Dry Age Related Macular DegenerationPhase 1/2Dry AMDNCT01344993
Safety and Tolerability of Sub-retinal Transplantation of hESC Derived RPE (MA09-hRPE) Cells in Patients With Advanced Dry Age Related Macular Degeneration
A Phase 1/2 study testing MA09-hRPE in people with Dry Age Related Macular Degeneration, run by Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a safety and tolerability trial to evaluate the effect of subretinal injection of human embryonic stem cell derived retinal pigment epithelium cells in patients with dry Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) and to perform exploratory evaluation of potential efficacy endpoints to be used in future studies… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dry Age Related Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- MA09-hRPE
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 9 Jun 2011to 19 Aug 2015
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult male or female over 55 years of age.
- Patient should be in sufficiently good health to reasonably expect survival for at least four years after treatment
- Clinical findings consistent with advanced dry AMD with evidence of one or more areas of >250microns of geographic atrophy (as defined in the Age-Related eye Disease Study [AREDS] study) involving the central fovea.
- GA defined as attenuation or loss of RPE as observed by biomicroscopy, OCT, and FA.
- No evidence of current or prior choroidal neovascularization in the treated eye
- The visual acuity of the eye to receive the transplant will be no better than 20/400. The visual acuity of the eye in the better vision cohort to receive the transplant will be no better than 20/100.
Show all 31Show fewer
- The visual acuity of the eye that is not to receive the transplant will be no better than 20/400 for the worse vision patients and no worse than 20/100 for the better vision patients.
- Electrophysiological findings consistent with advanced dry AMD.
- Medically suitable to undergo vitrectomy and subretinal injection.
- Medically suitable for general anesthesia or waking sedation, if needed.
- Medically suitable for transplantation of an embryonic stem cell line:
- Any laboratory value which falls slightly outside of the normal range will be reviewed by the Medical Monitor and Investigators to determine its clinical significance. If it is determined not to be clinically significant, the patient may be enrolled into the study.
- Normal serum chemistry (sequential multi-channel analyzer 20 [SMA-20]) and hematology (complete blood count [CBC], prothrombin time [PT], and activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]) screening tests. (NOTE:With the exception of abnormalities specifically identified in the exclusion criteria)
- Negative urine screen for drugs of abuse.
- Negative human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV) serologies.
- No history of malignancy (with the exception of successfully treated (excised) basal cell carcinoma[skin cancer] or successfully treated squamous cell carcinoma of the skin).
- Negative cancer screening within previous 6 months:
- complete history \& physical examination;
- dermatological screening exam for malignant lesions;
- negative fecal occult blood test \& negative colonoscopy within previous 7 years;
- negative chest roentgenogram (CXR);
- normal CBC \& manual differential;
- negative urinalysis (U/A);
- normal thyroid exam;
- if male, normal testicular examination; digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate specific antigen (PSA);
- if female, normal pelvic examination with Papanicolaou smear; and
- If female, normal clinical breast exam and, negative mammogram.
- If female and of childbearing potential, willing to use two effective forms of birth control during the study.
- If male, willing to use barrier and spermicidal contraception during the study.
- Willing to defer all future blood, blood component or tissue donation.
- Able to understand and willing to sign the informed consent
Who cannot join
- Presence of active or inactive CNV in the eye to be treated.
- Presence or history of retinal dystrophy, retinitis pigmentosa, chorioretinitis, central serious choroidopathy, diabetic retinopathy or other retinal vascular or degenerative disease other than ARMD.
- History of optic neuropathy.
- Macular atrophy due to causes other than AMD.
- Presence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy in the study eye, uncontrolled IOP, or use of two or more agents to control IOP (acetazolamide, beta blocker, alpha-1-agonist, antiprostaglandins, anhydrous carbonic inhibitors).
- Cataract of sufficient severity likely to necessitate surgical extraction within 1 year.
Show all 30Show fewer
- History of retinal detachment repair in the study eye.
- Axial myopia of greater than -8 diopters
- Axial length greater than 28 mm.
