AzTrials
AzTrials

Newborn MorbidityEPIPPAINNCT01346813

Epidemiology of Painful Procedures in Neonates

An observational study of Newborn Morbidity and Pain, run by Hôpital Armand Trousseau at 21 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Sick or premature neonates are exposed to frequent painful and stressful procedures during their stay in neonatal intensive care units. Although neonates do feel pain and may have long term effects induced by painful experiences, prevention and treatment of neonatal pain is far from optimal in many units. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 45 weeks
Conditions the study is for
Newborn Morbidity, Pain, Procedures
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
21 sitesFrance
Study dates
May 2011to Aug 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 45 weeks
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Two settings: neonatal or pediatric intensive care units and regional pediatric transport system (SMUR). In intensive care units, during the first 14 days of admission prospective data will be collected on all neonatal procedures causing pain, stress, or discomfort with the corresponding analgesic therapy and pain assessment. A detailed record of conditions of endotracheal intubations will also be carried out. In the SMUR, neonates transported during the 2-months study period by all of 5 SMUR will have all their procedures recorded in a specific data collection form. A real-time assessment of pain induced by each procedure will be carried out by staff using the DAN scale. A detailed record of conditions and neonate tolerance of endotracheal intubations will also be carried out.

Who may be able to join

  • Intensive care units:
  • Neonates admitted to the unit during the 6-week recruitment period
  • Age less than 45 post-conceptional weeks
  • Regional pediatric transport system (SMUR):
  • Neonates transported during the 2-months recruitment period
  • Age less than 45 post-conceptional weeks

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

21 sites in 1 country.

21 sites in 1 country

France21 sites
  • Hôpital Victor Dupouy. Service de réanimation néonatale

    Argenteuil, 95107

  • Hôpital Antoine Béclère. Service de réanimation néonatale

    Clamart, 92141

  • SMUR 92 Clamart

    Clamart, 92141

  • Hôpital Louis Mourier. Service de réanimation néonatale

    Colombes, 92701

  • CHI Créteil. Service de réanimation néonatale

    Créteil, 94000

  • Hôpital du Sud Francilien. Service de réanimation néonatale

    Évry, 91014

  • Hôpital de Bicêtre. Service de réanimation pédiatrique et néonatale

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275

  • Hôpital de Meaux. Service de réanimation néonatale

    Meaux, 77104

  • CHI André Grégoire. Service de réanimation néonatale

    Montreuil, 93100

  • SAMU 93 Montreuil

    Montreuil, 93100

  • Hôpital Armand Trousseau. Service de Réanimation Pédiatrique

    Paris, 75012

  • Hôpital Cochin-Port Royal. Service de médecine néonatale

    Paris, 75014

  • Institut de Puériculture et de Périnatalogie. Service de réanimation néonatale

    Paris, 75014

  • Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades. Service de réanimation pédiatrique et néonatale

    Paris, 75015

  • SMUR 75 Necker

    Paris, 75015

  • Hôpital Robert Debré. Service de réanimation néonatale

    Paris, 75019

  • SMUR 75 Robert Debré

    Paris, 75019

  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy Saint Germain en Laye Service de réanimation néonatale

    Poissy, 78300

  • Centre Hospitalier René Dubos. Service de réanimation néonatale

    Pontoise, 95303

  • SAMU 95 Pontoise

    Pontoise, 95303

  • Hôpital Delafontaine. Service de réanimation néonatale

    Saint-Denis, 93205

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Epidémiologie Des Gestes Douloureux ou Stressants Chez Les Nouveau-nés Pris en Charge Dans Les unités de réanimation néonatale et pédiatrique et Par Les équipes de SMUR de la région d'Ile de France

Sick or premature neonates are exposed to frequent painful and stressful procedures during their stay in neonatal intensive care units. Although neonates do feel pain and may have long term effects induced by painful experiences, prevention and treatment of neonatal pain is far from optimal in many units. An epidemiological study (EPIPPAIN) conducted in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units in France in 2005 showed that painful procedures were extremely frequent and that analgesics treatments varied a lot among units. Since many guidelines have been issued by international scientific societies to manage neonatal pain, one may expect that the prevention and treatment of neonatal pain has improved over the last 6 years.

