Leukemia, Myelocytic, AcutePhase 3NCT01339910
Reduced Intensity Regimen vs Myeloablative Regimen for Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (BMT CTN 0901)
A Phase 3 study testing Fludarabine and Busulfan, Fludarabine and Melphalan and Busulfan and Fludarabine in people with Leukemia, Myelocytic, Acute, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 32 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The study is designed as a Phase III, multicenter trial comparing outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) between patients receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC) versus reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia, Myelocytic, Acute
- What is being tested?
- Fludarabine and Busulfan, Fludarabine and Melphalan and Busulfan and Fludarabine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 272 participants
- Where
- 32 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2011to 16 Oct 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age equal or less than 65 years old and equal to or greater than 18 years old.
- Patients with the diagnosis of MDS or AML with fewer than 5% myeloblasts in the bone marrow and no leukemic myeloblasts in the peripheral blood on morphologic analysis performed within 30 days of start of the conditioning regimen enrollment.
- For patients receiving treatment of their MDS or AML prior to transplantation: a)Interval between the start of the most recent cycle of conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and enrollment must be at least 30 days; b)Interval between completing treatment with a hypomethylating agent or other non-cytotoxic chemotherapy and enrollment must be at least 10 days.
- Patients must have a related or unrelated bone marrow or peripheral blood donor who is human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched at 7 or 8 of 8 HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1 at high resolution using DNA-based typing.
- HCT-Specific Comorbidity Index Score (HCT-CI) less than or equal to 4.
- Organ function: a) Cardiac function: Ejection fraction greater than or equal to 40%; b) Hepatic function: total bilirubin less than or equal to 2 times the upper limit of normal and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) less than or equal to 3 times the upper limit of normal.; c)Pulmonary function: Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) greater than or equal to 40% and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) greater than or equal to 50% (corrected for hemoglobin).
- Creatinine clearance greater than or equal to 50mL/min based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula.
- Signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Prior allograft or prior autograft.
- Symptomatic coronary artery disease.
- Leukemia involvement in the central nervous system (CNS) within 4 weeks of enrollment for patients with a history of prior CNS leukemia involvement (i.e., leukemic blasts previously detected in the cerebral spinal fluid).
- Karnofsky Performance Score less than 70.
- Patients receiving supplemental oxygen.
- Planned use of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) therapy.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients with uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infections (undergoing appropriate treatment and with progression of clinical symptoms).
- Patients seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- Patients with prior malignancies, except resected basal cell carcinoma or treated cervical carcinoma in situ. Cancer treated with curative intent greater than 5 years previously. Cancer treated with curative intent less than 5 years previously will not be allowed unless approved by the Protocol Officer or one of the Protocol Chairs.
- Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Fertile men and women unwilling to use contraceptive techniques during and for 12 months following treatment.
Trial locations and contacts
32 sites in 1 country.
32 sites in 1 country
United States32 sites
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Blood and Marrow Transplant Program at Northside Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
DFCI, Brigham & Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
University of North Carolina Hospital at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Jewish Hospital BMT Program
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45236
University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5061
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
University of Florida College of Medicine
Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0277
University of Kansas
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
University of California, San Diego Medical Center
La Jolla, California, 92093
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792-5156
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53211
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
West Virginia University Hospital
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198
Florida Hospital Cancer Institute
Orlando, Florida, 32804
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Mayo Clinic Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239-3098
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55095
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
Utah BMT/University of Utah Medical School
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
Texas Transplant Institute
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Seattle, Washington, 98109
Washington University/Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, 33624
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Multi-Center, Phase III Study of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Comparing Regimen Intensity in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (BMT CTN #0901)
The study is designed as a Phase III, multicenter trial comparing outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) between patients receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC) versus reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens.
Read the detailed description
Patients randomized to RIC will receive one of two regimen types: the combination of fludarabine (120-180 mg/m^2) and busulfan (less than or equal to 8 mg/kg or IV equivalent) (Flu/Bu) or fludarabine (120-180 mg/m^2) and melphalan (less than 150 mg/m^2) (Flu/Mel). Patient randomized to MAC will receive one of three regimens: busulfan (16 mg/kg oral or 12.8 mg/kg IV equivalent) and cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) (Bu/Cy); or, busulfan (16 mg/kg PO or 12.8 mg/kg IV) and fludarabine (120-180 mg/m^2) (Bu/Flu); or, cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) and total body irradiation (greater than 1200-1420cGy) (CyTBI). A total of 356 patients (178 to each arm) will be accrued on this study over a period of four years. Patients will be followed for up to 18 months from transplantation.