- History of malignancy (with the exception of successfully treated [excised] basal cell carcinoma[skin cancer] or successfully treated squamous cell carcinoma of the skin).
- History of myocardial infarction in previous 12 months.
- History of diabetes mellitus.
- History of cognitive impairments or dementia which may impact the patients ability participate in the informed consent process and to appropriately complete evaluations.
- Any immunodeficiency.
- Any current immunosuppressive therapy other than intermittent or low dose corticosteroids.
- Alanine transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) >1.5 times the upper limit of normal or any known liver disease.
- Renal insufficiency, as defined by creatine level >1.3 mg/dL.
- A hemoglobin concentration of less than 10 gm/dL, a platelet count of less than 100k/mm3 or an absolute neutrophil count of less than 1000/mm3 at study entry.
- Serologic evidence of infection with Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, or HIV.
- Current participation in any other clinical trial.
- Participation within previous 6 months in any clinical trial of a drug by ocular or systemic administration.
- Any other sight-threatening ocular disease.
- Any history of retinal vascular disease (compromised blood-retinal barrier.
- Glaucoma.
- Uveitis or other intraocular inflammatory disease.
- Significant lens opacities or other media opacity.
- Ocular lens removal within previous 3 months.
- Ocular surgery in the study eye in the previous 3 months
- If female, pregnancy or lactation.
- Any other medical condition, which, in the Investigator's judgment, will interfere with the patient's ability to comply with the protocol, compromises patient safety, or interferes with the interpretation of the study results.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United States4 sites
Mass Eye and Ear
Boston, Massachusetts
Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA School of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Miami, Florida
Wills Eye Institute-Mid Atlantic Retina
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
About this study
Official title: A Phase I/II, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Prospective Study to Determine the Safety and Tolerability of Sub-retinal Transplantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived Retinal Pigmented Epithelial (MA09-hRPE) Cells in Patients With Advanced Dry AMD
This is a safety and tolerability trial to evaluate the effect of subretinal injection of human embryonic stem cell derived retinal pigment epithelium cells in patients with dry Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) and to perform exploratory evaluation of potential efficacy endpoints to be used in future studies retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cellular therapy.
Read the detailed description
This study is a Phase I/II, open-label, non randomized, sequential, multi-center clinical trial. There will be 5 cohorts, the 4 low vision cohorts will contain 3 patients, the better vision cohort will contain 4 patients. The enrolled cohorts will be as follows:
Three AMD patients- 50,000 MA09-hRPE cells transplanted Three AMD patients- 100,000 MA09-hRPE cells transplanted Four Better Vision AMD patients- 100,000 MA09-hRPE cells transplanted Three AMD patients- 150,000 MA09-hRPE cells transplanted Three AMD patients- 200,000 MA09-hRPE cells transplanted
Patients will be enrolled sequentially, and within each cohort of 3 patients, each patient's clinical course over the first 6 weeks following cell transplantation will be reviewed by an independent (DSMB) before enrollment is opened for the next 2 patients. A full safety assessment of all 3 patients in each cohort will be made by the DSMB when the 3rd patient in each cohort completes 4 weeks of follow-up, and before the first patient in the next cohort receives a cell transplant. The exception is the better vision group where all patients may be enrolled once DSMB approval has been received.
Each cohort will be enrolled sequentially in turn, with the exception of the better vision cohort which may be enrolled in parallel with the other cohorts.
The day of the cell implantation will be Day 0, and patients will remain in the study until the last visit at 12 months.