Although awake endotracheal intubations are extremely difficult or impossible in older children or adults, such intubations are still frequently performed without sedation/analgesia in neonates. Recent studies have shown that premedications facilitate intubation conditions and greatly improve neonates tolerance of the procedure. Studies aimed at assessing the risks and benefits of different sedations/analgesia strategies are urgently needed in neonates. We also need a tool to assess at the same time the technical conditions of intubations and the tolerance of the neonate to the procedure so that data from different studies can be compared.

Read more

The objectives of the present study are:

  1. To describe the incidence of painful and stressful procedures performed in the neonate in intensive care units as well as in neonates transported by the medical emergency system (SMUR) of the Ile-de-France region 6 years after the first EPPIPAIN study conducted in the same region and same type of population in order to assess the evolution of practices. The description of painful and stressful procedures will be completed with a real-time around-the-clock assessment of the pain induced by procedures using a validated behavioral pain scale.
  2. To link this study with The Epipage study 2 in order to look for associations between the number of painful and stressful procedures and/or analgesic treatments of the neonatal period and the neurological outcome of children that will be followed in the Epipage cohort. The Epipage study is a separate study that will follow for 13 years a cohort of premature neonates recruited in 2011.
  3. To describe the incidence of painful or stressful procedures and analgesic treatments in neonates transported by the pediatric emergency system (SMUR) of the Ile-de-France region in France.
  4. To obtain initial validity of a tool permitting to assess intubations in neonates. An observational detailed description of endotracheal intubations conditions will be conducted in neonates transported and intubated by SMUR and in neonates intubated in intensive care units
  5. To describe continuous sedation and analgesia practices in ventilated neonates in intensive care units. For these neonates, data from medical records will be recovered up to 2 months of admission in intensive care units
  6. To describe the frequency of heel sticks for glycemia measurement and blood gazes practices among centers. Relate heel stick practices to the normality or abnormality of glycemia results
Read the detailed description

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

Principal hypothesis

  • The number of painful and stressful procedures performed in the neonate admitted to intensive care units is still very high but it is lower than in 2005 Pain scores are lower when procedures are performed with a specific analgesia prior to procedure.

Secondary hypothesis

  • The frequency of pre-procedural analgesia is higher than in 2005
  • Certain common procedures such as heel sticks and endotracheal intubations are carried out with a more frequent analgesia than in 2005
  • The use of a continuous sedation and analgesia does not induce a reduction in specific pre-procedural analgesia
  • A real-time pain assessment of painful procedures can be carried out in more than 80% of procedures performed in neonates in intensive care units Pain scores show that certain procedures which are apparently not very painful may elicit high pain scores in very sick neonates
  • Certain procedures such as nursing care or weighing may induce high pain scores in neonates who have invasive tubes (endotracheal tubes, thoracic drainage)
  • A continuous sedation and analgesia is given to more than 50% of ventilated neonates.
  • Certain characteristics of neonates may influence the use of analgesics for painful procedures. Ex: gender, age, respiratory support
  • Certain contextual characteristics or center may influence the use of analgesics for painful procedures. Ex: day or night, pain referent in the unit, night head nurse, written pain management guidelines.
  • More than 80% of semi-urgent or non-urgent intubations are carried out with the use of premedication.
  • Opioids are the most commonly drugs used for premedication during endotracheal intubations in neonates
  • The assessment of intubating conditions and neonate tolerance show lower scores when intubations are performed with a premedication considered as "recommended" by the American Academy of Pediatrics
  • The detailed observation of intubations in SMUR and intensive care units will enable initial validation of a tool assessment
  • Too many capillary blood samples by heel sticks are carried out in neonates even in neonates that have normal values throughout repeated sticks.
  • The frequency of blood gas assessments is widely variable among centers
  • The frequency of capillary blood glycemia is widely variable among centers

LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF PAIN AND ANALGESIC TREATMENTS

This objective will be assessed by matching the data of the current Epippain study and another parallel study (Epipage 2)

Principal hypothesis

  • After adjusting for the disease severity, neonates that undergo more painful procedures have a poorer neurological outcome later in infancy.

