NYHA Class III Heart FailureFIX-HF-5CNCT01381172
Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5C
A study testing Optimizer System in people with NYHA Class III Heart Failure and NYHA Class IV Heart Failure, run by Impulse Dynamics at 42 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the OPTIMIZER® System in subjects with medically refractory moderate-to-severe heart failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- NYHA Class III Heart Failure, NYHA Class IV Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Optimizer System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 42 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2011to 19 Mar 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects who are 18 years of age or older
- Subjects who are either male or female. Females of childbearing potential must be using a medically approved method of birth control and must agree to continue to use birth control throughout the study, or must be surgically sterilized (tubal ligation, hysterectomy) or post-menopausal for at least 1 year.
- Condition
- Subjects who have a baseline ejection fraction greater than or equal to 25% and less than or equal to 45% by echocardiography determined by the echocardiography core laboratory.
- Subjects who have been treated for heart failure for at least 90 days (including treatment with a β-blocker for at least 90 days unless the subject is intolerant) and are in New York Heart Association functional Class III and IV at the time of enrollment.
- Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure according to the region- specific guideline recommendations. For patients with EF≤35%, this regimen shall consist of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and β-blocker. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or 50% decrease in dose.
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (based on the current guidelines for clinical practice ), have a clinical indication for an implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD, e.g., EF≤35%) and/or pacemaker, must have an existing device or agree to undergo implantation of such a device unless the patient refuses to undergo the implantation of such device for personal reasons.
- Subjects who are willing and able to return for all follow-up visits.
Who cannot join
- Subjects whose baseline peak VO2 is <9 or >20 ml O2/min/kg.
- Subjects who have a potentially correctible cause of heart failure, such as valvular heart disease or congenital heart disease.
- Subjects who have clinically significant angina pectoris, consisting of angina during daily life (i.e., Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina score of II or more), an episode of unstable angina within 30 days of enrollment, or angina and/or ECG changes during exercise testing performed during baseline evaluation.
- Subjects who have been hospitalized for heart failure which required the use of inotropic support within 30 days of enrollment.
- Subjects who have a clinically significant amount of ambient ectopy, defined as more than 8,900 PVCs per 24 hours on baseline Holter monitoring.
- Subjects having a PR interval greater than 375 ms.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Subjects who have chronic (permanent or persistent) atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter or those cardioverted within 30 days of enrollment.
- Subjects whose exercise tolerance is limited by a condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, COPD, peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or who are unable to perform baseline stress testing.
- Subjects who are scheduled for a CABG or a PTCA procedure, or who have undergone a CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment.
- Subjects who have a biventricular pacing system, an accepted indication for such a device, or a QRS width of 130ms or greater.
- Subjects who have had a myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment.
- Subjects who have mechanical tricuspid valve.
- Subjects who have a prior heart transplant.
- Subjects on dialysis.
- Subjects who are participating in another experimental protocol.
- Subjects who are unable to provide informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
42 sites in 3 countries.
42 sites in 3 countries
United States32 sites
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135
The Lindner Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
The Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Dallas VA Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75216
Detroit Medical Center - Cardiovascular Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Inova Heart & Vascular Institute
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
Stern Cardiovascular Foundation
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138
Cardiovascular Consultants
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Nebraska Heart Institute
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68526
Bryan Heart LGH
Lincoln, Nebraska, 69506
Cardiovascular Associates of Mesa
Mesa, Arizona, 85206
Chan Heart Rhythm Institute
Mesa, Arizona, 85206
Aurora Health Care
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Advocate Medical Group - Midwest Heart Foundation
Naperville, Illinois, 60540
Yale - New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519
Ochsner Clinic
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Mt. Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
UMDNJ
Newark, New Jersey, 07103
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Newport Beach, California, 92663
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Arizona Heart & Rhythm Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
Guthrie Medical Group
Sayre, Pennsylvania, 18840
Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Washington Adventist Hospital
Takoma Park, Maryland, 20912
Florida Hospital - Pepin Heart Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Pima Heart
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
Trinity Clinic
Tyler, Texas, 75701
Germany9 sites
Herz- und Gefässzentrum Bad Bevensen
Bad Bevensen, 29549
Charité Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin
Berlin, 12203
Charité Campus-Virchow-Klinikum
Berlin, 13353
Universitätsklinikum Essen
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122
ASKLEPIOS Klinik St. Georg
Hamburg, 20099
UKE - Universitäres Herzzentrum GmbH
Hamburg, 20246
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
Hanover, Göttingen, 37075
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
Mannheim, 68167
Klinikum der Univ. München - Grosshadern
München, 81377
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure With Ejection Fraction Between 25% and 45%: FIX-HF-5C
The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the OPTIMIZER® System in subjects with medically refractory moderate-to-severe heart failure.