- Conditions
- Dry Age Related Macular Degeneration
- Being tested
- MA09-hRPE
- Keywords
- Dry AMD, Geographic atrophy
- Medical subject headings
- Geographic Atrophy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MA09-hRPEBiological
Cohort 1 50,000 cells Cohort 2 100,000 cells Cohort 2a Better Vision 100,000 cells Cohort 3 150,000 cells Cohort 4 200,000 cells
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MA09-hRPE | Experimental | Experimental: Subretinal injection of MA09-hRPE
* Cohort 1 50,000 cells
* Cohort 2 100,000 cells
* Cohort 2a Better Vision 100,000 cells
* Cohort 3 150,000 cells
* Cohort 4 200,000 cells Receives: Biological: MA09-hRPE |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety of hESC derived RPE cells
The transplantation of hESC-derived RPE cells MA09-hRPE will be considered safe and tolerated in the absence of:
- Any grade 2 (NCI grading system) or greater adverse event related to the cell product
- Any evidence that the cells are contaminated with an infectious agent
- Any evidence that the cells show tumorigenic potential
Measured: 12 Months
Secondary outcomes (1)
exploratory evaluations for potential efficacy endpoints.
Secondary endpoints will be evaluated as exploratory evaluations for potential efficacy endpoints.
- Change in the mean of BCVA
- Autofluorescence photography
- Reading speed
Evidence of successful engraftment will consist of:
- Structural evidence (OCT imaging, fluorescein angiography, slit-lamp examination with fundus photography) that cells have been implanted in the correct location
- Electroretinographic evidence (mfERG) showing enhanced activity in the implant location
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Study start9 Jun 2011
- Primary completion19 Aug 2015
- Study completion19 Aug 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dry Age Related Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01344993
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 7316-CL-0002
- Other IDs
- ACT MA09-hRPE AMD-001
- Acronym
- Dry AMD
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 28 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Publications
Schwartz SD, Regillo CD, Lam BL, Eliott D, Rosenfeld PJ, Gregori NZ, Hubschman JP, Davis JL, Heilwell G, Spirn M, Maguire J, Gay R, Bateman J, Ostrick RM, Morris D, Vincent M, Anglade E, Del Priore LV, Lanza R. Human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium in patients with age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt's macular dystrophy: follow-up of two open-label phase 1/2 studies. Lancet. 2015 Feb 7;385(9967):509-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61376-3. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
PubMed 25458728Schwartz SD, Hubschman JP, Heilwell G, Franco-Cardenas V, Pan CK, Ostrick RM, Mickunas E, Gay R, Klimanskaya I, Lanza R. Embryonic stem cell trials for macular degeneration: a preliminary report. Lancet. 2012 Feb 25;379(9817):713-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60028-2. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
PubMed 22281388
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase I/II, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Prospective Study to Determine the Safety and Tolerability of Sub-retinal Transplantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived Retinal Pigmented Epithelial (MA09-hRPE) Cells in Patients With Advanced Dry AMD
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01344993
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Dry AMD / 7316-CL-0002
- Conditions
- Dry Age Related Macular Degeneration
- Keywords
- Dry AMD, Geographic atrophy
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Institute for Regenerative MedicineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 9 Jun 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Aug 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Aug 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a safety and tolerability trial to evaluate the effect of subretinal injection of human embryonic stem cell derived retinal pigment epithelium cells in patients with dry Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) and to perform exploratory evaluation of potential efficacy endpoints to be used in future studies retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cellular therapy.
Detailed description
This study is a Phase I/II, open-label, non randomized, sequential, multi-center clinical trial. There will be 5 cohorts, the 4 low vision cohorts will contain 3 patients, the better vision cohort will contain 4 patients. The enrolled cohorts will be as follows:
Three AMD patients- 50,000 MA09-hRPE cells transplanted Three AMD patients- 100,000 MA09-hRPE cells transplanted Four Better Vision AMD patients- 100,000 MA09-hRPE cells transplanted Three AMD patients- 150,000 MA09-hRPE cells transplanted Three AMD patients- 200,000 MA09-hRPE cells transplanted
Patients will be enrolled sequentially, and within each cohort of 3 patients, each patient's clinical course over the first 6 weeks following cell transplantation will be reviewed by an independent (DSMB) before enrollment is opened for the next 2 patients. A full safety assessment of all 3 patients in each cohort will be made by the DSMB when the 3rd patient in each cohort completes 4 weeks of follow-up, and before the first patient in the next cohort receives a cell transplant. The exception is the better vision group where all patients may be enrolled once DSMB approval has been received.
