Major Depressive DisorderPhase 4LillyNCT01360190
Neurophysiologic Monitoring of Antidepressant Treatment
A Phase 4 study testing fluoxetine in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by University of California, Los Angeles.
Trial summary
The overall goal of this proposal is to study quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG ) as a method for the detection of antidepressant treatment response. The investigators have developed a QEEG algorithm called "cordance" that appears to provide much the same information about brain function as PET or SPECT… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Depressive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- fluoxetine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Aug 1994to Aug 1996
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All subjects will meet DSM-IV criteria for major depression based upon the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV - Patient Version (SCID-P) (First et al., 1994). All research personnel have undergone SCID-P training, and soon will extend this training to the DSM-IV version.
- Subjects also will have a score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale of > 18 (with item #1 > 2).
- All subjects will be under the care of a clinician not affiliated with the study at the time of entry into the study, and through the course of the study.
Who cannot join
- Subjects will have no serious medical illness.
- We will exclude patients also meeting criteria for the following groups of axis I diagnoses: delirium or dementia, substance-related disorders, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, or eating disorders.
- In addition, patients meeting criteria for cluster A or B axis II diagnoses will be excluded.
- Subjects with a history of current or past active suicidal ideation, or suicide attempts will be excluded, as will patients who previously have failed to respond to an adequate clinical trial of fluoxetine, or have failed to tolerate the medication.
- Subjects who have had suboptimal trials, however, may still be considered for the study.
About this study
The overall goal of this proposal is to study quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG ) as a method for the detection of antidepressant treatment response. The investigators have developed a QEEG algorithm called "cordance" that appears to provide much the same information about brain function as PET or SPECT scanning, and has shown patterns of brain function that appear to be indicative of depression. Of greatest interest is that these patterns appear to normalize in response to antidepressant treatment.
Read the detailed description
Background and Significance/Preliminary Studies:
- Cordance. There is considerable evidence indicating that abnormal slow-wave activity in the EEG is caused by partial cortical deafferentation. Despite this fact, no clinically relevant measure of deafferentation has been available. The investigators sought to develop such a measure by examining young and old subjects with white-matter lesions that presumably undercut the cerebral cortex, as well as subjects with several different types of brain disease who had undergone SPECT scanning. The investigators discovered an indicator termed discordance, that is characteristic of cortex undercut by white-matter lesions, or that is hypoperfused for any reason. The investigators also discovered an indicator the investigators termed concordance , which is characteristic of cortex that has normal perfusion.
This overall technique for the non-invasive assessment of afferent function, cerebral perfusion, and metabolism the investigators call cordance mapping, which is the subject of a United States patent. A detailed explanation of the formulae used to calculate cordance is provided in the manuscripts referenced above. The first of these two manuscripts contains illustrative examples where discordance was useful in detection of white-matter lesions or degenerative disease. The second manuscript shows a quantitative analysis of cordance and HMPAO-SPECT data from 27 patients with a variety of conditions, and demonstrates that cordance is superior to conventional EEG measures in its correlations with relative perfusion. Like SPECT, cordance measurements vary according to the patients' state, but has high test-retest reliability for detecting brain lesions.
- Differential diagnosis of depression. One promising application of cordance is to the differential diagnosis of psychiatric illness. A "normal" cordance pattern is one of posterior dominant concordance with cordance values near zero in the frontal regions. The investigators have reported a "classic" cordance pattern for subjects with Alzheimer's disease (DAT), in which there is parietal discordance (in the beta or theta bands) in conjunction with alpha concordance that has shifted from the occipital to the central head regions. This finding is consistent with the pattern seen commonly on PET and SPECT, in which there is parietal hypoperfusion or hypometabolism with preserved metabolism over the central head regions (the motor strip), which is known to be less affected by Alzheimer's changes.
In evaluating treatment results, the investigators will need to determine what effect medication status has upon QEEG measures. Although results thus far suggest that there is little significant effect , the investigators will carefully examine the effects of antidepressant and antianxiety medications further
METHODS:
The investigators plan to examine cordance in 26 subjects undergoing antidepressant treatment, and to use this neurophysiologic method to assess the response to treatment in depressed patients. The project has the following three specific aims: 1) to identify physiologic indices of fluoxetine treatment response using quantitative EEG; 2) to detect how early in the course of fluoxetine treatment response this response may be detected; 3) to determine if QEEG measures of response distinguish subjects who are not responding to treatment from those who are responding.
