AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 2REMEDEE-OCTNCT01405287

Study of Vascular Healing With the Combo Stent Versus the Everolimus Eluting Stent in ACS Patients by Means of OCT

A Phase 2 study testing PTCA with stent placement in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Atherosclerosis, run by OrbusNeich at 6 sites in 5 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

OBJECTIVE It is the objective of the REMEDEE OCT study to assess vascular healing after deployment of the Abluminal Sirolimus Coated Bio-Engineered Stent (Combo Bio-Engineered Sirolimus Eluting Stent) in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) with single de novo native coronary artery lesions ranging in diameter… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
PTCA with stent placement
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
6 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
Oct 2011to Jan 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age ≥18 and ≤ 80 years
  • ST or Non-ST-segment elevation MI (assumed to be a type 1)
  • Acceptable CABG candidate
  • Patient willing to comply with specified follow-up
  • Patient or legally authorized representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has been provided written informed consent
  • Single de novo or non-stented restenotic lesion in a native coronary artery
  • Patients with 2-vessel coronary disease, may have undergone successful treatment (<20% diameter stenosis by visual estimate) of the non-target vessel with approved devices up to and including the index procedure but must be prior to the index target vessel treatment. Any non-target vessel or lesion intended to be treated during the index procedure or follow-up, cannot be an unprotected left main, ostial lesion, chronic total occlusion, heavily calcified, bifurcation, vein grafts, be anything requiring atherectomy, thrombectomy, or pre-treatment with anything other than balloon angioplasty; 8. Target lesion (maximum length is 20 mm by visual estimate) to be covered by a single stent of max 23 mm (stent coverage incl at least 3 mm of healthy vessel is recommended). The lesion length to be measured after pre-dilation 9. Reference vessel diameter ≥2.5 to ≤ 3.5 mm by visual estimate 10. The vessel diameter should be measured after pre-dilation procedure and after intra-coronary nitroglycerin if spasm is suspected 11. Target lesion ≥50% and <100% stenosed by visual estimate

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure. Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test done within 7 days prior to the index procedure per site standard test
  • Impaired renal function or on dialysis
  • Platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3 or a WBC<3,000 cells/mm3
  • Patient has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or patients in whom anti-platelet and/or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated
  • Patient requires low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment postprocedure or has received a dose of LMWH ≤8 hours prior to index procedure
  • Patient has received any organ transplant or is on a waiting list for any organ transplant;
Show all 26Show fewer
  • Patient has other medical illness or known history of substance abuse that may cause non-compliance with the protocol, confound the data interpretation or is associated with a limited life expectancy (<1 year)
  • Patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin/bivalirudin, clopidogrel/ticlopidine, prasugrel, stainless steel alloy, sirolimus and/or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated
  • Patient has previously received murine therapeutic antibodies and exhibited sensitization through the production of Human Anti-Murine Antibodies
  • Patient presents with cardiogenic shock
  • Patient has extensive peripheral vascular disease that precludes safe 6 French sheath insertion;
  • Any significant medical condition which in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with the patient's optimal participation in the study
  • Currently participating in another investigational drug or device study or patient in inclusion in another investigational drug or device study during follow-up
  • Unprotected left main coronary artery disease with ≥50% stenosis
  • Ostial target lesion(s)
  • Totally occluded target vessel (TIMI flow 0)
  • Calcified target lesion(s) which cannot be successfully predilated
  • Target lesion has excessive tortuosity unsuitable for stent delivery and deployment;
  • Target lesion involving bifurcation with a side branch ≥2.0 mm in diameter (either stenosis of both main vessel and major side branch or stenosis of just major side branch) that would require intervention of diseased side branch
  • A significant (>50%) stenosis proximal or distal to the target lesion that cannot be covered by same single stent
  • Diffuse distal disease to target lesion with impaired runoff
  • Pre-treatment with devices other than balloon angioplasty
  • Prior stent within 10 mm of target lesion
  • Intervention (PCI or bypass) of any lesion in the target vessel performed within the previous 6 months
  • Intervention (PCI or bypass) of another lesion in a non-target vessel performed within 30 days prior to the index
  • Planned intervention of another lesion (target vessel or non-target vessel) within 30 days.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 5 countries.

