HIV-1 InfectionPhase 2NCT01351025
Atorvastatin on Biomarkers of Inflammation, Coagulopathy, Angiogenesis & T-cells
A Phase 2 study testing atorvastatin in people with HIV-1 Infection, run by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections at 31 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
ACTG A5275 was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over design pilot study evaluating the effect of atorvastatin on biomarkers of inflammation, coagulopathy, angiogenesis, and T-lymphocyte activation in HIV-1 infected individuals with suppressed HIV-1 RNA on stable protease inhibitor… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV-1 Infection
- What is being tested?
- atorvastatin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 98 participants
- Where
- 31 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 14 Apr 2011to May 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HIV-1 infected
- Combination ART that includes any boosted PI regimen for at least 6 months prior to study entry
- No plans to change the antiretroviral regimen in the next year
- Must have been on the same HAART regimen for at least 12 weeks with no change prior to study entry. More information on this criterion can be found in the study protocol.
- If on vitamin D replacement therapy, must have been on stable regimen for ≥ 1 mo. prior to study entry.
- CD4+ T-cell count obtained within 45 days prior to study entry at any laboratory that has a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certification or its equivalent.
Show all 14Show fewer
- Screening HIV-1 RNA < 40 copies/mL by Abbott RealTime PCR at a laboratory certified by the DAIDS Virology Quality Assurance (VQA) program within 45 days prior to study entry.
- All known HIV-1 RNA levels obtained within 180 days prior to study entry are below the limits of quantification on all tests, with documentation of at least 1 test by any FDA-approved assay at a CLIA-certified laboratory obtained between 90 to 180 days prior to study entry. A single RNA "blip" of < 500 copies/mL during this time period was permissible if RNA levels immediately before and after were below the limits of quantification for the assay.
- Laboratory values obtained within 45 days prior to study entry- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) 750/mm3, Hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g/dL for female subjects,10.0 g/dL for male subjects, Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm3, Calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) 30 mL/min, as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation, Creatine kinase (CK) < 3 x ULN, AST ≤ 2.0 x ULN, ALT ≤ 2.0 x ULN, Total bilirubin ≤ 2.5 x ULN. If the subject was taking an indinavir- or atazanavir-containing regimen at the time of screening, a total bilirubin of ≤ 5 x ULN is acceptable, Fasting LDL cholesterol ≥ 70 mg/dL and < 130 mg/dL, Fasting triglycerides < 400 mg/dL, Fasting glucose < 110 mg/dL
- Screening plasma D-dimer > 0.34 μg/mL from a sample obtained within 45 days prior to study entry was the original D-dimer criterion. It was revised to ≥ 0.25 ug/mL four months after the first enrollment, and subsequently the D-dimer eligibility criterion was completely cut off a year later.
- For females of reproductive potential (women who had not been post-menopausal for at least 24 consecutive months, i.e., who had menses within 24 months prior to study entry), or women who had not undergone surgical sterilization, specifically hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation) required a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 48 hours prior to entry. More information on this criterion can be found in the study protocol.
- Must agree not to participate in the conception process (e.g., active attempt to become pregnant or to impregnate, sperm donation, in vitro fertilization), and if participating in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy, the subject/partner must use at least 2 reliable methods of contraception, (condoms, without a spermicidal agent; a diaphragm or cervical cap without spermicide; an IUD; or hormone-based contraceptive), for 2 weeks before study treatment, while receiving study treatment, and for 6 weeks after receiving study treatment. As hormone-based contraceptives (oral, transdermal, or subdermal) can affect coagulopathy biomarkers, subjects who plan on using such a contraceptive during the study must be taking the same product for ≥ 4 weeks prior to screening and be encouraged to continue throughout the duration of the study if medically feasible.
- Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70 on at least one occasion within 45 days prior to study entry
- Confirmation of the availability of the stored pre-entry fasting plasma, serum, and cell samples. The site had to confirm that these samples had entered into the Laboratory Data Management System (LDMS).
