AzTrials
AzTrials

Post-operative InfectionsNCT01426217

Reduction in IV Associated Contamination

A study testing Passive Bundle PSI (Problem Solving Innovations) Medical HubScrub, PSI Medical DocIt in people with Post-operative Infections, run by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether implementing a novel syringe and IV stopcock cap system impregnated with alcohol will reduce IV catheter bacterial contamination and infections in patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Post-operative Infections
What is being tested?
Passive Bundle PSI (Problem Solving Innovations) Medical HubScrub, PSI Medical DocIt
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
594 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2011to Nov 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patient undergoing surgery or procedure in operating room
  • Undergoing general anesthesia

Who cannot join

  • Children (age < 18 years)
  • Lack of intravenous access
  • failure of anesthesia provider to complete training on experimental device

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

    Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Reduction in Intraoperative Lumen Contamination of Standard 3-Way Open Lumen Stopcock Sets Through Use of a Novel, Passive Bundle

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether implementing a novel syringe and IV stopcock cap system impregnated with alcohol will reduce IV catheter bacterial contamination and infections in patients.

Read the detailed description

Bacterial contamination of patient intravenous stopcock sets is a common intraoperative event associated with increased patient mortality, possibly via an infectious mechanism. The most common type of intravenous tubing used in operating rooms is the open lumen stopcock set which lacks a barrier between the environment and intraluminal space, and thus the intravascular space of the patient. The stopcock connector can be easily contaminated by provider hands due to improper handling of the device and/or contaminated by soiled syringe tips subsequently connected to the device. Further, the stopcock connector is often left uncapped by the provider and directly exposed to the environment. Thus, common breaches in intraoperative aseptic practice of healthcare providers can lead to bacterial contamination of the endoluminal space of the open lumen device. The primary aim of the current study is to assess the efficacy of a passive bundle designed to decrease intravenous stopcock and tubing intraluminal bacterial contamination. This passive bundle includes two novel interventions, a DOCit station and HubScrub caps. The HubScrub is designed to clean the needleless connectors and open lumen stopcock systems. The DOCit station is designed to simultaneously clean the interior and exterior of needle-less luer connectors of syringes with isopropyl alcohol while also providing a method of storage and organization of multiple syringes. The investigators hypothesize that the application of this passive bundle to the standard open lumen system commonly employed by anesthesia providers in the operating room will significantly reduce bacterial contamination of standard 3-way open lumen stopcock sets and improve patient safety.

Being tested
Passive Bundle PSI (Problem Solving Innovations) Medical HubScrub, PSI Medical DocIt
Keywords
IV contamination, intravenous contamination, stopcock contamination, surgical site infection
Medical subject headings
Surgical Wound Infection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Passive Bundle PSI (Problem Solving Innovations) Medical HubScrub, PSI Medical DocItDevice

    Also called PSI Medical HubScrub, PSI Medical DocIt

    Implementation of passive bundle which includes HubScrub and DocIt device into the operating room environment.

Study groups in NCT01426217
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionControl arm using standard of care operating room procedures and equipment
Problem Solving Innovations (PSI) ExperimentalExperimentalImplementation of the passive bundle including HubScrub and DocIt
Receives: Device: Passive Bundle PSI (Problem Solving Innovations) Medical HubScrub, PSI Medical DocIt

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Presence of Bacterial IV Stopcock Lumen Contamination

    The presence of bacteria in the stopcock lumen was assessed by analyzing swab cultures of the lumens. Each swab potentially containing bacteria from any of the 3 lumens of the stopcock sets were analyzed

    Measured: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Presence of Positive Bacterial Culture in IV Stopcock Due to Effluent Contamination

    Open lumen ports were removed from the patient; sent directly to the anesthesiology microbiology laboratory; connected by the same clinical laboratory scientist to sterile catheters using sterile, aseptic technique; and injected directly into a BacT/Alert 3D system (bioMérieux Inc., Durham, NC) with 2 mL of sterile saline per port. BacT/Alert is a blood culture system that automatically monitors bacterial growth using colorimetry; a sensor inserted at the bottom of the bottle changes color on detecting the carbon dioxide produced by the growth of the bacteria. Catheters were then removed, and the bottles were directly incubated in the BacT/Alert system for 5 days or until positive. Once positive, the liquid in the bottle was examined to identify the organism.

    Measured: Until positive, up to 5 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Aug 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2011
  3. Primary completionNov 2011
  4. Study completionNov 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
594 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01426217
Sponsor's protocol ID
22743
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
29 Aug 2011
Last updated
18 Oct 2018
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Loftus RW, Muffly MK, Brown JR, Beach ML, Koff MD, Corwin HL, Surgenor SD, Kirkland KB, Yeager MP. Hand contamination of anesthesia providers is an important risk factor for intraoperative bacterial transmission. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):98-105. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e7ce18. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

    PubMed 20686007
  • Koff MD, Loftus RW, Burchman CC, Schwartzman JD, Read ME, Henry ES, Beach ML. Reduction in intraoperative bacterial contamination of peripheral intravenous tubing through the use of a novel device. Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):978-85. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a06ec3.

    PubMed 19352154
  • Loftus RW, Koff MD, Burchman CC, Schwartzman JD, Thorum V, Read ME, Wood TA, Beach ML. Transmission of pathogenic bacterial organisms in the anesthesia work area. Anesthesiology. 2008 Sep;109(3):399-407. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318182c855.

    PubMed 18719437
  • Loftus RW, Brindeiro BS, Kispert DP, Patel HM, Koff MD, Jensen JT, Dodds TM, Yeager MP, Ruoff KL, Gallagher JD, Beach ML, Brown JR. Reduction in intraoperative bacterial contamination of peripheral intravenous tubing through the use of a passive catheter care system. Anesth Analg. 2012 Dec;115(6):1315-23. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826d2aa4. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

    PubMed 23144441

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Passive Bundle PSI (Problem Solving Innovations) Medical HubScrub, PSI Medical DocIt in people with Post-operative Infections, run by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Oct 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Presence of Bacterial IV Stopcock Lumen Contamination (time frame: 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01426217, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in