 2015 Apr;45(4):969-79. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00136014. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
PubMed 25573406
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) Compared With the Individual Components (2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium, 5 µg Olodaterol) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). [TOnado TM 1]
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01431274
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1237.5
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,624 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2011
- Primary completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Jul 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 52 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) compared with the individual components ( tiotropium, olodaterol) (delivered by the RESPIMAT Inhaler) in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropium+olodaterol low dose FDC | Experimental | Drug: tiotropium + olodaterol, Device: RespimatOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| tiotropium+olodaterol high dose FDC | Experimental | Drug: tiotropium + olodaterol, Device: RespimatOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| olodaterol | Active comparator | Drug: olodaterol, Device: RespimatOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| tiotropium low dose | Active comparator | Drug: tiotropium, Device: RespimatOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| tiotropium high dose | Active comparator | Drug: tiotropium, Device: RespimatOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Relatively stable airway obstruction with post FEV1< 80% predicted normal and post FEV1/FVC <70%.
- Male or female patients, 40 years of age or older.
- Smoking history of more than 10 pack years.
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Significant disease other than COPD
- Clinically relevant abnormal lab values.
- History of asthma.
- Diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis
- Diagnosis of paroxysmal tachycardia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropium + olodaterolfixed dose combination | Drug | tiotropium+olodaterol low dose FDC |
| tiotropiumlow dose | Drug | tiotropium low dose |
| olodaterolone dose only | Drug | olodaterol |
| tiotropiumhigh dose | Drug | tiotropium high dose |
| tiotropium + olodaterolfixed dose combination | Drug | tiotropium+olodaterol high dose FDC |
| RespimatRespimat inhaler | Device | olodaterol, tiotropium high dose, tiotropium low dose, tiotropium+olodaterol high dose FDC, tiotropium+olodaterol low dose FDC |
Primary outcome
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Response on Day 169.
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169.
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) was calculated as the area under the FEV1- time curve from 0 to 3 h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3 h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC(0-3h) response was defined as FEV1 AUC(0-3h) minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1). The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an Mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the MMRM model in each treatment group.
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 170.
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication on Day 170
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) and was calculated as the mean of the 2 FEV1 measurements performed at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at the clinic visit on the previous day. Trough FEV1 response was defined as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. Baseline was defined as the mean of the 2 pre-dose measurements performed 1 h and 10 min prior to administration of the first dose at visit 2 (day 1). The adjusted means (SE) were obtained from fitting an MMRM including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment-by-test day interaction, baseline and baseline-by-test day interaction, patient as random effect, and spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation for denominator degrees of freedom. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures (MMRM) model in each treatment group.
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Time frame: Day 169
The SGRQ is designed to measure health impairment in patients with COPD. It is divided into 2 parts: part 1 produces the symptoms score, and part 2 the activity and impacts scores. A total score is also produced. Each subscale score is the sum of the weights for the items in the subscale as a percent of the sum of the weights for a patient in the worst possible condition. The total score uses the same calculation except that the weights are summed over the entire questionnaire. The individual subscales as well as the total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status. Number of participants analyzed are the number of patients contributing to the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) in each treatment group.
27 secondary outcomes
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Time frame: Day 169
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 1
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on the first day of randomized treatment.
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 85
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 85 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 85.
FEV1 AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 365
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 365 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 365.
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 15.
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 15
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 43
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 43.
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 85
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 85.
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 169
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 10 min pre-dose on Day 169
Trough FEV1 Response on Day 365
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 10 min pre-dose on day 365
FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 1
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on the first day of randomized treatment.
FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 85
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 85 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 85.
FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 169
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169.
FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) AUC(0-3h) Response on Day 365
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 365 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 365.
Trough FVC Response on Day 15.
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 15
Trough FVC Response on Day 43.
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 10 min pre-dose on day 43
Trough FVC Response on Day 85.
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and on day 85
Trough FVC Response on Day 170.
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and at 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication on Day 170
Trough FVC Response on Day 365.
Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and on Day 365.
FEV1 AUC(0-12h) Response in the Sub-set of Patients With 12-hour Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h post-dose on Day 169.
FEV1 AUC(0-24h) Response in the Sub-set of Patients With 12-h PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 23 h, 23 h and 50 min post-dose on Day 169.
FVC AUC(0-12h) Response in the Sub-set of Patients With 12-h PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h post-dose on Day 169.