Who cannot join
- Current or past malignancy (except non-melanoma cancer of the skin)
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) or CAD equivalent including diabetes mellitus or National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) calculated 10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk of > 20%.
- Known cirrhosis.
- Known chronic active hepatitis B or C.
- Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) < 1.0 x lower limit of normal or > 1.0 x ULN.
- Known inflammatory conditions, such as, but not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), sarcoidosis, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), chronic pancreatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, myositis, or myopathy.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Pregnant or breast-feeding.
- Previous intolerance to any statin or any of its components.
- Use of any lipid-lowering therapies including all statin drugs, Omega 3 fatty acids/fish oil, red yeast rice, and niacin products ≥ 1 g/day (e.g., niacin, nicotinic acid, vitamin B3) taken within 45 days prior to study entry. More information on this criterion can be found in the study protocol.
- Immunosuppressant use, such as, but not limited to, systemic or potentially systemic glucocorticoids (including nasal or inhaled steroids), azathioprine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, sirolimus, rapamycin, or cyclosporine within 45 days prior to study entry.
- Use of any systemic antineoplastic or immunomodulatory treatment, investigational vaccines, interleukins, interferons, growth factors, or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) within 45 days prior to study entry. More information on this criterion can be found in the study protocol.
- Concurrent use of prohibited medications. More information on this criterion can be found in the study protocol.
- Heavy alcohol use as defined by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) (http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/Practitioner/pocketguide/pocket_guide3.htm) and alcohol or drug use or dependence that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
- Current use of anticoagulation therapy other than ≤ 325 mg of daily aspirin.
- Known coagulopathy, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism within 6 months prior to study entry.
- Known active or recent (not fully resolved within 4 weeks prior to study entry) bacterial, fungal, parasitic, or viral infections.
- Known history of recurrent rectal and/or genital herpes simplex virus (HSV) or varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection within 12 weeks prior to study entry.
- Serious illness or trauma requiring systemic treatment and/or hospitalization within 4 weeks prior to study entry.
- History of stroke.
Trial locations and contacts
31 sites in 2 countries.
31 sites in 2 countries
United States30 sites
University of Colorado Hospital CRS (6101)
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
31788 Alabama CRS
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Massachusetts General Hospital ACTG CRS (101)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Brigham and Women's Hosp. ACTG CRS (107)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Beth Israel Deaconess Med. Ctr., ACTG CRS (103)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Cooper Univ. Hosp. CRS (31476)
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Unc Aids Crs (3201)
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516
Northwestern University CRS (2701)
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Univ. of Cincinnati CRS (2401)
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
Case CRS (2501)
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Metro Health CRS (2503)
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109
The Ohio State Univ. AIDS CRS (2301)
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Wayne State Univ. CRS (31478)
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Henry Ford Hosp. CRS (31472)
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Duke Univ. Med. Ctr. Adult CRS (1601)
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Houston AIDS Research Team CRS (31473)
Houston, Texas, 77030
UCLA CARE Center CRS (601)
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Cornell CRS (7804)
New York, New York, 10011
NY Univ. HIV/AIDS CRS (401)
New York, New York, 10016
New Jersey Medical School-Adult Clinical Research Ctr. CRS (31486)
Newark, New Jersey, 07103
Hosp. of the Univ. of Pennsylvania CRS (6201)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Pitt CRS (1001)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Virginia Commonwealth Univ. Medical Ctr. CRS (31475)
Richmond, Virginia, 23219
AIDS Care CRS (1101)
Rochester, New York, 14642
University of Rochester Adult HIV Therapeutic Strategies Network CRS (31787)
Rochester, New York, 14642
Ucsd, Avrc Crs (701)
San Diego, California, 92103
University of Washington AIDS CRS (1401)
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Washington U CRS (2101)
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Harbor-UCLA Med. Ctr. CRS (603)
Torrance, California, 90502
Georgetown University CRS (GU CRS) (1008)
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Study Evaluating the Effect of Atorvastatin on Biomarkers of Inflammation, Coagulopathy, Angiogenesis, and T-lymphocyte Activation in HIV-1 Infected Individuals With Suppressed HIV-1 RNA and LDL Cholesterol < 130 mg/dL
ACTG A5275 was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over design pilot study evaluating the effect of atorvastatin on biomarkers of inflammation, coagulopathy, angiogenesis, and T-lymphocyte activation in HIV-1 infected individuals with suppressed HIV-1 RNA on stable protease inhibitor based antiretroviral therapy with fasting LDL cholesterol < 130 mg/dL.