Secondary hypothesis

  • Higher pain scores are associated with a poorer neurological outcome later in infancy
  • The use of central analgesics like opioid does not have a negative effect on neurological outcome later in infancy.
  • The potential negative effect of numerous painful procedures during the neonatal period can be counteracted by the use of analgesics.

METHODOLOGY

This study will be carried out in neonates cared for in two settings: (i) neonatal or pediatric intensive care units and (ii) the medical regional pediatric transport system (SMUR) In the intensive care units, this study is designed as a prospective observational study to collect around-the-clock bedside data on all painful or stressful procedures performed in neonates admitted to the participating units. All 16 tertiary care centers, Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) and Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) in the Paris Region will participate. Since this is an observational study no changes in the standard of care will be carried out. During the first 14 days of admission to the participating units, prospective data will be collected on all neonatal procedures causing pain, stress, or discomfort with the corresponding analgesic therapy. A real-time assessment of pain induced by each procedure will be carried out by unit staff using the DAN scale. A detailed record of conditions of endotracheal intubations will also be carried out.

Demographic data, type and duration of respiratory support, sedative and analgesic drugs administered concomitantly or pre-procedure, and conditions related to each procedure (type, hour of the day, operator, parental presence) will be collected. We'll also record repeat procedure attempts for procedures requiring more than one attempt before successful completion. The use of specific pre-procedural analgesia will be noted for each procedure. If neonates are discharged from the units before 14 days, data collection on painful procedures will be stopped on the day of discharge.

In the medical regional pediatric transport system (SMUR), neonates transported during the 2-months study period, will have all their procedures recorded in a specific data collection form. Demographic data, type of respiratory support, sedative and analgesic drugs administered concomitantly or pre-procedure, and conditions related to each procedure (type, hour of the day, operator, parental presence) will be collected. We'll also record repeat procedure attempts for procedures requiring more than one attempt before successful completion. The use of specific pre-procedural analgesia will be noted for each procedure. A real-time assessment of pain induced by each procedure will be carried out by unit staff using the DAN scale. A detailed record of conditions and neonate tolerance of endotracheal intubations will also be carried out.

Keywords
Newborns, Premature, Pain, Pain assessment, Painful Procedures, Stressful Procedures, Endotracheal Intubation, Analgesia, Sedation, Longterm effects of pain, Epidemiology
Medical subject headings
Pain, Agnosia, Premature Birth

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 May 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2011
  3. Primary completionAug 2011
  4. Study completionAug 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01346813
Sponsor's protocol ID
EPIPPAIN2_IDF
Acronym
EPIPPAIN
Status last verified
Oct 2011
First submitted
2 May 2011
Last updated
26 Oct 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Carbajal R, Lode N, Ayachi A, Chouakri O, Henry-Larzul V, Kessous K, Normand A, Courtois E, Rousseau J, Cimerman P, Chabernaud JL. Premedication practices for tracheal intubation in neonates transported by French medical transport teams: a prospective observational study. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 14;9(11):e034052. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034052.

    PubMed 31727669
  • Courtois E, Cimerman P, Dubuche V, Goiset MF, Orfevre C, Lagarde A, Sgaggero B, Guiot C, Goussot M, Huraux E, Nanquette MC, Butel C, Ferreira AM, Lacoste S, Sejourne S, Jolly V, Lajoie G, Maillard V, Guedj R, Chappuy H, Carbajal R. The burden of venipuncture pain in neonatal intensive care units: EPIPPAIN 2, a prospective observational study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 May;57:48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

    PubMed 27045564

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Newborn Morbidity and Pain, run by Hôpital Armand Trousseau at 21 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 21 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01346813, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in