Read the detailed description
The Impulse Dynamics FIX-HF-5C Study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) signals delivered by the implantable OPTIMIZER System in patients with NYHA class III and IV heart failure and an ejection fraction 25-45%. The study will involve the recruitment of 160 subjects at a total of up to 60 sites.
Those subjects who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria based upon baseline test results will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the OPTIMIZER System plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) or to a control group receiving OMT alone. All randomized subjects will be followed for 24 weeks and shall receive the same study related assessments throughout the course of the study. In addition, all subjects will continue to receive OMT for the treatment of their heart failure. Mortality will be reported out to 2 years.
- Being tested
- Optimizer System, No intervention: Optimal medical therapy
- Keywords
- Heart Failure, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic heart disease, Cardiac contractility modulation, CCM, CHF
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Optimizer SystemDevice
Also called CCM therapy
The OPTIMIZER System delivers non-excitatory cardiac contractility modulating (CCM) electrical signals to the heart muscle. Treatment group subjects receive five non-contiguous one-hour periods of CCM signals per day.
No intervention: Optimal medical therapyOther
The control group receives optimal medical therapy only.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | The treatment group receives the OPTIMIZER System implant and continues with optimal heart failure medical therapy. Receives: Device: Optimizer System |
| Control | Other | The Control group will not receive the OPTIMIZER System and will continue with optimal heart failure medical therapy. Receives: Other: No intervention: Optimal medical therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Peak VO2
Exercise tolerance quantified by peak VO2 measured with cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX) and evaluated by a blinded core lab.
Measured: 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire
Change in quality of life at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire. The MLWHFQ score could range from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health-related quality of lif
Measured: 24 weeks
Peak VO2 With Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER)
Peak VO2 with change in respiratory exchange ratio (RER) included as a covariate, as measured by a blinded core lab.
Measured: 24 weeks
NYHA
Heart failure class, as assessed by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification.
Measured: 24 weeks
Peak VO2 With a Peak RER of ≥1.05
Peak VO2 in an analysis that only includes tests with a peak RER of ≥1.05.
Measured: 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2011
- Primary completion19 Mar 2019
- Study completion19 Mar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NYHA Class III Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Impulse Dynamics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Daniel Burkhoff, MD, PhD, Study director, Impulse Dynamics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01381172
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CP OPT2009-009
- Other IDs
- G030099
- Acronym
- FIX-HF-5C
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2011
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kadish A, Nademanee K, Volosin K, Krueger S, Neelagaru S, Raval N, Obel O, Weiner S, Wish M, Carson P, Ellenbogen K, Bourge R, Parides M, Chiacchierini RP, Goldsmith R, Goldstein S, Mika Y, Burkhoff D, Abraham WT. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in advanced heart failure. Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):329-337.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.025.
PubMed 21315216Abraham WT, Burkhoff D, Nademanee K, Carson P, Bourge R, Ellenbogen KA, Parides M, Kadish A; FIX-HF-5 Investigators and Coordinators. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with systolic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):641-648.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.019.