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Myelocytic, Acute
- Being tested
- Fludarabine and Busulfan, Fludarabine and Melphalan, Busulfan and Fludarabine, Busulfan and Cyclophosphamide, Cyclophosphamide and Total Body Irradiation
- Keywords
- Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fludarabine and BusulfanDrug
Also called Fludara and Busulfex
(Flu/Bu)
- Fludarabine: 30 mg/m^2/day on Days -6 to -2 (total dose of 150 mg/m^2)
- Busulfan: 4 mg/kg/day PO or 3.2 mg/kg/day (total dose of 8 mg/kg or 6.4 mg/kg, respectively) on Days -5 to -4
Fludarabine and MelphalanDrug
Also called Fludara and Alkeran
(Flu/Mel)
- Fludarabine: 30 mg/m^2/day on Days -5 to -2 (total dose of 120 mg/m^2)
- Melphalan: 140 mg/m^2 on Day -2
Busulfan and FludarabineDrug
Also called Busulfex and Fludara
(Bu/Flu)
- Busulfan: 4 mg/kg/day PO, 3.2 mg/kg/day IV or mg/m^2/day with Bu Css 900±100 ng/mL (total dose of 16 mg/kg, 12.8 mg/kg or 520 mg/m^2, respectively) on Days -5 to -2
- Fludarabine: 30 mg/m^2/day on Days -5 to -2: Flu (total dose of 120 mg/m^2)
Busulfan and CyclophosphamideDrug
Also called Busulfex and Cytoxan
(Bu/Cy)
- Busulfan: 4 mg/kg/day PO, 3.2 mg/kg/day IV or 130 mg/m^2/day with Bu Css 900 ± 100 ng/mL (total dose of 16 mg/kg or 12.8 mg/kg or 520 mg/m^2, respectively) on Days -7 to -4
- Cyclophosphamide: 60 mg/kg/day on Days -3 to -2 (total dose of 120 mg/kg)
Cyclophosphamide and Total Body IrradiationDrug
Also called Cytoxan and radiation
(Cy/TBI)
- TBI: 1200-1420 cGy on Days -7 to -4
- Cyclophosphamide: 60 mg/kg/day on Days -3 to -2 (total dose of 120 mg/kg)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) | Experimental | One of two different regimens in RIC will be administered; fludarabine and busulfan, or fludarabine and melphalan. Receives: Drug: Fludarabine and Busulfan; Drug: Fludarabine and Melphalan |
| Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen (MAC) | Active comparator | One of three different regimens in MAC will be administered; busulfan and fludarabine, busulfan and cyclophosphamide, or cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation. Receives: Drug: Busulfan and Fludarabine; Drug: Busulfan and Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Cyclophosphamide and Total Body Irradiation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is defined as survival of death from any cause.
Measured: 18 months post-randomization
Secondary outcomes (14)
Percentage of Participants With Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)
Relapse-free survival is defined as survival without relapse of the primary disease.
Measured: 18 months post-randomization
Percentage of Participants With Disease Relapse
Disease Relapse is defined as relapse of the primary disease.
Measured: 18 months post-randomization
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality
Treatment-related mortality is defined as death without a previous relapse of the primary disease.
Measured: 18 months post-randomization
Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment
Neutrophil engraftment is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count greater than 500x10^6/liter for 3 consecutive measurements on different days. The first of the 3 days will be designated the day of neutrophil engraftment. Platelet engraftment is defined as achieving platelet counts greater than 20,000/microliter for consecutive measurements over 7 days without requiring platelet transfusions. The first of the 7 days will be designated the day of platelet engraftment. Subjects must not have had platelet transfusions during the preceding 7 days.