6 sites in 5 countries

Belgium2 sites
  • OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst

    Aalst, 9300

  • AZ Middelheim

    Antwerp, 2020

Other trials in Belgium

Finland1 site
  • Satakunta Central Hospital

    Pori, 28500

Other trials in Finland

Netherlands1 site
  • Academisch Medisch Centrum

    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ

Other trials in Netherlands

Switzerland1 site
  • University Hospital Zurich

    Zurich, 8032

Other trials in Switzerland

United Kingdom1 site
  • King's College Hospital

    London, SE5 9RS

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Vascular Healing After Deployment of the Abluminal Sirolimus Coated Bio-Engineered (Combo) Stent Versus the Everolimus Eluting Stent in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome by Means of OCT

OBJECTIVE It is the objective of the REMEDEE OCT study to assess vascular healing after deployment of the Abluminal Sirolimus Coated Bio-Engineered Stent (Combo Bio-Engineered Sirolimus Eluting Stent) in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) with single de novo native coronary artery lesions ranging in diameter from ≥2.5 mm to ≤3.5 mm and ≤ 20 mm in length.

STUDY DESIGN The REMEDEE OCT study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized study designed to enroll 60 patients with ACS who will be randomized 1:1 to be treated with the Combo stent versus the commercially available everolimus eluting stent (Xience V or Promus). Patients will receive Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and Quatitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) follow-up imaging at 60 days post procedure. Clinical follow-up is scheduled at 30, 60, 180, 360 and 540 days. Furthermore, QCA and OCT will also be performed at baseline in all participants of the study.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND The implantation of bare-metal stents (BMS) has significantly reduced clinical and angiographic restenosis compared to balloon angioplasty alone after PCI due to eliminating elastic recoil and reducing arterial remodeling. However, in-stent restenosis still occurred frequently after BMS implantation in 20% to 40% of patients due to neointimal proliferation. The development, clinical validation and widespread use of drug-eluting stents (DES) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. Large-scale, prospective, multicenter double-blind randomized trials have provided strong evidence that drug-eluting stents significantly reduce angiographic restenosis and enhance event-free survival compared with BMS after implantation in native coronary arteries (3-6).However, despite an improved efficacy in the prevention of restenosis and target vessel failure safety concerns have been raised for DES, focusing on a small but clinically important increase in stent thrombosis occurring greater than one year after the index procedure.

In patients receiving drug-eluting stents, the acute coronary syndrome has been identified as one of the major risk factors of stent thrombosis (10). Therefore, concerns about the long-term outcome and safety after drug-eluting stent implantation due to late stent thrombosis and late stent malapposition have been raised.

Stent thrombosis, in particular late stent thrombosis, has been related to an impaired stent healing, most of all to a reduced endothelial repair, i.e. reduced stent strut coverage, after implantation of drug-eluting stents. This has resulted in the recommendation of a prolonged 12-month double antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel after drug-eluting stent implantation, however, how long double antiplatelet therapy is needed is unknown at present. These observations have resulted in an intense search for alternative strategies to promote stent healing and endothelial repair, rather than to inhibit the endothelialisation of the stent, that is common to the substances used to prevent neointima formation.

Notably, endothelial repair can be substantially stimulated by CD34+ endothelial progenitor cells. The Combo stent is therefore covered with a CD34+ antibody to attract endothelial progenitor cells to promote endothelial and stent healing, and on the abluminal side releases sirolimus to prevent neointima formation and restenosis. Several preclinical studies in the porcine coronary artery model have shown, that endothelialisation and stent healing are accelerated in the Combo stent. The present study has therefore been designed to compare stent healing of the Combo stent with the everolimus-eluting stent by optical coherence tomography analysis (optical frequency domain imaging; OFDI), a high resolution intracoronary imaging technique allowing accurate evaluation of stent coverage and healing, in patients with an acute coronary syndrome. Previous studies have indicated, that coronary stent healing after DES implantation is particularly impaired in patients with ACS, and therefore this patient population is in a particular need of improved "pro-healing" stent concepts with a high efficacy.

RATIONALE An important limitation of stents eluting only growth-inhibiting substances is, that also the desirable endothelial cell growth over the stent struts is prevented, that is thought to represent a major cause of "late-stent-thrombosis". The rationale for the design of the "combo-stent" is therefore to combine a growth inhibiting substance with abluminal release with an endothelial progenitor cell attracting design to promote endothelial repair. In the pre-clinical studies, the "Combo Stent" demonstrated significantly lower neointimal hyperplasia, while also showing improved endothelial coverage relative to other commercially available DES. There was also a noticeably lower presence of inflammation and foreign body reaction.