Atorvastatin is a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating high cholesterol. Atorvastatin has also been able to lower the level of inflammation blood tests in certain other diseases but has not been studied for this purpose in people who have HIV. The main goal of this experimental study is to see how taking atorvastatin affects inflammation blood tests in people infected with HIV who do not need to take medicine for high cholesterol. In addition to observing the effects of atorvastatin on the level of inflammation measured in the blood, this study evaluated if atorvastatin is safe for people with HIV who are also taking medication for HIV.
Read the detailed description
Since people started taking HIV medications, illness from AIDS has decreased, but other serious diseases like heart disease (heart attacks) and certain kinds of cancer have increased. HIV causes inflammation (irritation) inside the body that cannot be felt but can be measured by levels of certain inflammation blood tests. Inflammation may contribute to diseases (such as heart attacks) that have become some of the leading causes of death in people with HIV. HIV therapy can partially lower levels of inflammation measured in blood, however, levels of inflammation in people who have HIV who are taking certain kinds of anti-HIV drugs may remain high compared with those found in people not infected with HIV.
- Conditions
- HIV-1 Infection
- Being tested
- atorvastatin, placebo for atorvastin
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
atorvastatinDrug
Also called Lipitor
10 mg daily for 4 weeks, if no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of atorvastatin toxicity, dose increase to 20 mg daily from week 4- week 20
atorvastatinDrug
Also called Lipitor
Starting at week 24, 10 mg daily for 4 weeks. If no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of atorvastatin toxicity were found, 20 mg daily from week 28- week 44.
placebo for atorvastinDrug
Also called placebo
One tablet once daily for 4 weeks. If no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of toxicity were found, then increase the dose to two tablets once daily.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: atorvastatin / placebo | Experimental | At study entry (week 0), participants continued the entry boosted PI-based antiretroviral regimen (not provided by the study) and initiated atorvastatin at a daily dose of 10 mg for 4 weeks. If no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of atorvastatin toxicity were found, the dose of atorvastatin was increased to 20 mg daily at the week 4 visit. At week 20, atorvastatin was stopped for a 4-week washout period.
At week 24, placebo was started for 4 weeks. If no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of toxicity were found, the placebo dose was doubled at week 28. At week 44, the placebo was stopped to allow for another 4-week washout period. Receives: Drug: atorvastatin; Drug: placebo for atorvastin |
| Arm B: placebo / atorvastatin | Experimental | At study entry (week 0), participants continued the entry boosted PI-based antiretroviral regimen (not provided by the study) and initiated placebo for 4 weeks. If no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of toxicity were found, the dose of placebo was doubled at the week 4 visit. At week 20, the placebo was stopped for a 4-week washout period.
At week 24, atorvastatin was started at a daily dose of 10 mg for 4 weeks. If no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of atorvastatin toxicity were found, the dose of atorvastatin was increased to 20 mg daily at week 28. At week 44, atorvastatin was stopped to allow for another 4-week washout period. Receives: Drug: atorvastatin; Drug: placebo for atorvastin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and [Change From Baseline to Week 20] in log10 IL-6
IL-6 (Interleukin 6) in log10 pg/mL: Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and [change from baseline to week 20] (i.e. [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline])
Measured: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and [Change From Baseline to Week 20] in CD4+ T-cell Activation Percent
CD4+ T-cell activation percent (% CD38+/DR+ of CD4+): Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and [change from baseline to week 20] (i.e. [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline])
Measured: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and [Change From Baseline to Week 20] in log10 D-dimer
D-dimer in log10 ng/mL: Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and [change from baseline to week 20] (i.e. [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline])
Measured: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and [Change From Baseline to Week 20] in CD8+ T-cell Activation Percent
CD8+ T-cell activation percent (% CD38+/DR+ of CD8+): Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and [change from baseline to week 20] (i.e. [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline])
Measured: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Secondary outcomes (8)
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and Change From [Baseline to Week 20] in MCP-1 (log10 Transformed)
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2) is one of the key chemokines that regulate migration and infiltration of monocytes/macrophages.
Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and change from [baseline to week 20] is defined as [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline].
Measured: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and Change From [Baseline to Week 20] in IP-10 (log10 Transformed)
IFN-gamma-inducible protein 10 (IP-10 or CXCL10) is a chemokine secreted from cells stimulated with type I and II IFNs and LPS, is also a chemoattractant for activated T cells.
Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and change from [baseline to week 20] is defined as [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline].
Measured: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and Change From [Baseline to Week 20] in CD40L (log10 Transformed)
Cluster of differentiation 40 (CD40L) is a costimulatory protein found on antigen presenting cells and is required for their activation.
Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and change from [baseline to week 20] is defined as [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline].
Measured: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and Change From [Baseline to Week 20] in sCD14 (log10 Transformed)
Soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14) is a human gene. Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and change from [baseline to week 20] is defined as [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline].
Measured: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and Change From [Baseline to Week 20] in P-selectin (log10 Transformed)
P-selectin is a protein that in humans encoded by the SELP gene. P-selectin functions as a cell adhesion molecule (CAM) on the surfaces of activated endothelial cells, which line the inner surface of blood vessels, and activated platelets.
Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and change from [baseline to week 20] is defined as [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline].
Measured: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and Change From [Baseline to Week 20] in sCD163 (log10 Transformed)
CD163 (Cluster of Differentiation 163) is a protein that in humans encoded by the CD163 gene; and sCD163 is soluble CD163.
Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and change from [baseline to week 20] is defined as [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline].
Measured: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Number of Participants With Safety Endpoints Before Study Treatment Cross-over (Baseline to Week 24)
Safety endpoints are defined as grade ≥ 2 signs and symptoms, laboratory abnormalities, AST/ALT > 3 X ULN, and adverse events prior to study treatment cross-over (baseline to week 24).
The DAIDS Adverse Event (AE) Grading Table, Version 1.0, December 2004 (Clarification, August 2009) was used for grading of AEs.
Measured: week 0 to week 24
Number of Participants With Safety Endpoints After Study Treatment Cross-over (Week 24 to Week 48)
Safety endpoints are defined as grade ≥ 2 signs and symptoms, laboratory abnormalities, AST/ALT > 3 X ULN, and adverse events after study treatment cross-over (week 24 to week 48).
The DAIDS Adverse Event (AE) Grading Table, Version 1.0, December 2004 (Clarification, August 2009) was used for grading of AEs.
Measured: week 24 to week 48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study start14 Apr 2011
- Primary completionMay 2014
- Study completionMay 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV-1 InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Judith A. Aberg, M.D., Study chair, NYU/Bellevue/HIV/AIDS CTUDaniel E Nixon, D.O., Ph.D., Study chair, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01351025
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACTG A5275
- Other IDs
- 1U01AI068636
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 8 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 3 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Rahman F, Brates I, Aweeka F, Bosch RJ, Deitchman A, Nixon D, Aberg JA. Evaluating the effect of atorvastatin exposure and vitamin D levels on lipid outcomes in people with HIV-1 with suppressed HIV-1 RNA and LDL cholesterol <130 mg/dL. HIV Med. 2023 Jun;24(6):749-753. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13453. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
PubMed 36549898
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Study Evaluating the Effect of Atorvastatin on Biomarkers of Inflammation, Coagulopathy, Angiogenesis, and T-lymphocyte Activation in HIV-1 Infected Individuals With Suppressed HIV-1 RNA and LDL Cholesterol < 130 mg/dL
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01351025
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACTG A5275
- Conditions
- HIV-1 Infection
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other InfectionsResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Pfizer
- Study start
- 14 Apr 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Aug 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
ACTG A5275 was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over design pilot study evaluating the effect of atorvastatin on biomarkers of inflammation, coagulopathy, angiogenesis, and T-lymphocyte activation in HIV-1 infected individuals with suppressed HIV-1 RNA on stable protease inhibitor based antiretroviral therapy with fasting LDL cholesterol < 130 mg/dL.