Measured: Days 28 and 60 post-transplant
Number of Participants With Donor Cell Engraftment
Donor cell engraftment will be assessed by donor-recipient chimerism assays. Full donor chimerism is defined as the presence of at least 95% donor cells as a proportion of the total population in the peripheral blood or bone marrow. Graft rejection is defined as the presence of no more than 5% donor cells as a proportion of the total population. Mixed chimerism is defined as the presence of between 5% and 95% donor cells. Mixed or full donor chimerism will be considered evidence of donor engraftment.
Measured: Days 28 and 100 and 18 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Acute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995:
Skin stage:
0: No rash
- Rash <25% of body surface area
- Rash on 25-50% of body surface area
- Rash on > 50% of body surface area
- Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation
Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)*:
0: <2 mg/dL
- 2-3 mg/dL
- 3.01-6 mg/dL
- 6.01-15.0 mg/dL
- >15 mg/dL
GI stage*:
0: No diarrhea or diarrhea <500 mL/day
- Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD
- Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day
- Diarrhea >1500 mL/day
- Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus * If multiple etiologies are listed for liver or GI, the organ system is downstaged by 1.
GVHD grade:
0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4
Measured: Day 100 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD
Chronic GVHD is classified per 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005) into categories of severity: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Occurrence of chronic GVHD is defined as the occurrence of mild, moderate, or severe chronic GVHD per this classification.
Measured: 18 months post-transplant
Number of Participants With Chronic GVHD Severity
Chronic GVHD is classified per 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005) into categories of severity: none, mild, moderate, and severe.
Measured: 18 months post-transplant
Number of Participants With Primary Graft Failure
Primary graft failure is defined by lack of neutrophil engraftment.
Measured: 28 days post-transplant
Number of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure
Secondary graft failure is defined by initial neutrophil engraftment followed by subsequent decline in neutrophil counts to less than 500x10^6/liter that is unresponsive to growth factor therapy.
Measured: 18 months post-transplant
Number of Participants With Maximum Grade 3-5 Toxicities
The maximum grade of toxicities reported by participants over the study duration are tabulated. Per the CTCAE criteria, toxicities are graded on a scale of 0-5, with higher numbers indicating greater severity. The categories correspond as follows:
3 - severe; 4 - life-threatening; 5 - fatal
Measured: 18 months
Infection Type
The number and types of infection events reported are tabulated.
Measured: 18 months post-transplant
Number of Participants With Infections
The maximum severity of infections reported by participants are tabulated.
The number of infections and the number of patients experiencing infections will be tabulated by type of infection, severity, and time period after transplant. The cumulative incidence of severe, life-threatening, or fatal infections will be compared between the two treatment arms at 6, 12, and 18 months from transplant or until death.
Measured: 18 months post-transplant
Number of Participants With Cause of Death
Primary cause of death was adjudicated using previously described criteria (Copelan et al. 2007). When relapse occurred, it was considered the primary cause of death regardless of other events.
Measured: 18 months post-randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2011
- Primary completion16 Jan 2017
- Study completion16 Oct 2017
Why it stopped: Accrual terminated as recommended by the data and safety monitoring board.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Leukemia, Myelocytic, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical College of WisconsinThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 272 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical College of Wisconsin
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, National Marrow Donor Program
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mary Horowitz, MD, Study director, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01339910
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BMTCTN0901
- Other IDs
- U01HL069294, U01HL069294-05, BMT CTN 0901, 5U24CA076518
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 20 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 4 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Findings will be published in a manuscript
Publications
Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, Harris NL, Le Beau MM, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Tefferi A, Bloomfield CD. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009 Jul 30;114(5):937-51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
PubMed 19357394Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, Storer B. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood. 2005 Oct 15;106(8):2912-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2004. Epub 2005 Jun 30.
PubMed 15994282Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ, Martin P, Chien J, Przepiorka D, Couriel D, Cowen EW, Dinndorf P, Farrell A, Hartzman R, Henslee-Downey J, Jacobsohn D, McDonald G, Mittleman B, Rizzo JD, Robinson M, Schubert M, Schultz K, Shulman H, Turner M, Vogelsang G, Flowers ME. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005 Dec;11(12):945-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.09.004.
PubMed 16338616Copelan E, Casper JT, Carter SL, van Burik JA, Hurd D, Mendizabal AM, Wagner JE, Yanovich S, Kernan NA. A scheme for defining cause of death and its application in the T cell depletion trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007 Dec;13(12):1469-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.08.047.