The study will tests the hypothesis that those subjects receiving active treatment who show clinical improvement will demonstrate normalization of cordance maps. Conversely, the investigators hypothesize that those subjects who either do not show improvement, or who have some improvement on placebo, will not show normalization of cordance.
The investigators will examine these hypotheses with a four-step plan. Specifically, the investigators will recruit 26 patients with major depression and perform baseline assessments of the severity of depressive symptoms, as well as QEEG studies. Second, the investigators will enroll these patients in an eight-week, double-blind placebo-controlled study in which they will receive either fluoxetine 20 mg. daily or placebo. Third, the investigators will follow subjects with ratings of mood and serial QEEG studies to determine if there is an association between resolution of depressive symptoms and QEEG cordance changes. Fourth, the investigators will enroll subjects in open-label treatment at the end of the eight weeks and examine cordance in those who previously received placebo and, where appropriate, in those receiving fluoxetine 40 mg. daily.
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Being tested
- fluoxetine
- Keywords
- MDD, major depressive disorder, QEEG, electroencephalograph, fluoxtine, placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Major
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
fluoxetineDrug
fluoxetine 20 mg. daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| fluoxetine | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: fluoxetine |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: fluoxetine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Hamilton Rating Scale For Depression Score
We will determine which subjects demonstrate improvement on the primary outcome measure (Ham-D) obtained the day of the EEG, and enter these as categorical variables (improved/not improved).
Measured: baseline, end of placebo-lead-in; and 48 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after randomized treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study startAug 1994
- Primary completionAug 1996
- Study completionAug 1996
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Major Depressive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, Los AngelesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Andrew F Leuchter, Principal investigator, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01360190
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 94-08-273-13
- Acronym
- Lilly
- Status last verified
- May 2011
- First submitted
- 23 May 2011
- Last updated
- 25 May 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 May 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neurophysiologic Monitoring of Antidepressant Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01360190
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Lilly / 94-08-273-13
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Keywords
- MDD, major depressive disorder, QEEG, electroencephalograph, fluoxtine, placebo
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los AngelesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 1994
- Primary completion
- Aug 1996 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 1996 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall goal of this proposal is to study quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG ) as a method for the detection of antidepressant treatment response. The investigators have developed a QEEG algorithm called "cordance" that appears to provide much the same information about brain function as PET or SPECT scanning, and has shown patterns of brain function that appear to be indicative of depression. Of greatest interest is that these patterns appear to normalize in response to antidepressant treatment.
Detailed description
Background and Significance/Preliminary Studies:
- Cordance. There is considerable evidence indicating that abnormal slow-wave activity in the EEG is caused by partial cortical deafferentation. Despite this fact, no clinically relevant measure of deafferentation has been available. The investigators sought to develop such a measure by examining young and old subjects with white-matter lesions that presumably undercut the cerebral cortex, as well as subjects with several different types of brain disease who had undergone SPECT scanning. The investigators discovered an indicator termed discordance, that is characteristic of cortex undercut by white-matter lesions, or that is hypoperfused for any reason. The investigators also discovered an indicator the investigators termed concordance , which is characteristic of cortex that has normal perfusion.
This overall technique for the non-invasive assessment of afferent function, cerebral perfusion, and metabolism the investigators call cordance mapping, which is the subject of a United States patent. A detailed explanation of the formulae used to calculate cordance is provided in the manuscripts referenced above. The first of these two manuscripts contains illustrative examples where discordance was useful in detection of white-matter lesions or degenerative disease. The second manuscript shows a quantitative analysis of cordance and HMPAO-SPECT data from 27 patients with a variety of conditions, and demonstrates that cordance is superior to conventional EEG measures in its correlations with relative perfusion. Like SPECT, cordance measurements vary according to the patients' state, but has high test-retest reliability for detecting brain lesions.