FVC AUC(0-24h) Response in Sub-set of Patients With 24-h PFTs on Day 169 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 23 h, 23 h and 50 min post-dose on Day 169.
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Time frame: Day 85
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Time frame: Day 365
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 43 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Time frame: Day 43
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 85 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Time frame: Day 85
Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) Focal Score on Day 365 From the Two Twin Trials, Present 1237.5 (NCT01431274) and 1237.6 (NCT01431287)
Time frame: Day 365
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33175291Rabe KF, Chalmers JD, Miravitlles M, Kocks JWH, Tsiligianni I, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT, Wedzicha J. Tiotropium/Olodaterol Delays Clinically Important Deterioration Compared with Tiotropium Monotherapy in Patients with Early COPD: a Post Hoc Analysis of the TONADO(R) Trials. Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):579-593. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01528-2. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32943047Singh D, Wedzicha JA, Siddiqui S, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Magnussen H, Miravitlles M, Chalmers JD, Calverley PMA. Blood eosinophils as a biomarker of future COPD exacerbation risk: pooled data from 11 clinical trials. Respir Res. 2020 Sep 17;21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01482-1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32848380Andreas S, Bothner U, de la Hoz A, Kloer I, Trampisch M, Alter P. No Influence on Cardiac Arrhythmia or Heart Rate from Long-Term Treatment with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus Monocomponents by Holter ECG Analysis in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1945-1953. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246350. eCollection 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32848379Andreas S, McGarvey L, Bothner U, Trampisch M, de la Hoz A, Flezar M, Buhl R, Alter P. Absence of Adverse Effects of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with the Monocomponents on Long-Term Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1935-1944. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246348. eCollection 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32776202Wedzicha JA, Buhl R, Singh D, Vogelmeier CF, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Anzueto A, Calverley PMA. Tiotropium/Olodaterol Decreases Exacerbation Rates Compared with Tiotropium in a Range of Patients with COPD: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R)/DYNAGITO(R) Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4266-4279. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01438-3. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32671684Buhl R, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT. Efficacy of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium as a First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Patients with COPD Who Are Naive to LAMA, LABA and ICS: Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4175-4189. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01411-0. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32462607Buhl R, Singh D, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Ferguson GT. Benefits of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium in Patients with COPD Receiving only LAMA at Baseline: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R) and OTEMTO(R) Studies. Adv Ther. 2020 Aug;37(8):3485-3499. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01373-3. Epub 2020 May 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30261995Ferguson GT, Buhl R, Bothner U, Hoz A, Voss F, Anzueto A, Calverley PMA. Safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis of three large, 52-week, randomized clinical trials. Respir Med. 2018 Oct;143:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29355547Maltais F, Buhl R, Koch A, Amatto VC, Reid J, Gronke L, Bothner U, Voss F, McGarvey L, Ferguson GT. beta-Blockers in COPD: A Cohort Study From the TONADO Research Program. Chest. 2018 Jun;153(6):1315-1325. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27993292Buhl R, Magder S, Bothner U, Tetzlaff K, Voss F, Loaiza L, Vogelmeier CF, McGarvey L. Long-term general and cardiovascular safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2017 Jan;122:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26112656Ferguson GT, Flezar M, Korn S, Korducki L, Gronke L, Abrahams R, Buhl R. Efficacy of Tiotropium + Olodaterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Initial Disease Severity and Treatment Intensity: A Post Hoc Analysis. Adv Ther. 2015 Jun;32(6):523-36. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0218-0. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25573406Buhl R, Maltais F, Abrahams R, Bjermer L, Derom E, Ferguson G, Flezar M, Hebert J, McGarvey L, Pizzichini E, Reid J, Veale A, Gronke L, Hamilton A, Korducki L, Tetzlaff K, Waitere-Wijker S, Watz H, Bateman E. Tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combination versus mono-components in COPD (GOLD 2-4). Eur Respir J. 2015 Apr;45(4):969-79. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00136014. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boehringer Ingelheim study chair
Boehringer Ingelheim
239 sites in 25 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing tiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium and olodaterol in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 239 sites in 25 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 239 sites in Japan, United States, China, Argentina, Germany and 20 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jul 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-3h) Response on Day 169. (time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose to on the first day of randomized treatment and on Day 169 and 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h post-dose on Day 169.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01431274, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2015.