AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiac Transplant RejectionNEW HEARTNCT01365806

Home Electrocardiogram (ECG) Monitoring After Heart Transplantation

An observational study of Cardiac Transplant Rejection and Qt Interval, Variation in, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The long-term goal of this research is to apply novel technology for detection of donor organ (allograft) rejection to improve patient outcomes following heart transplantation. The specific goal of this study is to determine whether daily monitoring of the transplant recipient's electrocardiogram (ECG) using a simple… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
345 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2011to Jan 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: adult heart transplant recipients from recruitment sites (Columbia University-New York Presbyterian Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Who may be able to join

  • ≥18 years of age
  • first heart transplant surgery
  • not enrolled in other research studies that conflict with study design

Who cannot join

  • clinically unstable at time of enrollment (i.e. clinical symptoms of allograph impairment)

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Home ECG Monitoring to Detect Allograft Rejection Following Heart Transplantation

The long-term goal of this research is to apply novel technology for detection of donor organ (allograft) rejection to improve patient outcomes following heart transplantation. The specific goal of this study is to determine whether daily monitoring of the transplant recipient's electrocardiogram (ECG) using a simple home device with transmission to an ECG Core Laboratory would provide an early biomarker for acute rejection. Despite routine immunosuppressant drug therapy, acute rejection is common, especially within the first 6 months following transplant surgery. To detect rejection, frequent endomyocardial biopsies of heart tissue are performed. An endomyocardial biopsy is a costly and invasive procedure performed in a hospital cardiac catheterization laboratory that has associated risks. Recent evidence suggests that acute allograft rejection causes delays in ventricular repolarization resulting in a longer QT interval on the ECG. The specific aims of the study are to: 1) determine whether an increase in the QT interval during the first 6 months following heart transplant is a sensitive and specific biomarker for acute rejection; and 2) determine the timing of QT interval increases relative to biopsy-diagnosed stages of mild/moderate/severe rejection. The potential benefit of finding a simple ECG biomarker of allograph rejection that could be measured at home is that it might yield earlier detection of rejection, allow more timely therapy and reduce mortality from acute allograft rejection.

Keywords
heart transplantation, allograft rejection, QT interval, electrocardiogram (ECG)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. number and grade of acute allograft rejection episodes

    Measured: within one year after transplant surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. all cause mortality

    Measured: one year after transplant surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jun 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2011
  3. Primary completionOct 2015
  4. Study completionJan 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
345 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01365806
Sponsor's protocol ID
1R01NR012003-01A1
Other IDs
1R01NR012003-01A1
Acronym
NEW HEART
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
1 Jun 2011
Last updated
8 Mar 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Doering LV, Hickey K, Pickham D, Chen B, Drew BJ. Remote noninvasive allograft rejection monitoring for heart transplant recipients: study protocol for the novel evaluation with home electrocardiogram and remote transmission (NEW HEART) study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012 Mar 2;12:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-14.

    PubMed 22386040

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiac Transplant Rejection and Qt Interval, Variation in, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

number and grade of acute allograft rejection episodes (time frame: within one year after transplant surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01365806, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in