PubMed 18926146Neelagaru SB, Sanchez JE, Lau SK, Greenberg SM, Raval NY, Worley S, Kalman J, Merliss AD, Krueger S, Wood M, Wish M, Burkhoff D, Nademanee K. Nonexcitatory, cardiac contractility modulation electrical impulses: feasibility study for advanced heart failure in patients with normal QRS duration. Heart Rhythm. 2006 Oct;3(10):1140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.06.031. Epub 2006 Jul 8.
PubMed 17018340Abraham WT, Nademanee K, Volosin K, Krueger S, Neelagaru S, Raval N, Obel O, Weiner S, Wish M, Carson P, Ellenbogen K, Bourge R, Parides M, Chiacchierini RP, Goldsmith R, Goldstein S, Mika Y, Burkhoff D, Kadish A; FIX-HF-5 Investigators and Coordinators. Subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in advanced heart failure. J Card Fail. 2011 Sep;17(9):710-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
PubMed 21872139Abraham WT, Lindenfeld J, Reddy VY, Hasenfuss G, Kuck KH, Boscardin J, Gibbons R, Burkhoff D; FIX-HF-5C Investigators and Coordinators. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and a narrow QRS duration: study rationale and design. J Card Fail. 2015 Jan;21(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
PubMed 25285748Abraham WT, Kuck KH, Goldsmith RL, Lindenfeld J, Reddy VY, Carson PE, Mann DL, Saville B, Parise H, Chan R, Wiegn P, Hastings JL, Kaplan AJ, Edelmann F, Luthje L, Kahwash R, Tomassoni GF, Gutterman DD, Stagg A, Burkhoff D, Hasenfuss G. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Contractility Modulation. JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Oct;6(10):874-883. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 May 10.
PubMed 29754812
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure With Ejection Fraction Between 25% and 45%: FIX-HF-5C
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01381172
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FIX-HF-5C / CP OPT2009-009
- Keywords
- Heart Failure, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic heart disease, Cardiac contractility modulation, CCM, CHF
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Impulse DynamicsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2011
- Primary completion
- 19 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Sep 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the OPTIMIZER® System in subjects with medically refractory moderate-to-severe heart failure.
Detailed description
The Impulse Dynamics FIX-HF-5C Study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) signals delivered by the implantable OPTIMIZER System in patients with NYHA class III and IV heart failure and an ejection fraction 25-45%. The study will involve the recruitment of 160 subjects at a total of up to 60 sites.
Those subjects who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria based upon baseline test results will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the OPTIMIZER System plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) or to a control group receiving OMT alone. All randomized subjects will be followed for 24 weeks and shall receive the same study related assessments throughout the course of the study. In addition, all subjects will continue to receive OMT for the treatment of their heart failure. Mortality will be reported out to 2 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Device: Optimizer SystemThe treatment group receives the OPTIMIZER System implant and continues with optimal heart failure medical therapy. |
| Control | Other | Other: No intervention: Optimal medical therapyThe Control group will not receive the OPTIMIZER System and will continue with optimal heart failure medical therapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Subjects who are 18 years of age or older
- Subjects who are either male or female. Females of childbearing potential must be using a medically approved method of birth control and must agree to continue to use birth control throughout the study, or must be surgically sterilized (tubal ligation, hysterectomy) or post-menopausal for at least 1 year.
- Condition
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Subjects whose baseline peak VO2 is <9 or >20 ml O2/min/kg.
- Subjects who have a potentially correctible cause of heart failure, such as valvular heart disease or congenital heart disease.
- Subjects who have clinically significant angina pectoris, consisting of angina during daily life (i.e., Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina score of II or more), an episode of unstable angina within 30 days of enrollment, or angina and/or ECG changes during exercise testing performed during baseline evaluation.
- Subjects who have been hospitalized for heart failure which required the use of inotropic support within 30 days of enrollment.