PubMed 18022577Scott BL, Pasquini MC, Logan BR, Wu J, Devine SM, Porter DL, Maziarz RT, Warlick ED, Fernandez HF, Alyea EP, Hamadani M, Bashey A, Giralt S, Geller NL, Leifer E, Le-Rademacher J, Mendizabal AM, Horowitz MM, Deeg HJ, Horwitz ME. Myeloablative Versus Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 10;35(11):1154-1161. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.7091. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
PubMed 28380315
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Multi-Center, Phase III Study of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Comparing Regimen Intensity in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (BMT CTN #0901)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01339910
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BMTCTN0901
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Myelocytic, Acute
- Keywords
- Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Accrual terminated as recommended by the data and safety monitoring board.
- Enrolment
- 272 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical College of WisconsinUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, National Marrow Donor Program
- Study start
- Jun 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Oct 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 May 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is designed as a Phase III, multicenter trial comparing outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) between patients receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC) versus reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens.
Detailed description
Patients randomized to RIC will receive one of two regimen types: the combination of fludarabine (120-180 mg/m^2) and busulfan (less than or equal to 8 mg/kg or IV equivalent) (Flu/Bu) or fludarabine (120-180 mg/m^2) and melphalan (less than 150 mg/m^2) (Flu/Mel). Patient randomized to MAC will receive one of three regimens: busulfan (16 mg/kg oral or 12.8 mg/kg IV equivalent) and cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) (Bu/Cy); or, busulfan (16 mg/kg PO or 12.8 mg/kg IV) and fludarabine (120-180 mg/m^2) (Bu/Flu); or, cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) and total body irradiation (greater than 1200-1420cGy) (CyTBI). A total of 356 patients (178 to each arm) will be accrued on this study over a period of four years. Patients will be followed for up to 18 months from transplantation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) | Experimental | Drug: Fludarabine and Busulfan, Drug: Fludarabine and MelphalanOne of two different regimens in RIC will be administered; fludarabine and busulfan, or fludarabine and melphalan. |
| Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen (MAC) | Active comparator | Drug: Busulfan and Fludarabine, Drug: Busulfan and Cyclophosphamide, Drug: Cyclophosphamide and Total Body IrradiationOne of three different regimens in MAC will be administered; busulfan and fludarabine, busulfan and cyclophosphamide, or cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age equal or less than 65 years old and equal to or greater than 18 years old.
- Patients with the diagnosis of MDS or AML with fewer than 5% myeloblasts in the bone marrow and no leukemic myeloblasts in the peripheral blood on morphologic analysis performed within 30 days of start of the conditioning regimen enrollment.
- For patients receiving treatment of their MDS or AML prior to transplantation: a)Interval between the start of the most recent cycle of conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and enrollment must be at least 30 days; b)Interval between completing treatment with a hypomethylating agent or other non-cytotoxic chemotherapy and enrollment must be at least 10 days.
- Patients must have a related or unrelated bone marrow or peripheral blood donor who is human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched at 7 or 8 of 8 HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1 at high resolution using DNA-based typing.
- HCT-Specific Comorbidity Index Score (HCT-CI) less than or equal to 4.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Prior allograft or prior autograft.
- Symptomatic coronary artery disease.
- Leukemia involvement in the central nervous system (CNS) within 4 weeks of enrollment for patients with a history of prior CNS leukemia involvement (i.e., leukemic blasts previously detected in the cerebral spinal fluid).
- Karnofsky Performance Score less than 70.