OCT- Examination of Vessel Healing Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a novel intravascular imaging modality based on infrared light emission that has a 10-20 fold higher resolution (10-20 µM) as compared to current intravascular ultrasound systems, and allows a detailed examination of stent healing. Strut coverage, strut apposition and neointima can be quantified at a micron-scale level with a resolution 10-20 times higher than conventional intravascular ultrasound. The quantification of stent healing by intravascular OCT analysis has recently been validated against histology, demonstrating an excellent accuracy of the OCT examination. Moreover, the safety and feasibility of OCT examination in a multicenter study has been demonstrated. Newer modalities of OCT image acquisition, as used in this study, have been reported to further simplify the technique and reduce procedural time.

Being tested
PTCA with stent placement
Keywords
stent, drug eluting stent, healing, endothelium, DES, OCT, MI, ACS
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerosis, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PTCA with stent placementDevice

    Also called Combo Stent, Xience V or Promus stent

    PTCA with stent placement (Drug Eluting Stent)

Study groups in NCT01405287
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Combo StentExperimentalPTCA with Combo Stent
Receives: Device: PTCA with stent placement
Everolimus Eluting Stent (EES)Active comparatorPTCA with DES (Everolimus Eluting Stent: Xience V or Promus)
Receives: Device: PTCA with stent placement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of uncovered stent struts per stent at follow-up (OCT)

    Measured: 60 days

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Secondary Clinical Endpoint: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

    Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)defined as a composite of death, Myocardial Infarction (MI) (Q wave or non-Q wave), emergent coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), or justified target lesion revascularization (TLR) by repeat Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) at hospital discharge

    Measured: 30, 60, 180, 360, 540 days

  2. Secondary Clinical Endpoint: components of MACE: cardiac death

    cardiac death

    Measured: 30, 60, 180, 360, 540 days

  3. Secondary Clinical Endpoints: components of MACE: MI

    MI (Q wave or non-Q wave)

    Measured: 30, 60, 180, 360, 540 days

  4. Secondary Clinical Endpoints: components of MACE: CABG or re-PTCA of target lesion

    emergent coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), or clinically justified target lesion revascularization (TLR) by repeat PTCA or CABG at hospital discharge

    Measured: 30, 60, 180, 360, 540 days

  5. Secondary Clinical Endpoints: Stent thrombosis

    Target vessel stent thrombosis per Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definition

    Measured: 30, 60, 180, 360, 540 days

  6. Secondary OCT Endpoints (1/12)

    Percentage of stent strut malapposition

    Measured: 60 days

  7. Secondary OCT Endpoints (2/12)

    Maximum length of segments (mm) with uncovered struts

    Measured: 60 days

  8. Secondary OCT Endpoints (3/12)

    Maximum length of segments (mm) with malapposed struts

    Measured: 60 days

  9. Secondary OCT Endpoints (4/12)

    Maximum malapposition distance (mm)

    Measured: 60 days

  10. Secondary OCT Endpoints (5/12)

    Total malapposition volume

    Measured: 60 days

  11. Secondary OCT Endpoints (6/12)

    Maximal malapposition volume

    Measured: 60 days

  12. Secondary OCT Endpoints (7/12)

    Mean neointimal thickness (NIT)(strut level)

    Measured: 60 days

  13. Secondary OCT Endpoints (8/12)

    Percentage of protruding struts per stent

    Measured: 60 days

  14. Secondary OCT Endpoints (9/12)

    Frequency of Abnormal Intrastent Tissue (AIST)

    Measured: 60 days

  15. Secondary OCT Endpoints (10/12)

    Stent Volume

    Measured: 60 days

  16. Secondary OCT Endpoints (11/12)

    Lumen Volume

    Measured: 60 days

  17. Secondary OCT Endpoints (12/12)

    Neointimal Hyperplasia (NIH) Volume

    Measured: 60 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jul 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2011
  3. Primary completionAug 2012
  4. Study completionJan 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01405287
Sponsor's protocol ID
VP-0509
Other IDs
36383
Acronym
REMEDEE-OCT
Status last verified
Mar 2014
First submitted
26 Jul 2011
Last updated
24 Mar 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Jaguszewski M, Aloysius R, Wang W, Bezerra HG, Hill J, De Winter RJ, Karjalainen PP, Verheye S, Wijns W, Luscher TF, Joner M, Costa M, Landmesser U. The REMEDEE-OCT Study: An Evaluation of the Bioengineered COMBO Dual-Therapy CD34 Antibody-Covered Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent Compared With a Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 13;10(5):489-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.040.

    PubMed 28279316

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing PTCA with stent placement in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Atherosclerosis, run by OrbusNeich at 6 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in Belgium, Finland, Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of uncovered stent struts per stent at follow-up (OCT) (time frame: 60 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01405287, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2014.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
REMEDEE-OCT Clinical Trial NCT01405287 | AzTrials