- Subjects who have a clinically significant amount of ambient ectopy, defined as more than 8,900 PVCs per 24 hours on baseline Holter monitoring.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Optimizer SystemAlso: CCM therapyThe OPTIMIZER System delivers non-excitatory cardiac contractility modulating (CCM) electrical signals to the heart muscle. Treatment group subjects receive five non-contiguous one-hour periods of CCM signals per day. | Device | Treatment |
| No intervention: Optimal medical therapyThe control group receives optimal medical therapy only. | Other | Control |
Primary outcome
Peak VO2
Time frame: 24 weeks
Exercise tolerance quantified by peak VO2 measured with cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX) and evaluated by a blinded core lab.
4 secondary outcomes
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire
Time frame: 24 weeks
Peak VO2 With Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER)
Time frame: 24 weeks
NYHA
Time frame: 24 weeks
Peak VO2 With a Peak RER of ≥1.05
Time frame: 24 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Sep 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21315216Kadish A, Nademanee K, Volosin K, Krueger S, Neelagaru S, Raval N, Obel O, Weiner S, Wish M, Carson P, Ellenbogen K, Bourge R, Parides M, Chiacchierini RP, Goldsmith R, Goldstein S, Mika Y, Burkhoff D, Abraham WT. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in advanced heart failure. Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):329-337.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.025.
- Background: PubMed 18926146Abraham WT, Burkhoff D, Nademanee K, Carson P, Bourge R, Ellenbogen KA, Parides M, Kadish A; FIX-HF-5 Investigators and Coordinators. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with systolic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):641-648.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.019.
- Background: PubMed 17018340Neelagaru SB, Sanchez JE, Lau SK, Greenberg SM, Raval NY, Worley S, Kalman J, Merliss AD, Krueger S, Wood M, Wish M, Burkhoff D, Nademanee K. Nonexcitatory, cardiac contractility modulation electrical impulses: feasibility study for advanced heart failure in patients with normal QRS duration. Heart Rhythm. 2006 Oct;3(10):1140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.06.031. Epub 2006 Jul 8.
- Background: PubMed 21872139Abraham WT, Nademanee K, Volosin K, Krueger S, Neelagaru S, Raval N, Obel O, Weiner S, Wish M, Carson P, Ellenbogen K, Bourge R, Parides M, Chiacchierini RP, Goldsmith R, Goldstein S, Mika Y, Burkhoff D, Kadish A; FIX-HF-5 Investigators and Coordinators. Subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in advanced heart failure. J Card Fail. 2011 Sep;17(9):710-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
- Background: PubMed 25285748Abraham WT, Lindenfeld J, Reddy VY, Hasenfuss G, Kuck KH, Boscardin J, Gibbons R, Burkhoff D; FIX-HF-5C Investigators and Coordinators. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and a narrow QRS duration: study rationale and design. J Card Fail. 2015 Jan;21(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
- Background: PubMed 29754812Abraham WT, Kuck KH, Goldsmith RL, Lindenfeld J, Reddy VY, Carson PE, Mann DL, Saville B, Parise H, Chan R, Wiegn P, Hastings JL, Kaplan AJ, Edelmann F, Luthje L, Kahwash R, Tomassoni GF, Gutterman DD, Stagg A, Burkhoff D, Hasenfuss G. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Contractility Modulation. JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Oct;6(10):874-883. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 May 10.
- Impulse Dynamics WebsiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for NYHA Class III Heart Failure
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Recruiting
Barostim-Enabled NEurohormonal Intervention For Improving Treatment of Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Heart Failure NYHA Class II
Recruiting
PrEcision Pacing in HFpEF: the PEP-HFpEF Trial
Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure New York Heart Association Class III
Active, not recruiting
Neural Cardiac Therapy for Heart Failure Study (NECTAR-HF)
Heart Failure, Congestive Heart Failure
Not yet recruiting
Inspiratory Muscle Training in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure Awaiting Advanced Therapies
Heart Failure, Heart Failure New York Heart Association Class III
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel Burkhoff, MD, PhD study director
Impulse Dynamics
42 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Optimizer System in people with NYHA Class III Heart Failure and NYHA Class IV Heart Failure, run by Impulse Dynamics at 42 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 42 sites in United States, Germany, Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Sep 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Peak VO2 (time frame: 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01381172, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2021.