- Patients receiving supplemental oxygen.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fludarabine and BusulfanAlso: Fludara and Busulfex(Flu/Bu) * Fludarabine: 30 mg/m^2/day on Days -6 to -2 (total dose of 150 mg/m^2) * Busulfan: 4 mg/kg/day PO or 3.2 mg/kg/day (total dose of 8 mg/kg or 6.4 mg/kg, respectively) on Days -5 to -4 | Drug | Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) |
| Fludarabine and MelphalanAlso: Fludara and Alkeran(Flu/Mel) * Fludarabine: 30 mg/m^2/day on Days -5 to -2 (total dose of 120 mg/m^2) * Melphalan: 140 mg/m^2 on Day -2 | Drug | Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) |
| Busulfan and FludarabineAlso: Busulfex and Fludara(Bu/Flu) * Busulfan: 4 mg/kg/day PO, 3.2 mg/kg/day IV or mg/m^2/day with Bu Css 900±100 ng/mL (total dose of 16 mg/kg, 12.8 mg/kg or 520 mg/m^2, respectively) on Days -5 to -2 * Fludarabine: 30 mg/m^2/day on Days -5 to -2: Flu (total dose of 120 mg/m^2) | Drug | Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen (MAC) |
| Busulfan and CyclophosphamideAlso: Busulfex and Cytoxan(Bu/Cy) * Busulfan: 4 mg/kg/day PO, 3.2 mg/kg/day IV or 130 mg/m^2/day with Bu Css 900 ± 100 ng/mL (total dose of 16 mg/kg or 12.8 mg/kg or 520 mg/m^2, respectively) on Days -7 to -4 * Cyclophosphamide: 60 mg/kg/day on Days -3 to -2 (total dose of 120 mg/kg) | Drug | Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen (MAC) |
| Cyclophosphamide and Total Body IrradiationAlso: Cytoxan and radiation(Cy/TBI) * TBI: 1200-1420 cGy on Days -7 to -4 * Cyclophosphamide: 60 mg/kg/day on Days -3 to -2 (total dose of 120 mg/kg) | Drug | Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen (MAC) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: 18 months post-randomization
Overall survival is defined as survival of death from any cause.
14 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)
Time frame: 18 months post-randomization
Percentage of Participants With Disease Relapse
Time frame: 18 months post-randomization
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality
Time frame: 18 months post-randomization
Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment
Time frame: Days 28 and 60 post-transplant
Number of Participants With Donor Cell Engraftment
Time frame: Days 28 and 100 and 18 months post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Time frame: Day 100 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD
Time frame: 18 months post-transplant
Number of Participants With Chronic GVHD Severity
Time frame: 18 months post-transplant
Number of Participants With Primary Graft Failure
Time frame: 28 days post-transplant
Number of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure
Time frame: 18 months post-transplant
Number of Participants With Maximum Grade 3-5 Toxicities
Time frame: 18 months
Infection Type
Time frame: 18 months post-transplant
Number of Participants With Infections
Time frame: 18 months post-transplant
Number of Participants With Cause of Death
Time frame: 18 months post-randomization
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jan 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19357394Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, Harris NL, Le Beau MM, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Tefferi A, Bloomfield CD. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009 Jul 30;114(5):937-51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
- Background: PubMed 15994282Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, Storer B. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood. 2005 Oct 15;106(8):2912-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2004. Epub 2005 Jun 30.
- Background: PubMed 16338616Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ, Martin P, Chien J, Przepiorka D, Couriel D, Cowen EW, Dinndorf P, Farrell A, Hartzman R, Henslee-Downey J, Jacobsohn D, McDonald G, Mittleman B, Rizzo JD, Robinson M, Schubert M, Schultz K, Shulman H, Turner M, Vogelsang G, Flowers ME. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005 Dec;11(12):945-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.09.004.
- Background: PubMed 18022577Copelan E, Casper JT, Carter SL, van Burik JA, Hurd D, Mendizabal AM, Wagner JE, Yanovich S, Kernan NA. A scheme for defining cause of death and its application in the T cell depletion trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007 Dec;13(12):1469-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.08.047.
- Results publication: PubMed 28380315Scott BL, Pasquini MC, Logan BR, Wu J, Devine SM, Porter DL, Maziarz RT, Warlick ED, Fernandez HF, Alyea EP, Hamadani M, Bashey A, Giralt S, Geller NL, Leifer E, Le-Rademacher J, Mendizabal AM, Horowitz MM, Deeg HJ, Horwitz ME. Myeloablative Versus Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 10;35(11):1154-1161. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.7091. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Findings will be published in a manuscript
Related trials for Leukemia, Myelocytic, Acute
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mary Horowitz, MD study director
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
32 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Fludarabine and Busulfan, Fludarabine and Melphalan and Busulfan and Fludarabine in people with Leukemia, Myelocytic, Acute, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 32 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 32 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 May 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) (time frame: 18 months post-randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01339910, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2023.