AzTrials
AzTrials

Arteriosclerosis of Coronary Artery Bypass GraftPhase 4MICSNCT01334866

Graft Patency Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Via Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery

A Phase 4 study testing Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft surgery in people with Arteriosclerosis of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft, run by Medtronic Cardiovascular at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This clinical study has been developed to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting via Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery (MICS); a minimally invasive coronary bypass procedure that is done on a beating heart via a smaller chest incision, thus avoiding the invasiveness of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
91 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Dec 2009to Apr 2013
Phase
Phase 4

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • > or equal to 18 and < or equal to 80 years of age
  • Suitable minimally invasive coronary surgery (MICS) candidate for non-emergent first time, single or multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (on pump or off pump)
  • Left ventricle ejection fraction >30%
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent and comply with study requirements

Who cannot join

  • Severe cerebrovascular disease within 90 days of surgery including history of prior stroke.
  • Previous cardiac surgery procedures such as CABG revisions, surgical ablations or valve replacements
  • Congestive heart failure with a New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV
  • History of renal insufficiency (i.e. prior serum creatinine of >2mg/dl) and/or requiring dialysis
  • Uncontrolled diabetes (i.e. >2 serum glucose concentrations of >350 mg/dl)
  • Severe uncontrolled systemic hypertension (i.e. systolic pressure >160 mmHg)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Peripheral/systemic active infection excluding the patient from cardiac surgery
  • Life expectancy of less than 1 year due to other illness such as cancer or pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease
  • Participation in another investigational protocol that may confound the results of this study
  • Female of child bearing potential and lactating or intends to become pregnant during the study
  • Severe distal disease and small posterior lateral targets

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

United States1 site
  • Staten Island University Hospital

    Staten Island, New York, 10305

Other trials in United States

Canada1 site
  • University of Ottawa Heart Institute

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y4W7

Other trials in Canada

About this study

This clinical study has been developed to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting via Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery (MICS); a minimally invasive coronary bypass procedure that is done on a beating heart via a smaller chest incision, thus avoiding the invasiveness of the standard procedure.

Being tested
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Keywords
Minimally invasive coronary surgery, Coronary artery bypass grafting, MICS CABG

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Also called MICS CABG

    The MICS CABG procedure can bridge the gap between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and standard sternotomy. The key components are direct vision, creating anastomoses with traditional instruments and proximal aortic location.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Technical Success (Graft Patency) in a MICS Approach

    For each subject, the endpoint for technical success (graft patency) in a MICS approach is defined as acceptable flow for graft size for an anastamosis. This will be characterized by the surgeon's assessment/angiography after the graft is complete.

    Measured: At time of procedure (day 1)

  2. Procedural Success in a MICS Approach

    A successful procedure can be defined as a procedures not requiring conversion (sternotomy). This will be characterized by whether the graft procedure can be completed through the minimally invasive thoracotomy without having to convert to a sternotomy in order to complete the grafting.

    Measured: At time of procedure (day 1)

  3. Patency of the Index Graft at 6 Months

    For each subject, the endpoint is the percent of stenosis collected on the subject's 6 month angiography form. This will be characterized for each graft using the FitzGibbon scoring system based on the 64-Slice CT Angiography results.

    The FitzGibbon Scoring system is as follows:

    A:Excellent graft with unimpaired runoff (< 50% stenosis) B:Stenosis reducing caliber of proximal or distal anastomoses or trunk to <50% of the grafted coronary artery.

    O:Occluded (100% stenosed)

    Measured: 6 months post-procedure

  4. Composite Major Adverse Event Rate (Early)

    During procedure and within 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer. The adverse events will include:

    • Major hemorrhage/bleeding requiring surgical intervention
    • Aortic complications
    • Graft vessel revision (GVR)
    • Transient ischemic attacks (TIA)
    • Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA)/stroke
    • Myocardial infarction (MI)
    • Death

    Measured: During procedure (day 1) and within 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer (throughout 6 month evaluation)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Composite Major Adverse Event Rate (Late)

    Characterize the composite major adverse event rate after 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer through the 6-Month evaluation. The major adverse events will include:

    • Major hemorrhage/bleeding requiring surgical intervention
    • Aortic complications
    • Graft vessel revision (GVR)
    • Transient ischemic attacks (TIA)
    • Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA)/stroke
    • Myocardial infarction (MI)
    • Death

    Measured: After 30 days post-procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is longer through the 6-Month evaluation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Apr 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2009
  3. Primary completionApr 2013
  4. Study completionApr 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
91 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01334866
Sponsor's protocol ID
D03782
Acronym
MICS
Status last verified
Nov 2013
First submitted
5 Apr 2011
Last updated
26 Nov 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Ruel M, Shariff MA, Lapierre H, Goyal N, Dennie C, Sadel SM, Sohmer B, McGinn JT Jr. Results of the Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Angiographic Patency Study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):203-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

    PubMed 24183338

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in