- Differential diagnosis of depression. One promising application of cordance is to the differential diagnosis of psychiatric illness. A "normal" cordance pattern is one of posterior dominant concordance with cordance values near zero in the frontal regions. The investigators have reported a "classic" cordance pattern for subjects with Alzheimer's disease (DAT), in which there is parietal discordance (in the beta or theta bands) in conjunction with alpha concordance that has shifted from the occipital to the central head regions. This finding is consistent with the pattern seen commonly on PET and SPECT, in which there is parietal hypoperfusion or hypometabolism with preserved metabolism over the central head regions (the motor strip), which is known to be less affected by Alzheimer's changes.
In evaluating treatment results, the investigators will need to determine what effect medication status has upon QEEG measures. Although results thus far suggest that there is little significant effect , the investigators will carefully examine the effects of antidepressant and antianxiety medications further
METHODS:
The investigators plan to examine cordance in 26 subjects undergoing antidepressant treatment, and to use this neurophysiologic method to assess the response to treatment in depressed patients. The project has the following three specific aims: 1) to identify physiologic indices of fluoxetine treatment response using quantitative EEG; 2) to detect how early in the course of fluoxetine treatment response this response may be detected; 3) to determine if QEEG measures of response distinguish subjects who are not responding to treatment from those who are responding.
The study will tests the hypothesis that those subjects receiving active treatment who show clinical improvement will demonstrate normalization of cordance maps. Conversely, the investigators hypothesize that those subjects who either do not show improvement, or who have some improvement on placebo, will not show normalization of cordance.
The investigators will examine these hypotheses with a four-step plan. Specifically, the investigators will recruit 26 patients with major depression and perform baseline assessments of the severity of depressive symptoms, as well as QEEG studies. Second, the investigators will enroll these patients in an eight-week, double-blind placebo-controlled study in which they will receive either fluoxetine 20 mg. daily or placebo. Third, the investigators will follow subjects with ratings of mood and serial QEEG studies to determine if there is an association between resolution of depressive symptoms and QEEG cordance changes. Fourth, the investigators will enroll subjects in open-label treatment at the end of the eight weeks and examine cordance in those who previously received placebo and, where appropriate, in those receiving fluoxetine 40 mg. daily.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| fluoxetine | Active comparator | Drug: fluoxetine |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: fluoxetine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- All subjects will meet DSM-IV criteria for major depression based upon the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV - Patient Version (SCID-P) (First et al., 1994). All research personnel have undergone SCID-P training, and soon will extend this training to the DSM-IV version.
- Subjects also will have a score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale of > 18 (with item #1 > 2).
- All subjects will be under the care of a clinician not affiliated with the study at the time of entry into the study, and through the course of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects will have no serious medical illness.
- We will exclude patients also meeting criteria for the following groups of axis I diagnoses: delirium or dementia, substance-related disorders, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, or eating disorders.
- In addition, patients meeting criteria for cluster A or B axis II diagnoses will be excluded.
- Subjects with a history of current or past active suicidal ideation, or suicide attempts will be excluded, as will patients who previously have failed to respond to an adequate clinical trial of fluoxetine, or have failed to tolerate the medication.
- Subjects who have had suboptimal trials, however, may still be considered for the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| fluoxetinefluoxetine 20 mg. daily | Drug | fluoxetine, placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in Hamilton Rating Scale For Depression Score
Time frame: baseline, end of placebo-lead-in; and 48 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after randomized treatment
We will determine which subjects demonstrate improvement on the primary outcome measure (Ham-D) obtained the day of the EEG, and enter these as categorical variables (improved/not improved).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 May 2011.
Related trials for Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 4
Biomarker-Guided Antidepressant Selection
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD)
Recruiting
Targeting Network Dysfunction in Apathy of Late-life Depression Using Digital Therapeutics
Major Depressive Disorder, Apathy
RecruitingObservational study
Student Precarity and Psychiatry
Depressive Disorder, Major, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Therapy for Depression
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrew F Leuchter principal investigator
University of California, Los Angeles
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing fluoxetine in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by University of California, Los Angeles.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Hamilton Rating Scale For Depression Score (time frame: baseline, end of placebo-lead-in; and 48 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after randomized treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2011.