Atorvastatin is a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating high cholesterol. Atorvastatin has also been able to lower the level of inflammation blood tests in certain other diseases but has not been studied for this purpose in people who have HIV. The main goal of this experimental study is to see how taking atorvastatin affects inflammation blood tests in people infected with HIV who do not need to take medicine for high cholesterol. In addition to observing the effects of atorvastatin on the level of inflammation measured in the blood, this study evaluated if atorvastatin is safe for people with HIV who are also taking medication for HIV.
Detailed description
Since people started taking HIV medications, illness from AIDS has decreased, but other serious diseases like heart disease (heart attacks) and certain kinds of cancer have increased. HIV causes inflammation (irritation) inside the body that cannot be felt but can be measured by levels of certain inflammation blood tests. Inflammation may contribute to diseases (such as heart attacks) that have become some of the leading causes of death in people with HIV. HIV therapy can partially lower levels of inflammation measured in blood, however, levels of inflammation in people who have HIV who are taking certain kinds of anti-HIV drugs may remain high compared with those found in people not infected with HIV.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: atorvastatin / placebo | Experimental | Drug: atorvastatin, Drug: placebo for atorvastinAt study entry (week 0), participants continued the entry boosted PI-based antiretroviral regimen (not provided by the study) and initiated atorvastatin at a daily dose of 10 mg for 4 weeks. If no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of atorvastatin toxicity were found, the dose of atorvastatin was increased to 20 mg daily at the week 4 visit. At week 20, atorvastatin was stopped for a 4-week washout period. At week 24, placebo was started for 4 weeks. If no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of toxicity were found, the placebo dose was doubled at week 28. At week 44, the placebo was stopped to allow for another 4-week washout period. |
| Arm B: placebo / atorvastatin | Experimental | Drug: atorvastatin, Drug: placebo for atorvastinAt study entry (week 0), participants continued the entry boosted PI-based antiretroviral regimen (not provided by the study) and initiated placebo for 4 weeks. If no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of toxicity were found, the dose of placebo was doubled at the week 4 visit. At week 20, the placebo was stopped for a 4-week washout period. At week 24, atorvastatin was started at a daily dose of 10 mg for 4 weeks. If no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of atorvastatin toxicity were found, the dose of atorvastatin was increased to 20 mg daily at week 28. At week 44, atorvastatin was stopped to allow for another 4-week washout period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- HIV-1 infected
- Combination ART that includes any boosted PI regimen for at least 6 months prior to study entry
- No plans to change the antiretroviral regimen in the next year
- Must have been on the same HAART regimen for at least 12 weeks with no change prior to study entry. More information on this criterion can be found in the study protocol.
- If on vitamin D replacement therapy, must have been on stable regimen for ≥ 1 mo. prior to study entry.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Current or past malignancy (except non-melanoma cancer of the skin)
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) or CAD equivalent including diabetes mellitus or National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) calculated 10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk of > 20%.
- Known cirrhosis.
- Known chronic active hepatitis B or C.
- Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) < 1.0 x lower limit of normal or > 1.0 x ULN.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| atorvastatinAlso: Lipitor10 mg daily for 4 weeks, if no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of atorvastatin toxicity, dose increase to 20 mg daily from week 4- week 20 | Drug | Arm A: atorvastatin / placebo |
| atorvastatinAlso: LipitorStarting at week 24, 10 mg daily for 4 weeks. If no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of atorvastatin toxicity were found, 20 mg daily from week 28- week 44. | Drug | Arm B: placebo / atorvastatin |
| placebo for atorvastinAlso: placeboOne tablet once daily for 4 weeks. If no symptoms or lab findings suggestive of toxicity were found, then increase the dose to two tablets once daily. | Drug | Arm A: atorvastatin / placebo, Arm B: placebo / atorvastatin |
Primary outcome
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and [Change From Baseline to Week 20] in log10 IL-6
Time frame: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
IL-6 (Interleukin 6) in log10 pg/mL: Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and [change from baseline to week 20] (i.e. [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline])
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and [Change From Baseline to Week 20] in CD4+ T-cell Activation Percent
Time frame: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
CD4+ T-cell activation percent (% CD38+/DR+ of CD4+): Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and [change from baseline to week 20] (i.e. [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline])
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and [Change From Baseline to Week 20] in log10 D-dimer
Time frame: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
D-dimer in log10 ng/mL: Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and [change from baseline to week 20] (i.e. [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline])
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and [Change From Baseline to Week 20] in CD8+ T-cell Activation Percent
Time frame: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
CD8+ T-cell activation percent (% CD38+/DR+ of CD8+): Difference between [change from week 24 to week 44] and [change from baseline to week 20] (i.e. [week 44 - week 24] - [week 20 - baseline])
8 secondary outcomes
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and Change From [Baseline to Week 20] in MCP-1 (log10 Transformed)
Time frame: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and Change From [Baseline to Week 20] in IP-10 (log10 Transformed)
Time frame: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and Change From [Baseline to Week 20] in CD40L (log10 Transformed)
Time frame: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and Change From [Baseline to Week 20] in sCD14 (log10 Transformed)
Time frame: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and Change From [Baseline to Week 20] in P-selectin (log10 Transformed)
Time frame: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and Change From [Baseline to Week 20] in sCD163 (log10 Transformed)
Time frame: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44
Number of Participants With Safety Endpoints Before Study Treatment Cross-over (Baseline to Week 24)
Time frame: week 0 to week 24
Number of Participants With Safety Endpoints After Study Treatment Cross-over (Week 24 to Week 48)
Time frame: week 24 to week 48
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Aug 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36549898Rahman F, Brates I, Aweeka F, Bosch RJ, Deitchman A, Nixon D, Aberg JA. Evaluating the effect of atorvastatin exposure and vitamin D levels on lipid outcomes in people with HIV-1 with suppressed HIV-1 RNA and LDL cholesterol <130 mg/dL. HIV Med. 2023 Jun;24(6):749-753. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13453. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
Related trials for HIV-1 Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Cohort of Women Living With HIV-1 and Receiving Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), Pregnancy
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Provide Continued Access to Study Drug to Children and Adolescents Who Have Completed Clinical Studies Involving Gilead HIV Treatments
HIV-1-infection
RecruitingObservational study
Leukapheresis Procedures to Obtain Plasma and Lymphocytes for Research Studies on Antiretroviral Naive HIV-1 Research Participants
HIV
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Study to Compare Bictegravir/Lenacapavir Versus Current Therapy in People With HIV-1 Who Are Successfully Treated With Biktarvy
HIV-1-infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Study to Compare Bictegravir/Lenacapavir Versus Current Therapy in People With HIV-1 Who Are Successfully Treated With a Complicated Regimen (ARTISTRY-1)
HIV-1-infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Judith A. Aberg, M.D. study chair
NYU/Bellevue/HIV/AIDS CTU
Daniel E Nixon, D.O., Ph.D. study chair
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
31 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing atorvastatin in people with HIV-1 Infection, run by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections at 31 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 31 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Aug 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference Between [Change From Week 24 to Week 44] and [Change From Baseline to Week 20] in log10 IL-6 (time frame: baseline, week 20, week 24, and week 44). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01351025, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2021.