Each cohort will be enrolled sequentially in turn, with the exception of the better vision cohort which may be enrolled in parallel with the other cohorts.
The day of the cell implantation will be Day 0, and patients will remain in the study until the last visit at 12 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MA09-hRPE | Experimental | Biological: MA09-hRPEExperimental: Subretinal injection of MA09-hRPE * Cohort 1 50,000 cells * Cohort 2 100,000 cells * Cohort 2a Better Vision 100,000 cells * Cohort 3 150,000 cells * Cohort 4 200,000 cells |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (31 listed)
- Adult male or female over 55 years of age.
- Patient should be in sufficiently good health to reasonably expect survival for at least four years after treatment
- Clinical findings consistent with advanced dry AMD with evidence of one or more areas of >250microns of geographic atrophy (as defined in the Age-Related eye Disease Study [AREDS] study) involving the central fovea.
- GA defined as attenuation or loss of RPE as observed by biomicroscopy, OCT, and FA.
- No evidence of current or prior choroidal neovascularization in the treated eye
Key exclusion criteria (30 listed)
- Presence of active or inactive CNV in the eye to be treated.
- Presence or history of retinal dystrophy, retinitis pigmentosa, chorioretinitis, central serious choroidopathy, diabetic retinopathy or other retinal vascular or degenerative disease other than ARMD.
- History of optic neuropathy.
- Macular atrophy due to causes other than AMD.
- Presence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy in the study eye, uncontrolled IOP, or use of two or more agents to control IOP (acetazolamide, beta blocker, alpha-1-agonist, antiprostaglandins, anhydrous carbonic inhibitors).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MA09-hRPECohort 1 50,000 cells Cohort 2 100,000 cells Cohort 2a Better Vision 100,000 cells Cohort 3 150,000 cells Cohort 4 200,000 cells | Biological | MA09-hRPE |
Primary outcome
Safety of hESC derived RPE cells
Time frame: 12 Months
The transplantation of hESC-derived RPE cells MA09-hRPE will be considered safe and tolerated in the absence of: * Any grade 2 (NCI grading system) or greater adverse event related to the cell product * Any evidence that the cells are contaminated with an infectious agent * Any evidence that the cells show tumorigenic potential
1 secondary outcome
exploratory evaluations for potential efficacy endpoints.
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25458728Schwartz SD, Regillo CD, Lam BL, Eliott D, Rosenfeld PJ, Gregori NZ, Hubschman JP, Davis JL, Heilwell G, Spirn M, Maguire J, Gay R, Bateman J, Ostrick RM, Morris D, Vincent M, Anglade E, Del Priore LV, Lanza R. Human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium in patients with age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt's macular dystrophy: follow-up of two open-label phase 1/2 studies. Lancet. 2015 Feb 7;385(9967):509-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61376-3. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22281388Schwartz SD, Hubschman JP, Heilwell G, Franco-Cardenas V, Pan CK, Ostrick RM, Mickunas E, Gay R, Klimanskaya I, Lanza R. Embryonic stem cell trials for macular degeneration: a preliminary report. Lancet. 2012 Feb 25;379(9817):713-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60028-2. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Related trials for Dry Age Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Autologous Transplantation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelium for Geographic Atrophy Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
Not yet recruiting
Safety and Clinical Performance of the LENTIS® MAX LS-313 MF80 Compared With the Monofocal L-313 in Cataract Patients With Late Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Multicenter Comparative Clinical Investigation.
Cataract, AMD - Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Not yet recruiting
MacuMira Microcurrent Stimulation for Dark Adaptation in Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of OCU410 for Geographic Atrophy
Geographic Atrophy
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Efficacy Study of OpRegen for Treatment of Advanced Dry-Form Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing MA09-hRPE in people with Dry Age Related Macular Degeneration, run by Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 31 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety of hESC derived RPE cells (time frame: 12 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01344993, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2024.